This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by del Carmen Burón-Barral, M. Articles by Parkinson, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by del Carmen Burón-Barral, M. Articles by Parkinson, J. S.

Loss- and Gain-of-Function Mutations in the F1-HAMP Region of the Escherichia coli Aerotaxis Transducer Aer

Biology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112

Received 21 January 2006/ Accepted 3 March 2006

The Escherichia coli Aer protein contains an N-terminal PAS domain that binds flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), senses aerotactic stimuli, and communicates with the output signaling domain. To explore the roles of the intervening F1 and HAMP segments in Aer signaling, we isolated plasmid-borne aerotaxis-defective mutations in a host strain lacking all chemoreceptors of the methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) family. Under these conditions, Aer alone established the cell's run/tumble swimming pattern and modulated that behavior in response to oxygen gradients. We found two classes of Aer mutants: null and clockwise (CW) biased. Most mutant proteins exhibited the null phenotype: failure to elicit CW flagellar rotation, no aerosensing behavior in MCP-containing hosts, and no apparent FAD-binding ability. However, null mutants had low Aer expression levels caused by rapid degradation of apparently nonnative subunits. Their functional defects probably reflect the absence of a protein product. In contrast, CW-biased mutant proteins exhibited normal expression levels, wild-type FAD binding, and robust aerosensing behavior in MCP-containing hosts. The CW lesions evidently shift unstimulated Aer output to the CW signaling state but do not block the Aer input-output pathway. The distribution and properties of null and CW-biased mutations suggest that the Aer PAS domain may engage in two different interactions with HAMP and the HAMP-proximal signaling domain: one needed for Aer maturation and another for promoting CW output from the Aer signaling domain. Most aerotaxis-defective null mutations in these regions seemed to affect maturation only, indicating that these two interactions involve structurally distinct determinants.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Watts, K. J., Johnson, M. S., Taylor, B. L. (2008). Structure-Function Relationships in the HAMP and Proximal Signaling Domains of the Aerotaxis Receptor Aer. J. Bacteriol. 190: 2118-2127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Amin, D. N., Taylor, B. L., Johnson, M. S. (2007). Organization of the Aerotaxis Receptor Aer in the Membrane of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 189: 7206-7212 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yao, J., Allen, C. (2007). The Plant Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum Needs Aerotaxis for Normal Biofilm Formation and Interactions with Its Tomato Host. J. Bacteriol. 189: 6415-6424 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gosink, K. K., del Carmen Buron-Barral, M., Parkinson, J. S. (2006). Signaling Interactions between the Aerotaxis Transducer Aer and Heterologous Chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 3487-3493 [Abstract] [Full Text]