JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JB.01079-07v1
189/20/7343    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. Y.
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2007, p. 7343-7350, Vol. 189, No. 20
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01079-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The sbcDC Locus Mediates Repression of Type 5 Capsule Production as Part of the SOS Response in Staphylococcus aureus{triangledown}

Zhongyi Chen, Thanh T. Luong, and Chia Y. Lee*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205

Received 8 July 2007/ Accepted 6 August 2007

Most strains of Staphylococcus aureus produce one type of capsular polysaccharide that belongs to either type 5 or type 8. The production of these capsules has been shown to be regulated by various regulators. Here we report that the sbcD and sbcC genes are involved in the repression of type 5 capsule production. Chromosomal deletions in the sbcDC genes resulted in increased capsule promoter activity, capsule gene transcripts, and capsule production. The survival rates of the sbcDC deletion mutant were reduced upon UV irradiation compared to those for the wild-type strain Newman, suggesting that the genes are involved in DNA repair in S. aureus. The two genes were organized as an operon and were expressed very early in the exponential growth phase. A subinhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin or mitomycin C induced sbcDC transcription but repressed the capsule promoter activity, suggesting that the sbcDC genes and the capsule genes are part of the SOS regulon. By reporter gene fusion and Northern blotting, we found that sbcDC regulated capsule by downregulating arl and mgr. Further genetic studies indicate that sbcDC functions upstream of arl and mgr in capsule regulation. Collectively, our results indicate that sbcDC, upon the SOS response, represses type 5 capsule production through an arl-mgr pathway. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that an SbcDC homolog was involved in transcriptional regulation.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., Mail Slot 511, Little Rock, AR 72205. Phone: (501) 526-7687. Fax: (501) 686-5359. E-mail: clee2{at}uams.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 17 August 2007.


Journal of Bacteriology, October 2007, p. 7343-7350, Vol. 189, No. 20
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01079-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.