Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, October 1998, p. 5327-5333, Vol. 180, No. 20
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
MinCD Proteins Control the Septation Process during
Sporulation of Bacillus subtilis
Imrich
Barák,*
Peter
Prepiak, and
Falko
Schmeisser
Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak
Academy of Sciences, 841 51 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Received 14 April 1998/Accepted 14 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mutation of the divIVB locus in Bacillus
subtilis causes misplacement of the septum during cell division
and allows the formation of anucleate minicells. The divIVB
locus contains five open reading frames (ORFs). The last two ORFs
(minCD) are homologous to minC and
minD of Escherichia coli but a minE
homolog is lacking in B. subtilis. There is some similarity
between minicell formation and the asymmetric septation that normally
occurs during sporulation in terms of polar septum localization.
However, it has been proposed that MinCD has no essential role in
sporulation septum formation. We have used electron microscopic studies
to show septation events during sporulation in some minD
strains. We have observed an unusually thin septum at the midcell
position in minD and also in minD spoIIE71 mutant cells. Fluorescence microscopy also localized a SpoIIE-green fluorescent protein fusion protein at the midcell site in
minD cells. We propose that the MinCD complex plays an
important role in asymmetric septum formation during sporulation of
B. subtilis cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bacillus subtilis is a
gram-positive endospore-forming bacterium that when grown vegetatively
divides by precise placement of a septum at midcell. However, during
sporulation the generation of two cells with different development
fates is preceded by an asymmetric division. Vegetative division
involves FtsZ, FtsA, DivIB, DivIC, FtsL, and PBP2B, in addition to
other proteins. It is believed that the asymmetric division in
sporulation uses the same division proteins. FtsZ appears to play a
pivotal role in selection of the division site prior to cell division
in both Escherichia coli and B. subtilis (7,
8); at the onset of sporulation, assembly of an FtsZ ring shifts
from midcell to the two potential polar sites, and this shift is
dependent on the transcription factor Spo0A (25).
Three min genes (minC, minD, and
minE) are known to exist in E. coli. Homologous
MinC and MinD proteins have been identified in B. subtilis,
but a MinE equivalent has not yet been found (23, 24, 32).
The MinE protein appears to play a role in topological specificity in
E. coli (29). Because of the similarity between minicell formation and asymmetric septation during sporulation, it was
proposed that there were two MinE-like B. subtilis proteins, with different topological properties (29). The vegetative
specific MinE protein would activate septation at midcell, whereas
sporulation-specific MinE would allow division at the polar position
and simultaneously allow the division inhibitor to block septation at
midcell. This model also predicts that these different MinE proteins
will have different topological properties. The vegetative MinE would
counteract the action of the MinCD division inhibitor at midcell but
not at the cell poles. In contrast, sporulation-specific MinE would counteract the division inhibitor at the polar sites and would block
the midcell septation site. The search for MinE-like proteins in
B. subtilis led to the discovery of the DivIVA protein,
which has some characteristics expected of a MinE-like protein (9, 14). Although genetic evidence supports the hypothesis that in
B. subtilis DivIVA has a function analogous to that of MinE in E. coli, there are important differences between these
two proteins. Cha and Stewart (9) also proposed that DivIVA
is involved in activation of polar septation sites during the
sporulation process.
MinC and MinD proteins are inhibitors of septation at medial and polar
sites in both E. coli and B. subtilis, and their
absence leads to minicell formation. However, the role of MinCD in
sporulation is unclear, as minCD mutants sporulate very
efficiently, in contrast with mutations at another locus associated
with the minicell phenotype, divIVA. Here we report that the
lack of active MinCD during sporulation causes the creation of thin
sporulation-like septa at the midcell position. This is a surprising
discovery that has likely not been reported previously because this
phenotype has only a minimal influence on the level of sporulation
efficiency. We also report that SpoIIE, a sporulation-specific protein
which allows activation of
F in the forespore, localizes
in these cells not only in a bipolar manner but also at the midcell
position.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, culture media, and genetic techniques.
