Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, October 1998, p. 5077-5084, Vol. 180, No. 19
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Structure and Mechanism of Action of the Protease
That Degrades Small, Acid-Soluble Spore Proteins during Germination of
Spores of Bacillus Species
Claudio
Nessi,1
Mark J.
Jedrzejas,2 and
Peter
Setlow1,*
Department of Biochemistry, University of
Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
06032,1 and
Department of Microbiology
and Center for Macromolecular Crystallography, University of
Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 352942
Received 27 March 1998/Accepted 22 July 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The germination protease (GPR) of Bacillus megaterium
initiates the degradation of small, acid-soluble proteins during spore germination. Trypsin treatment of the 46-kDa GPR zymogen (termed P46) removes an ~15-kDa C-terminal domain generating a
30-kDa species (P30) which is stable against further
digestion. While P30 is not active, it does autoprocess to
a smaller form by cleavage of the same bond cleaved in conversion of
P46 to the active 41-kDa form of GPR (P41).
Trypsin treatment of P41 cleaves the same bond in the
C-terminal part of the protein as is cleaved in the
P46
P30 conversion. While the ~29-kDa
species generated by trypsin treatment of P41 is
active, it is rapidly degraded further by trypsin to small inactive
fragments. These results, as well as a thermal melting temperature for
P41 which is 13°C lower than that for P46 and
the unfolding of P41 at significantly lower concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride than for P46, are further
evidence for a difference in tertiary structure between P46
and P41, with P46 presumably having a more
compact stable structure. However, circular dichroism
spectroscopy revealed no significant difference in the secondary
structure content of P46 and P41. The removal of ~30% of P46 or P41 without significant
loss in enzyme activity localized GPR's catalytic residues to the
N-terminal two-thirds of the molecule. This finding, as well as
comparison of the amino acid sequences of GPR from three different
species, analysis of several site-directed GPR mutants, determination
of the metal ion content of purified GPR, and lack of inhibition of
P41 by a number of protease inhibitors, suggests that
GPR is not a member of a previously described class of protease.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Between 10 and 20% of total spore
protein is degraded to amino acids in the first minutes of germination
of spores of Bacillus species (30). The proteins
degraded are a group of small, acid-soluble proteins (SASP) unique to
the spore stage of the life cycle. The
/
-type SASP, which are
coded for by a multigene family, are bound to the dormant spore's DNA
and provide a significant component of spore resistance to heat,
hydrogen peroxide, and UV radiation (28, 30, 31). The
-type SASP, which are coded for by a single gene, are also in the
spore core (the site of spore DNA) but are not bound to any
macromolecule. SASP degradation at the beginning of spore germination
both frees up the DNA for transcription and provides amino acids that
are used for protein synthesis during subsequent development (22,
30).
SASP degradation during spore germination is initiated by one or two
endoproteolytic cleavages catalyzed by a sequence specific germination
protease termed GPR which is synthesized during sporulation at about
the same time as its SASP substrates (30). GPR is
synthesized as a protein of 46 kDa as measured by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE); this species,
termed P46, is inactive (13). Two hours later in
sporulation, P46 undergoes intramolecular autoprocessing
which removes an N-terminal propeptide of 15 (Bacillus megaterium) or 16 (B. subtilis) amino acids; the new,
fully active form of GPR is called P41 (13, 24).
Both P46 and P41 are tetramers, and only the
tetrameric form of P41 is active (12). The
autoprocessing of P46 to P41 is triggered both
in vivo and in vitro by low pH, dipicolinic acid, and dehydration
(8). Although active in vitro, P41 carries out
no SASP degradation during sporulation because the conditions inside
the developing and dormant spore (in particular the dehydration and
mineralization) are not favorable for enzymatic action. However, in the
first minutes of spore germination, the spore core rehydrates, allowing
rapid attack of GPR on SASP. Synthesis of GPR in an inactive form and
its autoprocessing at the correct time in sporulation are essential to
generate a fully resistant spore; a strain with a GPR variant that
autoprocesses P46 to P41 ~1 h earlier during
sporulation produces spores that are more sensitive than wild-type
spores to a variety of treatments, because the
/
-type SASP
content of the mutant spores is reduced (6).
In addition to the autoprocessing reaction converting P46
to P41, the P41 of B. megaterium
also undergoes an additional autoprocessing to P39 with
loss of an additional seven N-terminal residues (8). The
enzymatic activities of P39 and P41 are
identical, and P39 is not generated from P41 of
B. subtilis. Consequently, the generation of
P39 with B. megaterium GPR may not have any
functional significance.
While the role played by GPR in SASP degradation as well as its
autoprocessing are reasonably well understood, little is known of the
structural differences between P46 and P41 and
the nature of GPR's active site(s). Indeed, the precise class of
protease to which GPR belongs has not been established. To obtain more information on these latter topics, we have analyzed the trypsin digestion products generated from P46 and P41
and have used a variety of techniques in an attempt to determine the
class of protease to which GPR belongs. The latter data suggest
that GPR is not a member of a previously described class of proteases.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacteria and plasmids used and isolation of DNA.
The
bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table
1. Escherichia coli strains
were routinely grown at 37°C in 2× YT medium (5 g of NaCl, 16 g
of tryptone, and 10 g of yeast extract per liter). Plasmid DNA was
isolated from E. coli with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit
(Qiagen).
Site-directed mutagenesis.
We used the megaprimer-based PCR
method (26) to make mutations in B. megaterium
gpr in which Ser219 or Ser229 is replaced
by Ala (Fig. 1A). The oligonucleotide
primers used for the first round of PCR were A
(5'-CAAGCTCTAATACGACTCAC-3'), B
(5'-CATCCGGGGGCTGGGGTTGGAAAC-3'), and C
(5'-GCGTAAAGAAATCGCTATGAAACACTTG GC-3').
