INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion References

The incidence of food-borne infections caused by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) has increased since the description of this pathogen in the early 1980s (48). EHEC can cause severe and potentially life-threatening diseases, being the major cause of bloody diarrhea and acute renal failure (6, 25). Up to 20% of infected patients develop hemolytic-uremic syndrome or hemorrhagic colitis (25). Typically, children and elderly people are the most susceptible, with high mortality rates (10% of hemolytic-uremic syndrome cases) (1). The low infective dose of EHEC (7) favors the development of epidemic outbreaks, such as that recently described in Japan, which affected more than 9,000 school children (59).

In many aspects, the pathogenesis of EHEC resembles that of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC); however, one distinctive feature of EHEC is the capacity to produce Shiga toxins. These powerful cytotoxins attack endothelial cells of blood vessels and appear to be involved in the increased incidence of complications experienced by infected patients (42, 56). In the early stages of the infection process, bacteria attach to the surface of eukaryotic cells, forming small localized colonies; then, they trigger the attaching and effacing lesion. This event is characterized by intimate bacterial contact, localized destruction of microvilli, and reorganization of cytoskeletal proteins beneath the attached bacteria.

A pathogenicity island known as the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) encodes the bacterial products required for the production of the attaching and effacing lesion (39). The eaeA gene codes for the outer membrane protein intimin, which is required for intimate bacterial attachment and which is essential for the infectious phenotype (12). The eaeA gene is located upstream of a gene cluster encoding several proteins (EspA, EspD, and EspB) secreted by a type III secretion system (13, 15, 20, 32, 36). The production of these proteins is temperature and medium dependent (17, 32) and triggers, in an as-yet-unknown manner, the inositol triphosphate signal transduction cascade that leads to microvillus disruption and rearrangement of the cytoskeleton (4, 49). Type III secretion systems are widespread in a variety of pathogenic bacteria and are encoded by at least 20 genes (for reviews, see references 5 and 21). The Yop (Yersinia outer proteins) secretion apparatus, partly composed of Ysc (Yersinia secretion) proteins, is the prototype of these systems (5, 21). In EHEC, four secretion apparatus genes, sepABCD, are located in the left half of the LEE, upstream of eaeA (30). Disruption of each of these genes abolishes the signal transduction events that are required for bacterial interactions with eukaryotic cells during the infection process (20, 49).

In this work, we identified and characterized a novel gene, designated pas (protein associated with secretion), which is located between the eaeA and espA genes. The encoded product is essential for the secretion of Esp proteins. An EHEC derivative containing an in-frame deletion in the pas gene was highly impaired in attachment and lost the capacities to trigger attaching and effacing activity and to invade eukaryotic cells.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion References

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media. The strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (50), on LB agar plates, and in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM; GIBCO, Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented with 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). Plasmids were maintained in E. coli DH5, and the INVF' strain was used as a recipient for cloning of fragments amplified by PCR into the pCR2.1 vector. Media were supplemented with chloramphenicol (50 µg ml¹), ampicillin (200 µg ml¹), or nalidixic acid (50 µg ml¹) when required.

DNA manipulations. Plasmid DNA isolation, restriction endonuclease digestion, ligation, transformation, agarose gel electrophoresis, and other standard DNA techniques were carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (50). Oligonucleotides (Table 2) were synthesized by GIBCO. Colony PCR, extraction of PCR products, and cloning experiments were performed in accordance with standard protocols (50). DNA sequencing was performed by the method of Sanger et al. (51) with a Taq DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit and an automated model 373A DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Restriction and modification enzymes were purchased from New England BioLabs, Schwalbach, Germany. Electroporation was carried out with a gene pulser (Bio-Rad Laboratories) as described by O'Callaghan and Charbit (43). Searches in databases for nucleotide and amino acid sequence homologies were performed with the BLASTP (2), BLASTP + BEAUTY (2, 64), NNPP (47), and PSORT (41) algorithms.

Cloning of the EHEC chromosomal region between the eaeA and espB genes. Primers AE19 (sense) and ANK7191 (antisense), which are homologous to positions 1962 to 1979 and positions 263 to 240 of the EHEC strain EDL933 eaeA and espB published sequences, respectively (EMBL database accession no. Z11541 and X96953, respectively), were used to amplify by PCR the region between the eaeA and espB genes. The resulting 5,583-bp fragment was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector, generating pANK84. Unidirectional digestion from each strand was performed with a double-stranded nested deletion kit (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany), and both strands of the resulting clones were sequenced with vector-specific universal primers.

