Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, August 1998, p. 3864-3872, Vol. 180, No. 15
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Control by Nutrients of Growth and Cell Cycle
Progression in Budding Yeast, Analyzed by Double-Tag Flow
Cytometry
Lilia
Alberghina,*
Carla
Smeraldi,
Bianca Maria
Ranzi, and
Danilo
Porro
Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica
Generali, Sezione Biochimica Comparata, Università degli
Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
Received 27 March 1998/Accepted 28 May 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
To gain insight on the interrelationships of the cellular
environment, the properties of growth, and cell cycle progression, we
analyzed the dynamic reactions of individual Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to changes and manipulations of their
surroundings. We used a new flow cytometric approach which allows, in
asynchronous growing S. cerevisiae populations, tagging of
both the cell age and the cell protein content of cells belonging to
the different cell cycle set points. Since the cell protein content is
a good estimation of the cell size, it is possible to follow the
kinetics of the cell size increase during cell cycle progression. The
analysis of the findings obtained indicates that both during a
nutritional shift-up (from ethanol to glucose) and following the
addition of cyclic AMP (cAMP), two important delays are induced. The
preexisting cells that at the moment of the nutritional shift-up were
cycling before the Start phase delay their entrance into S phase, while cells that were cycling after Start are delayed in their exit from the
cycle. The combined effects of the two delays allow the cellular
population that preexisted the shift-up to quickly adjust to the new
growth condition. The effects of a nutritional shift-down were also
determined.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A budding yeast divides by an
asymmetrical process. The degree of asymmetry at division depends on
the growth rate, with slow-growing cells dividing more asymmetrically
(14, 16, 19-21, 31, 37). In an asynchronously growing
S. cerevisiae population, individual cells differ in their
positions within the cell division cycle, their genealogical ages
(i.e., daughters, parents of first generation, parents of second
generation, etc.), and their sizes, although cells of the same size do
not necessarily have the same age or cell cycle position (8, 9,
14, 16, 17, 20-22, 28, 31, 34, 35, 38). All of these differences
determine the cell size distribution (i.e., the cell protein content
distribution) of the growing population. It has been shown that the
protein content distribution of a given population in balanced
exponential growth is stable and characteristic of each growth
condition (1, 3, 4, 24, 27, 29, 35). This homeostasis
depends on the mechanism that coordinates cell growth to DNA division cycle and prevents cells from becoming too small or too large (14,
28). Changes in the environment modify the protein content distribution of a given population in steady state, adjusting it, after
a transitory period, to the protein distribution characteristic of the
new growth condition (1, 3, 4, 29); this behavior indicates
that the homeostasis mechanism is operating under constraints different
from those active in steady-state environments. These experimental
conditions could be very informative in investigating the effects of
cell size on the control of cell cycle progression. In order to
adequately describe a transitory state it would be useful to determine
the relationship between the cell size of the newborn daughter cells
(called Po) and the fraction of budded cells. In this study, we
describe a set of experiments used to analyze the Po value and the
duration of the budded phase during transitory states of growth.
Studies on the dynamics of the growth of individual yeast cells and
their relationships with factors affecting cell cycle regulation are
generally done by cell synchronization procedures (38) or,
with a relatively small number of cells, by time-lapse studies
(14, 37, 38). Time-lapse studies and synchronous cell
population analyses usually require elaborate experimental procedures
and tend to perturb the physiological state of the cells. We used a
recently developed flow cytometric approach that allows, in
asynchronously growing S. cerevisiae populations, the
tagging of both the cell age and the cell protein content of individual
cells (24-27). This approach permitted characterization of
the properties of growth at the single cell level for yeast populations
exponentially growing at different specific growth rates.
The findings obtained during transient states of growth (i.e., in a
nutritional shift-up, in a nutritional shift-down, and following the
addition of cyclic AMP [cAMP]) indicate that the whole population
needs several hours to reach the new balanced growth condition. We
found that both the nutritional shift-up and the addition of cAMP delay
the entrance into S phase and the exit from the cycle, although
according to different schedules.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and growth conditions.
S. cerevisiae S288C
(29) and OL214 (7) were used in this study. Cells
were grown in flasks by being shaken at 30°C in Difco yeast nitrogen
base (YNB, 0.67% [wt/vol]) medium. The carbon sources were 2%
(wt/vol) glucose or 2% (vol/vol) ethanol. cAMP was added to a final
concentration of 3 mM as previously described (7).
Staining conditions.
Cells growing under conditions of
balanced exponential growth (balanced growth was typically observed in
a cell concentration range of between 1 × 106 and
6 × 106 cells ml
1) were collected by
centrifugation (5 min, 5,000 rpm) and sonicated in order to allow the
cell wall staining of each individual cell. Cells were stained by
resuspension in precooled fresh YNB-based medium containing 120 µg of
conjugated concanavalinA-fluorescein isothiocyanate (ConA-FITC)
ml
1 (ca. 3.6 mol of FITC per mol of lectin) at a cell
concentration of 2 × 108 cells ml
1. The
operations were carried out at 4°C. After 7 min of staining, the
cells were recovered by rapid centrifugation and resuspended in a
prewarmed fresh medium. We previously showed that the staining procedure does not perturb the normal growth behavior of the population (25). At different times after resuspension and new growth, yeast cells were collected by centrifugation, washed and fixed in 70%
(vol/vol) ethanol for 20 min at 4°C. The fixed cells were centrifuged
and washed once with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and the cell proteins
were stained by resuspending the cells in 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate
containing 50 µg of tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)
ml
1. After 30 min, cells were recovered by
centrifugation, washed three times, and resuspended in phosphate
buffer.
