Previous Article | Next Article 
J Bacteriol, June 1998, p. 3013-3016, Vol. 180, No. 11
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Analysis of cis-Acting Elements Required
for bfpA Expression in Enteropathogenic
Escherichia coli
Victor H.
Bustamante,
Edmundo
Calva, and
Jose Luis
Puente*
Departamento de Microbiología
Molecular, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62250, Mexico
Received 3 December 1997/Accepted 25 March 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
bfpA expression in enteropathogenic Escherichia
coli is regulated by growth medium, temperature, and ammonium
concentration and requires the BfpT protein (also called PerA), a
member of the AraC family of transcriptional activators. Site-directed
and PCR random mutagenesis, as well as deletion analysis of the
bfpA upstream regulatory region, supported assignment of
the promoter elements and demonstrated that the cis-acting
elements that mediate BfpT-dependent regulation of bfpA are
located between positions
85 and
46. Interestingly, this region
shares 73% identity with a 40-bp-long AT-rich tract located upstream
of the bfpT gene, which is essential for bfpT
autoregulation.
 |
TEXT |
Enteropathogenic Escherichia
coli (EPEC) is a common cause of diarrhea, particularly among
children under 6 months of age living in developing countries
(16). Recently, a three-stage model by which EPEC infections
proceed has been proposed (6). The initial stage involves
the generalized nonintimate interaction of bacterial microcolonies with
the surface of epithelial cells, in a pattern known as the localized
adherence phenotype (5). This pattern of attachment requires
the 80-kb EPEC adherence factor (EAF) plasmid, which contains a cluster
of 14 tandemly arrayed genes; this cluster is sufficient to direct the
production of the bundle-forming pilus (BFP), a type IV fimbria
associated with microcolony formation and bacterial autoaggregation
(8, 21, 23-25).
The expression of bfpA, the gene coding for the structural
subunit of BFP (23), occurs during the exponential phase of
growth, when it is modulated by the growth medium, ammonium
concentration, and temperature (19). Our previous studies
revealed that bfpA regulation is under the control of a
regulatory region that extends further upstream from the putative
35
and
10 promoter sequences, which seems to determine the coordinate
regulation of genes located downstream of bfpA (19,
21). This expression is regulated at the transcriptional level
and requires the product of the bfpT gene, which is the
first gene of the bfpTVW locus, localized 6.7 kb downstream
of the bfp gene cluster on the EAF plasmid (27). bfpT encodes a 274-amino-acid protein, which belongs to the
XylS-AraC family of transcriptional regulators (27). The
bfpTVW locus, previously identified as per,
has also been involved in the regulation of the eaeA and
esp genes, whose products mediate the second and third
stages of EPEC interactions with the host cells (6, 9, 12).
Interactions of BfpT with its target sites have been difficult to study
in vitro, since different attempts to overproduce and purify it have
been unsuccessful. We previously showed that a DNA fragment containing
the sequence between nucleotides
94 and
55 of the bfpA
regulatory region was bound by a T7-tagged BfpT fusion protein
immobilized on Dynabeads; however, attempts to perform footprinting
experiments with this fusion were unsuccessful (27). Thus,
an alternative route was to genetically analyze the bfpA
regulatory region, as presented here.
Deletion analysis of the bfpA regulatory region.
A
series of 5' upstream deletions of the bfpA-cat fusion
carried on plasmid pCAT232 (19), containing all of the
required elements for expression, were constructed by PCR amplification of the corresponding fragments and cloned into vector pKK232-8, which
contains a promoterless cat gene (2). The
nucleotide sequence of all cloned inserts was determined to confirm the
precise positions of the deletions and to ensure that no mutations were introduced by the amplification reaction. The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity directed by plasmids carrying these
bfpA-cat deletions was tested in EPEC B171-8 grown in
Dulbecco modified Eagle (DME) medium at 37°C, which are the optimal
conditions for bfpA expression, and under conditions that
are known to regulate bfpA expression, such as growth in
Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C, DME medium at 25 and 39°C, and
DME medium containing 15 mM ammonium sulfate at 37°C, as described
before (19).
