JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Koudelka, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Koudelka, G. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, August 2005, p. 5624-5630, Vol. 187, No. 16
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.16.5624-5630.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Bacteriophage 434 Repressor Dimer Preferentially Undergoes Autoproteolysis by an Intramolecular Mechanism

Barbara C. McCabe, David R. Pawlowski, and Gerald B. Koudelka*

Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260

Received 1 April 2005/ Accepted 16 May 2005

Inactivation of the lambdoid phage repressor protein is necessary to induce lytic growth of a lambdoid prophage. Activated RecA, the mediator of the host SOS response to DNA damage, causes inactivation of the repressor by stimulating the repressor's nascent autocleavage activity. The repressor of bacteriophage lambda and its homolog, LexA, preferentially undergo RecA-stimulated autocleavage as free monomers, which requires that each monomer mediates its own (intramolecular) cleavage. The cI repressor of bacteriophage 434 preferentially undergoes autocleavage as a dimer specifically bound to DNA, opening the possibility that one 434 repressor subunit may catalyze proteolysis of its partner subunit (intermolecular cleavage) in the DNA-bound dimer. Here, we first identified and mutagenized the residues at the cleavage and active sites of 434 repressor. We utilized the mutant repressors to show that the DNA-bound 434 repressor dimer overwhelmingly prefers to use an intramolecular mechanism of autocleavage. Our data suggest that the 434 repressor cannot be forced to use an intermolecular cleavage mechanism. Based on these data, we propose a model in which the cleavage-competent conformation of the repressor is stabilized by operator binding.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Cooke Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY 14260. Phone: (716) 645-2363, ext. 158. Fax: (716) 645-2975. E-mail: koudelka{at}buffalo.edu.


Journal of Bacteriology, August 2005, p. 5624-5630, Vol. 187, No. 16
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.16.5624-5630.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.