JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JB.00964-06v1
188/22/7932    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Armitage, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Armitage, J. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, November 2006, p. 7932-7940, Vol. 188, No. 22
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00964-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Two Chemosensory Operons of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Are Regulated Independently by Sigma 28 and Sigma 54{triangledown}

Angela C. Martin,{dagger} Marcus Gould,{dagger} Elaine Byles, Mark A. J. Roberts, and Judith P. Armitage*

Microbiology Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom

Received 3 July 2006/ Accepted 28 August 2006

Rhodobacter sphaeroides has a complex chemosensory system, with several loci encoding multiple homologues of the components required for chemosensing in Escherichia coli. The operons cheOp2 and cheOp3 each encode complete pathways, and both are essential for chemosensing. The components of cheOp2 are predominantly localized to the cell pole, whereas those encoded by cheOp3 are predominantly targeted to a discrete cluster in the cytoplasm. Here we show that the expression of the two pathways is regulated independently. Overlapping promoters recognized by {sigma}28 and {sigma}70 RNAP holoenzyme transcribe cheOp2, whereas cheOp3 is regulated by one of the four {sigma}54 homologues, RpoN3. The different regulation of these operons may reflect the need for balancing responses to extra- and intracellular signals under different growth conditions.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1865 275299. Fax: 44 1865 275297. E-mail: armitage{at}bioch.ox.ac.uk.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 8 September 2006.

{dagger} A.C.M. and M.G. contributed equally to this study.


Journal of Bacteriology, November 2006, p. 7932-7940, Vol. 188, No. 22
0021-9193/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00964-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.