Since the staining procedure slightly sticks the cells to each other,
it is very important to repeat the sonication procedure immediately
before the flow cytometry analysis (24, 26, 27) in order to
avoid the acquisition of cellular aggregates that could invalidate the
analyses of the data.
Cell number, fraction of budded cells, budded phase, and Td-d
determinations.
Cells were counted after sonication with a Coulter
Counter ZBI. The specific growth rate was obtained by fitting the cell number against time. The fraction of total budded cells (FBC) was
calculated after microscopic examination (at least 500 cells were
scored). The duration of the budded phase during the balanced growth
period or the time of budding (Tb), comprising the S, G2, M, and G1* cell cycle phases, was determined from the
following equation (19):
|
(1)
|
where Td is the duplication period for the whole cell
population. Table
1 shows the
budded-phase durations for the daughter
cells; however, it is generally
accepted that, at any given specific
growth rate, the budded period is
appreciably constant for both
daughter and parent cells (
3,
19,
25,
35). The duplication
times of the daughter subpopulations
(Td-d) were calculated with
a mathematical model that takes into
account four different subpopulations
of parent and daughter cells
(
1,
3,
23,
24,
26,
27)
or by using the following equation
(
19):
|
(2)
|
where FDB represents the fraction of daughter cells that are
budded.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Duplication time (Td-d), budded- and G1-phase
durations, Po (cell size at birth), Ps (cell size at Start), and Pd
(cell size at division) for different cohorts of daughter cells born
before, during, and after shift-up
|
|
For the determination of FDB, yeast cells were stained with Calcofluor
and scored under a Leitz Dialux fluorescence microscope
and, according
to the presence of bud scars, they were assigned
to one of the
following classes: unbudded daughters (cells without
bud and without
scars), budded daughters (with bud and without
scars), unbudded parents
(without bud and with one or more scars),
and budded parents (with bud
and with one or more scars) (
26,
27,
35). At least 600 to
800 cells were scored.
Flow cytometric analysis.
FITC and TRITC fluorescence signal
intensities were determined with a FACStarplus (Becton Dickinson)
equipped with an argon-ion laser (excitation wavelength, 488 nm; laser
power, 200 mW) (24, 26, 27). The sample flow rate during
analysis did not exceed 500 to 600 cells per s. Typically, 50,000 cells
were analyzed per sample. Only raw data have been used to prepare
figures.
 |
RESULTS |
Analysis of the dynamics of growth during a nutritional
shift-up.
Figure 1 shows the growth
curve, the FBC, and the cell protein content distributions of an S288C
yeast population that was grown on ethanol-YNB, harvested during the
exponential phase of growth (specific growth rate, 0.156 h
1; duplication time, 4.42 h), washed, and then
resuspended in a glucose-YNB fresh medium at time t = 0. The parameters obtained during the nutritional shift-up indicate a
very strong modulation of the FBC (Fig. 1A), the specific growth rate
(Fig. 1A), and the distributions of the cellular protein content (Fig.
1B). It is important to note the oscillatory change of the FBC value
and the increase of the protein content distribution of the growing population (Fig. 1B). The FBC represents a sensitive determination of
the relative rates of the entrance into the S phase-budded phase and of
the exit from the mitosis-cell division phase, while the increased size
of the cells suggests that the mechanism which coordinates the cell
growth with the DNA division cycle has undergone a resetting.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Effects of a nutritional shift-up on the FBC value, cell
concentration, and distribution of the cellular protein content. (A)
S288C yeast cells were grown on ethanol-YNB medium to balanced
exponential phase (0.156 h 1), harvested, washed, and
inoculated in fresh glucose-YNB medium at t = 0. The
specific growth rate and the FBC of the control yeast population
exponentially growing on glucose-YNB were 0.352 h 1 and
0.58, respectively. The specific growth rate of the yeast population
upon reaching the balanced growth conditions was 0.327 h 1. Symbols: , number of cells per milliliter for the
control yeast population growing on ethanol-YNB; , number of cells
per milliliter for the control yeast population growing on glucose-YNB;
, number of cells per milliliter for the yeast population growing
during the nutritional shift-up from ethanol to glucose; , FBC for
the yeast population growing during the nutritional shift-up from
ethanol to glucose. (B) At different times after resuspension, samples
of the culture were withdrawn, and the cell proteins were stained with
TRITC and analyzed at t = 0 h (A),
t = 1 h (B), t = 2 h (C),
t = 3 h (D), t = 4 h (E), and
t = 6 h (F). GLU, distribution of the cellular
protein content of the control yeast population growing on
glucose-YNB.
|
|
The transitory state appears to last for about 4 h. After this,
the yeast population reaches both the FBC value (Fig.
1A)
and the cell
protein content distribution characteristic of a
population that is
exponentially growing on YNB-glucose (i.e.,
the control population
[Fig.
1B]). It is also relevant that only
after 4 h of growth
does the cell number per milliliter start
to increase exponentially,
with the yeast population growing at
a specific growth rate very close
to that observed for a control
population exponentially growing on
glucose-YNB (0.327 h
1 versus 0.352 h
1,
respectively [Fig.
1A]). A transitory state period, which occurs
during nutritional shifts from C
2 and C
3 carbon
sources to glucose,
has been reported (
15,
36).
In order to better understand the transitory state of growth, one
should analyze and compare different cohorts of cells over
time, e.g.,
existing budded cells and newborn daughter cells.