Oligonucleotide A is in the T7 promoter of the pTZ19U portion of
pPS1907 (Table 1); oligonucleotide B begins at nucleotide (nt) 753 and
ends at nt 776 and oligonucleotide C begins at nt 779 and ends at nt
809 of the coding sequence of B. megaterium gpr.
Oligonucleotides B and C are complementary to the gpr
sequence except for the underlined nucleotides. In the first round of
PCR, the reaction mixture (100 µl) contained 100 pmol of primer B or C and 100 pmol of primer A, 1.5 mM MgSO4, 0.2 mM each
deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 200 ng of template (plasmid pPS1907), and
10 µl of 10× Vent DNA polymerase buffer. Reaction mixtures were
overlaid with mineral oil and heated for 8 min at 94°C, 1 U of Vent
DNA polymerase was added, and samples were subjected to 35 cycles of
PCR (1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C) and
incubated for 10 min at 72°C at the end of the last cycle. The
synthesized megaprimers were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.2%
agarose gel to verify that they were of the expected sizes and then
used for the second round of PCR. The second round of PCR was carried out in 50 µl containing ~50 ng of one of the megaprimers, 500 pmol
of primer D (5'-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTG-3'), which is
complementary to the sequence of pTZ19U in pPS1907 downstream of the
multiple cloning site, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each
deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 200 ng of
HindIII-linearized pPS1907 purified by agarose gel
electrophoresis, and 5 µl of 10× Taq DNA polymerase
buffer. Samples were treated as described above, 1 U of Taq
DNA polymerase was added, and PCR was performed as described above. The
final PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis;
fragments with the expected sizes were excised and ligated into plasmid
pCRII (Invitrogen). The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli INV
F' cells (Invitrogen), and transformants were selected
on 2×YT agar plates containing ampicillin (50 µg/ml) and
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (40 µg/ml). Plasmids were isolated from white colonies, and digestion with HincII and HindIII identified plasmids
with the appropriate ~1.5-kb insert. DNA sequence analysis confirmed
the presence of the desired mutations and that they were the only
mutations present in the 211-bp ClaI-EagI
fragment of B. megaterium gpr (Fig. 1A). This
ClaI-EagI fragment was purified by agarose gel
electrophoresis and ligated to ClaI-EagI-digested
pPS1910 which had been purified to obtain the large fragment. The
ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli UT481 to
ampicillin resistance, and plasmid DNA from several clones was isolated
and sequenced to ensure that gpr had acquired the desired
mutation. E. coli UT481 strains carrying plasmids with the
gpr S219A mutation and the gpr S229A mutation were called PS2577 and PS2578, respectively.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Locations of restriction sites in B. megaterium
gpr and possible catalytic residues in B. megaterium
GPR (A) and amino acid sequences of B. megaterium GPR
variants (B). (A) The locations of restriction sites and codons for
possible catalytic residues in B. megaterium gpr were taken
from reference 30. The locations of codons for
possible catalytic residues are given above the gene (open box), and
restriction sites (C1, ClaI; E1, EagI; H2,
HincII; H3, HindIII; NcI, NcoI;
NrI, NruI) are indicated below the gene. N and C denote the
N- and C-terminal coding regions, respectively. Note that the
HincII and HindIII sites are outside the
gpr gene's coding sequence. The arrow labeled
P39 denotes the region in which P41
autoprocesses to P39. (B) Amino acid sequences (in
one-letter code) of various forms of GPR. The sequences of
P46 and P41 (note that this is P41
overexpressed in E. coli) are from references
6 and 24. The sequence of
P39 is from this work, and those of the variants lacking
3 to 12 propeptide residues are from reference 17.
The numbers above the sequences are the positions of lysine or arginine
residues in P46; arrows labeled P41 and
P39 denote the sites of cleavage generating P41
and P39, respectively.
|
|
The mutations in B. megaterium GPR in which both
Ser274 and Ser276 are replaced by Ala, in
which the single Cys is replaced by Ala, and in which the
P41
P39 autoprocessing site is modified
to prevent P41
P39 conversion
(
P39) (Fig. 1) were generated with a Transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit (Clontech) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The template used was pPS1907, and the
phosphorylated primers were D (5'-GACGGCCAGTGAACGAGCTCGGTAC-3';
the selection primer which abolishes the unique EcoRI
site in the multiple cloning site), F
(5'-CAGGGAAAGCCGGCTAAGGCTCTGCTTCCGTCC-3';
used to change [underlined residues] Ser274 and
Ser276 to Ala), G
(5'-GATGATGCTAGCGCACTTGTAGTGGG-3';
used to change [underlined residues] Cys115
to Ala), and H (5'-CGAAGCAAAAGACGCGTTAGCAAATCAGCC-3';
used to change [underlined residues] the sequence coding for
KDIALEN in the P41
P39 autoprocessing
site to one coding for KDALAN). Given GPR's sequence specificity, the
latter change should eliminate P41
P39
conversion (6, 8). The presence of the desired mutations in
the plasmids obtained was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis, and the
EagI-HindIII fragment (double mutant), the
NruI-ClaI fragment (Cys-to-Ala mutation), and the
HincII-NcoI fragment (mutation in the
P41
P39 autoprocessing site) were excised and
ligated to EagI-HindIII-digested pPS1910,
NruI-ClaI-digested pPS1910, and HincII-NcoI-digested pPS1910, respectively (Fig.
1A). The ligation mixtures were used to transform E. coli
UT481 to ampicillin resistance, and plasmid DNA from several clones was
isolated and sequenced to confirm the presence of the desired
mutations. The E. coli UT481 strains carrying plasmids
generated with gpr S274A S276A, gpr C115A, and
P39 (lacking the P41
P39
cleavage site) were named PS2569, PS2524, and PS2479, respectively.
Protein overexpression and purification.
