JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, J. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1966 December; 92(6): 1604-1608
Copyright © 1966 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of the Normal Microbial Flora on the Resistance of the Small Intestine to Infection

Gerald D. Abrams and Jane E. Bishop

Department of Pathology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan

ABSTRACT

ABRAMS, GERALD D. (The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor), AND JANE E. BISHOP. Effect of the normal microbial flora on the resistance of the small intestine to infection. J. Bacteriol. 92:1604–1608. 1966.—Mucosal structure in the small intestine is known to be influenced by the normal microbial flora. This suggests that mucosal resistance to invasion by enteric pathogens might also be affected by the flora. To assess this possibility, germ-free and conventional mice were challenged with Salmonella typhimurium, and both the growth of organisms within the intestinal lumen and the translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes were studied quantitatively. There were significantly more organisms 24 hr after intragastric challenge in the mesenteric nodes of germ-free animals than in those of conventional ones. However, since intraluminal growth in the intestine was also greater in germ-free animals, no conclusion could be drawn about mucosal resistance per se. Results were similar when the challenge was intraduodenal. However, when intestinal emptying was prevented by ileal ligation before challenge, both intraluminal growth and translocation of S. typhimurium were equal in the two groups of mice. It is concluded from these data, as well as from preliminary dye studies of intestinal motility, that the normal flora does not influence mucosal resistance directly, but may alter enteric infection by affecting intestinal emptying.


J Bacteriol. 1966 December; 92(6): 1604-1608
Copyright © 1966 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.