JB Try MCB Online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deibel, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Silliker, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deibel, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Silliker, J. H.
J Bacteriol. 1963 April; 85(4): 827-832
Copyright © 1963, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

FOOD-POISONING POTENTIAL OF THE ENTEROCOCCI1

R. H. Deibela and J. H. Sillikerb

a Division of Bacteriology, American Meat Institute Foundation, The University of Chicago, Chicago
Department of Pathology, St. James Hospital, Chicago Heights, Illinois

ABSTRACT

DEIBEL, R. H. (American Meat Institute Foundation, Chicago, Ill.), AND J. H. SILLIKER. Food-poisoning potential of the enterococci. J. Bacteriol. 85:827–832. 1963.—A total of 23 enterococcus strains were fed to two and sometimes three human volunteers in an effort to elicit food-poisoning symptoms. Each culture was consumed after it was grown in whole sterile milk or on the surface of commercially sterile ham slices. Six strains of Streptococcus faecalis var. liquefaciens were consumed after complete liquefaction of gelatin. In addition, strains of S. faecalis were consumed after having been grown in media which altered the energy metabolism (arginine, gluconate, malate, and pyruvate). In no instance were any of the above conditions of growth conducive to the production of food-poisoning symptoms in the volunteers. Moreover, no evidence was found to indicate that either the age of the culture or the disruption of the cell was a factor in the production or release of a toxic principle. It would appear that until the environmental conditions (if any) for food poisoning are defined the evidence obtained suggests that the association of enterococci and food poisoning is questionable.


FOOTNOTES

1 Presented in part before the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, May, 1960, Philadelphia, Pa. Journal Paper no. 232, American Meat Institute Foundation.


J Bacteriol. 1963 April; 85(4): 827-832
Copyright © 1963, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1963 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.