B. megaterium
P46, P41, and the GPR variants lacking 3, 6, 9, or 12 propeptide residues were purified, respectively, from E. coli JM83 carrying plasmid pPS740, pPS1910, pPS2339,
pPS2340, or pPS2341 and from E. coli UT481 with plasmid
pPS2342 as described previously (6, 17). All other strains
for overexpression of GPR were grown at 37°C in 2×YT medium plus
ampicillin (50 µg/ml). At an optical density at 600 nm of 0.9, isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to 1 mM,
and the cells were harvested after 2 h of further growth at
37°C. GPR was routinely purified from these cells as described
(6, 17).
The procedure used to purify GPR for analysis of metal ions was a
modified version of the published procedure that gives a higher yield
and better purity. Cells from 2 liters of culture of either PS2479 or
E. coli JM83 carrying pPS740 obtained as described above
were broken by sonication in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 5 mM
CaCl2, 20% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol), the mixture was
centrifuged, and nucleic acids were precipitated from the supernatant
fluid with streptomycin sulfate (20 mg/ml) essentially as described
elsewhere (24). After centrifugation, the proteins in the
supernatant fluid were precipitated with 60% ammonium sulfate, resuspended in buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 5 mM
CaCl2, 20% glycerol, 100 mM NaCl), and dialyzed overnight
at 10°C against 2 liters of buffer B. The protein was loaded on a
DEAE-Sephadex A-50 column (5 by 15 cm) equilibrated with buffer B and
eluted with a 1-liter linear gradient from 100 to 500 mM NaCl in buffer B. The fractions containing GPR were pooled, precipitated with 70%
ammonium sulfate, dissolved in 10 ml of buffer B, and dialyzed overnight against 1 liter of the same buffer. The protein was then
loaded on a 12-ml anion-exchange column (UNO Q-12 column; Bio-Rad) on a
BioLogic FPLC system (Bio-Rad) and eluted as described above but with a
total gradient volume of 180 ml. The fractions containing GPR were
pooled, precipitated with 70% ammonium sulfate, dissolved in 10 ml of
buffer C (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 5 mM CaCl2, 20%
glycerol, 150 mM NaCl), and dialyzed overnight against the same buffer.
The dialyzed protein (5 to 10 ml) was finally run through a 340-ml
Sephacryl S-200 26/60 gel filtration column (Pharmacia) equilibrated
with buffer C. The fractions containing GPR were pooled, precipitated
with 70% ammonium sulfate, resuspended, and dialyzed overnight against
10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-5 mM CaCl2-20% glycerol. The
protein was concentrated in Centricon-30 concentrators (Amicon) to
~20 mg/ml and stored at
20°C.
Limited proteolytic digestion.
GPR (0.5 to 1 mg/ml) was
incubated at 37°C in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-20% glycerol-5 mM
CaCl2 with tosylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl
ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin (Worthington) at a GPR/trypsin ratio of
1,000:1 (wt/wt). The inclusion of glycerol in the digestion buffer was
essential to obtain stable functional products, as in the absence of
glycerol, both P46 and P41 were rapidly
degraded to small fragments. Reactions were stopped by addition of 2×
electrophoresis sample buffer and boiling for 5 min, and aliquots were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE on a 15% gel. Proteins were transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and stained with Coomassie blue;
protein bands were analyzed by automated amino acid sequencing and
matrix-assisted laser desorption-time-of-flight mass spectrometry
(MALDI-TOF) as described elsewhere (11, 17).
GPR assay and autoprocessing.
GPR was assayed as described
previously (12). When trypsin-digested P46 or
P41 was assayed, soybean trypsin inhibitor was added to
digests in a 2:1 molar ratio with trypsin prior to GPR assays. When
crude extracts were to be assayed, GPR was overexpressed as described
above and the cells were harvested by centrifugation. The cells from
~50 ml of culture were resuspended in 2 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.4)-5 mM CaCl2-20% glycerol, disrupted by sonication, and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min. The protein
concentration of the supernatant fluid was determined by the method of
Lowry et al. (14).
The autoprocessing of the stable trypsin digestion product of
P46 (termed P30) was for 3 h at 37°C
with 50 µg of protein in 100 µl of 250 mM
2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (pH 6.2)-10 mM
dipicolinic acid-20 mM CaCl2-40% polyethylene glycol 8000 (molecular grade; Sigma) as described previously (17). To ensure complete inactivation of trypsin in P30, a
twofold excess of soybean trypsin inhibitor over trypsin was added
prior to initiation of autoprocessing.
Effect of protease inhibitors on GPR activity.
Two different
procedures were used to test the effects of protease inhibitors on the
activity of purified P41. To test the effect of
1,10-orthophenanthroline (Ophen), P41 (0.2 mg/ml) was dialyzed overnight at 10°C against 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-5 mM CaCl2-20% glycerol-2 mM Ophen prior to enzyme assays
(1). To test the effects of 250 µM
N-acetylimidazole (NAI), 1 mM
3,4-dichloroisocoumarin (DCI), 10 mM disopropylfluorophosphate
(DFP), 10 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid (HQSA), 1 mM
iodoacetic acid (IAA), 1 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), 10 µM
pepstatin, and 3 or 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), the
inhibitors were routinely incubated in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-5 mM
CaCl2-20% glycerol with 20 to 200 µg of purified P41 per ml. Incubation was for 4 h at 23°C for NAI
(the buffer used was 25 mM MOPS [pH 7.4]), 2 h at 4°C for DCI
(with no glycerol in the incubation), 45 min at 37°C for DFP [50 mM
3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid (pH 10) was used with this
inhibitor in addition to Tris-HCl], 30 min at 37°C for HQSA, 1 h at 23°C for IAA, overnight at 23°C for NEM, 1 h at 23°C
for pepstatin (with 20 µg of P41 per ml), and 45 min at
23°C for PMSF. Aliquots of the incubation mixtures were assayed for
GPR activity as described above both before and after incubation, and
in parallel with P41 samples incubated similarly but
without inhibitors. In some cases the discontinuous colorimetric assay
for GPR (12, 29) was used, as some inhibitors inhibit the
aminopeptidase used in the GPR assay.
Metal analysis.
