This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Panos, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Panos, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1962 November; 84(5): 921-928
Copyright © 1962, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

STREPTOCOCCAL L-FORMS IV.

Comparison of the Metabolic Rates of a Streptococcus and Derived L-Form

^a Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, and Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

ABSTRACT

PANOS, CHARLES (University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, and Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa.). Streptococcal L-forms. IV. Comparison of the metabolic rates of a Streptococcus and derived L-form. J. Bacteriol. 84:921–928. 1962.—Glycolytic rates of hexoses, amino sugars, pentoses, two-carbon compounds, and certain intermediates of glycolysis and the adaptive response to glucose of a group A Streptococcus and its derived L-form were compared. It was found that removal of the streptococcal cell wall did not result in the loss of the homolactic characteristic of the parent coccus or in a marked increase in the metabolism of certain glycolytic intermediates by the L-form. It was shown that (i) a major difference exists between the coccus and its L-form in the metabolism of glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine; (ii) apparently, a loss of selectivity and internal control occurred in the transformation to the L-form; and (iii) this form, unlike the parent coccus, displayed an adaptive response to glucose. These data were not the result of an internal loss of essential cofactors or enzymes by diffusion from within the L-form. Nor could they be accounted for by dry-weight differences due to loss of the streptococcal cell wall. Finally, it was observed that the sonically disintegrated L-form in 0.5 M NaCl was capable of a glycolytic activity of 46% of that of the total intact culture. These data suggest that the conversion of a streptococcus to the L-form is accompanied by an alteration in carbohydrate metabolism as well as the loss of the cell wall. Previously reported data are in agreement with these findings and support the conclusion that the resulting form is not merely a bacterial cell without a rigid cell wall.

¹ Senior research fellow (SF 531), 1960. Present address: Research Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern Division, Philadelphia, Pa.