A biparametric flow
cytometric procedure recently developed in
our laboratory allows the
determination of the cell size of cells
belonging to the different cell
cycle phases of an asynchronously
growing yeast population
(
24-27). Briefly, the procedure is based
on labeling the
cell wall surface with a lectin (i.e., ConA) conjugated
to a
fluorescent marker (i.e., FITC). Cells are harvested during
exponential
growth phase, stained with ConA-FITC, and then allowed
to grow in a
fresh culture medium. Staining conditions have been
developed so the
labeling procedure will not perturb the growth
behavior and the cells
will retain the surface label over the
subsequent growth period
(
25). This first staining is then combined
with the
determination of the protein content of the individual
cells by
staining with TRITC (
24,
26,
27). The analysis
of the
double-staining pattern over time has been used to provide
direct
information on yeast populations growing under balanced
growth
conditions. The obtained findings indicated that (i) there
was an
exponential increase of the cell size during growth of
the individual
cells, (ii) that the daughter and parent subpopulations
grow at the
same specific growth rate, and (iii) that the average
cell size
increase rate (CSIR) of each individual cell is identical
to the
specific growth rate of the overall population. Furthermore,
this
analysis permits determination of the length of the budded
phase of the
population, the dimension of the newborn daughter
cells, and the cell
cycle length for the daughter cell population
so as to identify the
complex structure of a growing yeast population
(
24-27).
Identification of newborn daughter cells and determination of their
size during the transitory state.
We used the previously described
procedure to analyze individual cells growing during the nutritional
shift-up depicted in Fig. 1. Figure 2A
shows the time course of the double-staining pattern. At time
t = 0 (i.e., the time of resuspension) the cells belong
to all of the different cell cycle positions and are completely stained
with both of the fluorescent tags, ConA-FITC (see insert at the top)
and TRITC; each individual cell of the yeast population is represented
by a single dot. Since the synthesis of new cell wall material in the
budded cells is restricted to the bud (5, 10, 24-27, 32),
the first effect of the new cell growth is the production of newborn
daughter cells with a gradually decreasing amount of surface stain
(i.e., partially stained daughter cells). The analysis of the cytograms
clearly indicates a growing tail of newborn partially stained cells and
the accumulation of cells with the same degree of staining (i.e.,
unstained cells). The partially stained cells are newborn daughter
cells that originated from cells stained during the budded phase
(S-G2-M-G1*) of the cell cycle
(24-27) (Fig. 2A). Completely unstained cells represent the
newborn daughter cells that originated from cells stained while in the
unbudded phase (G1) (24-27). The time of
appearance (i.e., after 3.5 h) of this last subpopulation of new
daughter cells is a function of the duration of the
S-G2-M-G1* phase (24-27). Therefore, this analysis allows a direct determination of the length of
the budded phase during the transitory state (Table 1) (i.e., being
2.48 h for the budded phase of the yeast population growing on
ethanol and 1.39 h for the budded phase during the balanced growth
condition on glucose). Examples of selection of newborn daughter cells
that originated during the transient state of growth are shown in the
Fig. 2A: the gate R1 on the cytogram t = 0.66, the gate
R2 on the cytogram t = 1, the gate R3 on the cytogram
t = 2, the gate R4 on the cytogram t = 3, and the gate R5 on the cytogram t = 4 indicate the
diverse regions where newborn daughter cells were found. In this way,
it is possible to identify the newborn daughter cells (i.e., on the
abscissas) and to determine their size (i.e., on the ordinates). Figure
2B shows the protein content value of diverse cohorts of newborn
daughter cells that originated during the shift-up. The figure also
shows the cell protein content of newborn daughter cells that
originated during the balanced cell growth period on ethanol and
glucose (i.e., the controls). As previously indicated, the analysis of
such data also suggests that the yeast population needs about 4 h
to reach the new balanced growth condition. After that point, the cell size of the newborn daughter cells appears to be constant and very
close to that of the control population growing on glucose.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Dynamic of the double tagging over time for cells grown
on ethanol-YNB, stained with ConA-FITC, and resuspended in glucose-YNB
medium. (A) At different times after resuspension, samples of the
culture were withdrawn and cell proteins were stained with TRITC. The
cell wall tag (abscissa: ConA-FITC, channel number) and cell size tag
(ordinate: TRITC, channel number) signals were acquired with a linear
scale. During the acquisition of data at time t = 0, only the cells with lower ConA-FITC signals (i.e., the smaller cells)
were acquired (St., completely stained), and the settings were not
changed during the experiment. This approach provides evidence of even
the smallest differences in the ConA-FITC fluorescence signals between
individual cells (26, 27). The evolution of partially
stained (P.St.) and then unstained (Un.) cells over time is clearly
visible. The diagram at the top of panel A shows the cell cycle phases
of a growing yeast cell. (B) Cell protein content value of cohorts of
newborn daughter Po cells born at different times after resuspension.
S288C yeast cells were grown in ethanol-YNB medium till the exponential
phase; they were then stained with ConA-FITC, resuspended in
glucose-YNB medium, and processed as described in Fig. 2A. Examples of
selection of the regions where newborn daughter cells were located
after birth are indicated by gates R1 (t = 0.66), R2
(t = 1.0), R3 (t = 2), R4
(t = 3) and R5 (t = 4) in Fig. 2A. To
obtain the data after t = 4, cells from parallel and
independent experiments were collected, completely stained with
ConA-FITC, resuspended in the same medium, and processed as already
indicated. Newborn daughter cells born on ethanol or glucose (controls,
open symbols) were selected by applying the same procedure to yeast
cells exponentially growing on ethanol or glucose. Data are expressed
as the average channel number of the relative protein content
distributions (TRITC signals).
|
|
Since the partially stained daughter cells originated from cells
stained during the budded phase of their cell cycle (
27),
i.e., from cells that have already passed beyond Start, the increased
size of the newborn partially stained daughter cells (Fig.
