JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gopaul, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, E. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gopaul, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, E. O.
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2003, p. 6005-6015, Vol. 185, No. 20
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.20.6005-6015.2003

Characterization of the Two Mycobacterium tuberculosis recA Promoters

Krishna K. Gopaul,{dagger} Patricia C. Brooks, Jean-François Prost,{ddagger} and Elaine O. Davis*

Division of Mycobacterial Research, National Institute for Medical Research, London NW7 1AA, England

Received 10 March 2003/ Accepted 1 August 2003

The recA gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is unusual in that it is expressed from two promoters, one of which, P1, is DNA damage inducible independently of LexA and RecA, while the other, P2, is regulated by LexA in the classical way (E. O. Davis, B. Springer, K. K. Gopaul, K. G. Papavinasasundaram, P. Sander, and E. C. Böttger, Mol. Microbiol. 46:791-800, 2002). In this study we characterized these two promoters in more detail. Firstly, we localized the promoter elements for each of the promoters, and in so doing we identified a mutation in each promoter which eliminates promoter activity. Interestingly, a motif with similarity to Escherichia coli {sigma}70 -35 elements but located much closer to the -10 element is important for optimal expression of P1, whereas the sequence at the -35 location is not. Secondly, we found that the sequences flanking the promoters can have a profound effect on the expression level directed by each of the promoters. Finally, we examined the contribution of each of the promoters to recA expression and compared their kinetics of induction following DNA damage.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Mycobacterial Research, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, England. Phone: 020 8959 3666. Fax: 020 8913 8528. E-mail: edavis{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk.

{dagger} Present address: PHLS Mycobacterium Reference Unit, South London Public Health Laboratory, King's College Hospital (Dulwich), East Dulwich Grove, London SE22 8QF, England.

{ddagger} Present address: Institut de Biologie et Chimie des Protéines CNRS, 69367 Lyon Cedex 07, France.


Journal of Bacteriology, October 2003, p. 6005-6015, Vol. 185, No. 20
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.20.6005-6015.2003




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.