GPR for metal analysis was purified and
concentrated as described above and then dialyzed exhaustively against
10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-10% glycerol-1 mM CaCl2 in
otherwise metal-free water (Milli-Q); this dialysis buffer had <2 µM
Mg2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Co2+,
or Fe2+. Standard solutions were made with the dialysis
buffer as the diluent, and metal analyses were carried out on a Leeman
PS 1000 ICP atomic absorption spectrometer. The instrument was
calibrated, and standards were checked to verify the calibration.
CD spectroscopy, thermal melting, and guanidine hydrochloride
(GuHCl) denaturation.
Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were
recorded with an AVIV 62DS spectropolarimeter interfaced to a personal
computer. Spectra were collected at 20°C for solutions containing 1.9 mg of P41 or 1.6 mg of P46 per ml in 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-5 mM CaCl2-10% glycerol-2 mM EDTA.
The glycerol and CaCl2 were present to ensure protein
stability. The CD spectra were measured every 0.5 nm with 2-s averaging
per point and a 2-nm bandwidth; a 0.01-cm-path-length cell was used.
Spectra were signal averaged by adding five scans, and the baseline was
corrected by subtracting a spectrum for the buffer obtained under
identical conditions. The temperature was maintained by a Lauda RS2
circulating water bath, and the cell temperature was measured with a
thermosensor. The protein concentration in this experiment was
determined from the UV absorption at 280 nm, using calculated molar
absorption coefficients of 5,960 mol
1 cm
1
for P41 and 7,450 mol
1 cm
1 for
P46 (14).
For CD analysis of thermal melting, proteins were at 0.2 mg/ml in 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-5 mM CaCl2-20% glycerol. Measurements were at 220 nm, using a 3-nm bandwidth and a 1-cm cell. Data points were determined every 0.5°C, and the measured signal was averaged 10 s per point. The temperature of the cell holder was controlled and monitored as described above, and the temperature of the sample inside the cell was measured with a Bailey Instruments Bat 8 digital thermometer with a Sensotreck thermistor. The CD data at each temperature were converted to ellipticity in millidegrees, and the data
were fit to thermodynamic models by a standard strategy (10). The melting temperature of each protein was defined as the midpoint of the thermal unfolding process.
For measurement of unfolding by GuHCl, the ellipticity at 220 nm was
measured at 20°C essentially as described above. P46 or
P41 (5 mg/ml) was diluted 1/100 in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.4)-5 mM CaCl2-20% glycerol containing various
concentrations of GuHCl (ultrapure; ICN). The ellipticity was measured
after both 15 min and 2 h of incubation to ensure that the
unfolding process was complete.
 |
RESULTS |
Proteolytic digestion of GPR.
Previous work has indicated that
the only covalent change in conversion of P46 to
P41 is removal of 15 (B. megaterium) or 16 (B. subtilis) amino-terminal residues (24). To
further probe the structures of both P46 and
P41, we digested these proteins with trypsin and analyzed
both the sequences and the activities of the digestion products.
Trypsin rapidly converted P46 to a 30-kDa species (termed
P30) (Fig. 2) that exhibited
no further degradation after 24 h (data not shown). The
amino-terminal sequence of P30 was ELDLS, and its
molecular mass measured by MALDI-TOF was 28,798.1 Da. These data
indicate that P30 is generated by trypsin cleavage after
K3 and K268 (Fig. 1A), giving a polypeptide
with a calculated mass of 28,756.9 Da, in good agreement with the value
determined experimentally.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Digestion of P46 with trypsin. Purified
P46 was incubated with trypsin as described in Materials
and Methods. At various times, aliquots (~10 µg of protein) were
withdrawn and subjected to SDS-PAGE (15% gel), and the proteins were
stained with Coomassie blue. The GPR samples run in lanes 1 to 6 were
digested for 0, 2, 5, 15, 30, and 60 min, respectively. Molecular
weight markers run in parallel (not shown) indicated that the major
band in lane 6 is ~30 kDa, and this band was analyzed for both
molecular weight and N-terminal amino acid sequence.
|
|
Given the stability of P30, it was of obvious interest to
compare some of its properties to those of P46. Analysis by
gel filtration indicated that P30 is tetrameric (data
not shown), as is P46 (12). In common with
P46, P30 could autoprocess to a
slightly smaller form when incubated under the conditions
previously shown to promote P46
P41
conversion (Fig. 3). This
smaller form was tetrameric (data not shown), and its
N-terminal sequence (Fig. 3, band b) was LAVEA, which is that expected
for cleavage of P30 at the site of
P46
P41 conversion (6, 24).
However, we could not detect GPR activity in the processed
P30 presumably because of the instability of the
active form of P30 (see below) and the conditions used for
autoprocessing (pH 6.2 and no glycerol).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Autoprocessing of the stable P30 domain of
trypsin-digested P46. P30 was generated and
incubated under autoprocessing conditions as described in Materials and
Methods; an aliquot (10 µg) was precipitated with trichloroacetic
acid, resuspended in SDS sample buffer, and subjected to SDS-PAGE (12%
gel). Lane 1, unprocessed P30; lane 2, autoprocessed
P30. Arrows a and b denote the migration positions of
P30 and the autoprocessed product, respectively.
|
|
In addition to gaining enzymatic activity, another change occurring
upon conversion of P46 to P41 is an increase in
the reactivity of the protein's single sulfhydryl group with
5,5'-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) (7). However, the
sulfhydryl group in P30 was less reactive than that of
P41 and exhibited a reactivity similar to that in
P46 (data not shown). This is further evidence that the increased reactivity of the sulfhydryl group in P41 is
caused only by the loss of the propeptide, as was suggested by previous work (7, 17), and further, that loss of the C terminus of P46 does not unfold the protein. If the latter was the
case, we would most likely have seen an increase in the reactivity of
the sulfhydryl group in P30, as is observed in
P41 (7).
