This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Doherty, N. Articles by Winzer, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Doherty, N. Articles by Winzer, K.

Functional Analysis of luxS in Staphylococcus aureus Reveals a Role in Metabolism but Not Quorum Sensing

Neil Doherty,¹ Matthew T. G. Holden,² Saara N. Qazi,¹ Paul Williams,^1, and Klaus Winzer^1*,

Institute of Infections, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Nottingham, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom,¹ The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom²

Received 14 October 2005/ Accepted 31 January 2006

The function of AI-2 in many bacteria and the physiological role of LuxS, the enzyme responsible for its production, remain matters of debate. Here, we show that in Staphylococcus aureus the luxS gene forms a monocistronic transcriptional unit under the control of a ⁷⁰-dependent promoter. The gene was transcribed throughout growth under a variety of conditions, including intracellular growth in MAC-T cells. AI-2 was produced in rich media under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, peaking during the transition to stationary phase, but was hardly detectable in a sulfur-limited defined medium. In the presence of glucose or under anaerobic conditions, cultures retained considerable AI-2 activity after entry into stationary phase. Inactivation of luxS in various S. aureus strains did not affect virulence-associated traits, such as production of hemolysins and extracellular proteases, biofilm formation, and the agr signaling system. Conversely, AI-2 production remained unchanged in an agr mutant. However, luxS mutants grown in a sulfur-limited defined medium exhibited a growth defect. When grown together with the wild type in mixed culture, luxS mutants of various S. aureus strains showed reduced ability to compete for growth under these conditions. In contrast, a complemented luxS mutant grew as well as the parent strain, suggesting that the observed growth defect was of an intracellular nature and had not been caused by either second-site mutations or the lack of a diffusible factor. However, the LuxS/AI-2 system does not appear to contribute to the overall fitness of S. aureus RN6390B during intracellular growth in epithelial cells: the wild type and a luxS mutant showed very similar growth patterns after their internalization by MAC-T cells.

Paul Williams and Klaus Winzer are joint senior authors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Zhang, M., Sun, K., Sun, L. (2008). Regulation of autoinducer 2 production and luxS expression in a pathogenic Edwardsiella tarda strain. Microbiology 154: 2060-2069 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Shao, H., Lamont, R. J., Demuth, D. R. (2007). Autoinducer 2 Is Required for Biofilm Growth of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans. Infect. Immun. 75: 4211-4218 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lebeer, S., De Keersmaecker, S. C. J., Verhoeven, T. L. A., Fadda, A. A., Marchal, K., Vanderleyden, J. (2007). Functional Analysis of luxS in the Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Reveals a Central Metabolic Role Important for Growth and Biofilm Formation. J. Bacteriol. 189: 860-871 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sewald, X., Saum, S. H., Palm, P., Pfeiffer, F., Oesterhelt, D., Muller, V. (2007). Autoinducer-2-Producing Protein LuxS, a Novel Salt- and Chloride-Induced Protein in the Moderately Halophilic Bacterium Halobacillus halophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 371-379 [Abstract] [Full Text]