JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavrrar, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lavrrar, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, M. A.
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2003, p. 2194-2202, Vol. 185, No. 7
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2194-2202.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Architecture of a Fur Binding Site: a Comparative Analysis

Jennifer L. Lavrrar and Mark A. McIntosh*

Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri

Received 8 August 2002/ Accepted 6 January 2003

Fur is an iron-binding transcriptional repressor that recognizes a 19-bp consensus site of the sequence 5'-GATAATGATAATCATTATC-3'. This site can be defined as three adjacent hexamers of the sequence 5'-GATAAT-3', with the third being slightly imperfect (an F-F-F configuration), or as two hexamers in the forward orientation separated by one base pair from a third hexamer in the reverse orientation (an F-F-x-R configuration). Although Fur can bind synthetic DNA sequences containing the F-F-F arrangement, most natural binding sites are variations of the F-F-x-R arrangement. The studies presented here compared the ability of Fur to recognize synthetic DNA sequences containing two to four adjacent hexamers with binding to sequences containing variations of the F-F-x-R arrangement (including natural operator sequences from the entS and fepB promoter regions of Escherichia coli). Gel retardation assays showed that the F-F-x-R architecture was necessary for high-affinity Fur-DNA interactions and that contiguous hexamers were not recognized as effectively. In addition, the stoichiometry of Fur at each binding site was determined, showing that Fur interacted with its minimal 19-bp binding site as two overlapping dimers. These data confirm the proposed overlapping-dimer binding model, where the unit of interaction with a single Fur dimer is two inverted hexamers separated by a C:G base pair, with two overlapping units comprising the 19-bp consensus binding site required for the high-affinity interaction with two Fur dimers.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, M616 Medical Sciences Building, University of Missouri—Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212. Phone: (573) 882-4133. Fax: (573) 882-4287. E-mail: mcintoshm{at}health.missouri.edu.

Journal of Bacteriology, April 2003, p. 2194-2202, Vol. 185, No. 7
0021-9193/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2194-2202.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.