JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delwiche, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Finstein, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delwiche, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Finstein, M. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1965 July; 90(1): 102-107
Copyright © 1965 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Carbon and Energy Sources for the Nitrifying Autotroph Nitrobacter

C. C. Delwiche and M. S. Finstein1

a Kearney Foundation of Soil Science, University of California, Davis, California

ABSTRACT

DELWICHE, C. C. (University of California, Davis), AND M. S. FINSTEIN. Carbon and energy sources for the nitrifying autotroph Nitrobacter. J. Bacteriol. 90:102–107. 1965.—The effect of various organic compounds on the growth and metabolism of the obligatively autotrophic nitrifying organism Nitrobacter was studied. A slight stimulation of both nitrification and growth was obtainable with a number of organic amendments, including yeast extract, Vitamin Free Casamino Acids, and some amino acids. Depending upon culture conditions, a strong stimulation of growth was obtained with acetate as an amendment to the culture solution. Several compounds, including valine, hydroxyproline, and threonine, were inhibitory at concentrations of 10–3M. The incorporation of carbon from isotopically labeled organic compounds was demonstrated. Acetate and glycine were particularly strong contributors to cell carbons. These could not substitute for carbon dioxide as a sole carbon source for growth, however, nor could any other of the carbon compounds that were tried.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, N.J.


J Bacteriol. 1965 July; 90(1): 102-107
Copyright © 1965 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1965 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.