Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 1998, p. 5989-5996, Vol. 180, No. 22
Molecular Biology Division (151-S), VA
Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121, and Department
of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San
Francisco, California 94143
Received 18 May 1998/Accepted 3 September 1998
Succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (SQR) from Escherichia
coli is expressed maximally during aerobic growth, when it
catalyzes the oxidation of succinate to fumarate in the tricarboxylic
acid cycle and reduces ubiquinone in the membrane. The enzyme is
similar in structure and function to fumarate reductase
(menaquinol-fumarate oxidoreductase [QFR]), which participates in
anaerobic respiration by E. coli. Fumarate reductase, which
is proficient in succinate oxidation, is able to functionally replace
SQR in aerobic respiration when conditions are used to allow the
expression of the frdABCD operon aerobically. SQR has not
previously been shown to be capable of supporting anaerobic growth of
E. coli because expression of the enzyme complex is largely
repressed by anaerobic conditions. In order to obtain expression of SQR
anaerobically, plasmids which utilize the PFRD promoter of
the frdABCD operon fused to the sdhCDAB genes
to drive expression were constructed. It was found that, under
anaerobic growth conditions where fumarate is utilized as the terminal
electron acceptor, SQR would function to support anaerobic growth of
E. coli. The levels of amplification of SQR and QFR were
similar under anaerobic growth conditions. The catalytic properties of
SQR isolated from anaerobically grown cells were measured and found to
be identical to those of enzyme produced aerobically. The anaerobic
expression of SQR gave a greater yield of enzyme complex than was found
in the membrane from aerobically grown cells under the conditions
tested. In addition, it was found that anaerobic expression of SQR
could saturate the capacity of the membrane for incorporation of enzyme
complex. As has been seen with the amplified QFR complex, E. coli accommodates the excess SQR produced by increasing the
amount of membrane. The excess membrane was found in tubular structures
that could be seen in thin-section electron micrographs.
Succinate dehydrogenase
(succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase [SQR]) and fumarate
reductase (menaquinol-fumarate oxidoreductase [QFR]) are enzyme
complexes similar both in composition and in subunit structure, even
though in vivo they normally catalyze their enzymatic reactions in
opposite directions (2, 11). Each enzyme is a membrane-bound
complex that can catalyze a two-electron or two-proton transfer between
succinate or fumarate and quinone or quinol. Succinate dehydrogenase
plays an important role in cellular metabolism and directly connects
the Krebs cycle with the aerobic respiratory chain. Fumarate reductase
catalyzes the final step in anaerobic respiration with fumarate as a
terminal electron acceptor (21). These enzyme complexes are
thus examples of the high evolutionary adaptation of organisms to
specialized environments (11).
In Escherichia coli, two distinct operons encoding the SQR
(sdhCDAB) (7, 37) and QFR (frdABCD)
subunits are found (6, 22). Both enzymes have a large domain
extrinsic to the membrane composed of a flavoprotein subunit (SdhA or
FrdA) which contains a covalently bound flavin adenine dinucleotide
cofactor and the dicarboxylate binding site (2, 11, 27) and
an iron-sulfur protein subunit (SdhB or FrdB) containing three distinct
iron-sulfur clusters (17, 20). This domain is bound to two
small integral membrane subunits (SdhC and -D or FrdC and -D) which are
necessary to form the quinone binding site(s) (4, 36) found
in both of these enzyme complexes. One difference between SQR and QFR in E. coli is that SQR contains an additional prosthetic
group, a heme b556 cofactor, which bridges the
SdhC and SdhD subunits (33).
It has been 35 years since the first demonstration that in E. coli there are two distinct enzyme systems catalyzing fumarate reduction and succinate oxidation (13). The majority of
mechanistic studies on succinate dehydrogenase, however, have been done
on the mammalian enzyme from bovine mitochondria (2, 12).
Kinetic experiments on SQR have shown that the enzyme is much more
capable of oxidizing succinate than of reducing fumarate, with the
ratio of succinate oxidation to fumarate reduction on the order of 40:1 (9). In contrast, more recent cyclic voltammetry studies of soluble succinate dehydrogenase (SdhAB) adsorbed on a graphite electrode showed that rates of electron transfer between succinate or
fumarate and the electrode depended on the applied potential and pH.
