JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, R. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1962 February; 83(2): 423-428
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

GROWTH AND LETHAL EFFECTS OF THE PSITTACOSIS AGENT IN CHICKEN EMBRYOS OF DIFFERENT AGES

Robert B. Stewart

Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

ABSTRACT

STEWART, ROBERT B. (University of Rochester, Rochester, N. Y.). Growth and lethal effects of the psittacosis agent in chicken embryos of different ages. J. Bacteriol. 83:423–428. 1962.—Inoculation of the psittacosis agent (strain 6BC) into the yolk sacs of chicken eggs in different stages of embryonic development resulted in a steady decrease in LD50 titer as the embryos increased in age from 7 to 10 days. Correlated with the decreased LD50 titers in older eggs was the finding that the titers of the organism were lower in the yolk-sac tissues of the older eggs. The embryos themselves also gained appreciably in resistance with increase in age, since comparable titers of psittacosis organisms were found in embryonic tissues of differing ages at the time of inoculation but the mortality of older embryos was considerably less. This resistance of older embryos to the lethal effects of the psittacosis agent could not be demonstrated when the organism was introduced intravenously instead of into the yolk sac.


J Bacteriol. 1962 February; 83(2): 423-428
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1962 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.