Previous Article | Next Article 
J Bacteriol, May 1998, p. 2590-2598, Vol. 180, No. 10
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Stimulation of Transcription by Mutations Affecting
Conserved Regions of RNA Polymerase II
Jacques
Archambault,1,*
David B.
Jansma,1
Jean H.
Kawasoe,1
Kim T.
Arndt,2
Jack
Greenblatt,1 and
James
D.
Friesen1
Banting and Best Department of Medical
Research and Department of Molecular and Medical
Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8,
Canada,1 and
Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724
Received 15 April 1997/Accepted 9 March 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mutations that increase the low-level transcription of the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS4 gene, which results from
deletion of the genes encoding transcription factors BAS1, BAS2, and
GCN4, were isolated previously in SIT1 (also known as
RPO21, RPB1, and SUA8), the gene
encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). Here we
show that sit1 substitutions cluster in two conserved
regions of the enzyme which form part of the active site. Six
sit1 mutations, affect region F, a region that is involved in transcriptional elongation and in resistance to
-aminatin. Four
sit1 substitutions lie in another region involved in
transcriptional elongation, region D, which binds Mg2+ ions
essential for RNA catalysis. One region D substitution is lethal unless
suppressed by a substitution in region G and interacts genetically with
PPR2, the gene encoding transcription elongation factor
IIS. Some sit1 substitutions affect the selection of
transcriptional start sites at the CYC1 promoter in a
manner reminiscent of that of sua8 (sua stands
for suppression of upstream ATG) mutations. Together with previous
findings which indicate that regions D and G are in close proximity to
the 3' end of the nascent transcript and that region F is involved in
the translocation process, our results suggest that transcriptional
activation by the sit1 mutations results from alteration of
the RNAPII active center.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The structures and functions of
eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III are well conserved during
evolution (reviewed in references 6, 41, and
53). Structurally, these three enzymes contain two
large subunits which are homologous to the two largest subunits,
and
', of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) and
which contain the active site of the enzyme (reviewed in references 6, 41, and 53). In addition to
containing the two largest subunits, eukaryotic RNAPs also contain
approximately 10 smaller subunits, some of which are present in both
RNAPI and RNAPII or in all three enzymes (reviewed in references
41 and 53).
Mutations affecting the two largest subunits of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae RNAPII were isolated by Arndt et al. (8) in
a genetic selection for sit mutations (sit stands
for suppressor of initiation of transcription defect) that can increase
transcription of the HIS4 gene in a strain in which the
BAS1, BAS2, and GCN4 genes were
deleted. The last three of these genes encode transcription factors
which activate transcription of HIS4 through specific DNA
elements located in the promoter region of the gene (8). A
yeast strain which lacks BAS1, BAS2, and GCN4 is auxotrophic for
histidine because HIS4 is transcribed poorly (7,
8). Transcription of HIS4 can be increased by
mutations in SIT1 (also known as RPO21,
RPB1, and SUA8) and SIT2 (also known
as RPO22 and RPB2), which encode the largest and
second-largest subunits of RNAPII, respectively. Transcription of
HIS4 in sit1 and sit2 mutant strains,
as in a wild-type strain, requires the presence of a functional TATA
element as well as a binding site for RAP1 in the promoter. The
requirement for these two promoter elements most likely reflects a need
for RAP1 to antagonize the repressing effect of chromatin and allow the
general transcription machinery to gain access to the HIS4
promoter, at least in part through an interaction between TBP and the
TATA box (22). RAP1 binds to the HIS4 promoter
but does not efficiently stimulate its transcription in the absence of
BAS1, BAS2, and GCN4 (8, 22).
One can envisage two general mechanisms by which the sit1
and sit2 mutations affect RNAPII in order to increase
synthesis of HIS4 mRNAs. First, these mutations could
increase the number of initiation complexes that assemble at or are
recruited to the HIS4 TATA box. Results of experiments
performed in vivo in which high levels of transcription were obtained
by artificially tethering the RNAPII holoenzyme to promoter DNA
suggested that recruitment of the holoenzyme to the promoter is a
rate-limiting step in transcription (9).
Second, the sit1 and sit2 mutations could affect
other steps that can be rate limiting following transcription
initiation, such as an early block to elongation or premature
termination (14, 28, 36, 39, 52). In this case, the
sit1 mutations could increase the number of RNAPII molecules
that reach the end of the transcription unit, without affecting the
overall rate of initiation, by increasing the processivity of RNAPII
during elongation. The increased processivity of the enzyme could
affect either early elongation, by increasing the frequency at which the initiation complexes leave the HIS4 promoter and enter
the elongation mode (promoter clearance), or later stages of
elongation, by decreasing the rate of premature termination. As a first
step toward understanding how the sit1 mutations affect
transcriptional activation, we have identified regions of the largest
subunit of RNAPII that are affected by these mutations.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
S. cerevisiae strains and yeast manipulations.
All sit1 strains used in this study were isolated as
spontaneous His+ revertants of strain L3110
(MATa gcn4-2 bas1-2 bas2-2 ura3-52) as
previously described (7, 8). The yeast strain YF2047
(MAT
gcn4-2 bas1-2 bas2-2 rpo21::LEU2
leu2 trp1::hisG ura3-52 [pJS121;
RPO21 on URA3 CEN/ARS plasmid]) was constructed in several steps. First, the TRP1 locus of L3110 was changed
to trp1::hisG as previously described
(1) to create yeast strain YF2037. YF2037 was then mated
with yeast strain CY843 (MAT
gcn4-2 bas1-2 bas2-2 ura3-52
leu2). The resulting diploid was sporulated, and tetrads were
dissected. A Leu
Trp
haploid progeny,
YF2044 (MAT
gcn4-2 bas1-2 bas2-2 ura3-52
trp1::hisG leu2), was then transformed to
uracil prototrophy with plasmid pJS121 (RPO21 URA3 CEN/ARS)
(4). The RPO21 locus of this merodiploid strain
was then disrupted (rpo21::LEU2) in one
step to create strain YF2047. The yeast strain YDW383, which carries
the sua8-1 mutation as well as an isogenic SUA8
wild-type strain, T16, have been described previously (13).