Construction of a nonpolar mutation. Overlap extension PCR (29) was used to generate an in-frame deletion in the pas gene. Two PCR fragments were obtained by use of an Expand High Fidelity kit (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) with the primer pairs ANK36-ANK37 (452 bp) and ANK38-ANK39 (437 bp). The resulting products contained the first 100 bp and the last 161 bp of the pas open reading frame (ORF), respectively. A 14-bp overlap in the sequences allowed the amplification of an 875-bp fragment during a second PCR with the primer pair ANK36-ANK39. The resulting product, which encompassed a pas gene containing an internal 960-bp deletion, was digested with BamHI and cloned into BclI-digested pMAK700oriT (57), generating pKSC1. This plasmid was transformed into the S17-1pir strain and then transferred by conjugation (27) into the recipient EHEC strain E32511/0 Nal^r. Plasmid pKSC1 was recovered from E32511/0 and subsequently electroporated into EHEC strain EDL933. Cointegration and excision of the suicide vector were performed as previously described (57). The in-frame deletion contained in the EDL933 pas mutant resulting from the allelic exchange was confirmed by Southern blot analysis and DNA sequencing of a PCR product obtained with the primers KSCeaeA and ANK292, which have homology with adjacent external sequences (data not shown). The primers ANK36 and ANK39 were used to amplify the full-length pas gene and 340 bp of the region located upstream of the start codon; the product was subsequently cloned into pCR2.1, generating pKSC2, which was used for complementation studies.

Production of a Pas-specific antiserum. The pas gene was amplified by PCR with the primer pair ANK49-ANK50. The resulting product was digested with BamHI/KpnI, ligated with predigested pQE30 (Qiagen), and subsequently transformed into E. coli strain M15(pREP4). The resulting pQE30-PasEE plasmid carries a histidine-tagged Pas fusion protein. Overexpression and purification of the recombinant protein were performed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations (Qiagen) under denaturing conditions. Mice were immunized intraperitoneally (50 µg of protein with Freund's incomplete adjuvant) and given a booster after 15 days. Blood was collected 15 days following the last immunization, and the Pas-specific antiserum (MPas) was separated and stored at 20°C.

Detection of secreted proteins. To enhance the expression and secretion of Esp proteins, bacteria were grown in DMEM-HEPES until they reached an absorbance at 600 nm of 0.6 (31). The proteins present in supernatant fluids were precipitated by the addition of 10% (vol/vol) trichloroacetic acid, overnight incubation at 4°C, and subsequent centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 30 min. The dry pellet was resuspended in 1.5 M Tris (pH 8.8). To obtain whole-cell extracts, bacteria were pelleted and, after resuspension in electrophoresis sample buffer (50), boiled at 100°C for 10 min. Bacteria were fractionated to obtain periplasmic, cytoplasmic, and outer and inner membrane extracts in accordance with standard protocols (52). Proteins (30 µg/lane) were fractionated by discontinuous sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) with a 12.5% separating gel (50). Proteins were transferred onto a positively charged Biodyne B nylon membrane (Pall, Dreieich, Germany) by use of a semidry device (Bio-Rad). Nonspecific binding sites were saturated with 5% (vol/vol) low-fat milk (1.5%) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-Tween 20 (0.1%, vol/vol). The EspB, EspE, and Pas proteins were detected with mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for EspB (mabMEspB) and EspE (mabMEspE) (9, 17) and the Pas-specific antiserum (MPas) as primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM as secondary antibodies (Bio-Rad). Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized by chemiluminescence with an ECL kit (Amersham Life Science, Braunschweig, Germany).

Analysis of the interactions between Pas and proteins secreted by EHEC. To study the interactions between Pas and Esp proteins, proteins present in supernatant fluids were concentrated, fractioned by SDS-PAGE, and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) as described above. Single lanes were cut and individually treated. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin in PBS-Tween 20 (0.5%, vol/vol) at room temperature (RT) for 1 h. Strips were incubated at 4°C overnight with 0.5% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin in PBS-Tween 20 containing either purified recombinant Pas or cytoplasmic or inner membrane fractions from strain EDL933. Strips were washed with PBS-Tween 20 for 15 min, blocked at RT for 1 h, washed, and incubated with the Pas-specific antiserum (MPas) diluted 1:1,000 for 1 h at RT. After being washed, the strips were further incubated for 1 h at RT with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG and IgM (Bio-Rad) and washed, and antigen-antibody complexes were visualized by chemiluminescence with the ECL kit. To detect Esp proteins, control strips were incubated overnight at 4°C with monoclonal antibodies specific for EspA, EspB, EspD, and EspE (9, 17), and the strips were processed as described above.

