JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neu, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neu, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chou, J.
J Bacteriol. 1967 December; 94(6): 1934-1945
Copyright © 1967 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Release of Surface Enzymes in Enterobacteriaceae by Osmotic Shock

Harold C. Neu1 and James Chou

a Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032

ABSTRACT

The process of osmotic shock, which has been used to release degradative enzymes from Escherichia coli, can be applied successfully to other members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Cyclic phosphodiesterase (3'-nucleotidase), 5'-nucleotidase (diphosphate sugar hydrolase), acid hexose phosphatase, and acid phenyl phosphatase are released from Shigella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Serratia strains. Some strains of Salmonella also release these enzymes. Members of Proteus and Providencia groups fail to release enzymes when subjected to osmotic shock and do not show a lag in regrowth, although they do release their acid-soluble nucleotide pools. In contrast to E. coli, release of enzymes from other members of the Enterobacteriaceae studied is affected by growth conditions and strain of organism. None of the organisms was as stable to osmotic shock in exponential phase of growth as was E. coli. Exponential-phase cells of Shigella, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter could be shocked only with 0.5 mM MgCl2 to prevent irreparable damage to the cells. These observations suggest that this group of degradative enzymes is probably loosely bound to the cytoplasmic membrane through the mediation of divalent cations.


FOOTNOTES

1 Career scientist of the New York Health Research Council.


J Bacteriol. 1967 December; 94(6): 1934-1945
Copyright © 1967 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1967 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.