Bacterial strains used in this work are listed in Table
1. Isolation of genomic and plasmid DNA,
methods for transformation of B. subtilis and E. coli strains, selection of antibiotic resistance markers, and
other standard genetic techniques were carried out as described
previously (10). Standard enzymatic reagents, including restriction enzymes, DNA ligase, and Taq DNA polymerase,
were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim, New England Biolabs, or
Perkin-Elmer, Inc. Amplification of DNA by PCR was carried out using
standard methods (19). To construct plasmids pBGCDM3 and
pBGCDdel, PCR products were amplified from PY184 and PY79 chromosomal
DNA, respectively, using oligonucleotides MINCECO
(5'-GTGGAATTCGTGAAGACCAAAAAGCAGC-3') and MINDBAM
(5'-CGGTGGATCCAAGAACAAAGCAGGC-3'). These PCR products contained the nucleotide sequence coding for the entire minC
and minD genes. The PCR fragment derived from PY184 was
digested with EcoRI and BamHI and inserted into
pGEM-3Zf(+)cat (35) digested with the same restriction
enzymes, creating plasmid pBGCDM3. The PCR fragment derived from PY79
was inserted into plasmid pGEM-3Zf(+)cat as described above, creating
plasmid pBGCD. This plasmid was cut with KpnI, and then a
5-kb backbone was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and ligated,
creating plasmid pBGCDdel. The presence of the divIVB1
mutation on plasmid pBGCDM3 was confirmed by DNA sequencing using the
fmol DNA cycle sequencing system (Promega Corp.). Plasmids pBGCDM3
and pBGCDdel were used for transformation of PY79 cells by selection
for chloramphenicol resistance, creating strains IB498 and IB515,
respectively. The correct recombination of both plasmids in the
minCD region of the chromosome was verified by Southern blot
hybridization. Strain IB508 was prepared and its chromosomal structure
was verified as described above for strain IB498. Plasmid pBGCDM3-kan,
a derivative of plasmid pBGCDM3, was prepared by replacing the
cat gene with the Kmr gene from plasmid pUK19 (a
gift from W. Haldenwang). This plasmid was used for transformation of
strain PY79, creating strain IB508. The chromosomal structure was also
verified by Southern blot hybridization.
Electron microscopy.
Sporulation was induced by nutrient
exhaustion in DSM (Difco sporulation medium) broth as described
previously (10). At various times after cessation of growth,
samples were harvested by centrifugation, washed in a buffer containing
0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.2), and fixed for 1 h at 4°C in
the same buffer containing 2% glutaraldehyde and 1% OsO4
(17). Following fixation, cells were pelleted by
centrifugation, washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, and dehydrated by a
series of washes and incubations (10 min each at ambient temperature)
in graded concentrations of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 85, 95, and 100%
[twice in 100% ethanol]). This was followed by washing (twice for 30 min each time) in acetone. Dehydrated cells were embedded in Spurr
medium (31) and polymerized for 8 h at 70°C. Samples
were sectioned (60- to 120-nm thickness) on a NOVA3 ultramicrotome
(LKB) and floated onto copper grids. Sections were stained on uranyl
acetate drops for 20 min and on lead citrate drops for 5 min. Stained
thin sections were examined and photographed on a JEOL-100 CX or Tesla
Brno (T541) electron microscope.
Scoring criteria.
Thickness of septa was scored from
digitalized electron micrographs scanned with a Hewlett-Packard 4C
scanner and using PowerPoint 7.0 software (Microsoft) or by direct
measurement of thickness from photographs taken at higher
magnification. For quantification of morphological classes by electron
microscopy, at least 100 complete longitudinal sections were scored
from random fields for each sample.
Fluorescence microscopy and light microscopy.
Cells were
prepared for fluorescence microscopy as described previously
(4). B. subtilis IB509, containing a copy of
plasmid pBsIIE-mutGFP integrated at the chromosomal spoIIE
locus, was cultured in 50 ml of DSM broth at 37°C. At selected times
during growth and sporulation, 400-µl culture samples were
transferred to 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and collected by centrifugation,
and the pellet was resuspended in preservation buffer (40 mM
NaN3, 50% [wt/vol] sucrose, 0.5 M Tris [pH 7.5], 0.77 M NaCl). Samples were examined or photographed after a few hours.
