This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goranov, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goranov, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, A. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, August 2006, p. 5595-5605, Vol. 188, No. 15
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00342-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Characterization of the Global Transcriptional Responses to Different Types of DNA Damage and Disruption of Replication in Bacillus subtilis{ddagger}

Alexi I. Goranov, Elke Kuester-Schoeck,{dagger} Jue D. Wang, and Alan D. Grossman*

Department of Biology, Building 68-530, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Received 9 March 2006/ Accepted 31 March 2006

DNA damage and perturbations in DNA replication can induce global transcriptional responses that can help organisms repair the damage and survive. RecA is known to mediate transcriptional responses to DNA damage in several bacterial species by inactivating the repressor LexA and phage repressors. To gain insight into how Bacillus subtilis responds to various types of DNA damage, we measured the effects of DNA damage and perturbations in replication on mRNA levels by using DNA microarrays. We perturbed replication either directly with p-hydroxyphenylazo-uracil (HPUra), an inhibitor of DNA polymerase, or indirectly with the DNA-damaging reagents mitomycin C (MMC) and UV irradiation. Our results indicate that the transcriptional responses to HPUra, MMC, and UV are only partially overlapping. recA is the major transcriptional regulator under all of the tested conditions, and LexA appears to directly repress the expression of 63 genes in 26 operons, including the 18 operons previously identified as LexA targets. MMC and HPUra treatments caused induction of an integrative and conjugative element (ICEBs1) and resident prophages (PBSX and SPß), which affected the expression of many host genes. Consistent with previous results, the induction of these mobile elements required recA. Induction of the phage appeared to require inactivation of LexA. Unrepaired UV damage and treatment with MMC also affected the expression of some of the genes that are controlled by DnaA. Furthermore, MMC treatment caused an increase in origin-proximal gene dosage. Our results indicate that different types of DNA damage have different effects on replication and on the global transcriptional profile.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, Building 68-530, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139. Phone: (617) 253-1515. Fax: (617) 253-2643. E-mail: adg{at}mit.edu.

{ddagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

{dagger} Present address: Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.


Journal of Bacteriology, August 2006, p. 5595-5605, Vol. 188, No. 15
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00342-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Simmons, L. A., Goranov, A. I., Kobayashi, H., Davies, B. W., Yuan, D. S., Grossman, A. D., Walker, G. C. (2009). Comparison of Responses to Double-Strand Breaks between Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis Reveals Different Requirements for SOS Induction. J. Bacteriol. 191: 1152-1161 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Breier, A. M., Grossman, A. D. (2009). Dynamic Association of the Replication Initiator and Transcription Factor DnaA with the Bacillus subtilis Chromosome during Replication Stress. J. Bacteriol. 191: 486-493 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Britton, R. A., Kuster-Schock, E., Auchtung, T. A., Grossman, A. D. (2007). SOS Induction in a Subpopulation of Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (Smc) Mutant Cells in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 189: 4359-4366 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wang, J. D., Berkmen, M. B., Grossman, A. D. (2007). Genome-wide coorientation of replication and transcription reduces adverse effects on replication in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 5608-5613 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Simmons, L. A., Grossman, A. D., Walker, G. C. (2007). Replication is required for the RecA localization response to DNA damage in Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 1360-1365 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cirz, R. T., Jones, M. B., Gingles, N. A., Minogue, T. D., Jarrahi, B., Peterson, S. N., Romesberg, F. E. (2007). Complete and SOS-Mediated Response of Staphylococcus aureus to the Antibiotic Ciprofloxacin. J. Bacteriol. 189: 531-539 [Abstract] [Full Text]