2B)
could
depend both on the increased duration of the budded phase
(i.e.,
3.5 h versus 2.48 h of the yeast population exponentially
growing on ethanol) and on an increased specific growth rate.
Determination of the specific growth rate of individual daughter
cells during the transitory state.
We previously showed that,
since the stained cells retain the surface label over the subsequent
growth period (i.e., the dye on the single cells is only diluted by the
new growth) (25), it is possible to follow over time the
growth dynamics of a cohort of selected daughter cells born at the same
time (24-27). In Fig. 2A, an example of the selection of
such a cohort of daughter cells over time (gate R1 in the cytograms
t = 0.66 through t = 6) is reported.
The dynamics of the cell protein content values over time are shown in
Fig. 3. Different cohorts of daughter
cells, born at different times during the same experiment (i.e., 0.666, 1, and 2 h after resuspension), have been analyzed. Experimental data acquired from birth till t = 5 clearly indicate an
exponential increase of the cell size over time, reflecting an
exponential growth of the individual cells (Fig. 3, open symbols). The
coefficient of correlation for all cases is higher than 0.99. The
exponential fitting of the data yields the CSIR, i.e., the specific
growth rate (27), of the different cohorts of daughter
cells. The CSIR values for the three different cohorts of daughter
cells are the same (CSIR = 0.324 ± 0.05 hr
1
from birth till t = 5) and are identical to the
specific growth rate of the overall population during the newly reached
balanced growth condition as determined by the increase of the cell
number concentration (0.327 h
1). Suddenly, 5 h after
resuspension, an exponential rate law cannot be utilized any more (Fig.
3, closed symbols). However, it is important to note that the time at
which such deviation from the exponential increase occurs is the same
for the three different cohorts of cells. At the time of deviation, the
cell sizes of the cells belonging to the different cohorts are also the
same. We have previously shown for yeast populations exponentially
growing with different duplication times that this deviation depends
on, and slightly precedes in time, the cellular division of the
daughter cells (i.e., 31 min for a yeast population growing with a
specific growth rate of 0.25 h
1 and 15 min and 5 to 7 min
for specific growth rates of 0.224 and 0.211 h
1,
respectively) (27). Figure 3 also reports the cell size
increase, from birth to division, of daughter cells born during the
balanced cell growth on glucose. It is interesting that the cell size
of the dividing daughter cells during balanced growth on glucose (i.e.,
441.76) also represents the cell size value reached from the selected
daughter cells at 40 min (t = 5.66) after the deviation observed at t = 5. The CISR values as well as the
coefficients of correlation for the three cohorts of cells selected do
not change following inclusion of these last data, and therefore it is
reasonable to assume that the selected daughter cells divide at
t = 5.66.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Average cell protein content (TRITC signals) of selected
cohorts of partially stained daughter cells as a function of time after
birth during the transitory state of growth. S288C yeast cells were
grown in ethanol-YNB medium until the exponential phase; they were then
stained with ConA-FITC, resuspended in glucose-YNB medium, and
processed as described for Fig. 2A. (Since, from birth to division, the
surface label does not change, the gate R1 in Fig. 2A selects the same
cohort of partially stained daughter cells over time.) The figure shows
the average cell protein content (TRITC signal) of selected cohorts of
daughter cells born at different times (i.e., 0.666 h [ and ],
1 h [ and ], and 2 h [ and ]; see arrows)
after resuspension. Data represented with the open symbols clearly fit
an exponential increase of the cell size over time (in each case the
coefficient of correlation is higher than 0.99), while the data
represented by the closed symbols show that an exponential rate law
cannot be utilized. Starting from t = 0 are also
reported data for the cell size increase for daughter cells
exponentially growing on ethanol or during the balanced-growth phase on
glucose (i.e., the controls). These values have been calculated by
taking into consideration the estimated specific growth rate of the
daughter populations (0.156 and 0.327 h 1, respectively),
the estimated cell size values of the daughter cells at birth, and the
calculated generation times of the daughter subpopulations (the
generation times of the daughter populations were calculated, by using
a previously developed mathematical model, to be 6.56 and 2.74 h
for the yeast populations growing on ethanol and glucose,
respectively). The same data were obtained by using equation 2 as
described in the text). The cell size value of the dividing daughter
cells during exponential growth on glucose (i.e., the control) has been
used to extrapolate (dashed arrow) the correct cell sizes of the
different cohorts of daughter cells at division (data in the circle).
Data are expressed as the average channel number of the relative
protein content distributions (TRITC signals).
|
|
Determination of generation time, duration of the G1
phase, and duration of the budded phase of diverse cohorts of daughter
cells born before, during, and after the transitory state.
By
using the experimental procedure previously described in Fig. 2 and 3,
the generation times for the daughter cells selected at different times
after resuspension were determined (Table 1). These generation times
were found to be 5.0 h for daughter cells born at
t = 0.66 and grown till t = 5.66;
4.66 h for daughter cells born at t = 1.0 and
grown till t = 5.66, and 3.66 h for daughter cells
born at t = 2.0 and grown till t = 5.66. It is interesting that 5, 4.66, and 3.66 h are periods of
time much longer than the duplication time of the overall population
during the steady state of growth on glucose (i.e., 2.11 h = ln2/0.327).