Epifluorescence micrographs were recorded on Kodak transparency film
with an Olympus B201 microscope using a filter set (420- to 480-nm
excitation, DM500 dichroic reflector, and 515-nm emission filters).
Film transparencies were digitalized, and the epifluorescence
micrographs were prepared for printing by using CorelDraw 6.0 software.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Sporulation of minD mutants.
We prepared
divIVB1 mutant (IB498) and minD deletion (IB515)
strains as described in Materials and Methods. The divIVB1
strain contains two mutations in the last gene of the divIVB
operon, which is minD. The first mutation results in
substitution of lysine for methionine at amino acid residue 87, and the
second results in an isoleucine-to-threonine change at amino acid 147 of MinD (32). The minD deletion is at a
KpnI site which leaves only the first 23 amino acid residues
at the N terminus of MinD.
A modest reduction in sporulation of the
divIVB1 strain was
observed (Table
2). While Levin et al.
(
24) reported that a
divIVB1 mutant strain
sporulates at a level approximating that
of the wild type, other
authors reported a slight reduction after
24 h (
9,
23).
This reduction may have been caused by the
change in number of sites
potentially available for septation
during sporulation in such strains
and/or by a delay of sporulation
due to improper localization of some
sporulation-specific proteins
at the same midcell septa.
Ultrastructure of minD mutant cells.
Sporulating
cultures of the divIVB1 mutant (IB498), the minD
deletion strain (IB515), and the wild-type strain (PY79) were harvested
at various times during sporulation and examined by electron microscopy
to test whether the small decrease in sporulation efficiency in
divIVB1 cells was caused by release of MinCD repression at
all possible sites of septation (middle and both polar sites). We used
samples harvested at t4 (4 h after the beginning
of sporulation) for quantitative determinations of different types and
localization of septa. As expected, in the wild-type strain we observed
two kinds of septa: asymmetrically positioned thin sporulation septa and thick vegetative septa at the midcell site (Fig. 1A and
C). In strains IB498 and IB515, we
observed cells with unusually thin septa at the midcell position, which
we call sporulation-like septa (Fig. 1A to C). We also observed these
thin septa at the midcell position in different stages of forespore
development. Figures 1A and C show cells with a thin midcell septum at
a very early time in sporulation. Some midcell thin septa also were
observed in later stages of forespore development (Fig. 1B). In a few
cross sections, cells with multiple septa were observed. Some of the thin septa are not positioned at the precise midpoint of the cell (Fig.
1A), possibly a consequence of the nature of the specific minD mutation carried by the cells. Heterogeneity of cell
length was observed previously in E. coli minD mutants, and
it is believed that this is caused by the role of MinD protein in
nucleoid partition, which is coupled with septation (12).
Dassain and Bouché (11), in contrast, proposed that
polar division in minD mutants causes an abrupt and
temporary decrease in the amount of FtsZ available for nonpolar
division, which in turn has effects such as the cell length
heterogeneity noted above.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Electron micrographs of representative examples of
septum morphologies in strains IB498 (divIVB1) (A to C),
IB507 (spoIIE::Tn917 HU7
divIVB1) (D), and IB506 (spoIIE71 divIVB1)
(E). The insets to panels A and C show examples of wild-type (wt)
vegetative and sporulation septa, respectively. Samples were harvested
at 2 (A and C), 4 (D and E), and 7 h after cessation of logarithmic
growth (B). Each scale bar represents 0.3 µm.
|
|
We suggest that the midcell-positioned thin septa in
B. subtilis
minD cells are not used as proper sporulation septa, even
though
they are similar in thickness to sporulation septa (Table
3). Septa were considered thin if they
measured 14 to 26 nm and
thick if they were 40 to 46 nm (Table
3). All
scored septa fell
into these two classes except those sporulation-like
septa which
proceeded further in forespore development, beyond stage
IIi according
to the classification of Illing and Errington
(
18). Both kinds
of septa, vegetative and sporulation, are
of uniform thickness
when they start to form at the site of septation
in wild-type
cells. The midcell division septum is a participant in
cytokinesis,
with the peptodoglycan component splitting bilaterally,
cleaved
by autolysins as daughter cells separate from one another
(
22).
In contrast, the asymmetrically positioned sporulation
septum
is a participant in the engulfment process, during which most
if
not all of the peptidoglycan is removed.