These results indicated that, at a potential of The control of sdhCDAB and frdABCD gene
expression is provided by two cellular regulatory proteins, ArcA and
Fnr, and responds to aerobic-anaerobic conditions and the cellular
growth medium (16, 24). Under anaerobic conditions,
sdhCDAB gene expression is repressed and frdABCD
expression levels are increased more than 10-fold, whereas aerobic
conditions have the opposite effect on SQR and QFR levels
(18). Thus, under anaerobic conditions the levels of SQR in
E. coli are not sufficient to support anaerobic respiration,
with succinate dehydrogenase acting in reverse as a fumarate reductase.
The present studies were undertaken to determine if in vivo SQR could
functionally replace QFR, when conditions are provided to express the
sdhCDAB genes anaerobically. To accomplish this, vectors in
which the PFRD promoter of the frdABCD (fumarate reductase) operon was used to express the sdhCDAB genes were
constructed and the cells were grown anaerobically under conditions
requiring fumarate reduction for growth. The results of these studies
and the properties of the SQR complex obtained from membranes of
anaerobically grown cells are described below.
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The E. coli
strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table
1. Strain DW35 (35), a
derivative of MC4100, contains a deletion of the frd operon
(
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Anaerobic Expression of Escherichia coli Succinate
Dehydrogenase: Functional Replacement of Fumarate Reductase in the
Respiratory Chain during Anaerobic Growth
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References
75 mV and at pH 7.5, SdhAB functions as proficiently in fumarate reduction as in succinate
oxidation (14). As a neutrophilic bacterium, E. coli maintains a cytoplasmic pH of 7.6 to 7.8 (23). In
the bacterial cell, the composition of the quinone pool is controlled by oxygen. In order to reduce more negative terminal substrates than
oxygen under anaerobic conditions, menaquinones (
75 mV) and
demethylmenaquinone (+36 mV) predominate in the cell membrane (29,
32). Aerobic growth or exposure of cells to oxygen induces ubiquinone (+112 mV) production and represses menaquinone biosynthesis (29). Taken together, the above results would indicate that SQR should function as a fumarate reductase under physiological conditions, similar to the demonstrated ability of QFR to function physiologically as a succino-oxidase in cases where SQR function has
been disrupted (10).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References
frdABCD) and an insertional mutation in sdh
(sdhC::Kan) (36) that eliminates strain
background expression of any enzymes capable of succinate oxidase
activity. Plasmid pSDH15 encodes the
sdhC+D+A+B+
operon (33), both pH3 and pGC1002 contain the
frdA+B+C+D+
(3, 4) operon, and all are derivatives of pBR322. The
construction of plasmids pFGS and pFAS, where the PFRD
promoter is used to control expression of the sdhCDAB genes,
is described below. The latter plasmids are identical, except that pFGS
has a GTG initiation codon for sdhC, whereas pFAS has an ATG
initiation codon in sdhC.
TABLE 1.
E. coli strains and plasmids
Construction of plasmids. Molecular cloning and related procedures were carried out by standard methods (26). Promega kits (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis.) were used for plasmid isolation. Plasmid pH3-177 was constructed by inserting the 4.44-kb HindIII-XhoI fragment of pH3 encompassing the frd operon into the HindIII-XhoI sites of pACYC177. The construction of plasmid pFGS is diagrammed in Fig. 1. The PFRD promoter was fused to the sdhCDAB genes by synthesizing two DNA fragments by PCR and then joining the fragments by the method of PCR overlap extension (15). The PFRD promoter was synthesized with pGC1002 (PFRD frdA+B+C+D+) as the template with oligonucleotide FRD011 (5'-CACGAATTCAAAGAACGACGG-3') and either FRD012 (5'-CATTTCTTATCATGACATTCCTCCAG-3') for plasmid pFAS or oligonucleotide FRD013 (5'-CATTTCTTATCACGACATTCCTCCAG-3') for plasmid pFGS used as primer (Fig. 1A). Oligonucleotide FRD011 annealed 3' of the NdeI site (5) in the noncoding region of the frd operon insert