YF2277 (MAT
rpo21::ADE2 [pJS121]), a strain congenic with W303-1B (MAT
ade2-1 trp1-1 leu2-3,112 his3-11,15 ura3-52 can1-100 ssd1-d) contains a disruption of the chromosomal RPO21 allele caused by a replacement by
ADE2 of the RPO21 sequence from positions
718
to +660 (the A of the translation initiation codon is +1). YF2278
(MAT
rpo21::ADE2
ppr2::hisG [pJS121]) is isogenic to YF2277
except for the disruption of PPR2 by hisG. This
was introduced by using plasmid pJD3, which contains
ppr2::hisG-URA3-hisG (a gift of C. M. Kane, University of California at Berkeley). YF2277 and YF2278 were
generated by standard genetic techniques. Details of their construction
are available upon request. Growth media used were as described
previously (45). Yeast transformation was performed as
described previously (26).
Plasmids.
Plasmid pJAY61, which was used for the isolation
of sit1 alleles, was constructed in two steps. First, an
integrating plasmid carrying URA3 as a selectable marker and
the wild-type SIT1 gene on a
HindIII-EcoRI genomic DNA fragment (the
HindIII and EcoRI sites are located 1.6 kb
upstream of the SIT1 translation initiation codon and 1.7 kb
downstream of the translation termination codon, respectively) was
constructed. Second, a deletion was introduced in the SIT1
open reading frame by removing the DNA sequences contained between an
AvrII site (located 162 nucleotides downstream of the translation initiation codon) and a SnaB1 site (located 16 nucleotides downstream of the translation termination site) and
replacing them with a BamHI linker (5'-GGGATCCC-3')
after filling in the protruding ends of the AvrII site
with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. Plasmid pJA483 was
created by subcloning a 5.7-kb EcoRI-HindIII
fragment encompassing RPO21 into the EcoRI and
HindIII sites of pFL39 (TRP1 CEN6 ARS)
(15). Plasmids pM50 and pM107, which carry
CYC1-lacZ and cyc1-5000-lacZ, respectively,
cloned in a single-copy (URA3) plasmid, have been described
previously (38).
DNA manipulation and sequencing.
All DNA manipulations were
performed essentially as described previously (30). DNA
sequencing of plasmid DNA was performed by the chain termination method
(40) using primers synthesized on the basis of the
SIT1 sequence.
PCR amplification of the DNA sequence encoding conserved region
F.
The DNA sequence between nucleotides 2155 and 2907 (in the
numbering system of Allison et al. [3]), which encodes
the conserved region F of RPO21, was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA
of several sit1 alleles by using the following two
oligonucleotides: 5'-CGGGATCCGGTGTAGTAGAGAAAAAAAC-3' and
5'-CGGGATCCTGAATAACGTTACCCAATG-3'. The resulting amplified fragments containing BamHI sites at both ends (generated by
the two primers) were then cut with BamHI and cloned into
the BamHI site of plasmid YEp24 (17). For each
sit1 allele amplified and cloned, two independently isolated
plasmids were sequenced. The amplified region F DNAs were also cut with
PpuMI and XbaI and subcloned between the
PpuMI and XbaI sites of pJA483 (RPO21 TRP1 CEN6 ARS).
PCR amplification of the DNA sequence encoding regions B, C, D,
and E.
The DNA sequence between the SpeI and
PpuMI sites of RPO21, which encodes conserved
regions B, C, D, and E, was amplified by PCR using the following two
oligonucleotides: 5'-AGAGCGAAAATTGGTGGTC-3' and
5'-GCCTCTGCAATTGTCTCTG-3'. The amplified fragment was cut with SpeI and PpuMI and was subcloned into pJA483
(RPO21 TRP1 CEN6 ARS) cut with SpeI and
PpuMI. For each sit1 allele, the DNA sequence
between SpeI and PpuMI was determined in two
independently isolated plasmids.
-Galactosidase assays.
-Galactosidase activity was
measured as described by Miller (34). Cells were grown to an
optical density (at 600 nm) of 0.6 in SC-Ura medium (45)
with glucose as a carbon source. For each measurement,
-galactosidase activity was determined on three independent
cultures.
 |
RESULTS |
Molecular cloning of sit1 alleles.
As a first step
toward determining the mechanism by which mutations which affect RNAPII
can increase transcription of HIS4 in the absence of the
BAS1, BAS2, and GCN4 proteins, we set out to identify which regions of
the largest subunits are altered by the sit1 mutations. A
gap repair strategy (37) was used to clone five independent
sit1 alleles (sit1-4, -5,
-7, -8, and -9) as well as the
wild-type SIT1 allele from the parental yeast strain, L3110
(7). In order to localize the sit1 mutations, two
independently cloned copies of each sit1 allele were
digested with several restriction endonucleases, each of which
recognizes a different 4-bp site (AluI, HaeIII,
TaqI, and Sau3A), in the hope that certain
sit1 mutations would either create or destroy a site so as
to give rise to a restriction fragment length polymorphism. A
Sau3A restriction fragment was detected in the
sit1-7 allele that was not present in any of the other
mutant alleles or in the wild-type gene (data not shown). This
Sau3A polymorphic fragment was cloned and sequenced. The
mutation creating the new Sau3A site results in the
replacement of glycine 730 with an aspartic acid residue in the
conserved region F of the largest subunit of RNAPII (Table 1), one of
eight regions of this polypeptide that have been conserved during
evolution (27).
Six sit1 alleles carry mutations affecting conserved
region F of RPO21.
Additional sit1 mutants were
then examined for the presence of mutations affecting region F
(nucleotides 2200 to 2900 in the numbering system of Allison et al.
[3]). When the other cloned sit1 alleles
(sit1-4, -5, -8, and -9)
were examined, region F mutations were found in sit1-4,
sit1-5, and sit1-9 (Table
1 and Fig.
1). In the case of sit1
mutants for which the sit1 allele was not cloned, the DNA
sequence encoding region F (between nucleotides 2200 and 2900) was
amplified from genomic DNA by PCR and cloned into a plasmid and two
independent plasmid isolates were sequenced. Of five sit1
mutants analyzed in this fashion (sit1-290, -246, -252, -261, and -278), two
(sit1-290 and -246) were found to carry mutations
that affect region F (Table 1 and Fig. 1). One of them (sit1-290) had two mutations, one in region F and one just
upstream of region F (Table 1). Since four of the sit1
alleles tested (sit1-8, -252, -261,
and -278) did not carry a mutation affecting region F, at
least one other region of SIT1 can be altered so as to
confer the Sit phenotype (see below).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Locations of sit1 amino acid substitutions.