Statistical studies (Fig.
2A and B)
revealed that forespore development in strain IB498 was significantly
delayed compared
with that in the wild-type strain. As discussed
previously, vegetative
cells lacking MinCD function should produce 67%
minicells, with
only 33% of cells undergoing midcell division
(
9). These cells
actually produced about 30% or less
minicells, and it was proposed
that other systems could be involved in
septation site selection
during vegetative growth (
9).
During sporulation, the total
number of
minC minD cells with
asymmetrically positioned septa
at
t4 was
approximately two times higher (61%) than the number
of cells with
septa at the midcell position (31%) (Fig.
2A). The
total number of
polar septa also includes the thick vegetative-like
septa of minicells,
as well as a number of forespores at stage
III and later of
sporulation; these forespores had to originate
from asymmetrically
positioned septa. These results suggest that
all three possible sites
of septation (two polar and one midcell)
are equally used by the
division machinery at the beginning of
the sporulation process. It also
suggests that the MinCD complex
is probably the main septation
repressor of the midcell position
during stage I of sporulation, when
polar septation is initiated.
Mutations in
minD might thus
reduce the sporulation efficiency,
by about 30%; a decrease is
difficult to measure in commonly used
sporulation efficiency assays. A
delay in forespore development
in strains IB498 and IB515 might also be
caused by localization
of some sporulation-specific proteins at the
thin midcell septa,
thus allowing some of these proteins to function in
the wrong
compartment of the sporulating cell.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Quantitation of morphological classes in sporulating
cells of strains PY79, IB498, IB506, and IB507. Cells were cultured in
DSM broth at 37°C and harvested for examination by electron
microscopy 4 or 7 h after cessation of logarithmic growth.
Morphological classes were used as indicated at the right: 1, no septa;
2, thin septum at polar position; 3, thick septum at polar position; 4, thin septum at midcell position; 5, thick septum at midcell position;
6, cell with forespore at stage III or later.
|
|
Localization of SpoIIE-GFP fusion in the minD
strain.
A few sporulation-specific proteins are known to be
associated specifically with the sporulation septum: SpoIIE (2,
4), SpoIIGB (20), SpoIIGA (15), and
SpoIIIE (34). The SpoIIE protein has an important role as a
serine phosphatase that releases
F activity specifically
in the forespore compartment (13). We investigated the
localization of SpoIIE protein in minD cells by using a
SpoIIE-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion in strain IB509. The main
pattern of GFP localization at t2 was bipolar (Table 4), as observed previously in a
MinCD+ strain (2, 4). In addition to polar
localization of SpoIIE, we expected to find cells in which the signal
localized at the midcell position. Indeed, in some cells we observed a
signal that represents the localization of SpoIIE at the unusual
midcell position (Fig. 3), although the
number of such cells was lower (9% of total cells) (Table 4) than we
expected (30% of total cells). The unexpectedly low frequency of cells
with SpoIIE localized to the midcell may well have been caused by the
fast disappearance of the protein from this position, as earlier work
has shown that SpoIIE rapidly disappears from the sporangium, first
from the mother cell pole and then from the forespore pole
(28). Another possibility for the low level of cells with
SpoIIE at the midcell position could be lower affinity of the protein
for this site than for polar sites at onset of sporulation. However,
localization of SpoIIE phosphatase at the midcell position might
inhibit sporulation and thus cause a delay or arrest of further
forespore development.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Fluorescence microscopy of cells with
SpoIIE-GFP-associated fluorescence at sites of septation in strain
IB509 from cultures harvested 2 h after cessation of logarithmic
growth, photographed as described in Materials and Methods. Cells with
SpoIIE-GFP localization are marked. Arrows indicate the position of
SpoIIE-GFP signals. Each scale bar represents 2 µm.
|
|
Ultrastructure of minD and spoIIE
double-mutant cells.