Tissue culture methods and analysis by immunofluorescence microscopy. HeLa cells (ATCC CCL2) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 25 mM HEPES, 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS), and glutamine (GIBCO) in an atmosphere containing 5% CO₂ at 37°C. To study the reorganization of cellular actin underneath bacteria upon EHEC infection, cells were seeded onto 12-mm-diameter glass coverslips (InterMed Nunc, Wesbaden-Biebrich, Germany) at a concentration of approximately 5 × 10⁴ per well in 24-well Nunclon Delta tissue culture plates (InterMed Nunc). Cell monolayers were infected with overnight-grown bacteria resuspended in DMEM-HEPES at a cell/bacterium ratio of 1:100. After 6 h of incubation, the monolayers were washed to remove unattached bacteria, fixed with 3.7% (vol/vol) p-formaldehyde in PBS, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS, and bacteria were stained with a rabbit polyclonal antiserum against EHEC O157:K (Behring, Marburg, Germany). Coverslips were washed, the primary antibody was labelled with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany), and F actin was stained (34) with tetramethyl-rhodamine-isothiocyanate-labelled phalloidin (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany). Coverslips were washed and mounted, and cells were examined by epifluorescence with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Scanning and transmission electron microscopy. For scanning electron microscopy studies, infected cells grown on round 12-mm Thermanox glass coverslips were fixed in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M cacodylate, 0.01 M MgCl₂, 0.01 M CaCl₂, pH 6.9) containing 3% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde and 5% (vol/vol) p-formaldehyde for 45 min on ice, washed with PBS, dehydrated in a graded series of acetone, and subjected to critical-point drying with CO₂. Samples were sputtered with a 10-nm gold film and examined with a Zeiss DSM 982 Gemini field-emission scanning electron microscope. Transmission electron microscopy was used to visualize internalized bacteria. At 6 h postinfection, the monolayers were washed twice with PBS and fixed in cacodylate buffer (see above) for 45 min on ice. Postfixation was performed for 1 h at RT with 1% (wt/vol) aqueous OsO₄ in cacodylate buffer, and the monolayers were dehydrated in a graded series of acetone (10, 30, and 50%, vol/vol). In-block staining was performed with 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate in 70% acetone overnight. After complete dehydration in 90 and 100% (vol/vol) acetone, the samples were incubated in a mixture of 1 part acetone/1 part Spurr's resin (54) overnight, followed by 1 part acetone/2 parts Spurr's resin. Subsequently, the samples were placed in pure Spurr's resin, with several changes. After polymerization of the resin at 70°C for 8 h, the samples were trimmed and cut with a glass knife (Ultracut S; Leica, Bensheim, Germany). Ultrathin sections were collected onto Formvar-covered 300-mesh copper grids and poststained with uranyl acetate for 30 min at 4°C and lead citrate for 3 min at 20°C with an Ultrostainer (Leica). Sections were examined with a Zeiss EM 910 transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV at calibrated magnifications.

Quantitative determination of bacterial attachment and invasion. HeLa cells were seeded into 24-well plates (5 × 10⁴ cells/well) and grown overnight in DMEM-HEPES with 10% FCS. Prior to infection, each well was washed and the medium was replaced with DMEM-HEPES supplemented or not supplemented with FCS. Cell monolayers were infected at a bacterium/cell ratio of 100:1 for 3.5 h. Supernatant fluids were subsequently discarded, the wells were washed with PBS to remove nonadherent bacteria, DMEM supplemented with gentamicin (100 µg ml¹) was added, and HeLa cells were further incubated for 2.5. The wells were washed with PBS, HeLa cells were lysed by the addition of 500 µl of 0.25% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, and the number of CFU recovered from each well was determined by plating of appropriate dilutions on LB agar plates with a Spiral Plater (Autoplate Model 3000; Bio-Sys, Karben, Germany). For the quantification of attached bacteria, cells were infected for 6 h with antibiotic-free DMEM-HEPES (during this period, monolayers were washed several times to remove nonadherent bacteria). The cells were washed and lysed, and the total number of bacteria recovered per well was determined. Values were corrected by subtracting the number of viable intracellular bacteria, as determined with matching controls pretreated with gentamicin. Reported results are mean values of three independent experiments ± standard errors of the mean. The statistical significance of the results obtained was evaluated by Student's t test; differences were considered significant at a P value of 0.05.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences reported here (pas, orf1, espA, espD, and espB) will appear in the EMBL database under accession no. Y13068 and Y13859 (EDL933 and 413.89-1, respectively).

	RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials & Methods Results & Discussion References

Identification of a gene in the LEE of EHEC encoding a protein with homology to the SpiB protein of Salmonella typhimurium. To date, a database sequence for the region between eaeA nd espB is available only for EPEC strain E2348/69 (19) (EMBL accession no. AF022236) and shows six ORFs with the following arrangement: eaeA, escD, sepL, espA, espD, and espB. Earlier studies had shown that EHEC strain EDL933 contains an espB gene which exhibits 75% similarity to espB from EPEC strain E2348/69 (17). In this work, we generated a plasmid (pANK84) which contains a PCR-amplified fragment encompassing the region between eaeA and espB of EHEC strain EDL933 (for details, see Materials and Methods). As expected, the insert contained in pANK84 exhibited a high degree of homology to the EPEC sequences available in the database. An analysis of the nucleotide sequence from pANK84 led to the identification of four ORFs with the following arrangement: pas, orf1, espA, and espD. The start codon for pas is located 1,484 bp downstream of eaeA in the complementary strand. Using the NNPP promoter prediction algorithm (47), we found 273 bp upstream of the pas start codon a potential nitrogen-regulated promoter with a predicted probability of 1.00 (Fig. 1). The 1,221-bp ORF encodes a 406-amino-acid product (Pas) with a predicted molecular mass of 45.3 kDa and a pI of 6.96. A sequence resembling a rho-independent terminator was found 221 to 253 bp downstream of the TAA stop codon, suggesting that pas is monocistronically transcribed.

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   Map of the chromosomal region between the eaeA and espB genes from EHEC strain EDL933. Genes and ORFs are shown as arrows. sep genes required for type III secretion are shown as a large closed box, sequences common to E. coli K-12 are shown by an open box, the stem-loop between eaeA and pas is shown as a hairpin symbol, a potential nitrogen-regulated promoter is shown as a black arrow in the map and boxed within the nucleotide sequence, and a potential Shine-Dalgarno sequence is shown by double underlining within the nucleotide sequence. The fragment of the pas gene deleted in pKSC1 is shown as a broken line below the pas box.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2.   Hydrophobicity plots for Pas and the Pas-homologous proteins YscD and PscD. The amino acid sequences of Pas, PscD (EMBL accession no. U56077), and YscD (EMBL accession no. M74011) were analyzed with the program TopPred II and the Kyte-Doolittle algorithm (8, 35).

View larger version (36K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3.   Comparison between Pas and bacterial permeases. The NH2-terminal region of the protein contains two predicted transmembrane domains (positions 78 to 98 and positions 118 to 138). The numbers on the left and right sides indicate the amino acid positions. Conserved residues are shown in boldface letters. Pas EDL933, EHEC EDL933; Pas E32511/0, EHEC E32511/0; Pas 413.89-1, STEC 413.89-1; Pas RDEC-1, rabbit EPEC RDEC-1 (EMBL accession no. U59503); HemU, Y. enterocolitica (SPTREMBL accession no. P74980); FepG, E. coli (SWISSPROT accession no. P23877); FxuA, Mycobacterium smegmatis (SPTREMBL accession no. Q50376); BtuC, E. coli (SWISSPROT accession no. P06609); CbrC, Erwinia chrysanthemi (SWISSNEW accession no. Q47086); FecD, E. coli (SWISSPROT accession no. P15029).

