JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by King, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by King, T. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1961 September; 82(3): 354-358
Copyright ©, 1961, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

GLUTAMIC DECARBOXYLASE OF ERGOT, CLAVICEPS PURPUREA

John A. Anderson, Vernon H. Cheldelin and Tsoo E. King

Department of Chemistry and Science Research Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

ABSTRACT

ANDERSON, JOHN A. (Oregon State University, Corvallis), VERNON H. CHELDELIN, AND TSOO E. KING. Glutamic decarboxylase of ergot, Claviceps purpurea. J. Bacteriol. 82:354–358. 1961.—L-Glutamic acid is the only naturally occurring amino acid which can be decarboxylated by cell-free extracts of Claviceps purpurea. This decarboxylase was partially purified and the properties of the enzyme studied.

The specific activity of the purified preparation was 111 µliters per 10 min per mg of protein. The products formed, stability, inhibition, stimulation of activity with pyridoxal phosphate, and pH activity curve were typical of L-glutamic decarboxylase in Escherichia coli and other microorganisms.

The substrate constants at pH 4.6, 5.25, and 5.65 were 0.0169 M, 0.0174 M, and 0.0139 M, respectively. The respective maximal velocities at these pH values were 104, 104, and 90 µliters per 10 min.

The pH optimum was 4.8 to 5.2. The enzyme was unstable below pH 4.5 and it was suggested that the fall in activity at the lower end of the pH curve was due to inactivation of the enzyme.

The decrease in activity above pH 5.2 did not appear to be due to a change in affinity of enzyme for substrate but to a change of the enzyme-substrate complex into an inactive form.


J Bacteriol. 1961 September; 82(3): 354-358
Copyright ©, 1961, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1961 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.