Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2009, p. 6067-6074, Vol. 191, No. 19
0021-9193/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00762-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Laboratory Medicine,1 DNA Analysis Core Facility,2 School of Health Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,3 Institut Pasteur, Unité de Biologie des Bactéries Intracellulaires, Paris, France,4 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, València, Spain,5 CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain6
Received 12 June 2009/ Accepted 20 July 2009
Mycobacterium lepromatosis is a newly discovered leprosy-causing organism. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of its 16S rRNA gene and a few other gene segments revealed significant divergence from Mycobacterium leprae, a well-known cause of leprosy, that justifies the status of M. lepromatosis as a new species. In this study we analyzed the sequences of 20 genes and pseudogenes (22,814 nucleotides). Overall, the level of matching of these sequences with M. leprae sequences was 90.9%, which substantiated the species-level difference; the levels of matching for the 16S rRNA genes and 14 protein-encoding genes were 98.0% and 93.1%, respectively, but the level of matching for five pseudogenes was only 79.1%. Five conserved protein-encoding genes were selected to construct phylogenetic trees and to calculate the numbers of synonymous substitutions (dS values) and nonsynonymous substitutions (dN values) in the two species. Robust phylogenetic trees constructed using concatenated alignment of these genes placed M. lepromatosis and M. leprae in a tight cluster with long terminal branches, implying that the divergence occurred long ago. The dS and dN values were also much higher than those for other closest pairs of mycobacteria. The dS values were 14 to 28% of the dS values for M. leprae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a more divergent pair of species. These results thus indicate that M. lepromatosis and M. leprae diverged
10 million years ago. The M. lepromatosis pseudogenes analyzed that were also pseudogenes in M. leprae showed nearly neutral evolution, and their relative ages were similar to those of M. leprae pseudogenes, suggesting that they were pseudogenes before divergence. Taken together, the results described above indicate that M. lepromatosis and M. leprae diverged from a common ancestor after the massive gene inactivation event described previously for M. leprae.
Published ahead of print on 24 July 2009.
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»