Subcellular localization of the product encoded by the pas gene. Strain EDL933 was grown in DMEM-HEPES, and the efficient secretion of Esp proteins was confirmed by Western blot analysis. Bacterial cultures were then fractionated into supernatant, outer membrane, periplasmic, inner membrane, and cytoplasmic fractions, and the resulting extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with a Pas-specific antiserum to determine the topology of Pas. One major band and two more weakly reacting bands of approximately 45 (major), 51, and 59 kDa were detected in the cytoplasmic fraction (Fig. 4). The electrophoretic mobility of the major product corresponded to the predicted molecular mass of Pas (45.3 kDa). Therefore, Pas seems to be located in the cytoplasm of actively secreting EHEC; this location appears to be inconsistent with its predicted topology and homology to inner membrane proteins. However, the Pas-specific antiserum also detected a weakly reacting band and two major bands of 45 (weak), 51, and 59 kDa in the inner membrane fraction. Extended boiling and iodoacetamide treatment did not modify the observed patterns (data not shown), suggesting that the lower-mobility bands did not result from the formation of either heterodimers or intramolecular disulfide bonds.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4.   Subcellular localization of the Pas protein. Bacterial cultures were fractionated, and protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE (0.6 µg of protein in lane A and 30 µg in all other lanes) and analyzed by immunoblotting with a Pas-specific antiserum (MPas) to determine the topology of the pas-encoded product. Lane A, recombinant histidine-tagged Pas protein; lane B, supernatant fraction; lane C, outer membrane fraction; lane D, inner membrane fraction; lane E, periplasmic fraction; lane F, cytoplasmic fraction. The molecular masses of the main protein products are indicated by arrows.

The product encoded by the pas gene is required for bacterial attachment to and invasion of HeLa cells. The pathogenicity island LEE, which includes the gene encoding the Pas protein, is essential for the virulence of both EPEC and EHEC. In addition, it has been shown that the integration of LEE into a nonpathogenic E. coli strain is sufficient to promote attaching and effacing activity (38). Therefore, to determine the role of pas in the pathogenesis of infections caused by EHEC, a mutant containing a 960-bp in-frame deletion in this gene was generated as described in Materials and Methods. The deletion disrupts pas 100 bp downstream of the start codon, generating a 261-bp truncated version of pas. The mutated pas allele was cloned into the thermosensitive suicide vector pMAK700oriT (57), generating pKSC1. Since we were unable to introduce this plasmid into EDL933 directly either by conjugation or by electroporation, probably due to the presence of restriction systems (15), EHEC strain E32511/0 was used as an intermediate bacterial host. Plasmid DNA isolated from this strain was transferred by electroporation into EDL933; cointegration and excision of the vector were performed as previously described (57). The recombinant clone resulting from the allelic exchange, EDL933 pas, was hemolytic on sheep blood agar plates; PCR analysis confirmed the presence of the hly gene, which is located on the megaplasmid, as well as of the stx-1 and stx-2 genes (data not shown). No differences in growth were observed between the mutant and the wild-type strain in either LB broth or DMEM. The disruption present in the pas mutant resulted in abolition of the expression of Pas, as determined by Western blot analysis with a Pas-specific antiserum (data not shown).

View larger version (169K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5.   Analysis of bacterial attachment to and invasion of HeLa cells. Attachment and invasion of EHEC were analyzed by scanning (A, C, and E) and transmission (B, D, and F) electron microscopy after 6 h of infection with strains EDL933 (A and B), EDL933 pas (C and D), and EDL933 pas(pKSC2) (E and F). A single nonattached pas mutant cell is indicated by an arrow in panel D. Bars, 5 µm (A, C, and E), 0.5 µm (B and F), and 2.5 µm (D).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6.   Attachment of and invasion by the EDL933 pas mutant. The ability of EHEC strain EDL933, EDL933 pas derivative, and complemented EDL933 pas(pKSC2) to attach to (A) and invade (B) HeLa cells after 6 h of infection was analyzed by determining the total number of attached bacteria (A) and gentamicin-resistant internalized bacteria (B) as described in Materials and Methods. The differences between the EDL933 pas mutant and both the EDL933 parental strain and the EDL933 pas(pKSC2) derivative were statistically significant (P  0.05).

The product encoded by the pas gene is required for actin accumulation underneath adherent bacteria. Since the reorganization of cytoskeletal proteins plays an important role in the attachment of EHEC, studies were performed to assess whether this activity was impaired in the mutant strain. Immunofluorescence microscopic studies involving staining of F actin with fluorochrome-labelled phalloidin revealed that in contrast to parental strain EDL933, mutant strain EDL933 pas was deficient in inducing actin accumulation (Fig. 7A to D). The ability of bacteria to direct actin reorganization and accumulation was restored after the introduction of plasmid pKSC2, containing the pas gene, into EDL933 pas (Fig. 7E and F). The lack of full complementation, as indicated by the lower number of microcolonies formed on the surface of HeLa cells, may be explained, at least in part, as a gene dosage effect or by variations in transcriptional efficiencies related to the degree of supercoiling on the plasmid (16, 22, 28). However, the overall microscopic staining pattern of the actin accumulated underneath adherent bacteria was the same as that observed after infection with the wild-type strain.