Table
1 also reports the duplication times and the G
1 and
budded phase durations of the daughter cells exponentially growing
on
ethanol both after the shift-up and during the exponential
growth phase
on glucose. The duplication time (Td-d) and the budded
phase duration
(Tb) have been estimated by using an algorithm
developed for unequally
dividing cells (
1,
3,
23,
24,
26,
27) (equations 1 and 2 described above yielded the same
results, respectively), while the
G
1 phase durations were simply
inferred by subtracting Tb
from Td-d. Furthermore, Table
1 shows
the duplication time of the
daughter cells born on ethanol and
stained with ConA-FITC at Start (Ps)
at the time of resuspension.
This value has been estimated by
considering the time of appearance
of completely unstained cells after
the resuspension in the fresh
medium. As already noted, the time of
appearance of this last
subpopulation of new daughter cells (i.e., at
about 3.5 h) depends
on the length of the
S-G
2-M-G
1* cell cycle phase. The length of
the
duplication time for these daughter cells can be determined
based on
the length of the G
1 phase during exponential growth
on
ethanol (i.e., 4.08 + 3.5). Findings reported in Table
1 also
indicate that the duration of the budded phase, i.e., 2.48 h in
ethanol, increases to 3.5 h at the beginning of the shift-up and
stabilizes at 1.39 h for cells born 0.666 h after the shift-up.
All of the parent and daughter cells that have crossed Start at
the
time of the shift-up experience an increase in the length
of their
budded phase, producing newborn partially stained cells
of increasing
size (Fig.
2B). These new daughter cells have different
duplication
times (Fig.
3 and Table
1) and are growing exponentially
and with the
same specific growth rates (Fig.
3). Given the fact
that they divide
during the new balanced growth condition (
t =
5.66),
these cells will originate daughter cells of the same size.
This
consideration can be simply tested by analyzing the data
reported in
Fig.
2B. After
t = 4, the cell size of the newborn
daughter cells remains constant over time. Finally, taking into
consideration that all of the new materials in the budded cells
are
restricted to the bud (
5,
10,
24-27,
32), these cells
share
the same budded phase lengths, and this value is equal to
that of cells
growing under the balanced growth conditions (i.e.,
1.39 h).
In conclusion, these data are consistent in indicating that the
shift-up induces an early delay in the execution of cell division.
The
duration of the transitory state correlates with the fact
that the
value of protein content at birth (Po) of the daughter
cells requires
about 4 h to reach the value characteristic of
the new, richer
medium (see both Fig.
2B and Table
1).
Cell size of the newborn daughter cells as related to their
G1-phase length.
The nutritional shift-up produced
newborn daughter cells of increasing size (Fig. 2B), growing with the
same specific growth rate (Fig. 3) and having different duplication
times and different G1 phase lengths (Fig. 3 and Table 1).
More importantly, these new daughter cells share the same budded-phase
period and begin to bud and then divide at the same Ps and Pd values
(Table 1). This observation suggests that the different cohorts of
daughter cells that originated at different times after resuspension
are able to actively control their commitment to Start phase and to cell division. A similar process of resetting of the individual cell
cycles for daughter cells is also operative during balanced cell
growth. In fact, newborn daughter cells which originated from parent
cells of different genealogical ages have different sizes at birth but
begin to bud and then divide showing similar protein contents (3,
26, 27, 35). A simple explanation is that all daughter cells are
endowed at birth of the same amount of an inhibitor of the entrance
into S phase that would be inactivated by a growth-dependent protein
produced during G1 phase (2). Figure
4A shows the relationship of the cell
size of the newborn daughter cells produced over time during the
nutritional shift-up (see also Fig. 3) compared to their G1
durations (see also Table 1); Fig. 4B shows the relationship between
the cell size of a single cohort of daughter cells during cell cycle
progression and the remaining G1 phase duration. The linear
correlations found (in both cases the coefficients are higher than
0.99) suggest a relation between the cell size of the daughter cells
and the duration of their G1 phase. The daughter cells
under examination in Fig. 4A were produced from cells that crossed
Start before the nutritional shift-up. Since all of the cells increased
in size at the same specific rate (i.e., the amount of protein
synthesized per unit of cell mass per unit of time; see Fig. 3 and
text) and grow through the same cell cycle phases, the synthesis rates
(i.e., the amount of protein synthesized per unit of cell mass) of the constitutively synthesized proteins per cell may be assumed to be the
same. However, if a protein(s) is compartmentalized in the nucleus and
it is assumed that the dimension of the nucleus is constant and
independent of the cell size, that protein will be inherited at
increasing concentrations from the newborn daughter cells produced over
time. The increased concentration(s) could determine a proportionally
faster commitment to Start phase (Fig. 4). The growth-dependent factor
would neutralize the above-mentioned inhibitor and induce a sharp and
reproducible commitment to S phase at a given threshold (2).
A tentative model that involves the Cln3 protein (and its constant
accumulation rate through the cell cycle together with its
compartmentalization in the nucleus) as the growth-dependent factor has
recently been proposed (12).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Cell size of newborn daughter cells produced during the
shift-up relative to their G1 durations. (A) The cell sizes
of the newborn daughter cells were determined as described in Fig. 2;
their G1 durations were determined as described in Table 1.
(B) Cell sizes during cell cycle progression for the cohort of daughter
cells originated at t = 0.666 (Fig. 3) relative to the
remaining G1 phase duration. Data are expressed as the
average channel number of the relative protein content distributions
(TRITC signals).
|
|
Analysis of the dynamics of growth after the addition of cAMP.
