JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Rybenkov, V. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Rybenkov, V. V.
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2006, p. 4431-4441, Vol. 188, No. 12
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00313-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Chromosome Condensation in the Absence of the Non-SMC Subunits of MukBEF{dagger}

Qinhong Wang, Elena A. Mordukhova, Andrea L. Edwards, and Valentin V. Rybenkov*

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 620 Parrington Oval, Norman, Oklahoma 73019

Received 2 March 2006/ Accepted 4 April 2006

MukBEF is a bacterial SMC (structural maintenance of chromosome) complex required for chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli. We report that overproduction of MukBEF results in marked chromosome condensation. This condensation is rapid and precedes the effects of overproduction on macromolecular synthesis. Condensed nucleoids are often mispositioned; however, cell viability is only mildly affected. The overproduction of MukB leads to a similar chromosome condensation, even in the absence of MukE and MukF. Thus, the non-SMC subunits of MukBEF play only an auxiliary role in chromosome condensation. MukBEF, however, was often a better condensin than MukB. Furthermore, the chromosome condensation by MukB did not rescue the temperature sensitivity of MukEF-deficient cells, nor did it suppress the high frequency of anucleate cell formation. We infer that the role of MukBEF in stabilizing chromatin architecture is more versatile than its role in controlling chromosome size. We further propose that MukBEF could be directly involved in chromosome segregation.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Oklahoma, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 620 Parrington Oval, Norman, OK 73019. Phone: (405) 325-1677. Fax: (405) 325-6111. E-mail: valya{at}ou.edu.

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.


Journal of Bacteriology, June 2006, p. 4431-4441, Vol. 188, No. 12
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00313-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.