This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaidenko, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaidenko, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol, July 1998, p. 3730-3733, Vol. 180, No. 14
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

General Stress Transcription Factor sigma B and Sporulation Transcription Factor sigma H Each Contribute to Survival of Bacillus subtilis under Extreme Growth Conditions

Tatiana A. Gaidenko and Chester W. Price*

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616

Received 25 November 1997/Accepted 12 May 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The general stress response of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis is controlled by the sigma B transcription factor. Here we show that loss of sigma B reduces stationary-phase viability 10-fold in either alkaline or acidic media and reduces cell yield in media containing ethanol. We further show that loss of the developmental transcription factor sigma H also has a marked effect on stationary-phase viability under these conditions and that this effect is independent from the simple loss of sporulation ability.

    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The general stress response of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis is controlled by sigma B, an alternative sigma  factor that binds RNA polymerase to direct the transcription of over 50 genes (7, 11, 18, 36). The stresses that activate sigma B include heat, osmotic, and ethanol shocks to exponentially growing cells, as well as the energy limitations imposed on starving cells (2, 6, 11, 13, 35, 36). These stress signals are conveyed to sigma B by a signal transduction network that functions by the newly discovered "partner switching" mechanism, in which key protein interactions are controlled by reversible phosphorylation events (2, 3, 39).

Based on the stresses which lead to sigma B activation, genes expressed under sigma B control are thought to enhance survival when cells persist in a nongrowing state (11, 19, 36). However, early studies found no clear phenotype for sigma B null mutants (8, 16, 21, 23). Consequently, two complementary approaches have been used to determine the physiological role of the sigma B regulon. In the first, two-dimensional gel analysis identified proteins whose synthesis was sigma B dependent (7, 36). A significant discovery of this line of investigation was that sigma B is required for oxidative stress resistance in starved cells (4, 5, 17, 32). In the second approach, a genetic screen identified genes controlled by sigma B, or csb genes, with the view that their predicted products would provide important clues to sigma B function (12, 14). Of the six csb transcription units identified, four encode products that are either known or suspected to interact with the cell envelope (1, 14, 27, 33). Furthermore, one of the six is under the dual control of both sigma B and sigma H, suggesting that in addition to controlling sporulation initiation, sigma H might also regulate a subclass of genes involved in a general stress response (34).

From the results of the csb gene studies, we hypothesized that sigma B might contribute to cell viability under those growth conditions which induce sigma B activity while simultaneously taxing cell envelope function. In support of this notion, we report here that loss of sigma B reduces the viability of stationary-phase cells grown in alkaline or acidic media and also decreases cell yield in Luria broth (LB) containing high concentrations of ethanol. Significantly, loss of sigma H also affects the viability of stationary-phase cells under these same growth conditions.

Strains and growth conditions. We assayed the growth rate and viability of B. subtilis strains carrying a null mutation(s) in sigB, sigH, or both (Table 1). These strains were inoculated into LB, grown at 37°C to early logarithmic stage, and then diluted 1:100 into one of the three stress media described in the figure legends: alkali, acid, or ethanol stress medium. Cells were grown with vigorous shaking in flasks containing 1/10 volume of medium.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   B. subtilis strains used in this study

Loss of sigma B function results in diminished survival at alkaline pH. Maintenance of proton motive force at alkaline pH is thought to be a major energy drain which becomes especially severe during prolonged starvation (38). Bacteria are believed to respond to this stress by partially shifting energy-consuming processes from H+- to Na+-based energetics or by adopting membrane modifications that may provide an alternative means of maintaining proton motive force (9, 26, 28).