in pGC1002 and encodes an EcoRI extension. The first 13 nucleotides of FRD012 and FRD013 were complementary to the promoter sequence immediately 5' of the GTG start codon of frdA, and the remaining nucleotides were complementary to the 5' region of sdhC. The construction of pFAS was identical to that of pFGS except that oligonucleotide FRD012 was used as a primer in the PCRs in place of FRD013. FRD012 coded for an ATG initiation codon, as is found in wild-type sdhC, whereas for pFGS, FRD013 coded for a GTG start codon, as is normally found in frdA. A second PCR fragment (II) was synthesized, encompassing the complete sdhC gene and the 5' end of the sdhD gene, with pSDH15 (sdhC+D+A+B+) as the template and oligonucleotide ESD001 (5'-TGATAAGAAATGTGAAAAAACAAAGAC-3'), which was complementary to the 5' end of sdhC (excluding the first nucleotide), and ESD002 (5'-CATTGCGTCCTAATGCGGAGG-3'), which annealed within sdhD (Fig. 1B). The products from the PCRs (Fig. 1A and B, products I and II) were then used as the template for PCR overlap extension with FRD011 and ESD002 as the outside primers (Fig. 1C). The PCR product resulting from the reaction diagrammed in Fig. 1C was then digested with EcoRI and KpnI (a unique restriction site in the sdhD gene) and cloned into the appropriate sites in pSDH15 in order to reconstruct the sdh operon under the control of the PFRD promoter (Fig. 1D and E). This region was then sequenced to verify that no inadvertent mutations had been introduced into the coding region. Thus, the resulting plasmid pFGS has a PFRD-sdhC+D+A+B+ fusion and sdhC initiates with a GTG codon. Plasmid pFGS-177 was constructed by inserting the 4.39-kb AatII-BamHI fragment of pFGS, encompassing the complete frd promoter sdh gene region, into the AatII-BamHI sites of pACYC177.
|
Growth conditions. Cells were grown overnight in Luria-Bertani medium with appropriate antibiotics, and then a 1:500 dilution was used as the inoculum for anaerobic minimal medium. Anaerobic growth was carried out at 37°C with constant moderate stirring with a magnet in 1-liter sealed bottles filled to the top with minimal glycerol-fumarate medium (31) supplemented with 0.05% (wt/vol) Casamino Acids and ampicillin (100 µg per ml). Fumarate and glycerol were used at 25 mM concentrations. Growth was monitored by determining cell optical density at 600 nm with a Uvikon 10 spectrophotometer (Kontron Instruments, Zurich, Switzerland).
Thin-section electron microscopy. Cells were collected by centrifugation after 60 h of anaerobic growth and fixed with 2.7% glutaraldehyde-0.8% paraformaldehyde-0.2 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.2). They were then washed with phosphate-buffered sucrose, postfixed in 2% OsO4, reduced with 1.5% potassium ferricyanide, and block stained in 2% uranyl acetate. The samples were dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in Spurr's resin (Pelco, Inc., Redding, Calif.). Sections 70 nm thick were poststained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and mounted on grids for electron microscopy.
Preparation of membrane fraction and enzyme purification.
Cells from 1 liter of culture were collected by centrifugation at
4,500 × g for 10 min, then suspended with 200 ml of
100 mM potassium phosphate-5 mM EDTA (pH 7.6), centrifuged again as described above, and then frozen at
70°C. Cells were then suspended in 40 ml of the same buffer containing the "Complete" protease inhibitor tablets (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.) and disrupted by sonication. Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation (15 min at 10,000 × g), and the supernatant was
centrifuged for 90 min at 100,000 × g to collect the
membranes. The membrane fraction was suspended in 30 ml of the same
buffer, and both centrifugation steps were repeated. Membranes were
suspended in 50 mM potassium phosphate-0.2 mM EDTA (pH 7.8) to
approximately 15 mg of protein/ml and frozen at
70°C. SQR was
purified according to a published procedure (19). The
purification of QFR was essentially the same as that for SQR, except
that a linear gradient of 0.1 to 0.2 M NaCl was used for the DEAE
fast-flow chromatography step.
Measurement of enzymatic activity and analytical procedures.