The amino acid sequences of regions F, D, and G of S. cerevisiae RNAPII (S. cerevisiae) are compared to those
of other eukaryotes: Schizosaccharomyces pombe RNAPII
(S. pombe), Arabidopsis thaliana RNAPII (A. thaliana), Caenorhabditis elegans RNAPII (C. elegans), D. melanogaster RNAPII (D. melano.), Mus musculus RNAPII (M. musculus),
Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (S. acidocal.) subunit
A or C as indicated, E. coli RNAP, and S. cerevisiae RNAPIII (S. c. RNAPIII). Residues identical
to those of S. cerevisiae RNAPII are indicated by dots; gaps
are indicated by hyphens. For each sit1 mutation, the
substituted amino acid is indicated above the wild-type amino acid and
the designation of the allele is given in parentheses. A second
substitution in the sit1-290 polypeptide that is located
upstream of region F is not shown (Table 1). Amino acid substitutions
that confer resistance to the transcriptional inhibitor -amanitin
(Ama) in C. elegans (19), D. melanogaster (19), and M. musculus (10,
11) are also indicated. Single amino acid substitutions that
affect elongation and termination by E. coli RNAP
(49) are written below the sequence of the largest subunit
of E. coli RNAP (E. coli mut.). Substitutions
that confer streptolydigin resistance in E. coli (E. coli St1) (44) and Bacillus subtilis
(B. sub. St1) (51) are indicated. The double
substitutions in the S. cerevisiae RNAPIII C160-270 mutant
(RNAPIII C160-270) (47) and C160-112 mutant
(RNAPIII C160-112) (23) are indicated. The
invariant Mg2+ binding motif NADFDGD in region D is
underlined. Also indicated are the locations of the conditional lethal
rpb1-17 substitution (43), the sua8-1
and sua8-2 substitutions (13), and the mutations
(rpb1-501 and -502) that confer an Spt phenotype
(25).
|
|
In order to determine whether the region F mutations that were
identified are both necessary and sufficient to cause the Sit
phenotype, the DNA fragments encoding each mutant region F (nucleotides
2224 to 2844 [
PpuMI-
XbaI fragment]) were
subcloned individually
into an otherwise wild-type
SIT1 gene
(
sit1-246 was not used for
this analysis since it carries
the same mutation as
sit1-4). The
reconstructed
sit1 mutant alleles were tested for the ability
to support
growth on medium lacking histidine (the Sit phenotype)
by two different
assays. In the first assay, which relies on the
ability of the
sit1 alleles to complement a disrupted allele of
SIT1 (
sit1::
LEU2),
reconstructed
sit1 alleles carried on a single-copy
plasmid
were introduced into the diploid yeast strain YF2201
(
MATa/MAT
sit1::
LEU2/SIT1
gcn4-2/gcn4-2 bas1-2/bas1-2 bas2-2/bas2-2 ura3-52/ura3-52 leu2/leu2
trp1::
hisG/trp1::
hisG).
Following sporulation and tetrad
dissection, haploid progeny that
inherited the plasmid-borne reconstructed
sit1 allele and
the chromosomal disrupted
SIT1 allele were tested
for growth
on medium lacking histidine. Reconstructed alleles
sit1-4,
-5,
-7,
-9, and
-290 were
capable both of supporting yeast
cell growth and of bringing about the
Sit phenotype (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Region F and D substitutions are necessary to confer the
Sit phenotype. (A) Region F substitutions. Reconstructed
sit1 alleles carrying a region F mutation or the wild-type
SIT1 alleles were was assayed for the ability to confer the
Sit phenotype by introduction into the diploid strain YF2201
(MATa/MAT sit1::LEU2/SIT1
gcn4-2/gcn4-2 bas1-2/bas1-2 bas2-2/bas2-2 ura3-52/ura3-52 leu2/leu2
trp1::hisG/trp1::hisG).
The resulting transformants were then sporulated, 10 or more tetrads
were dissected, and spores were allowed to germinate on YPD medium
(45). Viable Trp+ (sit1 allele on
plasmid) Leu+ (sit1::LEU2)
haploid progeny were then tested by streaking onto solid SD medium
(45) containing (+ His) or lacking ( His) histidine. Cells
were allowed to grow for the indicated number of days at 30°C.
sit1-9 required a longer incubation to show visible single
colonies. (B) Region D substitutions. Reconstructed sit1
alleles carrying region D mutations or the wild-type SIT1
alleles were assayed for the ability to confer the Sit phenotype as
described above. Cells were allowed to grow on solid SD medium
(45) containing (+ His) or lacking ( His) histidine for
the indicated number of days at 30°C. sit1-8G did not grow on medium
lacking histidine, even when incubation was extended to 24 days. A
region F substitution (sit1-4) is shown for comparison.
|
|
The second assay that was used to test for the Sit phenotype is based
on our observation that mutant
sit1 alleles (either
reconstructed alleles or alleles derived entirely from a mutant
strain), but not the wild-type
SIT1 allele, can confer a
semidominant
Sit phenotype in yeast strain YF2047 (
MAT
gcn4-2 bas1-2 bas2-2 sit1::
LEU2 ura3-52 leu2
trp1::
hisG [pJS121;
SIT1 on
URA3 CEN/ARS
plasmid]). This observation was surprising,
because the Sit phenotype
was shown previously to be recessive
(
8). It may be that the
semidominant character of the Sit
phenotype is influenced by the
background of the strain. Alternatively,
the degree of dominance
of the Sit phenotype may depend on the relative
level of expression
of the mutant and wild-type alleles, which may be
influenced by
whether these alleles are expressed from their endogenous
chromosomal
location (
8) or from episomal plasmids (this
study). Regardless
of the explanation, this assay was useful as an
independent method
of confirming that all five
sit1
mutations affecting region F
(
sit1-4,
-5,
-7,
-9, and
-290) are sufficient to
confer a Sit
phenotype (data not shown).
Mapping the sit1 mutation in the sit1-8
allele.