The results of trypsin digestion of P41 were quite
different from those with P46, as P41 was much
less resistant to trypsin and was degraded to fragments of less than 10 kDa in ~30 min; however, short-lived active intermediates of ~27
and ~29 kDa were generated (Fig. 4).
Analysis of the N-terminal sequences of these two species gave MLAVE
for the larger intermediate and DALAN for the smaller one (note that
this experiment used
P39). While the first sequence is
of intact P41, the second is generated by cleavage after K21 (Fig. 1B). The molecular masses of the two
species as determined by MALDI-TOF were 27,302.9 and 26,760.8 Da,
respectively, in fairly good agreement with the molecular masses
calculated (27,309.4 and 26,566.4 Da), assuming that a second
tryptic cleavage takes place after K268 as in generation of
P30 from P46. While these two fragments were active (Fig. 4), their activity was lost within at most a few hours,
even if samples were frozen (data not shown).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Digestion of P41 with trypsin. Purified
P41 was incubated with trypsin as described in Materials
and Methods, and at various times aliquots (10 µg of protein) were
subjected to SDS-PAGE (15% gel). The numbers below the lanes give the
percentages of the initial activity of the enzyme assayed as described
in Materials and Methods; the value for undigested P41 was
set at 100%. The GPR samples in lanes 1 to 6 run were digested for 0, 2, 5, 15, 30, and 60 min, respectively. The two bands in lane 4 were
taken for analysis of molecular weight and N-terminal protein sequence.
Molecular weight markers run in parallel (not shown) indicated that the
latter two bands ran at 29 and 27 kDa.
|
|
In previous studies, we showed that deletion of up to nine residues of
the B. megaterium GPR propeptide did not result in a protein
with significant activity, while deletion of 12 of the propeptide
residues gave a protein with 30% of the activity of P41
(17). Digestion of GPR variants lacking three or six
propeptide residues with trypsin gave essentially the same
result as did digestion of P46; i.e., a stable inactive
species of ~30 kDa was generated (data not shown). In contrast,
digestion of the variants lacking 9 and 12 propeptide residues with
trypsin gave results similar to those with P41, i.e., rapid
digestion of the proteins with generation of short-lived active
intermediates (data not shown).
Analysis of P46 and P41 structures.
The differences in sulfhydryl reactivity and trypsin sensitivity of
P46 and P41 (7) indicate that these
proteins differ somewhat in structure; this variance could
reflect a difference in secondary structure, in tertiary structure, or
in both. We used CD spectroscopy to assess the secondary
structure content of P41 and P46. The two
proteins had very similar far-UV CD spectra, including characteristics
found in proteins with
helices (Fig. 5). Analysis of the spectra between 190 and 260 nm by the method of Chang et al. (3) indicated that
P41 contained 21% ± 5%
-helix structure, 58% ± 5%
sheet, and 21% ± 5% random coil; for P46, the
corresponding values were 19% ± 5%, 51% ± 5%, and 28% ± 5%.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
CD spectra of P41 and P46. The
far-UV spectra of P41 (1.9 mg/ml) and P46 (1.6 mg/ml) were recorded and analyzed as described in Materials and
Methods. Arrows 1 and 2 denote the spectra of P46 and
P41, respectively.
|
|
Although the CD spectroscopy would not have detected small differences
in secondary structure between P46 and P41, the
foregoing data indicate that these proteins have very similar secondary structures. This finding further suggests that the differences in
trypsin sensitivity and sulfhydryl group reactivity of P41 and P46 are due to difference in the tertiary structures of
these two proteins. To study this point further, we measured the
thermal melting of P41 and P46 as described in
Materials and Methods and found that P41 was significantly
less stable than P46, their melting temperatures being 63 and 76°C, respectively (Fig. 6). The
profile of the thermal unfolding of P41, as seen by CD
analysis, was quite different and more irregular than that of
P46, and P41 unfolding was initiated at a
significantly lower temperature. Using another method to compare
the stabilities of P46 and P41, we
calculated that the GuHCl concentrations needed for 50%
unfolding of P41 and P46 (determined as
described in Materials and Methods) were 1.4 M for P41 and
2 M for P46 (data not shown). These additional experiments
further indicate that P46 has a significantly more stable,
and presumably more compact, structure than P41.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Thermal unfolding of P46 and
P41. The thermal unfolding of P46 and
P41 was determined by analysis of CD at 220 nm as described
in Materials and Methods. Curves 1 and 2 denote the melting points of
P46 and P41, respectively.
|
|
Analysis of GPR residues essential for catalysis.
The removal
of ~30% of GPR residues without loss of enzyme activity or the
capacity for autoprocessing indicates that the residues essential for
GPR catalysis must reside in the remaining 70% of the protein.
Comparison of the amino acid sequences of GPR from B. megaterium and B. subtilis has previously failed to reveal any consensus sequence for any known class of protease (32). This analysis can now be extended further (Fig.
7), as the sequence of GPR from
Clostridium acetobutylicium has recently become available
from Genome Therapeutics Corporation (Waltham, Mass.) through the
Internet at www.cric.com. Analysis of these three protein
sequences shows that the sequence in the
P46
P41 cleavage site is the same in all
three proteins, but the clostridial protein has a much shorter
propeptide. Again, there are no conserved signature consensus sequences
for aspartic or cysteine proteases, metalloproteases, or serine
proteases, the four main classes of proteases (2,
19-21). However, comparison of these three sequences does
give information on residues that may or may not play a role in catalysis. Thus, the single cysteine residue conserved in
the GPR of the two Bacillus species is replaced by a
valine in the clostridial enzyme, although the latter protein contains
a cysteine residue at position 147. There are also two serines
that are conserved in the three GPRs; these residues are
Ser219 and Ser229 in B. megaterium
GPR. Ser274 and Ser276 of B. megaterium GPR are also conserved in B. subtilis GPR
but not in the C. acetobutylicum protein. While the latter
enzyme has Ser258 in the same region which might substitute
for either Ser274 or Ser276, these more
carboxyl-terminal serines seem unlikely to be essential for catalysis,
as they are probably removed by the trypsin digestion, generating
P30 and the analogous active forms generated from
P41.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Amino acid sequence alignment of GPRs from various
species. The protein sequences were aligned by using the ClustalW
program. Gaps introduced into the sequences are indicated by dashes.