The same flow cytometric approach has been used to gain insight into
the effects of the addition of cyclic AMP (cAMP) to yeast cells
exponentially growing on glucose. In our laboratory it has been
previously shown that the addition of cAMP to yeast cells growing on
glucose determines an oscillatory behavior in the fraction of budded
cells and an increase of the cell size (7). For such investigations, a strain permeable to cAMP is required (strain OL214).
Figures 5A and B show the growth curve,
FBC, and distributions of the cellular protein contents of a yeast
population grown on glucose, harvested in the exponential phase of
growth (Td = 1.86 h, with a budded-phase duration of 1.2 to
1.3 h), washed, and then resuspended in a glucose-YNB fresh
culture medium containing 3 mM cAMP at time t = 0. The
behavior of the FBC value and of the distribution of the cellular
protein content is similar to that observed during a nutritional
shift-up (see Fig. 1). However, several differences should be noted.
Although following a nutritional shift-up the FBC value remains
constant for about 0.666 h (Fig. 1), after the addition of cAMP it
decreases immediately. A second main difference relies on the fact that
after the addition of cAMP, the budded-phase period for cells stained
at Start at the time of resuspension does not change compared to the
value observed before the addition of cAMP (1.2 to 1.3 h [data
not shown]). It is important to note that by 1.2 to 1.3 h after
the addition of cAMP, the increase in the number of cells per
milliliter is almost blocked (Fig. 5A), indicating that at this time
also the rate of exit from the cycle is strongly reduced. On the other
hand, confirming data previously obtained by determining the protein and RNA synthesis rates in the whole population (7), we did not detect any difference in the CSIR for cohorts of daughter cells
selected before and after the addition of cAMP (data not shown). As a
consequence, the size of the newborn daughter cells increases (Fig.
5C).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effect of the addition of cAMP on the FBC value, number
of cells per milliliter, distribution of the cellular protein content,
and Po cell values. To OL214 yeast cells grown on glucose-YNB medium to
balanced exponential phase (duplication time, 1.86 h), cAMP was
added at time t = 0 (final concentration, 3 mM). (A)
Symbols: , number of cells per milliliter for the control yeast
population growing on glucose; , number of cells per milliliter for
the yeast population after addition of cAMP; , FBC for the yeast
population after the addition of cAMP. (B) At different times after
resuspension, samples of the culture were withdrawn, and the cell
proteins were stained with TRITC and analyzed at t = 0 h (A), t = 1.5 h (B), t = 1.83 h (C), t = 3 h (D), t = 3.5 h (E), t = 4.5 h (F), and
t = 6 h (G). (C) Behavior of the average cell size
of the population ( ), the average cell size of the newborn daughter
cells, Po ( ), and the FBC in the population ( ) for the yeast
population growing after the addition of cAMP. Po and the average cell
size of the population are expressed as the average channel number of
the relative protein content distributions (TRITC signals).
|
|
Finally, similar to the findings obtained during a nutritional shift-up
(Fig.
1), the analysis of the FBC values in Fig.
5A
suggests that the
population reaches an exponential growth condition
after
t = 4. However, cells become unable to reach a new
balanced
growth condition. Figure
5C shows that the average cell size
of
the whole population and the cell size of the new daughter cells
(Po) produced over time also increased after
t = 4.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Control of the cell cycle progression by nutrients has a key role
in the regulation of cell proliferation in all organisms. Mechanisms
are operative to coordinate nutrient availability to cell cycle
transitions. Therefore, controlled manipulations of the cellular
environment represent a useful methodological approach to gaining
better understanding of the dynamics and the controls determining the
cell cycle progression of a growing population.
In budding yeast, the main control of the cell division cycle takes
place late in the G1 phase at an area called Start
(14, 28). At Start, three essential processes begin:
budding, DNA replication, and spindle-pole body duplication. The
cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28, which is associated with the Cln3
cyclin, seems to be the most upstream activator of Start and acts as a
potent inducer of two distinct transcriptional complexes, SBF and MBF, respectively (11, 12, 18, 30, 33).
The analysis of the findings obtained during the nutritional shift-up
shown in Fig. 1 to 4 indicates that during this transition two delays
are induced. The cells that at the moment of the nutritional shift-up
existed before Start delay their entrance into S phase; cells cycling
after Start delay their exit from the cycle. The fast decrease in the
FBC (from 47.5 to 22.5%) that was observed during the first 2 h
shows that the rate of entrance into S phase is much more reduced than
the rate of exit from the cycle. When deprived of essential nutrients,
yeast cells are arrested in G1 phase. It has recently been
shown that nitrogen-deprived G1-phase-arrested cells are
able to grow, reaching a volume much larger than the average size
required for budding of nonstarved cells and thus suggesting a
mechanism that causes the accumulation of cells in G1 phase
even when the critical mass for budding seems to be largely overcome
(13). Such as response appears to be related to a faster degradation of Cln3 cyclin as a consequence of the changed nutritional conditions (13). In shift-up there is a prolonged stay in
the G1 phase, although the cell population is actively
growing; a diminished availability of Cln3 in shifting cells could be
the cause of the observed delay.
The second delay involves the cells shifted and stained after Start at
the time of resuspension. The increased duration of the budded-phase
period (from 2.48 to 3.5 h [Table 1]) indicates a delay in
mitosis and cellular division. The main effect of such as delay is the
production of newborn daughter cells of increasing size (Fig. 2B).
These daughter cells grow with a specific rate characteristic of the
new medium and are all committed to Start for the same Ps value
characteristic for the new medium. The combined effects of the two
delays allow the cell population that preexisted the shift-up to
quickly adjust to the new growth condition.