It was shown previously that SpoIIE is
essential for normal formation of the asymmetric sporulation septum and
that a spoIIE null mutant produced cells containing thick
asymmetric septa similar to those formed at the midcell site during
normal vegetative growth (5, 16, 18, 27); in addition, the
formation of these thick asymmetric septa is usually delayed (5,
16). Two strains with missense mutations, spoIIE64 and
spoIIE71, that block sporulation at stage II have also been
identified, but they have a strikingly different phenotype,
characterized by the presence of only thin asymmetric septa, frequently
at both polar positions (5, 16, 27). These two mutations are
in the region of the spoIIE domain important for encoding
the protein's phosphatase activity, but they have no effect on the
morphology of sporulation septa (1, 5, 16). We have
investigated septation defects in double-mutant strains, IB506 and
IB507, each with the divIVB1 mutation and with one of the
two different kinds of spoIIE mutations, i.e., the null
mutation spoIIE::Tn917
HU7 and the
missense mutation spoIIE71, respectively. Sporulating cells
of strain IB506 displayed characteristic phenotypic features of both
minD and spoIIE null mutations. We observed only
thick asymmetric septa, many cells having thick septa at the midcell
position (about 16% of total cells examined) (Fig. 2C). Figure 1D
shows a cross section of an IB506 cell, harvested 4 h after the
beginning of sporulation, with minicell and vegetative septum beginning
to be formed. Approximately 2% of the cells examined in cross sections
contained midcell septa that by their thickness (14 to 26 nm) were
classified as thin septa. An interesting feature of this double mutant
was that we observed no significant delay of asymmetric septation (Fig.
2C) as was described previously for the spoIIE null mutant
(5, 16). This observation suggests that the SpoIIE protein
can be a part of the control mechanism that activates septation at the
polar sites, probably through action of the MinCD complex. When SpoIIE
was expressed earlier in development from an
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside-inducible Pspac promoter, cells produced many septation abnormalities
and also an increase in the number of septa at different positions (6). However, it is not likely that SpoIIE is able to
directly recognize the MinCD complex at the poles because, as has been shown recently, localization of SpoIIE is FtsZ dependent
(26) and thus FtsZ and probably other division proteins are
directed to possible sites of septation earlier than SpoIIE itself. In contrast with this observation, Khvorova et al. (21)
demonstrated that SpoIIE is involved in the Spo0A-dependent switch in
the location of FtsZ rings.
We observed in approximately 60% of strain IB507 cells thin
sporulation-like asymmetric septa (Fig.
2C), a normal feature
of
spoIIE71 mutant cells. Thick asymmetric septa likely
represent
minicell structures caused by the
divIVB1
mutation. In contrast
with cells of strain IB506, almost all septa at
the midcell position
in IB507 cells were thin septa (Fig.
1E and
2C).
This finding
supports the notion that SpoIIE is crucial for formation
of thin
sporulation septa (
5,
16) and also suggests that
SpoIIE allows
formation of an unusually thin septum at midcell position
when
this site is not blocked by the MinCD complex.
Model of MinCD function during asymmetric septation.
The main
contribution of this work is the discovery that the MinCD complex
blocks the midcell site of septation during sporulation. There are two
main lines of evidence that support this finding. First, in the absence
of functional minD gene products, about 30% of cells create
thin sporulation-like septa at the midcell position, although the polar
septation event and subsequent stages of spore morphogenesis proceed
normally. Our findings confirm the model proposed recently by Rothfield
and Zhao (29), which predicts that the midcell position is
released from inhibition in the absence of MinC and MinD products
during sporulation. Second, the SpoIIE protein, normally localized in a
bipolar manner in wild-type sporulating cells, can also be recruited to
the midcell septal position in minD cells. Previous work has
shown that SpoIIE localization is FtsZ dependent and that SpoIIE may be
recruited to the potential division sites directly by FtsZ or may
interact with other FtsZ-associated division proteins (26).
Localization of SpoIIE protein to the midcell position in
minD cells clearly indicates that this position can be
recognized not only by division proteins involved in binary fission but
also by SpoIIE and probably other sporulation-specific proteins as
well. It was shown previously that SpoIIE expressed during vegetative
growth can be localized to the midcell division site (26)
where unusually thin septa are formed (6). Levin and Losick
(25) have shown that Spo0A protein switches the localization
of FtsZ from medial to a bipolar pattern. Additionally, these authors
showed that a mutation in minD does not restore bipolar
localization of FtsZ in sporulating cells of a spo0A mutant.
