JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molnar, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molnar, D. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1962 July; 84(1): 147-153
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

SEPARATION OF THE TOXIN OF BACILLUS CEREUS INTO TWO COMPONENTS AND NONIDENTITY OF THE TOXIN WITH PHOSPHOLIPASE

Dorothy M. Molnar

U.S. Army Chemical Corps, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland

ABSTRACT

MOLNAR, DOROTHY M. (U.S. Army Chemical Corps, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Md.). Separation of the toxin of Bacillus cereus into two components and nonidentity of the toxin with phospholipase. J. Bacteriol. 84:147–153. 1962—Bacillus cereus produced toxin in a Casamino acids medium without added serum or other protein. The toxin was separated into two components by adsorption on columns of calcium phosphate gel followed by elution with phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). The component eluted first has been called factor I and the component eluted later factor II. When tested alone each component was relatively nontoxic, but when combined they formed a toxic mixture as evidenced by skin reactions in guinea pigs and tests for lethal effects in mice.

The phospholipase activity, determined by the egg-yolk reaction, was found in the fraction containing factor I. However, using columns of alumina-C{gamma} gel the phospholipase activity was found in the fraction containing factor II. This suggests that the phospholipase is not the same chemical entity as either factor I or II. The following are further evidence for the non-identity of the toxin and phospholipase: (i) differential precipitation of the two activities by (NH4)2SO4; (ii) differential neutralization by various antisera; and (iii) differential inhibition with ethanol.


J Bacteriol. 1962 July; 84(1): 147-153
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1962 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.