The experimental approach described here has also been applied to gain
insight into the effects of a nutritional shift-down. Cells were grown
on fructose-yeast extract-peptone, harvested in the exponential phase
of growth, stained with ConA-FITC, and then resuspended in a
raffinose-YNB fresh culture medium. The Po cell value changes over time
following a pattern similar to but opposite that shown for a
nutritional shift-up. On the other hand, the qualitative behavior of
the FBC value is similar to that observed during a nutritional
shift-up, except that it shifts from higher (71% at time
t = 0) to lower values (58% upon reaching the balanced
growth condition) (data not shown).
Since the addition of glucose stimulates the level of cAMP in budding
yeast cells, it has been proposed that at least part of the effects of
glucose on growth and cell cycle progression could be mediated by cAMP,
whose connection to the early events of Start is well known (6,
7). The analysis of the transition following the addition of cAMP
to permeable yeast cells indicates both similarities and differences.
While the shift-up both delays the entrance into S phase and the exit
from the cycle for existing cells, the addition of cAMP first delays
entrance into S phase and only after 1.2 to 1.3 h delays the exit
from the cycle. The nutrients and cAMP modulations of the cell cycle,
both at Start and at exit from the cycle, could offer useful
experimental approaches for investigating the physiologically relevant
events in cell cycle progression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank the project "From Gene to Product in Yeast: a
Quantitative Approach," which is subsidized by the European Community (DG XII Framework IV Program on Cell Factories to D.P.) and the National Research Council of Italy for the Project "Ciclo Cellulare ed Apoptosi" (subproject, Meccanismi di controllo a soglia del ciclo
cellulare, to Enzo Martegani).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dipartimento di
Fisiologia e Biochimica Generali, Sezione Biochimica Comparata,
University of Milan, Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milan, Italy. Phone: 39 2 70644801. Fax: 39 2 70632811. E-mail:
l.alberg{at}imiucca.csi.unimi.it.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alberghina, L.,
L. Mariani,
E. Martegani, and M. Vanoni.
1983.
Analysis of protein distribution in budding yeast.
Biotechnol. Bioeng.
25:1295-1310.
|
| 2.
|
Alberghina, L.,
E. Martegani,
L. Mariani, and G. Bortolan.
1984.
A bimolecular mechanism for the cell size control of the cell cycle.
BioSystems
16:297-305.
|
| 3.
|
Alberghina, L., and D. Porro.
1993.
Quantitative flow cytometry: analysis of protein distributions in budding yeast. A mini-review.
Yeast
9:815-823[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Alberghina, L.,
B. M. Ranzi,
D. Porro, and E. Martegani.
1991.
Flow cytometry and cell size kinetics in continuous and fed-batch fermentations of budding yeast.
Biotechnol. Prog.
7:299-304[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Ballou, C. E.
1982.
Yeast cell wall and cell surface: metabolism and gene expression, p. 335-360.
In
J. N. Strathern, E. W. Jones, and J. R. Broach (ed.), The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Baroni, D.,
P. Monti, and L. Alberghina.
1994.
Repression of growth-regulated G1 cyclin expression by cyclic AMP in budding yeast.
Nature
371:339-342[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Baroni, D.,
P. Monti,
G. Marconi, and L. Alberghina.
1992.
cAMP-mediated increase in the critical cell size required for the G1 to S transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Exp. Cell Res.
201:299-306[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Carter, B. L. A.
1981.
The control of cell division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, p. 99-117.
In
P. L. C. John (ed.), The cell cycle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
|
| 9.
|
Carter, B. L. A., and M. N. Jagadish.
1978.
The relationship between cell size and cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Exp. Cell Res.
112:15-24[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Chung, K. L.,
R. Z. Hawirko, and P. K. Isaac.
1965.
Cell wall replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Can. J. Microbiol.
11:953-957[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dirick, L.,
T. Bohm, and K. Nasmyth.
1995.
Roles and regulation of Cln-Cdc28 kinases at the start of the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
EMBO J.
14:4803-4813[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Futcher, B.
1996.
Cyclins and the wiring of the yeast cell cycle.
Yeast
12:1635-1646[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Gallego, C.,
E. Garì,
N. Colomina,
E. Herreo, and M. Aldea.
1997.
The Cln3 cyclin is down-regulated by translational repression and degradation during the G1 arrest caused by nitrogen deprivation in budding yeast.
EMBO J.
16:7196-7206[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hartwell, L. H., and M. Unger.
1977.
Unequal division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its implications for the control of cell division.
J. Cell Biol.
75:422-435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Johnston, G. C.,
C. W. Ehrhardt,
A. Lorincz, and B. L. A. Carter.
1979.
Regulation of cell size in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
137:1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Johnston, G. C.,
J. R. Pringle, and L. H. Hartwell.
1977.
Co-ordination of growth and cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Exp. Cell Res.
105:79-98[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Johnston, G. C.,
R. A. Singer,
S. O. Sharrow, and M. L. Slater.
1980.
Cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae growing at different rates.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
118:479-484.
|
| 18.
|
Levine, K.,
K. Huang, and F. R. Cross.
1996.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae G1 cyclins differ in their intrinsic functional properties.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5843-5853.
|
| 19.
|
Lord, P. G., and A. E. Wheals.
1980.
Asymmetrical division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
142:808-818[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Lord, P. G., and A. E. Wheals.
1981.
Variability in individual cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Cell Sci.
50:361-376[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Lord, P. G., and A. E. Wheals.
1983.
Rate of cell cycle initiation of yeast cells when cell size is not rate-determining factor.
J. Cell Sci.
59:183-201[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Lorincz, A., and B. L. A. Carter.