Membranes were thawed and diluted with 50 mM potassium phosphate-0.2
mM EDTA (pH 7.8) to a concentration of 1 mg/ml. In order to measure the
full activity of SQR and QFR, it was necessary to remove bound
oxaloacetate from the active site of the enzymes. Therefore, 10 mM
malonate was added and samples were incubated for 15 min at 37°C and
stored at 4°C until used. All enzyme assays were carried out at
30°C in 2-ml cuvettes with 50 mM potassium phosphate-0.2 mM EDTA (pH
7.8)-3 mM KCN. Measurement of succinate oxidation by phenazine
ethosulfate (PES) and ubiquinone-2 (Q2) in the presence of
dichlorophenolindophenol (
600 = 21.8 mM
1
cm
1; pH 7.8) was performed as previously described
(1). The substrates were used at the following
concentrations: 10 mM succinate (pH 7.0), 50 µM
dichlorophenolindophenol, and 1.5 mM PES or 20 µM Q2. The
succinate-ferricyanide reductase activity of QFR was determined with
0.45 mM potassium ferricyanide (
420 = 1 mM
1 cm
1). The quinol-fumarate reductase
reaction was assayed in a coupled system with rat liver NADH-quinone
reductase (DT Diaphorase), with Q2 and menaquinone-1
(MQ1) as described elsewhere (9). The
succinate-quinone reductase and quinol-fumarate reductase reactions of
purified complexes were determined in the presence of 0.005% (wt/vol)
of the nonionic detergent Thesit (Boehringer Mannheim).
558-575 = 22.8 mM
1 cm
1) associated with SQR was reduced
with 10 mM succinate and sodium dithionite. Protein content was
determined by the biuret method with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rates of quinone reduction and quinol oxidation catalyzed by SQR and the QFR isolated and purified from aerobically and anaerobically grown cells, respectively, are shown in Table 2. It can be seen that the potential of the quinones affected the maximal rates of the reactions. The low-potential donor MQ1H2 was a better substrate for fumarate reduction. With the higher-potential acceptor Q2, the enzymes demonstrated higher rates of succinate oxidation. The data show that SQR catalyzes succinate oxidation by ubiquinone 40 times faster than it does fumarate reduction by ubiquinol (Q2H2). SQR catalyzed the reduction of fumarate 2.4 times faster with MQ1 than Q2. Moreover, when the enzyme operates with MQ1 it behaves as a fumarate reductase; the rate of fumarate reduction is more than 20 times higher than that of succinate oxidation. The activity of isolated QFR with quinone-quinols shows the opposite effects from that seen with SQR with respect to quinone potential. Thus, the data support the observation that QFR can functionally replace SQR when expressed aerobically (10). The data in Table 2 thus provide evidence that in vivo SQR should be able to support anaerobic respiration, assuming that conditions are found where the enzyme complex is able to be synthesized.
|
The first gene in the frd operon (frdA) belongs
to the small group of genes in E. coli which use a GUG
initiation codon instead of the more common AUG (5). In
order to investigate the ability of SQR to support anaerobic growth of
E. coli, a PFRD-sdhCDAB fusion was
constructed, with the PFRD promoter driving expression of
the sdhCDAB genes. Constructs were made with either ATG
(pFAS) or GTG (pFGS) as the start codon in sdhC and then
introduced into vector pBR322 or pACYC177. Initial growth studies using
anaerobic minimal glycerol-fumarate medium demonstrated that DW35
(
frd sdhC::kan) transformed with
plasmid pFGS would grow with a doubling time of about 3.0 h after
a long lag phase (data not shown). In order to reduce this lag phase,
the medium was supplemented with varying amounts of tryptone and yeast
extract. It was found that 0.025% (wt/vol) tryptone and yeast extract
were sufficient to stimulate growth without allowing strain DW35 to
grow anaerobically on glycerol-fumarate medium in the absence of QFR-
or SQR-encoding plasmids. This medium was used for all further studies.