They observed bands of FtsZ positioned at poles as well as at medial
locations (but only one band per cell length, although theoretically
all three sites are available) and argued that Spo0A is not acting
through the MinCD proteins. In contrast, our results indicate that
bipolar localization of SpoIIE is influenced by MinCD, and FtsZ should
be localized earlier than SpoIIE in a similar manner. The mechanism
that serves to sequester FtsZ to a single division site, in the absence
of active Spo0A and MinCD, is likely to be regulated by the level of
FtsZ. This suggestion is supported by the finding that in E. coli, increased levels of FtsZ can override the inhibition imposed
by the min system at the cell poles (33). One
explanation for the increase in concentration of FtsZ at the onset of
sporulation is that Spo0A, as a transcription activator, positively
regulates its transcription. This regulation also can be indirectly
mediated by AbrB and/or Spo0H proteins.
The delay in asymmetric septum formation observed in
spoIIE
null mutants (
5,
16) was not observed in the
minD
spoIIE null double-mutant strain. Suppression of this delay by the
absence
of MinD would suggest a role for SpoIIE in activation of this
septation process, probably indirectly through the MinCD complex.
The
SpoIIE protein may have not only a structural role in formation
of a
proper sporulation septum but also an important role in progression
of
septum formation (
21).
We propose three general models to explain how the MinCD complex could
control the switch from midcell division to bipolar
initiation of
septation during the onset of sporulation, keeping
in mind that this
switch is under the control of Spo0A protein.
Two of these models are
illustrated in Fig.
4 The
midcell-stabilizing
model (Fig.
4A) predicts instability of the MinCD
complex at the
onset of sporulation and the existence of factor x,
which specifically
recognizes the midcell position, stabilizes the
MinCD complex,
and thus prevents initiation of septation at this
position. The
MinCD complex at the polar sites then can be eliminated
without
any stabilizing effect of factor x at these positions. In
minCD mutant cells then, all three possible sites are
available for
septation. In cells without active Spo0A, initiation of
septation
is similar to that seen in vegetatively growing cells and is
carried
out at the midcell position. Although a model has been proposed
for DivIVA function in the control of MinCD division inhibition
during
vegetative growth (
14), it is still not clear how the
midcell site of septation is activated in binary fission. The
second,
bipolar activation model, outlined in Fig.
4B, predicts
the opposite
scenario: the MinCD complex is very stable at the
onset of sporulation,
and its inhibition activity is released
by factor y, which specifically
recognizes only polar division
sites and is under the control of the
Spo0A protein. This model
is very similar to the model proposed earlier
by Cha and Stewart
(
9), in which DivIVA protein initiates
sporulation septum formation
by contact with a sporulation-specific
protein. Our third model,
a combination of the two models described
above, predicts the
existence of both factors x and y. Although it is
premature to
propose exactly how the asymmetric septum forms, intensive
genetic
and biochemical research in the near future should give us the
answer to this crucial question.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Possible models demonstrating how the MinCD complex
controls the switch from midcell division to bipolar initiation of
septation during the onset of sporulation. Triangles represent possible
sites of septation; open triangles represent sites not blocked by
MinCD, and filled triangles represent sites blocked by active MinCD
complex (CD). 0A, Spo0A protein. (A) The midcell-stabilizing model,
whereby Spo0A controls factor x, which specifically stabilizes the
MinCD complex at midcell position. (B) The bipolar activation model.
Here Spo0A controls factor y, which specifically releases MinCD
inhibition at both polar positions. For details, see Results and
Discussion.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Phil Youngman for many years of support and for comments
on the manuscript. We thank Patrick Piggot for communicating results
before publication. In addition, we thank Paul Fawcett for supplying
strain PMF16, Jozef Kri
tín for use of his electron microscope, Jozef Nosek for use of his Olympus microscope, and L'ubo
Kl'u
ár for processing of digitized images.
We thank DeEtte Walker, Danka Valková, Du
an Pere
ko,
and Katarína Muchová for additional comments on the
manuscript.