1979.
Control of cell size at bud initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
113:281-295.
|
| 23.
|
Martegani, E.,
M. Vanoni, and D. Delia.
1984.
A computer algorithm for the analysis of protein distribution in budding yeast.
Cytometry
5:81-85[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Porro, D., and L. Alberghina.
1996.
Protein distribution to analyze budding yeast population structure and cell cycle progression, p. 225-240.
In
M. Al-Rubeai, and A. N. Emery (ed.), Flow cytometry applications in cell culture. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 25.
|
Porro, D., and F. Srienc.
1995.
Tracking of individual cell cohorts in asynchronous Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations.
Biotechnol. Prog.
11:342-347[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Porro, D.,
E. Martegani,
B. M. Ranzi, and L. Alberghina.
1997.
Identification of different cellular subpopulations in asynchronously growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells.
Res. Microbiol.
148:205-215[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Porro, D.,
B. M. Ranzi,
C. Smeraldi,
E. Martegani, and L. Alberghina.
1995.
A double flow cytometric tag allows tracking of the dynamics of cell cycle progression of newborn Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells during balanced exponential growth.
Yeast
11:1157-1169[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Pringle, J. R., and L. H. Hartwell.
1981.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle.
Cold Spring Harbor Monogr. Ser.
1:97-142.
|
| 29.
|
Ranzi, B. M.,
C. Compagno, and E. Martegani.
1986.
Analysis of protein and cell volume distribution in glucose-limited continuous cultures of budding yeast.
Biotechnol. Bioeng.
28:185-190.
|
| 30.
|
Stuart, D., and C. Wittemberg.
1995.
CLN3, not positive feedback, determines the timing of CLN2 transcription in cycling cells.
Genes Dev.
9:2780-2794[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Thompson, P. W., and A. E. Wheals.
1980.
Asymmetrical division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostat culture.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
121:401-409.
|
| 32.
|
Tkacz, J. S.,
E. B. Cybulska, and J. O. Lampen.
1971.
Specific staining of wall mannan in yeast cells with fluorescein-conjugated concanavalin A.
J. Bacteriol.
105:1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Tyres, M.,
G. Tokiwa, and B. Futcher.
1993.
Comparison of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G1 cyclins: Cln3 may be an upstream activator of Cln1, Cln2 and other cyclins.
EMBO J.
12:1955-1968[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Tyson, C. B.,
P. G. Lord, and A. E. Wheals.
1979.
Dependency of size of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth rate.
J. Bacteriol.
138:92-98[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Vanoni, M.,
M. Vai,
L. Popolo, and L. Alberghina.
1983.
Structural heterogeneity in populations of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
156:1282-1291[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Veinot-Drebot, L. M.,
G. C. Johnston, and R. A. Singer.
1991.
A cyclin protein modulates mitosis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Curr. Genet.
19:15-19[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Wheals, A. E.
1982.
Size control models of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell population.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2:361-368[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Woldringh, C. L.,
P. G. Huls, and N. O. E. Vischer.
1993.
Volume growth of daughter and parent cells during the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae a/ as determined by image cytometry.
J. Bacteriol.
175:3174-3181[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, August 1998, p. 3864-3872, Vol. 180, No. 15
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Cipollina, C., van den Brink, J., Daran-Lapujade, P., Pronk, J. T., Porro, D., de Winde, J. H.
(2008). Saccharomyces cerevisiae SFP1: at the crossroads of central metabolism and ribosome biogenesis. Microbiology
154: 1686-1699
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Querin, L., Sanvito, R., Magni, F., Busti, S., Van Dorsselaer, A., Alberghina, L., Vanoni, M.
(2008). Proteomic Analysis of a Nutritional Shift-up in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Identifies Gvp36 as a BAR-containing Protein Involved in Vesicular Traffic and Nutritional Adaptation. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 4730-4743
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cipollina, C., van den Brink, J., Daran-Lapujade, P., Pronk, J. T., Vai, M., de Winde, J. H.
(2008). Revisiting the role of yeast Sfp1 in ribosome biogenesis and cell size control: a chemostat study. Microbiology
154: 337-346
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Belotti, F., Tisi, R., Martegani, E.
(2006). The N-terminal region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RasGEF Cdc25 is required for nutrient-dependent cell-size regulation.. Microbiology
152: 1231-1242
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kwok, A. C. M., Wong, J. T. Y.
(2005). Lipid Biosynthesis and its Coordination with Cell Cycle Progression. Plant Cell Physiol
46: 1973-1986
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tamaki, H., Yun, C.-W., Mizutani, T., Tsuzuki, T., Takagi, Y., Shinozaki, M., Kodama, Y., Shirahige, K., Kumagai, H.
(2005). Glucose-dependent cell size is regulated by a G protein-coupled receptor system in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. GENES CELLS
10: 193-206
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alberghina, L., Rossi, R. L., Querin, L., Wanke, V., Vanoni, M.
(2004). A cell sizer network involving Cln3 and Far1 controls entrance into S phase in the mitotic cycle of budding yeast. JCB
167: 433-443
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bolte, M., Dieckhoff, P., Krause, C., Braus, G. H., Irniger, S.
(2003). Synergistic inhibition of APC/C by glucose and activated Ras proteins can be mediated by each of the Tpk1-3 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology
149: 1205-1216
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Irniger, S., Bäumer, M., Braus, G. H.
(2000). Glucose and Ras Activity Influence the Ubiquitin Ligases APC/C and SCF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics
154: 1509-1521
[Abstract]
[Full Text]