The results of anaerobic growth are depicted in Fig. 2. To maintain the plasmid in the cell, antibiotics were always present in the growth medium and the growth rates and final culture density were highly reproducible over numerous experiments. DW35, like the wild-type strain MC4100, grew with a doubling time of approximately 1.6 to 1.8 h when transformed with the wild-type QFR-encoding plasmid pH3 or pH3-177. Additionally, the SQR-encoding plasmid pFGS or pFGS-177 allowed the E. coli strain to grow with a 3.0- to 3.3-h doubling time, and the final cell density was approximately the same as that with the frdABCD plasmids. As a control, DW35 transformed with pSDH15 (sdhCDAB driven from the PSDH promoter in pBR322) was grown anaerobically. It can be seen that some growth is possible, although the doubling time is significantly slower than that with the pH3 or pFGS plasmid. It has been shown that the PSDH-lacZ fusions can be expressed anaerobically at about 3 to 5% of their aerobic expression level (28), and thus, this low-level expression from a multicopy plasmid with the PSDH promoter is able to support growth with a doubling time of greater than 8 h. The DW35/pSDH15 culture reproducibly stops growing at an optical density at 600 nm of about 0.35 after 48 h of growth, in contrast to results seen with other plasmids. As seen in Fig. 2, cells transformed with the SQR-encoding pFAS plasmid (sdhC initiates with an ATG codon) also supported growth but at a significantly slower doubling time of approximately 7.6 h, and the final cell density reached was only about half of that with the pFGS or pFGS-177 plasmid. A similar pattern of inhibition of growth by pFAS was also observed for anaerobically grown cultures on rich medium such as Terrific Broth (26) (data not shown). Aerobic cultures grown on either rich or minimal medium, however, do not show any inhibition by pFAS. The specific reason for inhibition of anaerobic growth by pFAS remains unknown; however, it may reflect the high level of amplification of the membrane-bound SQR from this plasmid (see below). It is possible that the overproduction of membrane-bound proteins from multicopy plasmids may be deleterious to host strains or that growth in the presence of pFAS may deplete the cultures of necessary nutrients for efficient growth. It should be noted, however, that this was not observed for overproduction of QFR in the experiments reported here or by others (2, 8, 34) or for SQR from pFGS (Fig. 2).
|
The levels of SQR expression were monitored by measuring succinate dehydrogenase activities and heme b556 content in the membrane fraction of cells grown anaerobically (Table 3). The data show that the enzyme has the same turnover number regardless of the plasmid source used for its expression. Based on the amount of SQR-specific heme b556 produced from the PFRD promoter with pFGS, the data suggest that succinate dehydrogenase is amplified to the same levels as wild-type QFR from similar vectors. In addition, the SQR complex isolated and purified from both aerobically and anaerobically grown E. coli showed no differences in its kinetic properties, rate of heme reduction, composition, and/or stability compared with aerobically expressed wild-type SQR (data not shown). Based on the level of heme b556 in the membrane, it can be seen in Table 3 that the anaerobic expression of the SQR complex is some seven- to ninefold higher with plasmid pFGS or pFAS, respectively, than when expressed from its own promoter (pSDH15). It should also be noted that, based upon heme content, the levels of SQR produced from anaerobically grown E. coli containing pFAS or pFGS are approximately twofold higher than that found in aerobic cells where SQR (pSDH15) is expressed from its native promoter (Table 3). This result is supported by the observation that a three- to fivefold-higher yield of purified SQR enzyme complex is obtained from an equivalent cell mass of anaerobically grown E. coli containing either pFAS or pFGS than from aerobically grown cells containing pSDH15 (data not shown).
|
In the present study, E. coli succinate-quinone oxidoreductase, normally a component of the aerobic respiratory chain, was expressed during anaerobic cell growth on glycerol-fumarate medium by using the PFRD promoter to achieve expression. Under these conditions where quinol-fumarate reductase activity is essential for respiration, SQR functionally replaced QFR in the simplified anaerobic respiratory chain consisting of the anaerobic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and menaquinones. Previous work from the Guest laboratory (10) has shown that fumarate reductase can offset the metabolic consequences of a deficiency of succinate dehydrogenase and thus replace the physiological function of succinate dehydrogenase. This was achieved by allowing amplification of fumarate reductase production aerobically through titration of a specific repressor (10). A similar observation was made when E. coli DW35 was grown with plasmid pH3 or pGC1002 on aerobic succinate minimal medium (3, 27, 36). The results described in this work directly demonstrate that the converse can occur, i.e., succinate dehydrogenase can physiologically replace fumarate reductase when conditions allow it to be expressed anaerobically. These results are also consistent with in vitro studies, using soluble beef heart succinate dehydrogenase, which suggest that the soluble enzyme (SdhAB domain) is physiologically capable of catalyzing fumarate reduction at pH values below 7.64 (14) and support the contention that complex II will also function as a fumarate reductase.