This analysis (Fig. 1) showed that a
bfpA-cat deletion down to position
85 (pCAT85) had similar
levels of expression and the same regulatory pattern in response to
environmental cues as other fusions containing further upstream
sequences. Also, a deletion to position
77 (pCAT77) showed an 84%
reduction of the BfpT-dependent expression, although, interestingly, it
still responded to regulatory signals to the same extent as the wild type. In contrast, only background activity was detected for deletions to position
54 or
40 (pCAT54 or pCAT40), both of which still contain the promoter (Fig. 1 and data not shown). These results indicated that the sequences required for BfpT-dependent expression of
bfpA are located upstream of the
35 region and up to
position
85.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Regulation of the bfpA 5' regulatory region
deletion fusions in response to environmental cues. The activities of
plasmids pCAT232, pCAT85, pCAT77, and pCAT54 were tested in EPEC strain
B171-8 grown in DME medium at 37, 25, and 39°C, in LB medium at
37°C, or in DME medium containing 15 mM ammonium sulfate at 37°C or
in EPEC strain T::Gmr, a bfpT mutant
derived from strain B171-8 (27), grown in DME medium at
37°C. The graph shows the maximal CAT-specific activity reached late
in growth. The data are representative of at least three different
experiments.
|
|
This AT-rich region contains two 8-bp-long direct-repeat elements, as
well as two 10-bp-long inverted-repeat elements, which
were designated
IRS1 and IRS2 (Fig.
2). Although the
precise role
of these elements in BfpT binding remains unclear, since
they
are not sufficient for full activation (Fig.
2), it should be
noticed that binding to tandem elements has been reported for
other
members of the AraC family, such as AraC, MelR, and VirF
(
3,
14,
28). Moreover, AT-rich sequences are necessary
for the regulatory
activity of other, closer homologs of BfpT,
such as Rns and CfaD
(regulation of the CS1 and CFA/I fimbrial
operons in enterotoxigenic
E. coli, respectively) (
11,
18)
and VirF
(regulation of plasmid-encoded invasion proteins in
Shigella species) (
26). Interestingly, another common feature of Rns,
CfaD, and VirF is that they seem to overcome the negative regulation
by
H-NS at their respective promoters, a mechanism that might
also account
for
bfpA repression at temperatures below 37°C (
11,
18,
26).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Nucleotide sequence alignment of the bfpA
(upper line) and bfpT (lower line) 5' regulatory regions.
The upstream regulatory sequence up to position 85 contains all of
the cis-acting elements required for the BfpT-dependent
activation of bfpA (this work). The bfpA sequence
between positions 85 and 46 shares a 73% identity over a
40-bp-long region (shaded bar) with the sequence between positions 65
and 26 of the bfpT regulatory region, which has been shown
to be required for bfpT autoactivation (17).
Brackets enclose the region bound by a T7-tag-BfpT fusion protein
(27). Thin and thick broken arrows indicate the positions of
each deletion and mutation, respectively, that affected CAT activity.
The activities listed in parentheses are expressed as percentages of
pCAT232 activity, which was assigned a value of 100% (see Fig. 1).
Horizontal arrows above or below the sequences denote the inverted
(IRS)- or direct-repeat elements. Promoter elements 35 and 10 and
the transcription start sites are also indicated.
|
|
Mutational analysis of the bfpA regulatory region.
To pinpoint the position of cis-acting regulatory elements
required for bfpA expression, random mutations were
generated in the bfpA regulatory region contained in
pCAT232, which was amplified under PCR conditions that enhance
error-prone copying, as described previously (15). The PCR
products were subcloned back into vector pKK232-8 (Ampr)
and transformed into Escherichia coli HB101 carrying plasmid pBTA-BH1 (Kmr), which contains the bfpT
regulatory locus (27). Mutations that reduced
bfpA-cat expression were identified by selecting colonies
that did not grow in concentrations of chloramphenicol noninhibitory
for strains carrying the wild-type fusion (pCAT232), while
transformants carrying mutations that improved bfpA-cat expression were screened for their ability to grow in a chloramphenicol concentration that inhibits the growth of a strain carrying the wild-type fusion. Candidates were assayed for CAT activity, as described before (19). Plasmid DNA from these clones was
purified and the nucleotide sequence of the bfpA-cat
regulatory region was determined, allowing the identification of two
groups of mutations.
Promoter mutations.