The above analysis indicated that in some sit1
alleles a region of the largest subunit other than region F is altered
so as to bring about the Sit phenotype. Hybrid genes were constructed that contained various portions of sit1-8 and wild-type
SIT1 (Fig. 3) in order to
localize the mutation in the sit1-8 allele, which does not
contain a region F mutation (see above). These chimeric genes were
tested by the two assays described above for the ability to support
growth on medium lacking histidine. As shown in Fig. 3, the smallest
region of sit1-8 that was capable of conferring a
His+ phenotype in an assay that relied on the semidominance
of the Sit phenotype was located between nucleotides 971 and 2224 (hybrid g). The nucleotide sequence of this region was determined, and a mutation was found that replaces Asn 479 by Tyr in conserved region D
of the largest subunit (Table 1 and Fig. 1). This mutation is referred
to as sit1-8D. By the same assay, it was also noticed that
yeast cells carrying a chimeric gene containing only the sit1-8D mutation (hybrid g) did not grow as well on medium
lacking histidine as did cells carrying the entire sit1-8
allele (hybrid a). This enhancement of growth was associated with a
second region of sit1-8, which was mapped to a region
between nucleotides 3433 and 4621 (compare hybrid b with hybrid c and
hybrid g with hybrid i). This region, however, was not sufficient by
itself to bring about the Sit phenotype (hybrid h). The region located
between nucleotides 3433 and 4621 was sequenced, and a mutation was
found that results in the replacement of alanine 1076 by valine in
conserved region G of the largest subunit (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The
presence of both the sit1-8D and sit1-8G
mutations was confirmed in other, independently isolated
sit1-8 alleles (data not shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Localization of mutations in the sit1-8
allele. Schematic representation of the SIT1 locus
(EcoRI-HindIII fragment) showing the
positions (in the numbering system of Allison et al.
[3]) of various endonuclease sites that were used in
the construction of the chimeric genes. The encoded SIT1 protein is
diagrammed below the restriction map. The gray boxes represent regions
(A to H) of the polypeptide that are most conserved evolutionarily
(27), and the diagonally striped box represents the
carboxy-terminal domain. The structures of the chimeric genes are
indicated by open and filled boxes representing wild-type
(RPO21) and mutant (sit1-8) sequences,
respectively. Each hybrid gene is designated by a letter (a to i). The
ability of each chimeric gene to confer a semidominant Sit phenotype
was assayed by introducing it into yeast strain YF2047 (MAT
gcn4-2 bas1-2, bas2-2 ura3-52 leu2 trp1::hisG
sit1::LEU2 [pJS121; SIT1 on
URA3 CEN/ARS plasmid] [4]) and testing the
resulting transformants for the ability to grow on solid SD medium
(45) lacking histidine: ++, growth rate similar to that of a
cell carrying the entire sit1-8 allele; +, growth rate
slower than that of a cell carrying the entire sit1-8
allele; , absence of growth.
|
|
Chimeric genes carrying both the
sit1-8D and
sit1-8G mutations or carrying either mutation alone were
also tested for the
ability to confer the Sit phenotype by the assay
that relies on
complementation of the
sit1::
LEU2 allele. In this assay,
hybrid
g, which carries only the
sit1-8D mutation, was
unable to support
growth of haploid cells even when histidine was
present in the
growth medium, indicating that the
sit1-8D
mutation is lethal.
In contrast, hybrid i (
sit1-8DG), which
carries both the
sit1-8D and
sit1-8G mutations,
was able to complement the
sit1::
LEU2
allele
and was also able to confer the Sit phenotype (Fig.
2B). Hybrid
h, which carries only the
sit1-8G mutation, was capable of
complementing
the
sit1::
LEU2 allele but
was unable to confer the Sit phenotype
(Fig.
2B). Taken together these
results suggest that the
sit1-8D allele encodes a mutant
subunit that assembles into an RNAPII
complex which is capable of
transcribing
HIS4 in the absence of
BAS1, BAS2, and GCN4.
However, this mutant RNAPII is not able
to support cell growth unless
it is modified further by the
sit1-8G substitution, perhaps
because genes that are either required or
toxic for cell growth are
aberrantly expressed (see Discussion).
In other experiments (see below), we found that the
sit1-8D
is not always lethal. This finding that the
sit1-8D allele
is
capable of supporting cell growth in certain genetic backgrounds
provides further evidence that this allele encodes a partially
functional subunit. It also suggests that the pleiotropic phenotypes
imposed by
sit1 mutations can vary according to the genetic
background
in which they are expressed (see Discussion).
Identification of other region D mutations.
Other
sit1 mutant strains which did not carry a region F mutation
(sit1-252, -261, and -278) were then
tested for the presence of a region D mutation. For each of these
mutants, a portion of SIT1 encoding conserved regions B, C,
D, and E (nucleotides 971 to 2224 [SpeI-PpuMI
fragment]) was amplified and subcloned into an otherwise wild-type
SIT1 gene. When tested for the Sit phenotype by the two
assays described above, all three reconstructed sit1 alleles
were capable of supporting growth on medium lacking histidine. DNA
sequencing revealed that two alleles, sit1-252 and
sit1-261, carry the same mutation which changes methionine
487 to leucine (Table 1 and Fig. 1). The mutation in the
sit1-278 allele replaces asparagine 445 by threonine (Table
1 and Fig. 1). The Sit phenotype imposed by region D substitutions is
shown in Fig. 2B.
Effect of sit1 mutations on start site selection.
Amino acid substitutions located in and near conserved region D of the
largest subunit were identified previously that suppress the reduction
in expression of CYC1 brought about by the insertion of a
nonfunctional AUG codon into the 5' untranslated sequence of the gene
(Sua phenotype [Sua stands for suppression of upstream ATG])
(38). Mutations in SUA8 affect the position of
the transcription start site at many yeast promoters in such a way that
downstream start sites are favored relative to upstream ones
(13). It was reported previously that some sit1
mutations have a similar effect in that they increase the number of
transcripts that start downstream of the HIS4 translation
initiation codon (8). This observation and the fact that
some of the mutations characterized in this study change amino acids in
region D which are also changed by sua8 mutations
(sua8-1 and sit1-278 change asparagine 445 to Ser and Thr, respectively) prompted us to determine whether sit1
mutations can confer an alteration of start site selection at
CYC1. Yeast strains carrying either the sit1-8
(regions D and G), the sit1-278 (region D), the
sit1-4 (region F), the sit1-5 (region F), or the wild-type SIT1 gene were transformed separately with a
plasmid carrying a CYC1-lacZ reporter gene that either
contains (cyc1-5000 allele; plasmid pM107
[38]) or lacks (wild type CYC1; plasmid pM50 [38]) a nonfunctional ATG codon in the
CYC1 5' untranslated region. As controls, the same two
plasmids were also introduced into a strain carrying the
sua8-1 mutation (YDW383 [13]) and an
isogenic SUA8 wild-type strain (T16 [13]).