In spite of a significant difference in turnover numbers of menaquinol-fumarate reductase reaction of SQR and QFR (Table 2), the cells encoding succinate dehydrogenase from pFGS and pFGS-177 grew only about two times slower (Fig. 2 and Table 3) than cells with frdABCD. In the case of QFR, up to 15-fold amplification of enzyme levels did not affect the culture's doubling time during anaerobic growth. These results suggest that the levels of fumarate reductase are not in themselves rate limiting for cell growth under the conditions tested. As shown in Table 3, the 10- to 15-fold overproduction of SQR obtained from plasmid pFGS and pFGS-177 is similar to the overproduction obtained from the QFR plasmids pH3-177 and pH3, which were constructed from the same vectors. This difference in SQR amplification in the membrane did not affect growth, as seen from the similar doubling times. It is significant to note, however, that although the level of enzyme produced in the membrane from plasmid pFAS is about 30% higher than that from pFGS, growth was impaired from this plasmid (Fig. 2). It has been found that the translation efficiency of E. coli proteins depends on the initiation codon, and the level of gene product is increased by changing the first codon from GUG to AUG (25). Furthermore, it has been shown that a promoter fusion, PFRD-lacZ+, starting with the ATG codon, gave a fivefold-higher expression level than that with protein fusion frdA'-lacZ+, which starts from a GTG codon (18). The data presented here are consistent with the higher level of expression when translation of the sdh genes begins with the AUG codon.
It has previously been shown that, in stationary-phase E. coli cells harboring a fumarate reductase-encoding plasmid similar to pH3, QFR production was amplified 20-fold (34). Because of the limited capacity of the inner membrane, the cells produced novel tubular structures rather than accumulating the extra protein in soluble form, or as inclusion bodies. The lipid-protein tubular structure was composed of QFR and enriched for cardiolipin compared to normal membranes (8, 34). Since SQR and QFR are similar in composition and function and because they are being expressed under similar growth conditions, it seemed likely that similar structures would be formed in cells containing the PFRD-sdhCDAB expression system. As shown in Fig. 3, structures resembling the QFR tubules are formed in DW35 transformed with pFAS when cells are grown anaerobically on glycerol-fumarate medium. While QFR overproduction induced the formation of tubular structures in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3A and B) (8, 34), cells harboring pFAS showed both tubular structures and vesicule-like structures in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3C to F). These differences are reproducible; however, the reason for the difference in type of structure formed is unknown. These structures are seen in either DW35 or a frd+ sdh+ strain of E. coli such as HB101. The overproduction of SQR causes tubule formation with either plasmid pFGS (not shown) or pFAS; however, it is more prevalent with the latter. It should also be noted that pFAS inhibits the growth rate of HB101 (similar to DW35 [Fig. 1]) even though this strain contains a wild-type copy of frdABCD. The significant decrease in cell doubling time seen in cultures containing pFAS may thus reflect the depletion of the resources necessary for efficient growth by enzyme overproduction.
|
The results described in this work are the first direct demonstration that succinate dehydrogenase can physiologically replace fumarate reductase when conditions allow it to be expressed anaerobically. An additional finding is that the isolated SQR complex obtained from anaerobically grown E. coli is produced in a fully active form and at a greater yield in the membrane (based on heme content) than aerobically produced enzyme. This is an aid in obtaining material for biochemical investigation of E. coli succinate dehydrogenase. By using the PFRD-sdhCDAB fusion with single-copy vectors, it should now also be possible to isolate SQR mutants that are altered in their ability to grow anaerobically. Questions remain as to the cause of the differences in catalytic activity seen with QFR and SQR; therefore, isolation of mutant forms of both enzyme complexes under physiological growth conditions will aid in understanding these differences.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Sandra L. Huling of the Morphology Core of the San Francisco VA Medical Center for her electron microscopy expertise. We also thank Orlena Chuck for assistance with the PCRs.
This research was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health grant HL-16251, and National Science Foundation grant MCB-9728778.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular Biology Division (151-S), VA Medical Center-UCSF, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA 94121. Phone: (415) 752-9676. Fax: (415) 750-6959. E-mail: ceccini{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.