Positions at which identical residues are present in proteins from all
three species are indicated by asterisks below the sequence. Numbers at
the right indicate the last residue in that row for each protein. The
labeled arrows denote the site cleaved in the generation of
P41 (a), the site cleaved in generation of P39
(b), the single cysteine in GPR from Bacillus species (c),
two serine residues conserved in all three proteins (d and e), the
likely site of trypsin cleavage generating P30 from
P46 (f), and serine residues conserved in the
Bacillus proteins (g and h). Sources of the sequences:
Bacillus megaterium (B. meg) (32), Bacillus
subtilis (B. su) (32), and Clostridium
acetobutilycum (C. acet) (the Internet at www.cric.com).
|
|
Previous work suggested that GPR might indeed be a serine protease, as
the enzyme's activity was inhibited by PMSF (29). We have
confirmed this finding for purified P41, as the enzyme was
inhibited completely by incubation as described in Materials and
Methods with 10 mM PMSF and ~60% by incubation with 3 mM PMSF (data
not shown). However, P41 was not inhibited by treatment with DCI or DFP as described in Materials and Methods (the latter inhibitor at both pH 7.4 and 10), conversion of P41 to
P39 was not inhibited by 10 mM PMSF, and incubation of
P46 overnight with 10 mM PMSF did not inhibit significant
autoprocessing of P46 to P41 (data not shown).
These findings call into question the identification of GPR as a serine
protease. The enzyme was also not inhibited by treatment with
pepstatin, IAA, and NEM as described in Materials and Methods,
suggesting that GPR is neither an aspartic nor a cysteine protease, nor
was it inhibited by NAI (data not shown).
To definitively establish or rule out a role for various residues in
GPR catalysis, we made a number of site-directed mutants of
B. megaterium P41. All of these GPR variants
were overexpressed to very similar high levels in
E. coli (data not shown), and assay of their enzymatic
activities showed conclusively that the sulfhydryl and serine residues
discussed above do not play an essential role in GPR catalysis
(Table 2). Consequently, GPR is
neither a cysteine nor a serine protease. We also assayed a variant of
P41 in which the site at which P41
autoprocesses to P39 was altered to a sequence different
from that recognized by P41. As expected, this variant,
P39, did not exhibit detectable conversion to
P39 under conditions in which P41 exhibited
>70% conversion to P39 (data not shown). The
P39 variant also had essentially the same specific
activity as P41, indicating that the
P41
P39 conversion likely has no role in GPR
activity.
Analyses of metal ions in GPR.
Previous work has shown that
Ca2+ is required for P41 stability, although
Ca2+ is likely not required for catalytic activity
(29). However, incubation of P41 as described in
Materials and Methods with chelators such as Ophen and HQSA, which have
a low affinity for Ca2+ but a high affinity for other
divalent cations (i.e., Zn2+), gave no inhibition of GPR
activity (data not shown). These results suggest that GPR is not a
metalloprotease, which is consistent with the absence of the classical
HEXXH motif of metalloproteases from GPR (21, 32). However,
it is still possible that GPR is an unusual metalloprotease with a very
tightly bound divalent cation. To test this point directly, we dialyzed
concentrated GPR solutions against metal-free buffer (except for the
stabilizing Ca2+ ions) and analyzed the protein for metal
ions by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Analysis of both
P41 and P46 showed that Cd2+,
Co2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Mg2+,
and Mn2+ were present at <0.03 mol/mol of enzyme subunits,
while Zn2+ was present at <0.05 mol/mol of enzyme subunits
(data not shown). These data effectively rule out the possibility that
GPR is a metalloprotease.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Proteases include enzymes that have been classified into
four families
aspartic and cysteine proteases, metalloproteases, and serine proteases
as well as a number of unclassified enzymes (2, 18-21). The data in this communication clearly show
that GPR is not a cysteine protease, metalloprotease, or serine
protease. Presumably, the inhibition of GPR by PMSF was due to reaction with some amino acid residue other than a serine or with a serine residue essential for protein stability but not catalysis. One catalytic residue other than serine that might react with PMSF is
threonine, and recently the catalytic residue in the proteasome has
been identified as an N-terminal threonine residue (27). While P41 does not have an N-terminal threonine residue,
there are nine threonine residues that are conserved in the three known GPR sequences (Fig. 7). Thus, it is formally possible that GPR could
utilize a threonine residue for catalysis. However, the proteasome is
inhibited by DCI (4), and this inhibitor had no effect on
P41. While the latter finding suggests that GPR is not a
threonine protease, it remains possible that the highly specific
P41 is a threonine protease; further mutagenesis will be required to test this possibility.
The facts that GPR's pH optimum is ~8 (28) and that the
enzyme is not inhibited by pepstatin also suggest that GPR is not an
aspartic protease, as these enzymes are generally active at much lower
pH values and are inhibited by pepstatin (20). However, it
is formally possible that GPR is an aspartic protease that is active at
neutral pH, possibly because of the environment around the
active-site aspartates, as has been suggested for several aspartic
proteases (5, 25), and perhaps the high specificity of
GPR's active site precludes inhibition by pepstatin. Indeed, while
GPRs lack the conserved motifs found in many aspartic proteases, the
sequences of GPR from the three species examined do contain seven
conserved aspartate residues.
Examination of the GPR sequences for other conserved residues that
might be nucleophiles in GPR catalysis reveals one conserved tyrosine,
one conserved histidine, one conserved lysine, and five conserved
arginines. Although none of these amino acids have been reported to be
the direct catalytic residues in proteases, several (e.g., histidine
and lysine) participate in catalysis, in particular in serine proteases
(19). The lack of inhibition of GPR by NAI suggests that a
tyrosine residue does not participate in catalysis (22), but
we have as yet no direct proof of the involvement (or lack of
involvement) of the other residues. Again, further mutagensis will be
required to examine the role of these other residues and to
definitively identify the catalytic residues in GPR.
