JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pattee, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pattee, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, J. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1962 November; 84(5): 1049-1055
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

TRANSDUCTION OF RESISTANCE TO SOME MACROLIDE ANTIBIOTICS IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS1

P. A. Patteea and J. N. Baldwinb

a Department of Bacteriology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
b Department of Microbiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

ABSTRACT

PATTEE, P. A. (Iowa State University, Ames) AND J. N. BALDWIN. Transduction of resistance to some macrolide antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 84:1049–1055. 1962.—By use of phage 80 of the International Typing Series, propagated on appropriate strains of Staphylococcus aureus, two related markers controlling resistance to certain macrolide antibiotics (erythromycin, oleandomycin, spiramycin, and carbomycin) were transduced among a variety of strains of S. aureus. Unlike the markers controlling penicillinase production and resistance to chlortetracycline and novobiocin, the determinants of resistance to the macrolide antibiotics were transduced at normal frequencies (at least 300 transductants per 109 phage) only to certain of the recipient strains. One of the markers studied appears to control an inducible enzyme system which is specifically induced by sub-inhibitory concentrations of erythromycin and which controls resistance to erythromycin, oleandomycin, spiramycin, and carbomycin. The other marker examined confers resistance to erythromycin, oleandomycin, spiramycin, and carbomycin, and shows no evidence of being dependent upon an inducible mechanism.


FOOTNOTES

1 Portions of this study were presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Philadelphia, Pa., May, 1960. This paper is based on portions of a dissertation submitted by the senior author to the Graduate School of Ohio State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree, Doctor of Philosophy.


J Bacteriol. 1962 November; 84(5): 1049-1055
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1962 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.