Present address: Department of Plant Biology, University of
Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ackrell, B. A. C., E. B. Kearney, and T. P. Singer. 1978. Mammalian succinate dehydrogenase. Methods Enzymol. 53:466-483[Medline]. |
| 2. | Ackrell, B. A. C., M. K. Johnson, R. P. Gunsalus, and G. Cecchini. 1992. Structure and function of succinate dehydrogenase and fumarate reductase, p. 229-297. In F. Muller (ed.), Chemistry and biochemistry of flavoenzymes, vol. III. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla. |
| 3. |
Blaut, M.,
K. Whittaker,
A. Valdovinos,
B. A. C. Ackrell,
R. P. Gunsalus, and G. Cecchini.
1989.
Fumarate reductase mutants of Escherichia coli that lack covalently bound flavin.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:13599-13604 |
| 4. |
Cecchini, G.,
C. R. Thompson,
B. A. C. Ackrell,
D. J. Westenberg,
N. Dean, and R. P. Gunsalus.
1986.
Oxidation of reduced menaquinone by the fumarate reductase complex in Escherichia coli requires the hydrophobic FrdD peptide.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:8898-8902 |
| 5. | Cole, S. T. 1982. Nucleotide sequence coding for the flavoprotein subunit of the fumarate reductase of Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem. 122:479-484[Medline]. |
| 6. | Cole, S. T., and J. R. Guest. 1980. Genetic and physical characterization of lambda transducing phages (lambda frdA) containing the fumarate reductase gene of Escherichia coli K12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 178:409-418[Medline]. |
| 7. | Darlison, M. G., and J. R. Guest. 1984. Nucleotide sequence encoding the iron-sulphur protein subunit of the succinate dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 223:507-517[Medline]. |
| 8. | Elmes, M. L., D. G. Scraba, and J. H. Weiner. 1986. Isolation and characterization of the tubular organelles induced by fumarate reductase overproduction in Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:1429-1439[Medline]. |
| 9. | Grivennikova, V. G., E. V. Gavrikova, A. A. Timoshin, and A. D. Vinogradov. 1993. Fumarate reductase activity of bovine heart succinate-ubiquinone reductase. New assay system and overall properties of the reaction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1140:282-292[Medline]. |
| 10. | Guest, J. R. 1981. Partial replacement of succinate dehydrogenase function by phage- and plasmid-specified fumarate reductase in Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 122:171-179[Medline]. |
| 11. | Hägerhäll, C. 1997. Succinate:quinone oxidoreductases; variations on a conserved theme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1320:107-141[Medline]. |
| 12. | Hederstedt, L., and T. Ohnishi. 1992. Progress in succinate:quinone oxidoreductase research, p. 133-198. In L. Ernster (ed.), Molecular mechanisms in bioenergetics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
| 13. |
Hirsch, C. A.,
M. Rasminsky,
B. D. Davis, and E. C. C. Lin.
1963.
A fumarate reductase in Escherichia coli distinct from succinate dehydrogenase.
J. Biol. Chem.
238:3770-3774 |
| 14. | Hirst, J., A. Sucheta, B. A. C. Ackrell, and F. A. Armstrong. 1996. Electrocatalytic voltammetry of succinate dehydrogenase: direct quantification of the catalytic properties of a complex electron-transport enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:5031-5038. |
| 15. | Horton, R. M., and L. R. Pease. 1991. Recombination and mutagenesis of DNA sequences using PCR, p. 217-247. In M. J. McPherson (ed.), Directed mutagenesis: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 16. |
Iuchi, S., and E. C. C. Lin.
1988.
ArcA (dye), a global regulatory gene in Escherichia coli mediating repression of enzymes in aerobic pathways.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:1888-1892 |
| 17. |
Johnson, M. K.,
A. T. Kowal,
J. E. Morningstar,
M. E. Oliver,
K. Whittaker,
R. P. Gunsalus,
B. A. C. Ackrell, and G. Cecchini.
1988.
Subunit location of the iron-sulfur clusters in fumarate reductase from Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:14732-14738 |
| 18. |
Jones, H. M., and R. P. Gunsalus.
1987.
Regulation of Escherichia coli fumarate reductase (frdABCD) operon expression by respiratory electron acceptors and the fnr gene product.
J. Bacteriol.
169:3340-3349 |
| 19. |
Kita, K.,
C. R. Vibat,
S. Meinhardt,
J. R. Guest, and R. B. Gennis.
1989.