View larger version (133K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 7.   Immunofluorescence microscopy of HeLa cells infected with EHEC strain EDL933. HeLa cells after 6 h of infection with strains EDL933 (A and B), EDL933 pas (C and D), and EDL933 pas(pKSC2) (E and F) are shown. Bacteria were labelled with O157-specific antiserum (A, C, and E), and actin was labelled with phalloidin (B, D, and F), both as described in Materials and Methods.

The pas gene is essential for the secretion of Esp proteins. Esp proteins, which are secreted by a type III secretion system, are required for the signal transduction events leading to cytoskeletal reorganization. Therefore, we analyzed bacterial production and secretion of Esp proteins by immunoblotting. EspB was detected in the supernatant fluids of EDL933 cultures, whereas no protein was observed in the supernatant fluids of EDL933 pas cultures (Fig. 8). These results indicated that in the mutant strain, either the expression or the secretion of EspB was disrupted. Similar results were obtained when antibodies specific for EspA and EspD were used (data not shown).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 8.   Expression and secretion of EspB by the EDL933 pas mutant. The presence of EspB was determined in bacterial culture supernatants (lanes A to C) and whole-cell lysates (lanes D to F) by Western blotting as described in Materials and Methods. Lanes A and D, EDL933; lanes B and E, EDL933 pas; lanes C and F, EDL933 pas(pKSC2). The main protein product is indicated by an arrow on the right.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 9.   Expression and secretion of EspE by the EDL933 pas mutant. Culture supernatants of EHEC EDL933 (lane A) and its pas derivative (lane B) were analyzed by Western blotting with a monoclonal antibody specific for EspE (mabMEspE) as described in Materials and Methods. Molecular masses are indicated by arrows.

Interactions between Pas and proteins secreted by EHEC. The potential involvement of Pas in the translocation process for Esp proteins and the localization of the putative modified Pas in the inner membrane prompted us to investigate whether Pas can bind to Esp proteins. Filter binding assays were performed with recombinant Pas (see Materials and Methods). However, since histidine-tagged Pas was purified under denaturating conditions, experiments were also performed with cytoplasmic (major 45-kDa band) and inner membrane (major 51- and 59-kDa bands) fractions of strain EDL933. The protein samples were incubated with membrane strips containing immobilized secreted proteins from EHEC, and Pas binding was detected with a Pas-specific antiserum. The results obtained suggested that Pas binds to the EspE protein and to another secreted protein of approximately 53 kDa, whose identity is unknown (Fig. 10, lanes A, B, and G). Under our experimental conditions, Pas binding to either EspA or EspD was not detected. However, a weak band corresponding to the electrophoretic mobility of EspB was detected (Fig. 10, lanes A and E), suggesting that Pas may also interact with EspB. Interestingly, only samples containing the higher-mobility forms of Pas (recombinant protein and cytoplasmic fraction) reacted with the secreted proteins (Fig. 10, lanes A and B), whereas the inner membrane fraction, which contains the putative modified form of Pas, did not bind (Fig. 10, lane C). The results obtained suggested that in order to carry out its biological activity Pas requires alternating cycles of insertion and deinsertion in the inner membrane (18) and that because only the cytoplasmic form of Pas is able to bind Esp proteins.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 10.   Binding of Pas to secreted proteins from EHEC strain EDL933. Supernatant fluids from EDL933 cultures were concentrated, separated by SDS-PAGE, and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Strips were cut and incubated with either purified histidine-tagged Pas (lane A) or the Pas-containing cytoplasmic (lane B) or inner membrane (lane C) fractions of EDL933. Bound Pas was detected by immunoblotting with a Pas-specific antiserum (MPas) as described in Materials and Methods. The localization of EspA (lane D), EspB (lane E), EspD (lane F), and EspE (lane G) proteins in matching strips was determined with protein-specific monoclonal antibodies. The molecular masses of the main protein products are indicated by arrows.