For each strain, the levels of
-galactosidase activity expressed
from the CYC1 (wild-type) allele or from the
cyc1-5000 allele were measured (Table
2). The ratio of the level of expression
of the cyc1-5000 allele to that of the wild-type
CYC1 gene increases in strains with sua8
mutations. A low ratio, such as that measured in strains carrying a
wild-type SIT1 gene (SUA8 or SIT1 in
Table 2), indicates that most of the transcripts that are initiated at
the cyc1-5000 promoter start upstream of the nonfunctional
ATG. In contrast, a high ratio, such as that measured in a
sua8-1 mutant strain, indicates that a substantial
proportion of cyc1-5000 transcripts start downstream of the
nonfunctional ATG and hence that the mutation affects the position of
the transcriptional start site.
Four observations were made. First, the level of expression of the
wild-type
CYC1 gene is reduced approximately two- to
fourfold
in
sit1 mutant strains (
sit1-8,
-278,
-4, and
-5) compared to
that of
a wild-type
SIT1 strain. This decrease in
CYC1
expression
is not surprising, since
sit1 mutations were
shown previously
to affect the expression of many genes, including
those, like
CYC1, that are required for growth on
nonfermentable carbon sources
(
8). Second, all four
sit1 mutant strains confer an increase
in the ratio of
cyc1-5000 to
CYC1 expression, albeit of variable
magnitude:
sit1-8 showed the smallest increase, whereas the
increase
conferred by
sit1-278 was comparable to that
imposed by the
sua8-1 allele. Third, both region D and F
mutations affect the expression
ratio. Fourth, expression of the
wild-type
CYC1 gene in a wild-type
SIT1 strain
can be affected by the genetic background of the strain
(compare
SUA8 and
SIT1 in Table
2). Whether this
background difference
is due to the absence of BAS1, BAS2, and GCN4 in
one strain (
SIT1)
but not the other (
SUA8)
remains to be investigated. Although
the
sit1 alleles tested
here have a feature of
sua8 mutants (i.e.,
an alteration of
start site selection that favors downstream start
sites), we do not
conclude that all of these alleles have a bona
fide Sua phenotype. An
Sua phenotype would require an absolute
increase in the expression of
cyc1-5000, such that this allele
would be capable of
supporting the growth of the strain when lactate
is the carbon source
(
38). Our data speak only to the feature
of altered start
site selection that is shared by
sua8 and these
sit1 alleles.
Synthetic lethality of sit1-8D and ppr2.
The
clustering of sit1 mutations in regions of RNAPII which form
part of its catalytic center suggest that these mutations may affect
the elongation properties of the enzyme (see Discussion). We reasoned
that if the sit1 mutations affect transcriptional elongation
in vivo, this defect may be exacerbated by a deletion of the
nonessential gene PPR2, which encodes transcription
elongation factor IIS (TFIIS). This was tested by shuffling plasmids
carrying the sit1 alleles (sit1-4, -5,
-7, -9, -290, -252,
-278, -8D, -8G, and -8DG)
into a strain carrying a disruption of both SIT1 and PPR2 (YF2278) or, as a control, into a strain carrying only
a disruption of SIT1 (YF2277). In these experiments, the
ability of the various sit1 alleles to support growth in the
absence or presence of TFIIS was tested by determining the ability of
cells to grow on medium containing 5'-fluoroorotic acid, which selects for loss of the wild-type SIT1 maintenance plasmid. Two
observations were made. First, in the genetic background used in these
experiments, the sit1-8D mutation is not lethal (Fig.
4). Second, this mutation is, however,
lethal when combined with a deletion of PPR2 (Fig. 4). To
our knowledge, sit1-8D is the first mutation in a gene encoding a subunit of RNAPII, or for that matter in any gene, reported
to be synthetically lethal with a PPR2 deletion. This synthetic lethality, between a sit1 mutation and a known
elongation factor, lends further support to the notion that
sit1 mutations affect transcriptional elongation in vivo. We
also noted that this synthetic lethal phenotype could be suppressed by
the sit1-8G substitution (Fig. 4), indicating that
sit1-8G and PPR2 may perform a similar function.
In this context, the sit1-8G substitution lies in a portion
of the largest subunit which is close to, and may even be part of, a
binding site for TFIIS (5, 50). None of the other
sit1 mutations tested (sit1-4, -5,
-7, -9, -290, -252,
-278, -8G, and -8DG) were
synthetically lethal in combination with a PPR2 deletion
(Fig. 4, data not shown), perhaps because their effect on elongation is
not as pronounced as that imposed by sit1-8D. The notion
that the sit1-8D mutation imposes a more pronounced effect
on transcription than the other sit1 alleles is supported by
the observation that it is the only sit1 mutation which can
be lethal.

