JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Touhami, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beveridge, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Touhami, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beveridge, T. J.
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2004, p. 3286-3295, Vol. 186, No. 11
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.11.3286-3295.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Atomic Force Microscopy of Cell Growth and Division in Staphylococcus aureus

Ahmed Touhami,1 Manfred H. Jericho,1* and Terry J. Beveridge2

Department of Physics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3J5,1 Canadian Bacterial Disease Network, National Centre of Excellence, Department of Microbiology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W12

Received 11 December 2003/ Accepted 21 January 2004

The growth and division of Staphylococcus aureus was monitored by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and thin-section transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A good correlation of the structural events of division was found using the two microscopies, and AFM was able to provide new additional information. AFM was performed under water, ensuring that all structures were in the hydrated condition. Sequential images on the same structure revealed progressive changes to surfaces, suggesting the cells were growing while images were being taken. Using AFM small depressions were seen around the septal annulus at the onset of division that could be attributed to so-called murosomes (Giesbrecht et al., Arch. Microbiol. 141:315-324, 1985). The new cell wall formed from the cross wall (i.e., completed septum) after cell separation and possessed concentric surface rings and a central depression; these structures could be correlated to a midline of reactive material in the developing septum that was seen by TEM. The older wall, that which was not derived from a newly formed cross wall, was partitioned into two different surface zones, smooth and gel-like zones, with different adhesive properties that could be attributed to cell wall turnover. The new and old wall topographies are equated to possible peptidoglycan arrangements, but no conclusion can be made regarding the planar or scaffolding models.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Physics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3J5. Phone: (902) 494-2316. Fax: (902) 494-5191. E-mail: jericho{at}fizz.phys.dal.ca.


Journal of Bacteriology, June 2004, p. 3286-3295, Vol. 186, No. 11
0021-9193/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.11.3286-3295.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.