The sequence of the
35 promoter region
of bfpA (TTGCGT) contains the most conserved
residues of the consensus hexamer (TTGACA) at the first
three positions. A T-to-C transition (T-35C) or a G-to-A transition
(G-33A), at the first and third positions, respectively (Fig. 2),
decreased expression of bfpA to the background level, showing that this sequence is critical for bfpA expression,
in contrast to what is observed for the majority of the positively controlled promoters (20). Furthermore, a G-to-T
transversion at position
29 (G-29T; 1 base downstream from the
35
hexamer) produced nearly a twofold increase in bfpA-cat
expression under all growth conditions tested (Fig. 2 and
3B). This mutation did not modify the
transcriptional start point (see below; Fig.
4B, lane 2) and caused a ninefold
increase in the basal BfpT-independent expression levels (Fig. 3B),
suggesting that it generated a stronger promoter. This is consistent
with the fact that, in E. coli promoters, a T is the most
frequently found residue 1 base downstream from the
35 hexamer
(10).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Regulation of selected bfpA 5' regulatory
region mutants. The activities of bfpA-cat fusions
containing down mutations (pMG51, pMG58, pMG60, and pMG65) (A) or
promoter mutations (pMNC6 and pSNE10-232) (B) were tested EPEC strain
B171-8 grown in DME medium at 37, 25, and 39°C, in LB medium at
37°C, or in DME medium containing 15 mM ammonium sulfate at 37°C or
in strain T::Gmr, a bfpT mutant EPEC
strain, grown in DME medium at 37°C. The graph shows the maximal
CAT-specific activity reached late in growth. The data are
representative of at least three different experiments.
|
|

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Primer extension analysis of bfpA and
bfpA-cat transcripts. (A) Total RNA samples extracted from
EPEC strain B171-8 were hybridized to a 5'-32P-end-labeled
bfpA specific primer; primer extension was performed with
avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase as described
previously (19). Lanes G, A, T, and C correspond to the DNA
sequence ladder obtained with the same primer. Arrow, the position of
the extended products, which correspond to an A residue shown in
boldface, 1 bp downstream from the G residue that was previously
reported (19). The bfpA transcript is shown in
lanes to the right and to the left of the sequence ladder. (B) Total
RNA samples extracted from EPEC strain B171-8 carrying plasmid pCAT232
(wild type [lane 1]), pMNC6 (G-29T [lane 2]), or pSNE10-232 (G-12T
[lane 3]) or from strain EPEC T::Gmr carrying
pSNE10-232 (lane 4) were hybridized to a 5'-32P-end-labeled
cat-specific primer.
|
|
Moreover, to better characterize the
bfpA promoter, two
site-directed mutations at the

10 hexamer were independently
generated
by PCR (
1). A T-to-G transversion at position

7
(T-7G) that
reduced the identity of the putative

10 region with the
consensus
sequence abolished
bfpA-cat expression (Fig.
2),
whereas a G-to-T
transversion at position

12 (G-12T) (pSNE10-232),
which brought
the similarity of the putative

10 region closer to the
consensus,
caused more than a twofold increase in CAT activity,
although
its regulation in response to environmental cues was similar
to
that of the wild-type fusion (Fig.
2 and
3B). Interestingly, in
the
absence of BfpT, the G-12T mutation produced a 30-fold increase
in the
bfpA-cat basal level of expression (Fig.
3B). Primer
extension
analysis of this promoter mutant showed that transcription
initiates
at the wild-type position either in the wild-type EPEC strain
or in its
bfpT mutant derivative (Fig.
4A and B, lanes 1, 3, and
4), ruling out the possibility of having generated an alternative
promoter. In summary, these results further support the assignment
of
the
bfpA promoter (Fig.
2).
Mutations upstream of the promoter.
Further analysis of
mutants with mutations randomly generated by PCR revealed that single
deletions or a single insertion at different positions upstream from
the promoter but downstream from the
85 position (e.g., an insertion
or a deletion of one A at the 10-A tract between positions
65 and
74, a deletion of one T at the 8-T tract between positions
44 and
51, or a deletion of one T between positions
41 and
42 [plasmids
pMG60, pMG51, pMG58, and pMG65, respectively]) decreased
bfpA expression to less than 2% (Fig. 2 and 3A).
Interestingly, this reduced level of expression still required BfpT and
was regulated by the growth medium, temperature, and ammonium
concentration (Fig. 3A).
