JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, A. M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Busby, S. J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, A. M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Busby, S. J. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, October 2003, p. 5993-6004, Vol. 185, No. 20
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.20.5993-6004.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Transcription Regulation by Tandem-Bound FNR at Escherichia coli Promoters

Anne M. L. Barnard,1 Jeffrey Green,2 and Stephen J. W. Busby1*

School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT,1 Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Western Bank, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom2

Received 13 May 2003/ Accepted 30 July 2003

FNR is an Escherichia coli transcription factor that regulates the transcription of many genes in response to anaerobiosis. We have constructed a series of artificial FNR-dependent promoters, based on the melR promoter, in which a consensus FNR binding site was centered at position -41.5 relative to the transcription start site. A second consensus FNR binding site was introduced at different upstream locations, and promoter activity was assayed in vivo. FNR can activate transcription from these promoters when the upstream FNR binding site is located at many different positions. However, sharp repression is observed when the upstream-bound FNR is located near positions -85 or -95. This repression is relieved by the FNR G74C substitution mutant, previously identified as being defective in transcription repression at the yfiD promoter. A parallel series of artificial FNR-dependent promoters, carrying a consensus FNR binding site at position -61.5 and a second upstream DNA site for FNR, was also constructed. Again, promoter activity was repressed by FNR when the upstream-bound FNR was located at particular positions.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 0121 414 5439. Fax: 0121 414 7366. E-mail: s.j.w.busby{at}bham.ac.uk.

Journal of Bacteriology, October 2003, p. 5993-6004, Vol. 185, No. 20
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.20.5993-6004.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.