To probe the possible role of the sigma B regulon under these conditions, we tested the growth and survival properties of wild-type and sigB null strains at alkaline pH. In LB medium buffered to pH 9, there was no difference in logarithmic growth rate between the wild type and the sigB mutant. Both strains had a generation time of 50 min in this medium, compared to 20 min in LB medium buffered to pH 7. However, after 5 days in stationary phase at pH 9, we saw a reproducible 10-fold loss of viability in the sigB null mutant (Fig. 1A). This difference was statistically significant by Student's two-tailed t test, assuming unequal variance (P < 0.01). In contrast, there was no decrease in viability when the sigB null mutant was maintained in medium buffered to pH 7 (Fig. 1B). We conclude that loss of sigma B function has a modest but significant effect on viability during prolonged incubation at alkaline pH.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Survival of B. subtilis strains under alkaline conditions. The data points shown in all three panels are averages of four independent experiments; differences noted are significant according to a one-factor analysis of variance (P < 0.001). The significance of key pairwise comparisons determined by Student's t test (unequal variance) is discussed in the text. (A) Strains bearing a null mutation(s) in sigB (PB153; triangle ), in sigH (PB384; diamond ), or in both sigB and sigH (PB386; open circle ) were grown to stationary phase in LB medium lacking salt (11) buffered to pH 9.0 with 100 mM 3-(1,1-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl amino)-2-hydroxypropanesulfonic acid. The measured pH of the medium was 8.5 at the end of 5 days of incubation. Cell growth was monitored with a Klett-Summerson colorimeter (red filter), and cell viability was determined by serial dilution and plating on tryptose blood agar (Difco Laboratories). Controls included wild-type strain PB2 (black-square) and spoIIA (sigF) null mutant PB513 (square ), which lacks sigma F activity. (B) The same experiment conducted with phosphate-buffered LB medium, pH 7.0. The symbols are the same as in panel A. (C) Comparison of the alkaline (pH 9.0) viability of strains bearing null mutations in sigH (PB384; diamond ) and spo0A (PB61; bullet ) to that of wild-type strain PB2 (black-square).

Consistent with the notion that sigma H is also involved in a stress response distinct from sporulation (34), we found that loss of sigma H function was extremely deleterious to survival under prolonged alkaline incubation, with a loss of viability exceeding 106 after 5 days at pH 9 (Fig. 1A). In contrast, no such decrease was observed following prolonged incubation at neutral pH (Fig. 1B). To address the possibility that this loss of viability was primarily a consequence of the impaired sporulation ability of the sigH null mutant, we also tested the viability of a sigF null mutant. sigma F is a forespore-specific transcription factor which acts immediately downstream from sigma H in the developmental cascade (29). Notably, a sigF null mutant was indistinguishable from the wild type during prolonged alkaline incubation (Fig. 1A). We concluded that the diminished viability of the sigH null mutant was specifically due to the loss of sigma H function and not due to a general loss of sporulation ability.

One function of sigma H is to direct the stationary-phase transcription of spo0A, which encodes a response regulator with multiple roles in growing and nongrowing cells (15, 20, 31). Because loss of spo0A function is known to pleiotropically affect stationary-phase viability, we tested whether the decreased alkaline viability observed in a sigH null mutant could be entirely attributed to decreased spo0A function. We first determined that survival of a spo0A null mutant was indistinguishable from that of wild-type cells at pH 7 (data not shown). In contrast, the spo0A null mutation dramatically affected viability under prolonged incubation at pH 9 and the sigH null mutation reproducibly caused a further 15-fold loss of viability (Fig. 1C). This additional 15-fold loss was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Therefore, most, but not all, of the viability loss in the sigH null mutant was due to the loss of spo0A function. Moreover, the comparison shown in Fig. 1C likely overestimated the extent to which loss of spo0A function contributes to loss of alkaline viability in a sigH null mutant. In addition to its sigma H-dependent stationary-phase promoter, spo0A also has a sigma A-like vegetative promoter to provide maintenance levels of Spo0A (15, 20). Therefore, in comparison to the spo0A null mutant, the sigH null mutant would be expected to retain at least some spo0A function. We conclude that, in addition to its role in spo0A transcription, sigma H must control at least one additional gene that significantly contributes to survival under alkaline conditions. And, because the effects of the sigB and sigH null mutations were roughly additive (Fig. 1A), we infer that these two transcription factors control largely independent stress response systems.

