This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Other Versions of this Article: JB.00094-08v1 190/16/5533    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Lagerbäck, P. Articles by Carlson, K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lagerbäck, P. Articles by Carlson, K.

Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, August 2008, p. 5533-5544, Vol. 190, No. 16
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00094-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Amino Acid Residues in the GIY-YIG Endonuclease II of Phage T4 Affecting Sequence Recognition and Binding as Well as Catalysis ^,

Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Received 18 January 2008/ Accepted 26 May 2008

Phage T4 endonuclease II (EndoII), a GIY-YIG endonuclease lacking a carboxy-terminal DNA-binding domain, was subjected to site-directed mutagenesis to investigate roles of individual amino acids in substrate recognition, binding, and catalysis. The structure of EndoII was modeled on that of UvrC. We found catalytic roles for residues in the putative catalytic surface (G49, R57, E118, and N130) similar to those described for I-TevI and UvrC; in addition, these residues were found to be important for substrate recognition and binding. The conserved glycine (G49) and arginine (R57) were essential for normal sequence recognition. Our results are in agreement with a role for these residues in forming the DNA-binding surface and exposing the substrate scissile bond at the active site. The conserved asparagine (N130) and an adjacent proline (P127) likely contribute to positioning the catalytic domain correctly. Enzymes in the EndoII subfamily of GIY-YIG endonucleases share a strongly conserved middle region (MR, residues 72 to 93, likely helical and possibly substituting for heterologous helices in I-TevI and UvrC) and a less strongly conserved N-terminal region (residues 12 to 24). Most of the conserved residues in these two regions appeared to contribute to binding strength without affecting the mode of substrate binding at the catalytic surface. EndoII K76, part of a conserved NUMOD3 DNA-binding motif of homing endonucleases found to overlap the MR, affected both sequence recognition and catalysis, suggesting a more direct involvement in positioning the substrate. Our data thus suggest roles for the MR and residues conserved in GIY-YIG enzymes in recognizing and binding the substrate.

Published ahead of print on 6 June 2008.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.