Recently, a substrate-specific protease has been identified in the
obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis
(9). This protease, termed EUO, appears specific for the
histone-like proteins which cause chromatin condensation late in this
organism's life cycle, and in this regard EUO displays some similarity
to GPR in its biological action. However, EUO differs tremendously from
GPR in size, sequence, and inhibition by both pepstatin and a serine
protease inhibitor (9).
The present work shows clearly that only the N-terminal two-thirds of
GPR is required for both catalytic activity of P41 and autoprocessing of P46 to P41. This is shown not
only by the activity and autoprocessing of the 27- to 30-kDa forms
generated from P41 and P46 by trypsin digestion
but also by the absence of 30 of the C-terminal residues in the
Bacillus GPRs from the clostridial enzyme. However, the
C-terminal third of the molecule is needed to impart stability at least
to P41. It is striking that the C-terminal regions of both
P46 and P41 are removed by trypsin cleavage at the same bond (K268). The trypsin sensitivity of the bond
between K268 and E269 suggests that these
residues are a part of a structure, possibly a loop, that is exposed to
the solvent. The loss of the 102 C-terminal residues from
P46 without loss of the autoprocessing activity of
P30 further suggests that these C-terminal residues form a domain (or domains) which is distinct from the catalytic domain of the
enzyme, although the C-terminal domain may be important in stabilizing
the intact enzyme. The resistance of P30 to further trypsin
digestion is in contrast to the lability of the 27- and 29-kDa forms
generated from P41 by trypsin. The degradation and instability of the latter species, the lack of reactivity of the SH
group in P30 (in contrast to the SH group in
P41), the much greater trypsin sensitivity of
P41 than of P46, the lower melting temperature
for P41 than for P46, and the greater
susceptibility of P41 than of P46 to unfolding
by GuHCl are further evidence for a significant difference in tertiary
structure between P46 and P41, with the latter
presumably having a less compact structure which is less stable and
more accessible to DTNB and trypsin. Such a difference in the structure
and stability of zymogen and active enzyme has been seen with a number
of other proteases, as the zymogen's propeptide not only helps
maintain the enzyme in an inactive state but also assists in the
compact folding and stabilization of the protein (15).
However, this difference in tertiary structure between these two forms
of GPR is not reflected in any significant difference in secondary
structure content.
The only major difference between P30 and the larger of the
two active forms of P41 generated by trypsin is the
presence of most of the propeptide residues in P30.
Previous work has shown that removal of 3, 6, or 9 propeptide residues
from P46 does not result in an active enzyme and does not
cause an increase in the reactivity of the enzyme's SH group, while
removal of 12 residues gives an active enzyme with a more reactive SH
group (17). Our new data largely reinforce these earlier
results, as (i) the clostridial GPR has only five propeptide residues
(analogous to the
2-10 variant of B. megaterium GPR),
which presumably are sufficient to maintain the enzyme as a zymogen;
and (ii) trypsin digestion of the GPR variants lacking 3 or 6 propeptide residues gave results similar to those obtained upon
digestion of P46, while trypsin digestion of the variant
lacking 12 propeptide residues was like that of P41. In
contrast, the
2-10 variant has essentially no enzymatic activity
(17), as is the case for P46, but trypsin digestion of the
2-10 variant gave results similar to those with the
active P41. While we cannot explain this discrepancy
completely, we note that there is an arginine three residues after the
N terminus of the
2-10 variant (Fig. 1B). Possibly the propeptide
region in the
2-10 region is unstable enough that trypsin can cleave at this arginine residue, generating an enzyme that is identical to the
2-13 variant that is rapidly degraded by trypsin.
While these results provide further support for the importance of the
propeptide in determining GPR structure, they also suggest that most of
the propeptide is unlikely to be freely accessible to the solvent, as
it is only in the
2-10 variant that there may have been significant
internal trypsin cleavage in the propeptide. However, the N-terminal
region of the propeptide must be solvent accessible, as trypsin does
cleave adjacent to K3. This result, as well as the relative
stability of the
2-7 variant to trypsin and a propeptide of only
five residues in the clostridial GPR, indicates that only a few
propeptide residues are needed to maintain GPR in the zymogen
conformation. Since there is no large conformational change in the
P46
P41 conversion, a clear challenge for
future work will be to elucidate the precise nature of this
conformational change.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are extremely grateful to Douglas Smith of Genome Therapeutics
Corporation for providing unpublished genome sequence data. We also
thank Donald D. Muccio and Marta Ferraroni for their help with
collecting and interpreting the CD spectra and Barbara Setlow for
assistance with some experiments.
The AVIV 62DS spectropolarimeter was obtained with funds from NSF grant
DIR 8820511. This work was supported by grant GM19698 from the National
Institutes of Health (P.S.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06032. Phone: (860) 679-2607. Fax: (860) 679-3408. E-mail:
setlow{at}sun.uchc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Auld, S. D.
1995.
Removal and replacement of metal ions in metallopeptidases.
Methods Enzymol.
248:228-242[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Barrett, A. J.
1994.
Classification of peptidases.
Methods Enzymol.
244:1-5[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chang, C. T.,
G.-S. C. Wu, and J. T. Yang.
1978.
Circular dichroic analysis of protein conformation: inclusion of the -turns.
Anal. Biochem.
91:13-31[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Coux, O.,
K. Tanaka, and A. L. Goldberg.
1997.
Structure and function of the 20S and 26S proteasomes.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65:801-848[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Ido, E.,
H.-P. Han,
F. J. Kezdy, and J. Tang.
1991.
Kinetic studies of human immunodeficiency virus type I protease and its active-site hydrogen bond mutant A28S.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:24359-24366[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Illades-Aguiar, B., and P. Setlow.