Loss of sigma B function results in diminished survival at acidic pH. We next assayed the growth and survival of wild-type and mutant strains during acid stress. In LB medium buffered to pH 5, there was no difference in logarithmic growth rate between the wild type and the sigB mutant. Both strains had a generation time of 60 to 65 min in this medium, compared to 20 min in LB buffered to pH 7. However, during prolonged incubation at pH 5, we saw a reproducible 10-fold loss of viability in the sigB and sigH null single mutants and a 100-fold loss in the sigB-sigH double mutant (Fig. 2). These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.03). Because the effects of the sigB and sigH mutations were cumulative, sigma B and sigma H contribute independently to stationary-phase survival at acidic pH. And, because a sigF null mutant (Fig. 2) and a spo0A null mutant (data not shown) were similar to the wild type in viability, the diminished acid survival of the sigH mutant was not simply due to an inability to sporulate or an inability to transcribe spo0A during stationary phase.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   Survival of B. subtilis strains under acidic conditions. The data points shown are averages of four independent experiments; differences noted are significant according to a one-factor analysis of variance (P < 0.001). Strains bearing a null mutation(s) in sigB (PB153; triangle ), in sigH (PB384; diamond ), or in both sigB and sigH (PB386; open circle ) were grown to stationary phase in LB medium buffered to pH 5.0 with 200 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid. The measured pH of the medium was 5.5 at the end of 5 days of incubation. Cell growth and viability were monitored as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Controls included wild-type strain PB2 (black-square) and spoIIA (sigF) null mutant PB513 (square ).

Loss of sigma B function results in decreased cell yield in ethanol-containing media. sigma B activity is strongly induced by ethanol shock (11, 36), and ethanol is known to have multiple effects on membrane function (reviewed in reference 22). Consequently, we tested the influence of various concentrations of ethanol on the growth of sigB and sigH null mutants. Our initial experiments found that growth of B. subtilis cells in LB medium led to rapid alkalification whether or not ethanol was present (data not shown). To eliminate the influence of alkalification, we therefore performed experiments with phosphate-buffered LB medium. At ethanol concentrations of up to 6% (wt/vol), there was no difference in growth rate between the wild-type and mutant strains; in greater-than-9% ethanol, neither the wild type nor the mutants could grow (data not shown), but with ethanol concentrations of 7, 8, and 9%, there was a clear difference in cell yield between the wild-type and mutant strains. Figure 3 shows the results of a typical growth experiment with 8% ethanol, in which sigB and sigH single mutants showed a fourfold-lower cell yield than either the wild-type or sigF control strain and the sigB-sigH double mutant manifested a 10-fold-lower cell yield. Because the effects of the sigB and sigH null mutations were approximately additive, sigma B and sigma H contribute independently to the ability of B. subtilis to grow in ethanol-containing LB medium.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.   Growth and yield of B. subtilis strains in LB medium containing 8% ethanol. The A420 of strains bearing a null mutation(s) in sigB (PB153; triangle ), in sigH (PB384; diamond ), or in both sigB and sigH (PB386; open circle ) was monitored by placing samples into 0.9% (vol/vol) formaldehyde and measuring A420 in a Varian DMS100 spectrophotometer, essentially as described by Neidhardt et al. (30). Over the range shown, A420 was found to be directly correlated with viable cell counts, with 1 U of A420 equal to 108 CFU/ml. Growth medium was phosphate-buffered LB lacking salt (11) and supplemented with 8% (wt/vol) ethanol. Controls included wild-type strain PB2 (black-square) and spoIIA (sigF) null mutant PB513 (square ).

Conclusions. Because a number of csb gene products appear to be associated with the cell envelope, we hypothesized that loss of sigma B function would become evident under environmental conditions that challenge envelope function. The results presented here indicate that sigma B significantly contributes to the survival of B. subtilis cells during prolonged starvation at extremes of pH and also contributes to the ability to grow in medium containing high ethanol concentrations. Although the molecular basis for these observations is not known, our findings do extend the phenotype of a sigB null mutant beyond the previously described sensitivity to oxidative stress (4, 5, 17, 32).

