JB Try MCB Online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porwollik, S.
Right arrow Articles by McClelland, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porwollik, S.
Right arrow Articles by McClelland, M.
Journal of Bacteriology, September 2005, p. 6545-6555, Vol. 187, No. 18
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.18.6545-6555.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Differences in Gene Content between Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Isolates and Comparison to Closely Related Serovars Gallinarum and Dublin{dagger}

S. Porwollik,1 C. A. Santiviago,1 P. Cheng,1 L. Florea,2 and M. McClelland1*

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 10835 Road to the Cure, San Diego, California 92121,1 George Washington University, 801 22nd Street NW, Suite 704, Washington, DC 20052, and Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 8301 Muirkirk Rd., Laurel, Maryland 207082

Received 22 February 2005/ Accepted 15 June 2005

Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis is often transmitted into the human food supply through eggs of hens that appear healthy. This pathogen became far more prevalent in poultry following eradication of the fowl pathogen S. enterica serovar Gallinarum in the mid-20th century. To investigate whether changes in serovar Enteritidis gene content contributed to this increased prevalence, and to evaluate genetic heterogeneity within the serovar, comparative genomic hybridization was performed on eight 60-year-old and nineteen 10- to 20-year-old serovar Enteritidis strains from various hosts, using a Salmonella-specific microarray. Overall, almost all the serovar Enteritidis genomes were very similar to each other. Excluding two rare strains classified as serovar Enteritidis in the Salmonella reference collection B, only eleven regions of the serovar Enteritidis phage type 4 (PT4) chromosome (sequenced at the Sanger Center) were absent or divergent in any of the other serovar Enteritidis strains tested. The more recent isolates did not have consistent differences from 60-year-old field isolates, suggesting that no large genomic additions on a whole-gene scale were needed for serovar Enteritidis to become more prevalent in domestic fowl. Cross-hybridization of phage genes on the array with related genes in the examined genomes grouped the serovar Enteritidis isolates into two major lineages. Microarray comparisons of the sequenced serovar Enteritidis PT4 to isolates of the closely related serovars Dublin and Gallinarum (biovars Gallinarum and Pullorum) revealed several genomic areas that distinguished them from serovar Enteritidis and from each other. These differences in gene content could be useful in DNA-based typing and in understanding the different phenotypes of these related serovars.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 10835 Road to the Cure, San Diego, CA 92121. Phone: (858) 450-5990. Fax: (858) 450-3251. E-mail: mmcclelland{at}skcc.org.

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.


Journal of Bacteriology, September 2005, p. 6545-6555, Vol. 187, No. 18
0021-9193/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.187.18.6545-6555.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.