This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, X. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Silva, F. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, X. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Silva, F. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, October 2009, p. 6067-6074, Vol. 191, No. 19
0021-9193/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00762-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparative Sequence Analysis of Mycobacterium leprae and the New Leprosy-Causing Mycobacterium lepromatosis{triangledown}

Xiang Y. Han,1 Kurt C. Sizer,1 Erika J. Thompson,2 Juma Kabanja,3 Jun Li,3 Peter Hu,3 Laura Gómez-Valero,4 and Francisco J. Silva5,6*

Department of Laboratory Medicine,1 DNA Analysis Core Facility,2 School of Health Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,3 Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Intracellulaires, Paris, France,4 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, València, Spain,5 CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain6

Received 12 June 2009/ Accepted 20 July 2009

Mycobacterium lepromatosis is a newly discovered leprosy-causing organism. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of its 16S rRNA gene and a few other gene segments revealed significant divergence from Mycobacterium leprae, a well-known cause of leprosy, that justifies the status of M. lepromatosis as a new species. In this study we analyzed the sequences of 20 genes and pseudogenes (22,814 nucleotides). Overall, the level of matching of these sequences with M. leprae sequences was 90.9%, which substantiated the species-level difference; the levels of matching for the 16S rRNA genes and 14 protein-encoding genes were 98.0% and 93.1%, respectively, but the level of matching for five pseudogenes was only 79.1%. Five conserved protein-encoding genes were selected to construct phylogenetic trees and to calculate the numbers of synonymous substitutions (dS values) and nonsynonymous substitutions (dN values) in the two species. Robust phylogenetic trees constructed using concatenated alignment of these genes placed M. lepromatosis and M. leprae in a tight cluster with long terminal branches, implying that the divergence occurred long ago. The dS and dN values were also much higher than those for other closest pairs of mycobacteria. The dS values were 14 to 28% of the dS values for M. leprae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a more divergent pair of species. These results thus indicate that M. lepromatosis and M. leprae diverged ~10 million years ago. The M. lepromatosis pseudogenes analyzed that were also pseudogenes in M. leprae showed nearly neutral evolution, and their relative ages were similar to those of M. leprae pseudogenes, suggesting that they were pseudogenes before divergence. Taken together, the results described above indicate that M. lepromatosis and M. leprae diverged from a common ancestor after the massive gene inactivation event described previously for M. leprae.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Apartat 22085, 46071 València, Spain. Phone: 34 963543650. Fax: 34 963543670. E-mail: francisco.silva{at}uv.es

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 24 July 2009.


Journal of Bacteriology, October 2009, p. 6067-6074, Vol. 191, No. 19
0021-9193/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00762-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.