This work was supported by grant 2027 from the Slovak Academy of
Sciences.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of
Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 841 51 Bratislava,
Slovak Republic. Phone: 421 7 378 2152. Fax: 421 7 372 316. E-mail:
umbibara{at}savba.savba.sk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adler, E.,
A. Donella-Deana,
F. Arigoni,
L. A. Pinna, and P. Stragier.
1997.
Structural relationship between a bacterial developmental protein and eucaryotic PP2C protein phosphatases.
Mol. Microbiol.
23:57-62[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Arigoni, F.,
K. Pogliano,
C. Webb,
P. Stragier, and R. Losick.
1995.
Localization of protein implicated in establishment of cell type to sites of asymmetric division.
Science
270:637-640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Backman, K.,
M. Ptashne, and W. Gilbert.
1976.
Construction of plasmids carrying the cI gene of bacteriophage lambda.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
73:4174-4178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Barák, I.,
J. Behari,
G. Olmedo,
P. Guzmán,
D. P. Brown,
E. Castro,
D. Walker,
J. Westpheling, and P. Youngman.
1996.
Structure and function of the Bacillus SpoIIE protein and its localization to sites of sporulation septum assembly.
Mol. Microbiol.
19:1047-1060[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Barák, I., and P. Youngman.
1996.
SpoIIE mutants of Bacillus subtilis comprise two distinct phenotypic classes consistent with a dual functional role for the SpoIIE protein.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4984-4989[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Barák, I.,
G. Olmedo, and P. Youngman.
1997.
Role of SpoIIE in the septum assembly and in the initiation of septation during development in Bacillus subtilis, p. 41.
In
Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on Bacilli, Lausanne, Switzerland.
|
| 7.
|
Bi, E., and J. Lutkenhaus.
1990.
Analysis of ftsZ mutations that confer resistance to the cell division inhibitor SulA (SfiA).
J. Bacteriol.
172:5602-5609[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bi, E., and J. Lutkenhaus.
1990.
Interaction between the min locus and ftsZ.
J. Bacteriol.
172:5610-5616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cha, J. H., and G. C. Stewart.
1997.
The divIVA locus of Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1671-1683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cutting, S. M., and P. Youngman.
1994.
Gene transfer in gram-positive bacteria, p. 348-364.
In
P. Gerhardt, R. G. E. Murray, W. A. Wood, and N. R. Krieg (ed.), Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 11.
|
Dassain, M., and J. P. Bouché.
1994.
The min locus, which confers topological specificity to cell division, is not involved in its coupling with nucleoid separation.
J. Bacteriol.
176:6143-6145[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
De Boer, P. A. J.,
R. E. Crossley,
A. R. Hand, and L. I. Rothfield.
1991.
The MinD protein is a membrane ATPase required for the correct placement of the Escherichia coli division site.
EMBO J.
10:4371-4380[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Duncan, L.,
S. Alper,
F. Arigoni,
R. Losick, and P. Stragier.
1995.
Activation of cell-specific transcription by a serine phosphatase at the site of asymmetric division.
Science
270:641-644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Edwards, D. H., and J. Errington.
1997.
The Bacillus subtilis DivIVA protein targets to the division septum and controls the site specificity of cell division.
Mol. Microbiol.
24:905-915[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Fawcett, P.,
I. Barák,
G. Olmedo, and P. Youngman.
1996.
A dual role for the SpoIIE protein in regulating morphogenesis and gene expression during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
In
Presented at the 12th International Spores Conference, Madison, Wis.
|
| 16.
|
Feucht, A.,
T. Magnin,
M. D. Yudkin, and J. Errington.
1996.
Bifunctional protein required for asymmetric cell division and cell-specific transcription in Bacillus subtilis.
Genes Dev.
10:794-803[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Hayat, M. A.
1981.
Fixation for electron microscopy.
Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
|
| 18.
|
Illing, N., and J. Errington.
1991.
Genetic regulation of morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis: roles of E and F in prespore engulfment.
J. Bacteriol.
173:3159-3169[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Innis, M. A.,
D. H. Gelfand,
J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White.
1990.
PCR protocols.
Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
|
| 20.
|
Ju, J.,
T. Luo, and W. G. Haldenwang.
1997.
Bacillus subtilis Pro- E fusion protein localizes to the forespore septum and fails to be processed when synthesized in the forespore.