This negative effect could have resulted from slight but significant
local distortions in the DNA spatial structure, which
would bring out
of phase the BfpT-binding sites with respect to
the promoter, probably
altering its interactions with other molecules,
i.e., RNA polymerase.
In this regard, it has been observed for
other regulatory proteins,
such as CRP and FNR, that the exact
spacing of their binding sites with
respect to the promoter is
crucial for activation (
7,
29).
Further analysis of site-directed
mutants with full or half-turn
insertions will be required to
test this hypothesis. In contrast, two
mutants with an A-to-G
transition in the same region (A-65G or A-66G)
rendered only a
moderate positive effect on
bfpA expression
(Fig.
2).
The PCR random mutagenesis strategy did not render a wider variety of
mutations, as illustrated by those that were generated
by site-directed
mutagenesis. In this respect, it is also possible
that the effect of
other mutations is not large enough to be detected
by our screening
procedure, contrasting with the larger effect
caused by several
single-base deletion or insertion mutants, which
allowed their easy and
recurrent isolation. In summary, new mutagenesis
and screening schemes
should be explored to exhaust all the possibilities.
The BfpT-independent expression of a bfpA promoter
mutant is still repressed in LB medium.
The BfpT-independent
expression showed by pSNE10-232 (Fig. 5)
was still repressed in LB medium but not by ammonium. Furthermore, a
derivative of this mutant with a deletion to position
40 (pSNE10-40) behaved in the same manner (Fig. 5). These observations suggested that
the different levels of bfpA expression in LB and DME medium could be mediated by a mechanism that acts directly on its promoter, while ammonium repression occurs through a different mechanism that
requires BfpT and sequences upstream of the promoter. Moreover, since
bfpA expression is selectively repressed upon entrance to stationary phase, we cannot exclude the possibility that the different levels of expression in DME and LB medium depend, at least partially, on how long the exponential phase of growth is sustained and that this
phenomenon might be directly or indirectly mediated by RpoS (19,
30).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Regulation of the bfpA 5' regulatory region
mutant G-12T (contained in pSNE10-232) and its 5' deletion derivative
fused to the CAT reporter gene. The activities of pSNE10-232 and its 5'
deletion derivative pSNE10-40 were tested for EPEC strain B171-10
(EPEC-10), a spontaneous plasmid-cured derivative of B171-8 (this
study), or for EPEC strain T::Gmr, a
bfpT mutant strain, grown in DME or LB medium at 37°C or
in DME medium containing 15 mM ammonium sulfate at 37°C. For
comparison, expression directed by the wild-type fusion pCAT232 in
B171-10 is also shown. The graph shows the maximal CAT-specific
activity reached during the culture period. The data are representative
of at least three different experiments.
|
|
The bfpA and bfpT regulatory regions share
a common motif.
Recently, we have observed that bfpT
expression is autoregulated and also modulated by the growth medium,
temperature, and ammonium concentration (17). Considering
these observations, we expected that common elements could be present
in the regulatory regions of bfpA and bfpT. The
nucleotide sequence alignment of these regions revealed the presence,
as part of the minimal regulatory region of bfpT, of a
sequence that shares 73% identity with the region between residues
85 and
46, which was shown to mediate regulation and BfpT-dependent
expression of bfpA (Fig. 2). In contrast, no significant
sequence similarities could be found with the bfpA region
upstream from position
84 or downstream from position
46 (Fig. 2).
Interestingly, the sequence comprised between positions
84 and
65,
which proved to be critical in bfpA activation and is part
of the bfpA-bfpT homologous motif, is located two full turns
further upstream in bfpA with respect to bfpT,
suggesting that BfpT can activate transcription from different
locations with respect to the promoter, as long as the correct phase is
maintained (Fig. 2), as has been described for many regulatory proteins
in E. coli (4, 7, 29).
Concluding remarks.
This study led us to determine that the
sequence between positions
85 and
55 is essential for the
BfpT-dependent activation and ammonium regulation of bfpA,
probably constituting the BfpT-binding motif. The region between
positions
55 and
35, which resembles an UP element (13,
22), probably accounts for the stronger promoter activity shown
by bfpA in comparison with that of bfpT, which
lacks this element (Fig. 2) (17), although this hypothesis remains untested. All of this provides the basis toward further understanding the molecular mechanisms that control the expression of
BFP and possibly other virulence factors in EPEC.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We particularly thank Francisco Santana for excellent technical
assistance. We thank Enrique Morett for critical reading of the
manuscript. J.L.P. thanks Dave Bieber for his collaborative effort and many helpful discussions at the early stage of this work.