Other studies have suggested additional roles for the sigma B regulon in preserving cell viability but have not associated these roles with a clear phenotype for a sigB null mutant. In one study, the ClpC operon was shown to be under the dual control of a sigma A-like promoter and a sigma B-dependent promoter (24). In addition to the ClpC protein, which is a pleiotropic regulator of stress responses, the ClpC operon also encodes products involved in DNA repair (25). In another study, expression of the OpuE transporter, which is required for proline-dependent osmoprotection, was also found to be under the control of dual sigma A and sigma B promoters, both of which are osmoregulated (37). These other studies, together with our results, implicate sigma B in the control of genes which are important for resistance to oxidative stress, for repair of DNA damage, for osmoprotection, for growth in ethanol, and for viability at extreme pH.

One unexpected finding is that in addition to its well-established role in controlling the sporulation process, sigma H also contributes to stress resistance in nonsporulating cells. From the cumulative effects of sigma H and sigma B under the three stress conditions tested, it is clear that these transcription factors independently contribute to stress response. Two different scenarios are consistent with this result. First, all alkali, acid, and ethanol stress genes in the sigma H and sigma B regulons could be under dual sigma H and sigma B control. In this view, the cumulative effect of these two transcription factors would primarily reflect their relative contribution to the expression of the same subset of stress genes. Alternatively, sigma H and sigma B could regulate largely independent sets of stress genes, only some of which are under the control of both transcription factors. In this latter case, the cumulative effect of sigma H and sigma B would then reflect the relative importance of these independent gene sets to survival of a given stress.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank R. Losick for providing strain SM69-1 bearing the sigF null allele and A. L. Sonenshein for helpful comments on the manuscript.

