JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heckly, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Windle, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heckly, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Windle, J. J.

Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1963 May; 85(5): 961-966
Copyright © 1963, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.

FREE RADICAL FORMATION AND SURVIVAL OF LYOPHILIZED MICROORGANISMS1

Robert J. Heckly, R. L. Dimmick and J. J. Windle

Naval Biological Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California
Western Regional Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California

ABSTRACT

HECKLY, ROBERT J. (University of California, Berkeley), R. L. DIMMICK, AND J. J. WINDLE. Free radical formation and survival of lyophilized microorganisms. J. Bacteriol. 85:961–966. 1963.—A correlation between death and spontaneous free radical production, measured by an increase in the relative electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signal, was shown to exist for several species of microorganisms stored in the freezedried state, but the relationship between the free radical concentration and number of dead cells was not a simple proportion. Lactose added to Sarcina lutea reduced radical production and increased stability when dry preparations were stored in air. Death and free radical formation were more extensive when lyophilized Streptococcus lactis cultures were stored in air than in vacuum. Free radicals were also produced by dry yeast. Few, if any, free radicals were produced by bacteria or yeast stored in vacuum. It was shown that the observed free radical production was not caused by exposure to light. The EPR signal produced by dry Serratia marcescens decreased rapidly when cells were exposed to a humid atmosphere but the EPR signal slowly increased after cells were redried and exposed to oxygen.


FOOTNOTES

1 Some of the results were described in a discussion at the Specialists Conference on Culture Collections, sponsored by the Canadian Committee on Culture Collections of Microorganisms, 27 and 28 August 1962, at Ottawa, Canada.


J Bacteriol. 1963 May; 85(5): 961-966
Copyright © 1963, The Williams & Wilkins Company. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1963 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.