JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T.
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2006, p. 5077-5088, Vol. 188, No. 14
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00206-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Limited Role for the DsrA and RprA Regulatory RNAs in rpoS Regulation in Salmonella enterica

Amy M. Jones, Adam Goodwill, and Thomas Elliott*

Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506

Received 7 February 2006/ Accepted 26 April 2006

RpoS, the sigma factor of enteric bacteria that responds to stress and stationary phase, is subject to complex regulation acting at multiple levels, including transcription, translation, and proteolysis. Increased translation of rpoS mRNA during growth at low temperature, after osmotic challenge, or with a constitutively activated Rcs phosphorelay depends on two trans-acting small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) in Escherichia coli. The DsrA and RprA sRNAs are both highly conserved in Salmonella enterica, as is their target, an inhibitory antisense element within the rpoS untranslated leader. Analysis of dsrA and rprA deletion mutants indicates that while the increased translation of RpoS in response to osmotic challenge is conserved in S. enterica, dependence on these two sRNA regulators is much reduced. Furthermore, low-temperature growth or constitutive RcsC activation had only modest effects on RpoS expression, and these increases were, respectively, independent of dsrA or rprA function. This lack of conservation of sRNA function suggests surprising flexibility in RpoS regulation.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV 26506. Phone: (304) 293-2676. Fax: (304) 293-7823. E-mail: telliott{at}hsc.wvu.edu.


Journal of Bacteriology, July 2006, p. 5077-5088, Vol. 188, No. 14
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00206-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.