This research was supported by Public Health Service grant GM42077 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Phone: (530) 752-1596. Fax: (530) 752-4759. E-mail: cwprice{at}ucdavis.edu.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Akbar, S., and C. W. Price. 1996. Isolation and characterization of csbB, a gene controlled by Bacillus subtilis general stress transcription factor sigma B. Gene 177:123-128[Medline].
2. Alper, S., L. Duncan, and R. Losick. 1994. An adenosine nucleotide switch controlling the activity of a cell type-specific transcription factor in B. subtilis. Cell 77:195-205[Medline].
3. Alper, S., A. Dufour, D. A. Garsin, L. Duncan, and R. Losick. 1996. Role of adenosine nucleotides in the regulation of a stress-response transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 260:165-177[Medline].
4. Antelmann, H., S. Engelmann, R. Schmid, and M. Hecker. 1996. General and oxidative stress responses in Bacillus subtilis: cloning, expression, and mutation of the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase operon. J. Bacteriol. 178:6571-6578[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Antelmann, H., S. Engelmann, R. Schmid, A. Sorokin, A. Lapidus, and M. Hecker. 1997. Expression of a stress- and starvation-induced dps/pexB-homologous gene is controlled by the alternative sigma factor sigma B in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 179:7251-7256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Benson, A. K., and W. G. Haldenwang. 1993. The sigma B dependent promoter of the Bacillus subtilis sigB operon is induced by heat shock. J. Bacteriol. 175:1929-1935[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Bernhardt, J., U. Völker, A. Völker, H. Antelmann, R. Schmid, H. Mach, and M. Hecker. 1997. Specific and general stress proteins in Bacillus subtilis---a two-dimensional protein electrophoresis study. Microbiology 143:999-1017[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Binnie, C., M. Lampe, and R. Losick. 1986. Gene encoding the sigma-37 species of RNA polymerase sigma factor from Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:5943-5947[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Bogachev, A. V., R. A. Murtazina, A. I. Shestopalov, and V. P. Skulachev. 1995. Induction of the Escherichia coli cytochrome-d by low Delta µH+ and by sodium ions. Eur. J. Biochem. 232:304-308[Medline].
10. Boylan, S. A., K. T. Chun, B. A. Edson, and C. W. Price. 1988. Early-blocked sporulation mutations alter expression of enzymes under carbon control in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 212:271-280[Medline].
11. Boylan, S. A., A. R. Redfield, M. S. Brody, and C. W. Price. 1993. Stress-induced activation of the sigma B transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 175:7931-7937[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Boylan, S. A., A. R. Redfield, and C. W. Price. 1993. Transcription factor sigma B of Bacillus subtilis controls a large stationary-phase regulon. J. Bacteriol. 175:3957-3963[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Boylan, S. A., A. Rutherford, S. M. Thomas, and C. W. Price. 1992. Activation of Bacillus subtilis transcription factor sigma B by a regulatory pathway responsive to stationary-phase signals. J. Bacteriol. 174:3695-3706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Boylan, S. A., M. D. Thomas, and C. W. Price. 1991. Genetic method to identify regulons controlled by nonessential elements: isolation of a gene dependent on alternate transcription factor sigma B of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 173:7856-7866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Chibazakura, T., F. Kawamura, and H. Takahashi. 1991. Differential regulation of spo0A transcription in Bacillus subtilis: glucose represses promoter switching at the initiation of sporulation. J. Bacteriol. 176:1977-1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Duncan, M. L., S. S. Kalman, S. M. Thomas, and C. W. Price. 1987. Gene encoding the 37,000-dalton minor sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase: isolation, nucleotide sequence, chromosomal locus, and cryptic function. J. Bacteriol. 169:771-778[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Engelmann, S., and M. Hecker. 1996. Impaired oxidative stress resistance of Bacillus subtilis sigB mutants and the role of katA and katE. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 145:63-69[Medline].
