JB IAI Online 2003
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grossowicz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grossowicz, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ariel, M.
J Bacteriol. 1963 February; 85(2): 293-300
Copyright © 1963, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

MECHANISM OF PROTECTION OF CELLS BY SPERMINE AGAINST LYSOZYME-INDUCED LYSIS

Nathan Grossowicz and Miriam Ariel

Department of Bacteriology, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem

ABSTRACT

GROSSOWICZ, NATHAN (Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel) AND MIRIAM ARIEL. Mechanism of protection of cells by spermine against lysozyme-induced lysis. J. Bacteriol. 85:293–300. 1963.—Spermine (1 to 5 x 10–3M) was found to prevent lysis of Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells by lysozyme. This protection is due to the rapid and efficient stabilization by spermine of the protoplasts formed by lysozyme, and not to interference with the enzymatic activity. This conclusion concerning the spermine effect is based on chemical and microscopic evidence: (i) the amount of hexosamine, released from lysozyme-treated cells, was equal to or even higher in the presence of spermine than in its absence; (ii) microscopic and electron microscopic pictures showed clearly that the spermine-protected structures resembled protoplasts. On the other hand, the "spermine protoplasts" showed a high stability against hypotonic conditions in comparison with "sucrose protoplasts." The spermine-protoplast complex was very stable and could not be destroyed by water and various agents (NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, cadaverine, and putrescine). A number of bases such as histamine, D-histidine, and streptomycin exhibited an effect similar to that of spermine, while diamines like cadaverine, putrescine, basic amino acids (lysine, arginine, L-histidine), as well as cations like magnesium, were virtually inactive.


J Bacteriol. 1963 February; 85(2): 293-300
Copyright © 1963, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1963 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.