V.H.B. was supported by a Ph.D. fellowship from the Consejo
Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (no. 90275). This work was
supported by grants from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México (DGAPA IN208095) and from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia
y Tecnología (CONACyT 1027P-N).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto de
Biotecnología, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 510-3, Cuernavaca, Morelos
62250, Mexico. Phone: (52) (73) 29-1621. Fax: (52) (73) 13-8673. E-mail: puente{at}ibt.unam.mx.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ali, S. A., and A. Steinkasserer.
1995.
PCR-ligation-PCR mutagenesis: a protocol for creating gene fusions and mutations.
BioTechniques
18:746-750.
[Medline] |
| 2.
|
Brosius, J.
1984.
Plasmid vectors for the selection of promoters.
Gene
27:151-160[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Caswell, R.,
C. Webster, and S. Busby.
1992.
Studies on the binding of the Escherichia coli MelR transcription activator protein to operator sequences at the melAB promoter.
Biochem. J.
287:501-508.
|
| 4.
|
Collado-Vides, J.,
B. Magasanik, and J. D. Gralla.
1991.
Control site location and transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli.
Microbiol. Rev.
55:371-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Cravioto, A.,
R. Gross,
S. Scotland, and B. Rowe.
1979.
An adhesive factor found in strains of Escherichia coli belonging to the traditional infantile enteropathogenic serotypes.
Curr. Microbiol.
3:95-99.
|
| 6.
|
Donnenberg, M. S.,
J. B. Kaper, and B. B. Finlay.
1997.
Interactions between enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and host epithelial cells.
Trends Microbiol.
5:109-114[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Gaston, K.,
A. Bell,
A. Kolb,
H. Buc, and S. Busby.
1990.
Stringent spacing requirements for transcription activation by CRP.
Cell
62:733-743[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Giron, J. A.,
A. S. Y. Ho, and G. K. Schoolnik.
1991.
An inducible bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Science
254:710-713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Gomez-Duarte, O. G., and J. B. Kaper.
1995.
A plasmid-encoded regulatory region activates chromosomal eaeA expression in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Infect. Immun.
63:1767-1776[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Harley, C. B., and R. P. Reynolds.
1987.
Analysis of E. coli promoters.
Nucleic Acids Res.
15:2343-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Jordi, B. J.,
B. Dagberg,
L. A. de Haan,
A. M. Hamers,
B. A. van der Zeijst,
W. Gaastra, and B. E. Uhlin.
1992.
The positive regulator CfaD overcomes the repression mediated by histone-like protein H-NS (H1) in the CFA/I fimbrial operon of Escherichia coli.
EMBO J.
11:2627-2632[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kenny, B., and B. B. Finlay.
1995.
Protein secretion by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is essential for transducing signals to epithelial cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:7991-7995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Landini, P., and M. R. Volkert.
1995.
RNA polymerase subunit binding in positively controlled promoters: a new model for RNA polymerase-promoter interaction and transcriptional activation in the Escherichia coli ada and aidB genes.
EMBO J.
14:4329-4335[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Lee, N.,
C. Franklyn, and E. Hamilton.
1987.
Arabinose-induced binding of AraC protein to araI2 activates the araBAD promoter.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:8814-8818[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Leung, D.,
E. Chen, and D. V. Goeddel.
1989.
A method for random mutagenesis of a defined DNA segment using a modified polymerase chain reaction.
Technique
1:11-15.
|
| 16.
|
Levine, M. M.
1987.
Escherichia coli that cause diarrhea: enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, enteroinvasive, enterohemorrhagic, and enteroadherent.
J. Infect. Dis.
155:377-385[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Martínez-Laguna, Y.,
E. Calva, and J. L. Puente.
1997.
Regulation of bfpT, the gene coding for the transcriptional activator of bfpA in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, abstr. H-171, p. 313.
In
Abstracts of the 97th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1997. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 18.
|
Murphree, D.,
B. Froehlich, and J. R. Scott.
1997.
Transcriptional control of genes encoding CS1 pili: negative regulation by a silencer and positive regulation by Rns.