18. Haldenwang, W. G., and R. Losick. 1980. A novel RNA polymerase sigma factor from Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:7000-7005[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Hecker, M., W. Schumann, and U. Völker. 1996. Heat-shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 19:417-428[Medline].
20. Hoch, J. A. 1993. Regulation of the phosphorelay and the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:441-465[Medline].
21. Igo, M., M. Lampe, C. Ray, W. Schafer, C. P. Moran, and R. Losick. 1987. Genetic studies of a secondary RNA polymerase sigma factor in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 169:3464-3469[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Ingram, L. O., and T. M. Buttke. 1984. Effects of alcohols on microorganisms. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 25:253-300[Medline].
23. Kalman, S., M. L. Duncan, S. M. Thomas, and C. W. Price. 1990. Similar organization of the sigB and spoIIA operons encoding alternate sigma factors of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 172:5575-5585[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Krüger, E., T. Msadek, and M. Hecker. 1996. Alternative promoters direct stress-induced transcription of the Bacillus subtilis clpC operon. Mol. Microbiol. 20:713-723[Medline].
25. Krüger, E., T. Msadek, S. Ohlmeir, and M. Hecker. 1996. The Bacillus subtilis clpC operon encodes DNA repair and competence proteins. Microbiology 143:1309-1316[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Krulwich, T. A., M. Ito, R. Gilmour, M. G. Sturr, A. A. Guffanti, and D. B. Hicks. 1996. Energetic problems of extremely alkaliphilic aerobes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1275:21-26[Medline].
27. Lee, S.-Y. 1995. Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Davis.
28. Lewis, K., V. Naroditskaya, A. Ferrante, and I. Folkina. 1994. Bacterial resistance to uncouplers. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 20:639-646.
29. Losick, R., and P. Stragier. 1992. Crisscross regulation of cell-type specific gene expression during development in B. subtilis. Nature (London) 355:601-604[Medline].
30. Neidhardt, F. C., P. L. Bloch, and D. F. Smith. 1974. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 119:736-747[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Predich, M., G. Nair, and I. Smith. 1992. Bacillus subtilis early sporulation genes kinA, spo0F, and spo0A are transcribed by RNA polymerase containing sigma H. J. Bacteriol. 174:2771-2778[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Scharf, C., S. Riethdorf, H. Ernst, S. Engelmann, U. Völker, and M. Hecker. 1998. Thioredoxin is an essential protein induced by multiple stresses in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 180:1869-1877[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Varón, D., S. A. Boylan, K. Okamoto, and C. W. Price. 1993. Bacillus subtilis gtaB encodes UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and is controlled by stationary-phase transcription factor sigma B. J. Bacteriol. 175:3964-3971[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Varón, D., M. S. Brody, and C. W. Price. 1996. Bacillus subtilis operon under the dual control of the general stress transcription factor sigma B and the sporulation transcription factor sigma H. Mol. Microbiol. 20:339-350[Medline].
35. Voelker, U., A. Voelker, B. Maul, M. Hecker, A. Dufour, and W. G. Haldenwang. 1995. Separate mechanisms activate sigma B of Bacillus subtilis in response to environmental and metabolic stresses. J. Bacteriol. 177:3771-3780[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Völker, U., S. Engelmann, B. Maul, S. Riethdorf, A. Völker, R. Schmid, H. Mach, and M. Hecker. 1994. Analysis of the induction of general stress proteins of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 140:741-752[Abstract/Free Full Text].
37. von Blohn, C., B. Kempf, R. M. Kappes, and E. Bremer. 1997. Osmostress response in Bacillus subtilis: characterization of a proline uptake system (OpuE) regulated by high osmolarity and the alternative transcription factor sigma-B. Mol. Microbiol. 25:175-187[Medline].
38. Weiner, L., and P. Model. 1994. Role of an Escherichia coli stress-induced operon in stationary phase survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2191-2195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
39. Yang, X., C. M. Kang, M. S. Brody, and C. W. Price. 1996. Opposing pairs of serine protein kinases and phosphatases transmit signals of environmental stress to activate a bacterial transcription factor. Genes Dev. 10:2265-2275[Abstract/Free Full Text].