View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Synthetic lethality of sit1-8D and
ppr2. TRP1 CEN/ARS plasmids bearing SIT1
(RPO21) alleles (indicated by white letters on a black
background) were introduced into YF2277 (MAT
rpo21::ADE2 [pJS121, RPO21 on
URA3, CEN/ARS]), shown on the left side of the
plate or YF2278 (MAT rpo21::ADE2
ppr2::hisG [pJS121, RPO21 on
URA3, CEN/ARS]), shown on the right side of the
plate, and grown on SD medium (45) lacking tryptophan and
containing 5'-fluoroorotic acid for 3 days at 30°C in order to select
for loss of the URA3 maintenance plasmid (pJS121).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results presented above, which indicate that both conserved
regions D and F of the largest subunit are altered by the sit1 mutations, suggest that these mutations exert their
effect by altering the overall structure of the RNAPII active center. Previous functional studies have suggested that regions D and F,
together with other conserved regions of the largest and second-largest subunits of multimeric RNA polymerases, form the active site of the
enzyme as broadly defined (23) to include the catalytic center together with the DNA and RNA binding sites (reviewed in references 6, 41, and 53). Region
D contains a segment, NADFDGD, that
is invariant among multimeric RNA polymerases (33) and is
involved in binding Mg2+ ions, which are essential for RNA
catalysis (the three aspartate residues that chelate Mg2+
are underlined) (54). Within the active site, region D is
located very close to the transcription initiation site (54)
and the 3' end of the RNA transcript (16, 31). Cross-linking
studies with E. coli RNAP indicated that region G is also in
close proximity to the 3' end of the transcript; while region G was the
predominant cross-linking site within arrested complexes, region D was
favored when cross-linking was performed on elongating complexes
(31). Our finding that a region D mutation
(sit1-8D) can be suppressed by a region G mutation
(sit1-8G) is consistent with the notion that both regions
participate in similar functions. Indeed, mutational studies have
indicated that both regions are involved in the selection of the start
site (13, 25; this study) and play a role in transcription elongation and termination (23, 49, 54). In S. cerevisiae, a mutant RNAPIII (C160-112) harboring a
conditional lethal double substitution in region D (T to I at position
506 [T506I] and N509Y [Fig. 1]) was characterized biochemically
(23). At a natural promoter, the mutant enzyme was as
proficient as the wild-type enzyme in carrying the initiation reaction
but was more prone to catalyze a slippage reaction during synthesis of the first few nucleotides. The mutant enzyme also had a markedly reduced elongation rate, which was attributable to increased pausing at
intrinsic pausing sites. It was hypothesized that the double amino acid
substitution could either affect the correct positioning of the 3' end
of the RNA transcript in the catalytic center of the enzyme or have a
more direct effect on the formation of phosphodiester bonds
(23). One of the two substitutions (N509Y) affects a residue of the invariant Mg2+-binding motif and was found to be
lethal unless suppressed by the second region D substitution (T506I)
(23). This is reminiscent of the sit1-8D
substitution (N479Y), which changes the analogous residue in the
invariant motif of RNAPII (Fig. 1) and can also be lethal unless
suppressed by the sit1-8G substitution (A1076V).
Region F, the other region altered by sit1 mutations, forms
a part of the enzyme active site which is targeted by certain inhibitors. Region F can be mutated to confer resistance to
-amanitin (reviewed in reference 6), which
inhibits the translocation step of eukaryotic RNAPII (21),
and to the antibiotic streptolydigin (44, 51), which
inhibits the elongation phase of prokaryotic RNAP (18, 32,
48). A role for region F in transcriptional elongation and
translocation is also supported by studies of mutant RNAPs. One
Drosophila melanogaster RNAPII mutant (C4) bearing an
-amanitin resistance substitution in region F (R741H) (Fig. 1) was
found to elongate more slowly in vitro and have an increased apparent
Km for UTP (20). In yeast, a mutant
RNAPIII (C160-270) that carried a double substitution in region F
(D829A R830A) (Fig. 1) and was defective in the transition from
abortive initiation to elongation and in its ability to exit from pause
sites was isolated (47). The mutant enzyme also showed an
increased RNA cleavage activity in halted ternary complexes. Finally,
in E. coli, several region F mutations were isolated that
increase termination in the trp operon leader region or
decrease termination at a
-independent terminator in vivo
(49). These mutations also affected termination efficiency
at other
-independent terminators in vitro, although the magnitude
and direction of the effect appeared to be dependent on the type of
terminator used (49). The last of these observations raise
the possibility that the effect of sit1 mutations on
transcription varies from one gene to another. Indeed sit1
mutations can lead to both over- and underexpression of genes such as
HIS4 and CYC1 (Table 2), respectively. These
profound effects on gene expression most likely underlie the many
pleiotropic phenotypes of sit1 mutants.
Further support for the notion that sit1 mutations alter the
active site of RNAP comes from experiments in which the
Mg2+ ion of the enzyme was replaced by Fe2+.
Hydroxyl radicals generated by Fe2+ cleave protein and DNA
in a 1-nm radius of the ion. In these experiments, DNA is cleaved
immediately upstream of the transcriptional start site (54),
indicating that the Mg2+ ion is near or at the catalytic
center of the enzyme. In a similar fashion, cut sites in the RNAP
peptide chain also identified residues that are in the active-site area
(35).
' was cleaved in three regions: conserved regions
D, F, and G. These regions correspond to those in which the
sit1 mutants and a suppressor to the growth defect of a
sit1 mutation (sit1-8G) were identified.
Two lines of evidence suggest that the pleiotropic effects of
sit1 alleles can vary according to the genetic background of the strain in which they are expressed. First, in at least one instance, we have shown that the Sit phenotype can be semidominant, whereas in other genetic backgrounds it is recessive. Second, we found
that the sit1-8D substitution is lethal in one genetic background, whereas in another it is viable. Although we do not yet
fully understand which set of genes is involved in these background differences, we nevertheless have gathered evidence to suggest that at
least one gene, PPR2, which encodes the transcription elongation factor TFIIS, can affect the phenotype imposed by the sit1-8D substitution. We found that in a genetic background
in which it is normally viable, the sit1-8D allele can be
synthetically lethal in combination with a disruption of the
nonessential gene PPR2 and that this synthetic phenotype can
be suppressed by the sit1-8G substitution which lies in, or
close to, a TFIIS-binding site in RNAPII (5, 50). These
findings have two implications. First, they raise the possibility that
some of the differences we observed between genetic backgrounds are due
to differences in genes which encode proteins that can affect
transcriptional elongation, either directly or indirectly. Further
analysis of these genetic differences should reveal whether this
hypothesis is correct. Second, and most importantly, the genetic
connection between sit1-8D, sit1-8G, and a known
transcription elongation factor lends further support to the hypothesis
that sit1-8D affects the elongation properties of RNAPII in
vivo.
Other than mutations that truncate the C-terminal domain of the largest
subunit of RNAPII (2, 42), the sit1 mutations are
the only mutations that implicate RNAPII directly in the process of
transcriptional activation. Our finding that sit1
substitutions affect start site selection and occur in regions of
RNAPII that form the enzyme active center implies that there is an
intimate relationship between initiation and elongation and has
implications for the mechanism of transcriptional activation. To our
knowledge, our findings provide the first evidence in eukaryotes that
alteration of the enzyme catalytic center can affect transcriptional
activation. Previous studies of the mechanism of transcriptional
activation have suggested that activation domains stimulate
transcription by several mechanisms, including counteracting the
repressing effect of chromatin, recruiting the RNAPII holoenzyme
complex to the promoter through multiple contacts between activation
domains and components of the RNAPII holoenzyme, and/or increasing the processivity of elongating RNAPII (reviewed in references
12 and 46). The results presented
in this study provide genetic evidence that partial activation of
transcription can also occur by alteration of the RNAPII active site
and suggest that some transcription-regulatory proteins exert their
effect by modifying, either directly or indirectly, the RNAPII active
center. In E. coli, the conformation of the RNAP active
center and in particular the way in which it contacts the nascent RNA
and the DNA template are major determinants of the processivity of the
enzyme (reviewed in reference 29), which can be
regulated by antitermination factors such as the N and Q gene products
of phage lambda (reviewed in reference 24). By
analogy, eukaryotic regulatory proteins that are known to increase the
processivity of RNAPII, such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat, yeast GAL4, human p53 and E2F1, and herpes simplex virus VP16
(14, 28, 52), could exert their effect by altering, either
directly or indirectly, the structure or conformation of the enzyme
active site during elongation. sit1 mutations, by directly
affecting the RNAPII active center, could help stabilize a more
processive form of the enzyme and in doing so partially bypass the need
for promoter-bound transcriptional activators at HIS4.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research
Council (MRC) of Canada to J.G. and J.D.F. and by a grant from the
National Cancer Institute of Canada to J.G. J.A. held a fellowship from the MRC.
We thank Ying Zou for technical assistance, Michael Hampsey and
Caroline Kane for the gift of plasmids and yeast strains, and Shahrzad
Nouraini for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address:
Bio-Méga/Boehringer Ingelheim Research Inc., 2100 Cunard St.,
Laval, Quebec H7S 2G5, Canada. Phone: (514) 682-4640. Fax: (514)
682-8434. E-mail: kinetics{at}montrealnet.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alani, E.,
L. Cao, and N. Kleckner.
1987.
A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains.
Genetics
116:541-545[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Allison, L. A., and C. J. Ingles.
1989.
Mutations in RNA polymerase II enhance or suppress mutations in GAL4.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:2794-2798[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Allison, L. A.,
M. Moyle,
M. Shales, and C. J. Ingles.
1985.
Extensive homology among the largest subunits of eukaryotic and prokaryotic RNA polymerases.
Cell
42:599-610[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Archambault, J.,
M. A. Drebot,
J. C. Stone, and J. D. Friesen.
1992.
Isolation and phenotypic analysis of conditional-lethal, linker-insertion mutations in the gene encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
232:408-414[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Archambault, J.,
F. Lacroute,
A. Ruet, and J. D. Friesen.
1992.
Genetic interaction between transcription elongation factor TFIIS and RNA polymerase II.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:4142-4152[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Archambault, J., and J. D. Friesen.
1993.
Genetics of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III.
Microbiol. Rev.
57:703-724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Arndt, K. T.,
C. Styles, and G. R. Fink.
1987.
Multiple global regulators control HIS4 transcription in yeast.
Science
237:874-880[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Arndt, K. T.,
C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink.
1989.
A suppressor of a HIS4 transcriptional defect encodes a protein with homology to the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatases.
Cell
56:527-537[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Barberis, A.,
J. Pearlberg,
N. Simkovich,
S. Farrell,
P. Reinagel,
C. Bamdad,
G. Sigal, and M. Ptashne.
1995.
Contact with a component of the polymerase II holoenzyme suffices for gene activation.
Cell
81:359-368[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Bartolomei, M. S., and J. L. Corden.
1995.
Clustered alpha-amanitin resistance mutations in mouse.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
246:778-782[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Bartolomei, M. S., and J. L. Corden.
1987.
Localization of an -amanitin resistance mutation in the gene encoding the largest subunit of mouse RNA polymerase II.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:586-594[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Bentley, D. L.
1995.
Regulation of transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5:210-216[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Berroteran, R. W.,
D. E. Ware, and M. Hampsey.
1994.
The sua8 suppressors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode replacements of conserved residues within the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II and affect transcription start site selection similarly to sua7 (TFIIB) mutations.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:226-237[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Blau, J.,
H. Xiao,
S. McCracken,
P. O'Hare,
J. Greenblatt, and D. Bentley.
1996.
Three functional classes of transcriptional activation domains.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:2044-2055[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Bonneaud, N.,
K. O. Ozier,
G. Y. Li,
M. Labouesse,
S. L. Minvielle, and F. Lacroute.
1991.
A family of low and high copy replicative, integrative and single-stranded S. cerevisiae/E. coli shuttle vectors.
Yeast
7:609-615[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Borukhov, S.,
J. Lee, and A. Goldfarb.
1991.
Mapping of a contact for the RNA 3' terminus in the largest subunit of RNA polymerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:23932-23935[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Botstein, D.,
S. C. Falco,
S. E. Stewart,
M. Brennan,
S. Scherer,
D. T. Stinchcomb,
K. Struhl, and R. W. Davis.
1979.
Sterile host yeasts (SHY): a eukaryotic system of biological containment for recombinant DNA experiments.
Gene
8:17-24[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Cassani, G.,
R. R. Burgess,
H. M. Goodman, and L. Gold.
1971.
Inhibition of RNA polymerase by streptolydigin.
Nat. New Biol.
230:197-200[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Chen, Y.,
J. Weeks,
M. A. Mortin, and A. L. Greenleaf.
1993.
Mapping mutations in genes encoding the two large subunits of Drosophila RNA polymerase II defines domains essential for basic transcription functions and for proper expression of developmental genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4214-4222[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Coulter, D. E., and A. L. Greenleaf.
1985.
A mutation in the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II alters RNA chain elongation in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:13190-13198[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
de Mercoyrol, L.,
C. Job, and D. Job.
1989.
Studies on the inhibition by alpha-amanitin of single-step addition reactions and productive RNA synthesis catalyzed by wheat-germ RNA polymerase II.
Biochem. J.
258:165-169[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Devlin, C.,
K. Tice-Baldwin,
D. Shore, and K. T. Arndt.
1991.
RAP1 is required for BAS1/BAS2- and GCN4-dependent transcription of the yeast HIS4 gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:3642-3651[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Dieci, G.,
S. Hermann-Le Denmat,
E. Lukhtanov,
P. Thuriaux,
M. Werner, and A. Sentenac.
1995.
A universally conserved region of the largest subunit participates in the active site of RNA polymerase III.
EMBO J.
14:3766-3776[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Greenblatt, J.,
J. R. Nodwell, and S. W. Mason.
1993.
Transcriptional antitermination.
Nature
364:401-406[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Hekmatpanah, D. S., and R. A. Young.
1991.
