JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shockman, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lampen, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shockman, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lampen, J. O.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1962 September; 84(3): 508-512
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

INHIBITION BY ANTIBIOTICS OF THE GROWTH OF BACTERIAL AND YEAST PROTOPLASTS

Gerald D. Shockman1 and J. Oliver Lampen2

Department of Microbiology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Institute of Microbiology, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

ABSTRACT

SHOCKMAN, GERALD D. (Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.) AND J. OLIVER LAMPEN. Inhibition by antibiotics of the growth of bacterial and yeast protoplasts. J. Bacteriol. 84:508–512. 1962.—The characteristics and requirements for growth of bacterial (Streptococcus faecalis) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) protoplasts were established and the effect of a variety of antibacterial and antifungal antibiotics determined. A clear differentiation was obtained between such inhibitors of bacterial cell wall synthesis as penicillin and cycloserine, which did not prevent protoplast growth, and all others, antibacterial and antifungal, which inhibited protoplasts and intact organisms at the same range of concentration. Novobiocin, previously reported to inhibit bacterial wall synthesis, was also effective against a reaction(s) essential to the growth of S. faecalis protoplasts. The antibacterial action of streptomycin, neomycin, and kanamycin was essentially eliminated by the high salt concentration needed to maintain the protoplasts. Removal of the cell wall did not significantly increase antibiotic susceptibility of a resistant species. Protoplasts of Bacillus megaterium were insensitive to the antifungal agent, nystatin, and did not bind it to any detectable degree. Thus, the yeast or bacterial cell wall does not appear to play a major role in determining relative antibiotic susceptibility by masking internal sensitive target sites. A variety of antifungal antibiotics tested on the growth of log-phase yeast cells failed to produce osmotically fragile forms.


J Bacteriol. 1962 September; 84(3): 508-512
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1962 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.