J. Bacteriol.
179:4888-4893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Khvorova, A.,
L. Zhang,
M. L. Higgins, and P. Piggot.
1998.
The spoIIE locus is involved in the Spo0A-dependent switch in the location of the FtsZ rings in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
180:1256-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kirchner, G.,
M. A. Kemper,
A. L. Koch, and R. J. Doyle.
1988.
Zonal turnover of cell poles of Bacillus subtilis.
Ann. Inst. Pasteur Microbiol.
139:645-654[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lee, S., and C. W. Price.
1993.
The minCD locus of Bacillus subtilis lacks the minE determinant that provides topological specificity to cell division.
Mol. Microbiol.
7:601-610[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Levin, P. A.,
P. S. Margolis,
P. Setlow,
R. Losick, and D. Sun.
1992.
Identification of Bacillus subtilis genes for septum placement and shape determination.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6717-6728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Levin, P. A., and R. Losick.
1996.
Transcription factor Spo0A switches the localization of the cell division protein FtsZ from a medial to a bipolar pattern in Bacillus subtilis.
Genes Dev.
10:478-488[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Levin, P. A.,
R. Losick,
P. Stragier, and F. Arigoni.
1997.
Localization of the sporulation protein SpoIIE in Bacillus subtilis is dependent upon the cell division protein FtsZ.
Mol. Microbiol.
25:839-846[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Piggot, P. J.
1973.
Mapping of asporogenous mutations of Bacillus subtilis: a minimum estimate of the number of sporulation operons.
J. Bacteriol.
114:1241-1253[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Pogliano, K.,
A. E. M. Hofmeister, and R. Losick.
1997.
Disappearance of the E transcription factor from the forespore and the SpoIIE phosphatase from the mother cell contributes to establishment of cell-specific gene expression during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
179:3331-3341[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Rothfield, L. I., and C. R. Zhao.
1996.
How do bacteria decide where to divide?
Cell
84:183-186[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Sandman, K.,
R. Losick, and P. Youngman.
1987.
Genetic analysis of Bacillus subtilis spo mutations generated by Tn917-mediated insertional mutagenesis.
Genetics
117:603-617[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Spurr, A. R.
1969.
A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy.
J. Ultrastruct. Res.
26:31-43[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Varley, A. W., and G. C. Stewart.
1992.
The divIVB region of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome encodes homologs of Escherichia coli septum placement (MinCD) and cell shape (MreBCD) determinants.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6729-6742[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Ward, J. E., and J. F. Lutkenhaus.
1985.
Overproduction of FtsZ indices minicells in E. coli.
Cell
42:941-949[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Wu, L. J., and J. Errington.
1997.
Septal localization of the SpoIIIE chromosome partitioning protein in Bacillus subtilis.
EMBO J.
16:2161-2169[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Youngman, P.
1990.
Use of transposons and integrational vectors for mutagenesis and construction of gene fusions in Bacillus species, p. 221-266.
In
C. R. Harwood, and S. M. Cutting (ed.), Molecular biological methods for Bacillus. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England.
|
| 36.
|
Youngman, P.,
J. B. Perkins, and R. Losick.
1984.
Construction of a cloning site near one end of Tn917 into which foreign DNA may be inserted without affecting transposition in Bacillus subtilis or expression of the transposon-borne erm gene.
Plasmid
12:1-9[Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, October 1998, p. 5327-5333, Vol. 180, No. 20
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hilbert, D. W., Piggot, P. J.
(2004). Compartmentalization of Gene Expression during Bacillus subtilis Spore Formation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
68: 234-262
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Errington, J., Daniel, R. A., Scheffers, D.-J.
(2003). Cytokinesis in Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
67: 52-65
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Muchova, K., Kutejova, E., Scott, D. J., Brannigan, J. A., Lewis, R. J., Wilkinson, A. J., Barak, I.
(2002). Oligomerization of the Bacillus subtilis division protein DivIVA. Microbiology
148: 807-813
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thomaides, H. B., Freeman, M., Karoui, M. E., Errington, J.
(2001). Division site selection protein DivIVA of Bacillus subtilis has a second distinct function in chromosome segregation during sporulation. Genes Dev.
15: 1662-1673
[Abstract]
[Full Text]