Mutations in a conserved region of RNA polymerase II influence the accuracy of mRNA start site selection.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:5781-5791[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Ito, H.,
Y. Fukuda,
K. Murata, and A. Kimura.
1983.
Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations.
J. Bacteriol.
153:163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Jokerst, R. S.,
J. R. Weeks,
W. A. Zehring, and A. L. Greenleaf.
1989.
Analysis of the gene encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II in Drosophila.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
215:266-275[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Krumm, A.,
L. B. Hickey, and M. Groudine.
1995.
Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II defines a general rate-limiting step after transcription initiation.
Genes Dev.
9:559-572[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Landick, R., and J. W. Roberts.
1996.
The shrewd grasp of RNA polymerase.
Science
273:202-203[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Maniatis, T.,
E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook.
1982.
In
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 31.
|
Markovtsov, V.,
A. Mustaev, and A. Goldfarb.
1996.
Protein-RNA interactions in the active center of transcription elongation complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:3221-3226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
McClure, W. R.
1980.
On the mechanism of streptolydigin inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
255:1610-1616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Memet, S.,
M. Gouy,
C. Marck,
A. Sentenac, and J. M. Buhler.
1988.
RPA190, the gene coding for the largest subunit of yeast RNA polymerase A.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:2830-2839[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Miller, J.
1972.
In
Experiments in molecular genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 35.
|
Mustaev, A.,
M. Kozlov,
V. Markovtsov,
E. Zaychikov,
L. Denissova, and A. Goldfarb.
1997.
Modular organization of the catalytic center of RNA polymerase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:6641-6645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
O'Brien, T.,
S. Hardin,
A. Greenleaf, and J. T. Lis.
1994.
Phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain and transcriptional elongation.
Nature
370:75-77[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Orr-Weaver, T. L.,
J. W. Szostak, and R. J. Rothstein.
1983.
Genetic applications of yeast transformation with linear and gapped plasmids.
Methods Enzymol.
101:228-245[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Pinto, I.,
J. G. Na,
F. Sherman, and M. Hampsey.
1992.
cis- and trans-acting suppressors of a translation initiation defect at the cyc1 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
132:97-112[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Rougvie, A. E., and J. T. Lis.
1988.
The RNA polymerase II molecule at the 5' end of the uninduced hsp70 gene of D. melanogaster is transcriptionally engaged.
Cell
54:795-804[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Sanger, F.,
S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson.
1977.
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
74:5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Sawadogo, M., and A. Sentenac.
1990.
RNA polymerase B (II) and general transcription factors.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
59:711-754[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Scafe, C.,
D. Chao,
J. Lopes,
J. P. Hirsch,
S. Henry, and R. A. Young.
1990.
RNA polymerase II C-terminal repeat influences response to transcriptional enhancer signals.
Nature
347:491-494[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Scafe, C.,
C. Martin,
M. Nonet,
S. Podos,
S. Okamura, and R. A. Young.
1990.
Conditional mutations occur predominantly in highly conserved residues of RNA polymerase II subunits.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:1270-1275[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Severinov, K.,
D. Markov,
E. Severinova,
V. Nikiforov,
R. Landick,
S. A. Darst, and A. Goldfarb.
1995.
Streptolydigin-resistant mutants in an evolutionarily conserved region of the beta' subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:23926-23929[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Sherman, F.,
G. R. Fink, and J. B. Hicks.
1986.
In
Laboratory course manual for methods in yeast genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 46.
|
Stargell, L. A., and K. Struhl.
1996.
Mechanisms of transcriptional activation in vivo two steps forward.
Trends Genet.
12:311-315[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Thuillier, V.,
I. Brun,
A. Sentenac, and M. Werner.
1996.
Mutations in the -amanitin conserved domain of the largest subunit of yeast RNA polymerase III affect pausing, RNA cleavage and transcriptional transitions.
EMBO J.
15:618-629[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
von der Helm, K., and J. S. Krakow.
1972.
Inhibition of RNA polymerase by streptolydigin.
Nat. New. Biol.
235:82-83[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Weilbaecher, R.,
C. Hebron,
G. Feng, and R. Landick.
1994.
Termination-altering amino acid substitutions in the beta' subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase identify regions involved in RNA chain elongation.
Genes Dev.
8:2913-2927[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Wu, J.,
D. E. Awrey,
A. M. Edwards,
J. Archambault, and J. D. Friesen.
1996.
In vitro characterization of mutant yeast RNA polymerase II with reduced binding for elongation factor TFIIS.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11552-11557[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Yang, X., and C. W. Price.
1995.
Streptolydigin resistance can be conferred by alterations to either the beta or beta' subunits of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:23930-23933[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Yankulov, K.,
J. Blau,
T. Purton,
S. Roberts, and D. L. Bentley.
1994.
Transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II is stimulated by transactivators.
Cell
77:749-759[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Young, R. A.
1991.
RNA polymerase II.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60:689-715[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Zaychikov, E.,
E. Martin,
L. Denissova,
M. Kozlov,
V. Markovtsov,
M. Kashlev,
H. Heumann,
V. Nikiforov,
A. Goldfarb, and A. Mustaev.
1996.
Mapping of catalytic residues in the RNA polymerase active center.
Science
273:107-109[Abstract].
|
J Bacteriol, May 1998, p. 2590-2598, Vol. 180, No. 10
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Malagon, F., Kireeva, M. L., Shafer, B. K., Lubkowska, L., Kashlev, M., Strathern, J. N.
(2006). Mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RPB1 Gene Conferring Hypersensitivity to 6-Azauracil. Genetics
172: 2201-2209
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Trinh, V., Langelier, M.-F., Archambault, J., Coulombe, B.
(2006). Structural Perspective on Mutations Affecting the Function of Multisubunit RNA Polymerases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
70: 12-36
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, B.-S., Hampsey, M.
(2004). Functional Interaction between TFIIB and the Rpb2 Subunit of RNA Polymerase II: Implications for the Mechanism of Transcription Initiation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 3983-3991
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Malagon, F., Tong, A. H., Shafer, B. K., Strathern, J. N.
(2004). Genetic Interactions of DST1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Suggest a Role of TFIIS in the Initiation-Elongation Transition. Genetics
166: 1215-1227
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pappas, D. L. Jr., Hampsey, M.
(2000). Functional Interaction between Ssu72 and the Rpb2 Subunit of RNA Polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 8343-8351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]