J. Bacteriol.
179:5736-5743[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Puente, J. L.,
D. Bieber,
S. W. Ramer,
W. Murray, and G. K. Schoolnik.
1996.
The bundle-forming pili of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: transcriptional regulation by environmental signals.
Mol. Microbiol.
20:87-100[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Raibaud, O., and M. Schwartz.
1984.
Positive control of transcription initiation in bacteria.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
18:173-206[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Ramer, S. W.,
D. Bieber, and G. K. Schoolnik.
1996.
BfpB, an outer membrane lipoprotein required for the biogenesis of bundle-forming pili in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6555-6563[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Ross, W.,
K. Gosink,
J. Salomon,
K. Igarashi,
C. Zou,
A. Ishihama,
K. Severinov, and R. L. Gourse.
1993.
A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by the subunit of RNA polymerase.
Science
262:1407-1413[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Sohel, I.,
J. L. Puente,
W. Murray,
J. Vuopio-Varkila, and G. K. Schoolnik.
1993.
Cloning and characterization of the bundle-forming pilin gene of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and its distribution in Salmonella serotypes.
Mol. Microbiol.
7:563-575[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Sohel, I.,
J. L. Puente,
S. W. Ramer,
D. Bieber,
C.-Y. Wu, and G. K. Schoolnik.
1996.
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: identification of a gene cluster coding for bundle-forming pilus morphogenesis.
J. Bacteriol.
178:2613-2628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Stone, K. D.,
H.-Z. Zhang,
L. K. Carlson, and M. S. Donnenberg.
1996.
A cluster of fourteen genes from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli is sufficient for the biogenesis of a type IV pilus.
Mol. Microbiol.
20:325-337[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Tobe, T.,
M. Yoshikawa,
T. Mizuno, and C. Sasakawa.
1993.
Transcriptional control of the invasion regulatory gene virB of Shigella flexneri: activation by virF and repression by H-NS.
J. Bacteriol.
175:6142-6149[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Tobe, T.,
G. K. Schoolnik,
I. Sohel,
V. H. Bustamante, and J. L. Puente.
1996.
Cloning and characterization of bfpTVW, genes required for the transcriptional activation of bfpA in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Mol. Microbiol.
21:963-975[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Wattiau, P., and G. R. Cornelis.
1994.
Identification of DNA sequences recognized by VirF, the transcriptional activator of the Yersinia yop regulon.
J. Bacteriol.
176:3878-3884[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Wing, H. J.,
S. M. Williams, and S. J. W. Busby.
1995.
Spacing requirements for transcription activation by E. coli FNR protein.
J. Bacteriol.
177:6704-6710[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Xu, J., and R. C. Johnson.
1995.
Identification of genes negatively regulated by Fis: Fis and RpoS comodulate growth-phase-dependent gene expression in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
177:938-947[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
J Bacteriol, June 1998, p. 3013-3016, Vol. 180, No. 11
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mellies, J. L., Barron, A. M. S., Carmona, A. M.
(2007). Enteropathogenic and Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Virulence Gene Regulation. Infect. Immun.
75: 4199-4210
[Full Text]
-
Ibarra, J. A., Villalba, M. I., Puente, J. L.
(2003). Identification of the DNA Binding Sites of PerA, the Transcriptional Activator of the bfp and per Operons in Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
185: 2835-2847
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hulbert, R. R., Taylor, R. K.
(2002). Mechanism of ToxT-Dependent Transcriptional Activation at the Vibrio cholerae tcpA Promoter. J. Bacteriol.
184: 5533-5544
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sánchez-SanMartín, C., Bustamante, V. H., Calva, E., Puente, J. L.
(2001). Transcriptional Regulation of the orf19 Gene and the tir-cesT-eae Operon of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
183: 2823-2833
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Munson, G. P., Holcomb, L. G., Scott, J. R.
(2001). Novel Group of Virulence Activators within the AraC Family That Are Not Restricted to Upstream Binding Sites. Infect. Immun.
69: 186-193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ogierman, M. A., Paton, A. W., Paton, J. C.
(2000). Up-Regulation of Both Intimin and eae-Independent Adherence of Shiga Toxigenic Escherichia coli O157 by ler and Phenotypic Impact of a Naturally Occurring ler Mutation. Infect. Immun.
68: 5344-5353
[Abstract]
[Full Text]