JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kraft, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kraft, A. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1965 October; 90(4): 857-862
Copyright © 1965 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Inhibitory Action of Selenite on Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, and Salmonella thompson1

K. F. Weissa,2, J. C. Ayresb and A. A. Kraftc

a Department of Bacteriology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Department of Dairy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Department of Food Industry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

ABSTRACT

WEISS, K. F. (Iowa State University, Ames), J. C. AYRES, AND A. A. KRAFT. Inhibitory action of selenite on Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, and Salmonella thompson. J. Bacteriol. 90:857–862. 1965.—The resistance of three microorganisms, Escherichia coli (ISU-41), Proteus vulgaris (ISU-37c), and Salmonella thompson (ISU-86-2), to increasing concentrations of selenite was determined. E. coli was completely inhibited by 1.25% sodium hydrogen selenite, and 0.25% sodium hydrogen selenite caused a pronounced lag. P. vulgaris survived selenite concentrations of over 3%. S. thompson was inhibited completely by 3% selenite but not by 2.5%, although there was a considerable lag and a decrease in total growth. The relationship of growth, uptake, and reduction of selenite was determined. The susceptible E. coli incorporated up to twice as much selenium as did the other two organisms during the early stages of incubation. Radioautographs of seleno analogues of sulfur-containing amino acids revealed the presence of seleno-cystine in all three organisms, and seleno-methionine in E. coli. Compounds having RF values corresponding to possible oxidation products of seleno-methionine were present in the hydrolysates of P. vulgaris and S. thompson. Kinetic aspects of selenite uptake, rather than the ultimate localization of selenite in the cell protein, appear to be the factors that determine the degree of resistance or of susceptibility to selenite.


FOOTNOTES

2 Present address: Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

1 Journal Paper J-4966 of the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project 1392, Center for Agricultural and Economic Development cooperating.


J Bacteriol. 1965 October; 90(4): 857-862
Copyright © 1965 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1965 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.