J Bacteriol, July 1998, p. 3730-3733, Vol. 180, No. 14
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tseng, C.-L., Shaw, G.-C. (2008). Genetic Evidence for the Actin Homolog Gene mreBH and the Bacitracin Resistance Gene bcrC as Targets of the Alternative Sigma Factor SigI of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 190: 1561-1567 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gourion, B., Francez-Charlot, A., Vorholt, J. A. (2008). PhyR Is Involved in the General Stress Response of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. J. Bacteriol. 190: 1027-1035 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Allenby, N. E. E., O'Connor, N., Pragai, Z., Ward, A. C., Wipat, A., Harwood, C. R. (2005). Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis of the Phosphate Starvation Stimulon of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 187: 8063-8080 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hoper, D., Volker, U., Hecker, M. (2005). Comprehensive Characterization of the Contribution of Individual SigB-Dependent General Stress Genes to Stress Resistance of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 187: 2810-2826 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Benachour, A., Muller, C., Dabrowski-Coton, M., Le Breton, Y., Giard, J.-C., Rince, A., Auffray, Y., Hartke, A. (2005). The Enterococcus faecalis SigV Protein Is an Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factor Contributing to Survival following Heat, Acid, and Ethanol Treatments. J. Bacteriol. 187: 1022-1035 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chen, C.-C., Yudkin, M. D., Delumeau, O. (2004). Phosphorylation and RsbX-Dependent Dephosphorylation of RsbR in the RsbR-RsbS Complex of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 186: 6830-6836 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Holtmann, G., Brigulla, M., Steil, L., Schutz, A., Barnekow, K., Volker, U., Bremer, E. (2004). RsbV-Independent Induction of the SigB-Dependent General Stress Regulon of Bacillus subtilis during Growth at High Temperature. J. Bacteriol. 186: 6150-6158 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bischoff, M., Dunman, P., Kormanec, J., Macapagal, D., Murphy, E., Mounts, W., Berger-Bachi, B., Projan, S. (2004). Microarray-Based Analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus {sigma}B Regulon. J. Bacteriol. 186: 4085-4099 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mendez, M. B., Orsaria, L. M., Philippe, V., Pedrido, M. E., Grau, R. R. (2004). Novel Roles of the Master Transcription Factors Spo0A and {sigma}B for Survival and Sporulation of Bacillus subtilis at Low Growth Temperature. J. Bacteriol. 186: 989-1000 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rea, R. B., Gahan, C. G. M., Hill, C. (2004). Disruption of Putative Regulatory Loci in Listeria monocytogenes Demonstrates a Significant Role for Fur and PerR in Virulence. Infect. Immun. 72: 717-727 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kazmierczak, M. J., Mithoe, S. C., Boor, K. J., Wiedmann, M. (2003). Listeria monocytogenes {sigma}B Regulates Stress Response and Virulence Functions. J. Bacteriol. 185: 5722-5734 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brigulla, M., Hoffmann, T., Krisp, A., Volker, A., Bremer, E., Volker, U. (2003). Chill Induction of the SigB-Dependent General Stress Response in Bacillus subtilis and Its Contribution to Low-Temperature Adaptation. J. Bacteriol. 185: 4305-4314 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Delumeau, O., Lewis, R. J., Yudkin, M. D. (2002). Protein-Protein Interactions That Regulate the Energy Stress Activation of {sigma}B in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 184: 5583-5589 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sung, H.-M., Yasbin, R. E. (2002). Adaptive, or Stationary-Phase, Mutagenesis, a Component of Bacterial Differentiation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 184: 5641-5653 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Britton, R. A., Eichenberger, P., Gonzalez-Pastor, J. E., Fawcett, P., Monson, R., Losick, R., Grossman, A. D. (2002). Genome-Wide Analysis of the Stationary-Phase Sigma Factor (Sigma-H) Regulon of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 184: 4881-4890 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pragai, Z., Harwood, C. R. (2002). Regulatory interactions between the Pho and {sigma}B-dependent general stress regulons of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 148: 1593-1602 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Palma, M., Cheung, A. L. (2001). sigma B Activity in Staphylococcus aureus Is Controlled by RsbU and an Additional Factor(s) during Bacterial Growth. Infect. Immun. 69: 7858-7865 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Petersohn, A., Brigulla, M., Haas, S., Hoheisel, J. D., Volker, U., Hecker, M. (2001). Global Analysis of the General Stress Response of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 183: 5617-5631 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gertz, S., Engelmann, S., Schmid, R., Ziebandt, A.-K., Tischer, K., Scharf, C., Hacker, J., Hecker, M. (2000). Characterization of the sigma B Regulon in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 182: 6983-6991 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Becker, L. A., Evans, S. N., Hutkins, R. W., Benson, A. K. (2000). Role of sigma B in Adaptation of Listeria monocytogenes to Growth at Low Temperature. J. Bacteriol. 182: 7083-7087 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Antelmann, H., Scharf, C., Hecker, M. (2000). Phosphate Starvation-Inducible Proteins of Bacillus subtilis: Proteomics and Transcriptional Analysis. J. Bacteriol. 182: 4478-4490 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Petersohn, A., Bernhardt, J., Gerth, U., Höper, D., Koburger, T., Völker, U., Hecker, M. (1999). Identification of sigma B-Dependent Genes in Bacillus subtilis Using a Promoter Consensus-Directed Search and Oligonucleotide Hybridization. J. Bacteriol. 181: 5718-5724 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nicholas, R. O., Li, T., McDevitt, D., Marra, A., Sucoloski, S., Demarsh, P. L., Gentry, D. R. (1999). Isolation and Characterization of a sigB Deletion Mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 67: 3667-3669 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Völker, U., Maul, B., Hecker, M. (1999). Expression of the sigma B-Dependent General Stress Regulon Confers Multiple Stress Resistance in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 181: 3942-3948 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Drzewiecki, K., Eymann, C., Mittenhuber, G., Hecker, M. (1998). The yvyD Gene of Bacillus subtilis Is under Dual Control of sigma B and sigma H. J. Bacteriol. 180: 6674-6680 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chan, P. F., Foster, S. J., Ingham, E., Clements, M. O. (1998). The Staphylococcus aureus Alternative Sigma Factor sigma B Controls the Environmental Stress Response but Not Starvation Survival or Pathogenicity in a Mouse Abscess Model. J. Bacteriol. 180: 6082-6089 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaidenko, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaidenko, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. W.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»