1994.
Studies of the processing of the protease which initiates degradation of small, acid-soluble proteins during germination of spores of Bacillus species.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2788-2795[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Illades-Aguiar, B., and P. Setlow.
1994.
The zymogen of the protease that degrades small, acid-soluble proteins of spores of Bacillus species can rapidly autoprocess to the active enzyme in vitro.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5571-5573[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Illades-Aguiar, B., and P. Setlow.
1994.
Autoprocessing of the protease that degrades small, acid-soluble proteins of spores of Bacillus species is triggered by low pH, dehydration, and dipicolinic acid.
J. Bacteriol.
176:7032-7037[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Kaul, R.,
A. Hoang,
P. Yan,
E. M. Bradbury, and W. M. Wenman.
1997.
The chlamydial EUO gene encodes a histone H1-specific protease.
J. Bacteriol.
179:5928-5934[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Khan, A. R., and M. N. G. James.
1998.
Molecular mechanisms for the conversion of zymogens to active proteolytic enzymes.
Protein Sci.
7:815-836[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Liang, X.,
J. Bai,
Y. Liu, and D. M. Lubman.
1996.
Characterization of SDS-PAGE-separated proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.
Anal. Chem.
68:1012-1018[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Loshon, C. A., and P. Setlow.
1982.
Bacillus megaterium spore protease: purification, radioimmunoassay, and analysis of antigen level and localization during growth, sporulation, and spore germination.
J. Bacteriol.
150:303-311[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Loshon, C. A.,
B. M. Swerdlow, and P. Setlow.
1982.
Bacillus megaterium spore protease: synthesis and processing of precursor forms during sporulation and germination.
J. Biol. Chem.
257:10838-10845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
N. J. Rosebrough,
A. L. Farr, and R. J. Randall.
1951.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.
J. Biol. Chem.
193:265-275[Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Muccio, D. E.,
D. V. Waterhous,
F. Fish, and C. G. Bronillette.
1992.
Analysis of the two-state behavior of the thermal unfolding of the serum retinol binding protein containing a single retinol ligand.
Biochemistry
31:5560-5567[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Pace, C. N.,
F. Vajdos,
L. Fee,
G. Grimsley, and T. Gray.
1995.
How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein.
Protein Sci.
4:2411-2423[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Pedersen, L. B.,
C. Nessi, and P. Setlow.
1997.
Most of the propeptide is dispensable for the stability and autoprocessing of the zymogen of the germination protease of spores of Bacillus species.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1824-1827[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Philipps, M. A., and R. J. Fletterick.
1992.
Proteases.
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
2:713-720.
|
| 19.
|
Rawlings, N. D., and A. J. Barrett.
1994.
Families of serine peptidases.
Methods Enzymol.
244:19-61[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Rawlings, N. D., and A. J. Barrett.
1995.
Families of aspartic peptidases, and those of unknown catalytic mechanism.
Methods Enzymol.
248:105-120[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Rawlings, N. D., and A. J. Barrett.
1995.
Evolutionary families of metallopeptidases.
Methods Enzymol.
248:183-228[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Riordan, J. F., and B. L. Vallee.
1967.
O-acetyltyrosine.
Methods Enzymol.
11:570-576.
|
| 23.
|
Sanchez-Salas, J.-L.,
M. L. Santiago-Lara,
B. Setlow,
M. D. Sussman, and P. Setlow.
1992.
Properties of mutants of Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus subtilis which lack the protease that degrades small, acid-soluble proteins during spore germination.
J. Bacteriol.
174:807-814[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Sanchez-Salas, J.-L., and P. Setlow.
1993.
Proteolytic processing of the protease which initiates degradation of small, acid-soluble proteins during germination of Bacillus subtilis spores.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2568-2577[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Sankaran, K., and H. C. Wu.
1995.
Bacterial prolipoprotein signal peptidase.
Methods Enzymol.
248:169-180[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Sarkar, G., and S. S. Sommer.
1990.
The "megaprimer" method of site-directed mutagenesis.
BioTechniques
8:404-407[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Seemuller, E.,
A. Lupas,
D. Stock,
J. Lowe,
R. Huber, and W. Baumeister.
1995.
Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum: a threonine protease.
Science
268:579-582[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Setlow, B., and P. Setlow.
1993.
Binding of small, acid-soluble spore proteins to DNA plays a significant role in the resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores to hydrogen peroxide.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59:3418-3423[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Setlow, P.
1976.
Purification and properties of a specific proteolytic enzyme present in spores of Bacillus megaterium.
J. Biol. Chem.
251:7853-7862[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Setlow, P.
1988.
Small acid-soluble, spore proteins of Bacillus species: structure, synthesis, genetics, function and degradation.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
42:319-338[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Setlow, P.
1992.
I will survive: protecting and repairing spore DNA.
J. Bacteriol.
174:2737-2741[Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sussman, M. D., and P. Setlow.
1991.
Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and regulation of the Bacillus subtilis gpr gene, which codes for the protease that initiates degradation of small, acid-soluble proteins during germination of spores of Bacillus species.
J. Bacteriol.
173:291-300[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, October 1998, p. 5077-5084, Vol. 180, No. 19
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Carroll, T. M., Setlow, P.
(2005). Site-Directed Mutagenesis and Structural Studies Suggest that the Germination Protease, GPR, in Spores of Bacillus Species Is an Atypical Aspartic Acid Protease. J. Bacteriol.
187: 7119-7125
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shimamoto, S., Moriyama, R., Sugimoto, K., Miyata, S., Makino, S.
(2001). Partial Characterization of an Enzyme Fraction with Protease Activity Which Converts the Spore Peptidoglycan Hydrolase (SleC) Precursor to an Active Enzyme during Germination of Clostridium perfringens S40 Spores and Analysis of a Gene Cluster Involved in the Activity. J. Bacteriol.
183: 3742-3751
[Abstract]
[Full Text]