One-step purification from Escherichia coli of complex II (succinate:ubiquinone oxidoreductase) associated with succinate-reducible cytochrome b556.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:2672-2677 |
| 20. | Kowal, A. T., M. T. Werth, A. Manodori, G. Cecchini, I. Schröder, R. P. Gunsalus, and M. K. Johnson. 1995. Effect of cysteine to serine mutations on the properties of the [4Fe-4S] center in Escherichia coli fumarate reductase. Biochemistry 34:12284-12293[Medline]. |
| 21. | Kröger, A. 1978. Fumarate as terminal acceptor of phosphorylative electron transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 505:129-145[Medline]. |
| 22. | Lohmeier, E., D. S. Hagen, P. Dickie, and J. H. Weiner. 1981. Cloning and expression of fumarate reductase gene of Escherichia coli. Can. J. Biochem. 59:158-164[Medline]. |
| 23. | Padan, E., and S. Schuldiner. 1986. Intracellular pH regulation in bacterial cells. Methods Enzymol. 125:337-352[Medline]. |
| 24. | Park, S. J., C. P. Tseng, and R. P. Gunsalus. 1995. Regulation of succinate dehydrogenase (sdhCDAB) operon expression in Escherichia coli in response to carbon supply and anaerobiosis: role of ArcA and Fnr. Mol. Microbiol. 15:473-482[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Reddy, P.,
A. Peterkofsky, and K. McKenney.
1985.
Translational efficiency of the Escherichia coli adenylate cyclase gene: mutating the UUG initiation codon to GUG or AUG results in increased gene expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:5656-5660 |
| 26. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 27. |
Schröder, I.,
R. P. Gunsalus,
B. A. C. Ackrell,
B. Cochran, and G. Cecchini.
1991.
Identification of active site residues of Escherichia coli fumarate reductase by site-directed mutagenesis.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:13572-13579 |
| 28. | Shen, J., and R. P. Gunsalus. 1997. Role of multiple ArcA recognition sites in anaerobic regulation of succinate dehydrogenase (sdhCDAB) gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 26:223-236[Medline]. |
| 29. | Shestopalov, A., A. V. Bogachev, R. A. Murtazina, M. B. Viryasov, and V. P. Skulachev. 1997. Aeration-dependent changes in composition of the quinone pool in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 404:272-274[Medline]. |
| 30. | Silhavy, T. J., M. L. Berman, and L. W. Enquist. 1984. Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 31. |
Spencer, M. E., and J. R. Guest.
1973.
Isolation and properties of fumarate reductase mutants of Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
114:563-570 |
| 32. | Unden, G. 1988. Differential roles for menaquinone and demethylmenaquinone in anaerobic electron transport of E. coli and their fnr-independent expression. Arch. Microbiol. 150:499-503[Medline]. |
| 33. | Vibat, C. R. T., G. Cecchini, K. Nakamura, K. Kita, and R. B. Gennis. 1998. Localization of histidine residues responsible for heme axial ligation in cytochrome b556 of complex II (succinate:ubiquinone oxidoreductase) in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 37:4148-4159[Medline]. |
| 34. |
Weiner, J. H.,
B. D. Lemire,
M. L. Elmes,
R. D. Bradley, and D. G. Scraba.
1984.
Overproduction of fumarate reductase in Escherichia coli induces a novel intracellular lipid-protein organelle.
J. Bacteriol.
158:590-596 |
| 35. |
Westenberg, D. J.,
R. P. Gunsalus,
B. A. C. Ackrell, and G. Cecchini.
1990.
Electron transfer from menaquinol to fumarate. Fumarate reductase anchor polypeptide mutants of Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:19560-19567 |
| 36. |
Westenberg, D. J.,
R. P. Gunsalus,
B. A. C. Ackrell,
H. Sices, and G. Cecchini.
1993.
Escherichia coli fumarate reductase frdC and frdD mutants. Identification of amino acid residues involved in catalytic activity with quinones.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:815-822 |
| 37. | Wood, D., M. G. Darlison, R. J. Wilde, and J. R. Guest. 1984. Nucleotide sequence encoding the flavoprotein and hydrophobic subunits of the succinate dehydrogenase of Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 222:519-534[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |