JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hengge-Aronis, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hengge-Aronis, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, December 1998, p. 6203-6206, Vol. 180, No. 23
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

The General Stress Sigma Factor sigma S of Escherichia coli Is Induced during Diauxic Shift from Glucose to Lactose

Daniela Fischer,1 Antje Teich,2 Peter Neubauer,2 and Regine Hengge-Aronis1,*

Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz,1 and Institute for Biotechnology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle,2 Germany

Received 7 August 1998/Accepted 28 September 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

The general stress sigma factor sigma S (RpoS) of Escherichia coli is strongly induced in response to glucose starvation. This increase in the cellular sigma S level is due to stabilization of sigma S, which under non-stress conditions is subject to rapid proteolysis. In the present study, it is demonstrated that sigma S is also induced during the diauxic shift from glucose to lactose, i.e., under conditions of glucose exhaustion in the presence of another, less-preferred carbon source that eventually gets utilized. This sigma S induction, which is due to stabilization, is transient and precedes the induction of beta -galactosidase. In parallel, sigma S-dependent genes are transiently activated, as was shown here for osmY. Although sigma S can mediate transcription of lacZ in vitro, sigma S does not contribute to the induction of beta -galactosidase during the diauxic lag phase. Rather, the induction of sigma S and the general stress response during the diauxic shift plays the role of a rapidly activated emergency system, which is shut off again as soon as the cells are able to cope with the stress situation by utilizing a more specific and more economical system.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

The sigma S subunit of RNA polymerase (or RpoS) is the master regulator of the general stress response in Escherichia coli. While sigma S levels are low in rapidly growing cells not exposed to any particular stress, sigma S is induced in response to a variety of rather diverse environmental stress conditions that include starvation for various nutrients, stationary phase in general, high osmolarity, and high or low temperature (for recent reviews, see references 3 and 4). These stresses differentially affect rpoS transcription and translation as well as the rate of proteolysis of sigma S, which under non-stress conditions is a highly unstable protein (11). Glucose starvation in particular is one of the conditions that interferes with sigma S turnover (11, 24). sigma S induction is then followed by the activation of numerous sigma S-dependent genes, which results in rather dramatic changes in physiology, including the expression of a strong general stress resistance, and even in cellular morphology (4, 7, 13).

The reaction to glucose exhaustion has been studied extensively under conditions where the medium contains a second utilizable, even though less-preferred, carbon source such as lactose. During growth on glucose, uptake and utilization of lactose are inhibited due to inducer exclusion and low-level expression of the lac operon mediated by enzyme IIAGlc, a component of the PTSGlc uptake and signal transduction system (14, 20-22). Here, glucose exhaustion results in a transient growth arrest termed the diauxic lag phase, during which lactose permease and beta -galactosidase are induced, which then allow the cells to resume growth on lactose as the carbon source (2, 16).

The regulation of the lac operon has provided the basis for paradigms of specific gene regulation in bacteria, but the diauxic shift has not been looked at as a bacterial stress response. Therefore, we asked whether entry into the diauxic lag phase, i.e., starvation for glucose in the presence of another carbon source that eventually gets utilized, provokes a stress response similar to that observed upon glucose starvation in a medium that does not contain other carbon sources, i.e., during entry into stationary phase. Under the latter conditions, induction of sigma S results in major physiological and morphological changes. However, when another carbon source could replace the missing glucose, the induction of such a complex response would not be necessary. E. coli might thus be able to discriminate between the two situations.

However, we observed sigma S induction during the diauxic lag phase, which precedes the induction of the lac operon and lactose utilization. As cells resume growth on lactose, sigma S levels are reduced again. Thus, sigma S induction, which is due to inhibition of sigma S proteolysis, has the characteristics of an immediate emergency system that the cells transiently resort to, even if in the somewhat longer run they can afford not to make use of it.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

Bacterial strains and growth conditions. E. coli W3110 [F- IN(rrnD-rrnE)1 thyA36 deoC2] (1, 19) was used in the present study. The strain was kindly provided by the E. coli Stock Center (New Haven, Conn.). As it was recently observed that strain W3110 exists in a number of variants with respect to sigma S levels and even sigma S molecular weight (6), we initially tested sigma S levels and stress inducibility and found that these were very similar in our W3110 strain and in strain MC4100, in which sigma S has been well characterized previously (11). The rpoS mutant derivative of W3110 was obtained by P1 transduction (15) with strain RH90 (MC4100 rpoS359::Tn10 [10]) as a donor.

Standard batch cultures were grown at 37°C under aeration in a rotary shaker in minimal medium M9 (15) supplemented with 0.03% glucose and 0.1% lactose for diauxie experiments. In single-carbon-source experiments, glucose and lactose were used at concentrations of 0.2%. Growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 578 nm (OD578).

SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. Sample preparations for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (8) and immunoblot analysis were performed as described previously (11). Twenty micrograms of total cellular protein per lane was used on SDS gels. For detection of sigma S and beta -galactosidase, polyclonal sera produced in rabbits were used. Bands were visualized by using a goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Sigma) and the chromogenic substrates BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate)-nitroblue tetrazolium (Boehringer Mannheim). Relative sigma S and beta -galactosidase levels determined were normalized for the levels obtained during exponential growth on glucose.

Pulse labelling of cells and immunoprecipitation. Pulse labelling of cells with L-[35S]methionine and immunoprecipitation of sigma S were previously described (11). The OD578 of the samples was adjusted with supernatant from the same cultures obtained by centrifugation immediately before taking the samples for pulse labelling. The pulse time was 1.0 min. For the determination of relative rates of sigma S synthesis, the chase time was 0.25 min, whereas for the determination of sigma S half-life, chase times varied between 0.25 and 10 min. For immunoprecipitation, a polyclonal serum against sigma S (11) was used. Protein bands on autoradiographs were quantitated densitometrically. The intensity of bands representing sigma S was calculated relative to the intensity of bands representing stable proteins that weakly cross-reacted with the antisera used.

Preparation of mRNA and primer extension. For the quantitation of osmY mRNA, strain W3110 transformed with pNH5, a pBR322 derivative carrying the osmY gene on a 1.4-kb PstI insert (4a), was used (W3110 carrying just the single copy of osmY on the chromosome does not produce enough osmY mRNA for reliable detection and quantification; osmY exhibits similar regulation when present in single or multiple copies [9], consistent with all its known regulators [9] being abundant proteins). Total RNA was prepared by hot phenol extraction of cells sampled during the different phases of the diauxie experiment. For primer extension reactions, a 5' digoxigenin-labelled oligonucleotide with the sequence 5'-CAGTCTTGTCATAGTCATGG-3', which is complementary to a region near the 5' end of osmY, was used. The reactions were performed according to standard procedures (23) with 5 µg of total RNA and 12.5 units of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Boehringer Mannheim) as previously described (9, 12). As a reference, double-strand sequencing reactions were performed with the same primer as that used in the primer extension experiments.

beta -Galactosidase assay. beta -Galactosidase activity was assayed by use of ONPG (o-nitrophenyl-beta -D-galactopyranoside) as a substrate and is reported as micromoles of o-nitrophenol per minute per milligram of cellular protein, as described by Miller (15).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

Cellular sigma S levels rapidly and transiently increase due to stabilization of sigma S during the diauxic lag phase. Classical diauxie experiments (16) were performed with E. coli W3110 by using a combination of 0.03% glucose and 0.1% lactose as carbon sources in a minimal medium batch culture. Relative cellular levels of sigma S and beta -galactosidase were determined by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 1). As expected, a diauxic lag phase of approximately 40 min was observed (Fig. 1A). Immediately after the onset of this lag phase, we found an approximately threefold induction of sigma S (Fig. 1B and C). Increased sigma S levels were maintained throughout the lag phase but started to gradually decline again as soon as the cells resumed growth. By contrast, a more than 20-fold induction of beta -galactosidase occurred with slower kinetics and reached a permanent maximum after the cells had already started to grow on lactose. Similar results (fivefold induction of sigma S) were obtained when the diauxic shift experiment was performed under batch fermentation conditions, where much higher cellular densities are reached (25).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Induction of sigma S and beta -galactosidase during the diauxic shift from glucose to lactose. Strain W3110 was grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with 0.03% glucose and 0.1% lactose. Samples are designated with the same numbers throughout the entire figure. OD578s were measured (A) and relative levels of sigma S and beta -galactosidase were determined by immunoblot analysis (B) (with size standard proteins of 106, 80, and 49 kDa shown at the left side of the figure). Bands representing sigma S (lower arrowhead) and beta -galactosidase (upper arrowhead) were quantitated densitometrically (C and D, respectively), and the data obtained were normalized for the values determined during exponential growth on glucose (sample 1).

When cells are grown on glucose alone as a carbon source, glucose exhaustion results in a rapid stabilization of sigma S (11, 24). The rapid kinetics of sigma S induction at the onset of the diauxic lag phase (Fig. 1) also suggested an inhibition of proteolysis rather than regulation at the genetic level. Therefore, we tested sigma S degradation in pulse-chase experiments during the different phases of the diauxie experiment (Fig. 2). We determined a sigma S half-life of approximately 2 min during the "glucose phase" (Fig. 2A), which is very similar to previously observed half-lives during growth on glucose alone (11, 17, 18, 24). In the diauxic lag phase, however, sigma S proteolysis was completely inhibited (Fig. 2B). sigma S turnover remained relatively inefficient in the "lactose phase" (as determined approximately 45 min after cells had started to grow on lactose), with the sigma S half-life being considerably higher (more than 20 min) than during the initial growth phase on glucose (Fig. 2C).


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   In vivo turnover of sigma S during the different phases of the diauxic shift experiment. Strain W3110 was grown in M9 medium supplemented with 0.03% glucose and 0.1% lactose. Samples were taken during initial growth on glucose (OD578 = 0.16) (A), approximately 10 min after the onset of the diauxic lag phase (OD578 = 0.26) (B), and during growth on lactose (OD578 = 0.35) (C). The samples were pulse labelled with [35S]methionine as described in Materials and Methods. sigma S was immunoprecipitated from cell extracts made of pulse-labelled cells and was visualized by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. A densitometric quantitation of the autoradiographic data is shown.

After the diauxic lag phase, when cells resume growth on lactose, the cellular sigma S content gradually declined to levels similar to those observed during initial growth on glucose (Fig. 1). Yet sigma S stability was clearly higher during the lactose phase than during the glucose phase (Fig. 2), indicating that the rate of sigma S synthesis might be low after cells start to grow on lactose. The 30% reduction in the relative rate of sigma S synthesis in W3110 cells growing on lactose compared to that observed in cells growing on glucose (data not shown) did not seem sufficient to account for the observed decrease in sigma S levels during the lactose phase. Whether and how various carbon sources or specific growth conditions differentially modulate rates of sigma S synthesis and degradation, even though the resulting sigma S levels might be similar, remains to be determined.

We conclude that glucose starvation, no matter whether another eventually utilizable carbon source is present or not, initially represents a stress condition the cells respond to by inhibiting sigma S proteolysis and thus rapidly increasing their sigma S content. As soon as the cells start to utilize lactose as the alternative carbon source, sigma S levels are reduced again. Interestingly, this decrease in sigma S content is not due to rapid proteolysis; rather, sigma S synthesis seems to be reduced.

The increase in the cellular sigma S level during the diauxic lag phase is accompanied by the induction of sigma S-dependent genes. The general stress response is dependent on many genes that require sigma S for expression, but their expression profiles do not necessarily follow that of sigma S, since often additional regulatory proteins are involved in their control. Many sigma S-dependent genes (e.g., osmY [9]) are under the negative control of cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein-cAMP complex (CRP-cAMP) (4). As cAMP levels rise during diauxic shift (5), we wondered whether those genes would really be activated in parallel to sigma S induction.

osmY mRNA was quantitated by primer extension before, during, and after the diauxic lag phase. We found that osmY mRNA levels increased in parallel to the sigma S content of the cells during diauxic growth arrest. As soon as cells resumed growth on lactose, osmY mRNA rapidly decreased again to hardly detectable levels (Fig. 3).


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Analysis of osmY mRNA during the different phases of the diauxic shift experiment. Strain W3110 carrying pNH5 was grown in M9 medium supplemented with 0.03% glucose and 0.1% lactose. RNA was prepared during growth on glucose (lane 1, OD578 = 0.15; lane 2, OD578 = 0.20), during the beginning (lane 3, OD578 = 0.27) and the end (lane 4, OD578 = 0.29) of the diauxic lag phase, and during growth on lactose (lane 5, OD578 = 0.31; lane 6, OD578 = 0.35). The reverse osmY transcript (for details, see Materials and Methods) is indicated by an arrowhead. As a reference, sequencing reactions were performed with pNH5 and the same primer as that used for primer extension. The sequence covering the osmY transcriptional start site is given, with the start site marked by an asterisk.

We conclude that not only sigma S but also osmY (and probably other similarly regulated sigma S-dependent genes) are induced during the diauxic lag phase, even though osmY is negatively controlled by CRP-cAMP (9). During the diauxic lag phase, cAMP levels increase in parallel to beta -galactosidase levels (5, 19a), i.e., they lag behind the induction of sigma S and osmY. This may explain why CRP-cAMP does not interfere with osmY activation. Rather, CRP-cAMP could contribute to the rapid and apparently complete shutoff of osmY and perhaps other sigma S-dependent genes, i.e., to the termination of the general stress response around the end of the diauxic lag phase (before cAMP levels decrease again during the early phase of growth on lactose [5]).

Does the increase in the cellular sigma S level during the diauxic lag phase play a role in the induction of the lac operon? In in vitro transcription assays, the lac promoter can be recognized by RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing either sigma 70 or sigma S (25). Therefore, it seemed possible that increased sigma S levels during the diauxic lag phase could contribute to the expression of the lac operon. This would also be consistent with the kinetics of induction of sigma S and beta -galactosidase. However, induction of beta -galactosidase during the diauxic lag phase is very similar in wild-type and otherwise isogenic rpoS mutant cells (Fig. 4), which demonstrates that sigma S does not play a role in the expression of the lac operon in vivo.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Induction of beta -galactosidase during the diauxic lag phase is not affected by a mutation in rpoS. Strain W3110 (closed symbols) and its rpoS::Tn10 derivative (open symbols) were grown in M9 minimal medium supplemented with 0.03% glucose and 0.1% lactose. Optical densities (circles) and specific beta -galactosidase activities (triangles) were determined.

Conclusions. During the diauxic lag phase, E. coli cells transiently induce sigma S and sigma S-dependent genes; i.e., they activate the general stress response, even though in the somewhat longer run they do not need this complex response. What is the function of increased levels of sigma S and sigma S-dependent stress-protective proteins during the diauxic lag phase?

With its rapid kinetics and transient nature, this induction of sigma S and of the general stress response has the characteristics of a rapid emergency response. It may be that this response is initiated whenever the nutritional situation deteriorates but is reversed as soon as the cells induce another, more economical system that allows them to cope with the situation. Thus, the general stress and starvation response in E. coli is a flexible, very rapidly inducible, and probably at any time reversible response. Nevertheless, if not reversed, the physiological and morphological consequences and the protective potential of this sigma S-mediated stress response are considerable and, in principle, comparable to the consequences of sporulation. With these properties, the general stress response is a key to the remarkable flexibility of enteric bacteria in surviving frequent, rapid, and extreme changes in their natural environments.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Andrea Muffler for preparing several figures. Part of this study was done in the laboratories of W. Boos, whose support is gratefully acknowledged.

Financial support was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schwerpunkt-Programm "Regulatory Networks in Bacteria," He-1556/5) and by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (both to R.H.-A.).

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Present address: Institute of Plant Physiology and Microbiology, Department of Biology, Free University of Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 12-16a, 14195 Berlin, Germany. Phone: (49)-30-838-3119. Fax: (49)-30-838-3118. E-mail: RHENGGEA{at}2EDAT.FU-BERLIN.DE.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References

1. Bachmann, B. J. 1972. Pedigrees of some mutant strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Bacteriol. Rev. 36:525-557[Free Full Text].
2. Epstein, W., S. Naono, and F. Gros. 1996. Synthesis of enzymes of the lactose operon during diauxic growth of Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 24:588-592.
3. Hengge-Aronis, R. 1996. Back to log phase: sigma S as a global regulator in the osmotic control of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 21:887-893[Medline].
4. Hengge-Aronis, R. 1996. Regulation of gene expression during entry into stationary phase, p. 1497-1512. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C.
4a. Henneberg, N., and R. Hengge-Aronis. Unpublished data.
5. Inada, T., K. Kimata, and H. Aiba. 1996. Mechanism responsible for glucose-lactose diauxie in Escherichia coli: challenge to the cAMP model. Genes Cells 1:293-301[Abstract].
6. Jishage, M., and A. Ishihama. 1997. Variation in RNA polymerase sigma subunit composition within different stocks of Escherichia coli W3110. J. Bacteriol. 179:959-963[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Kolter, R., D. A. Siegele, and A. Tormo. 1993. The stationary phase of the bacterial life cycle. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:855-874[Medline].
8. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[Medline].
9. Lange, R., M. Barth, and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1993. Complex transcriptional control of the sigma S-dependent stationary-phase-induced and osmotically regulated osmY (csi-5) gene suggests novel roles for Lrp, cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein-cAMP complex, and integration host factor in the stationary-phase response of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:7910-7917[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Lange, R., and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1991. Identification of a central regulator of stationary-phase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 5:49-59[Medline].
11. Lange, R., and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1994. The cellular concentration of the sigma S subunit of RNA-polymerase in Escherichia coli is controlled at the levels of transcription, translation and protein stability. Genes Dev. 8:1600-1612[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Lange, R., and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1994. The nlpD gene is located in an operon with rpoS on the Escherichia coli chromosome and encodes a novel lipoprotein with a potential function in cell wall formation. Mol. Microbiol. 13:733-743[Medline].
13. Loewen, P. C., and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1994. The role of the sigma factor sigma S (KatF) in bacterial global regulation. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48:53-80[Medline].
14. Magasanik, B. 1970. Glucose effects: inducer exclusion and repression, p. 189-220. In J. Beckwith, and D. Zipser (ed.), The lactose operon. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
15. Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
16. Monod, J. 1947. The phenomenon of enzymatic adaptation. Growth 11:223-289.
17. Muffler, A., M. Barth, C. Marschall, and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1997. Heat shock regulation of sigma S turnover: a role for DnaK and relationship between stress responses mediated by sigma S and sigma 32 in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:445-452[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Muffler, A., D. Fischer, S. Altuvia, G. Storz, and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1996. The response regulator RssB controls stability of the sigma S subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 15:1333-1339[Medline].
19. Neidhardt, F. C. 1983. Proteins induced by anaerobiosis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 154:336-343[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19a. Neubauer, P. Unpublished data.
20. Postma, P. W., J. W. Lengeler, and G. R. Jacobson. 1993. Phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase systems of bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 57:543-594[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Roseman, S., and N. D. Meadow. 1990. Signal transduction by the bacterial phosphotransferase system. J. Biol. Chem. 265:2993-2996[Free Full Text].
22. Saier, M. H., Jr. 1989. Protein phosphorylation and allosteric control of inducer exclusion and catabolite repression by the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system. Microbiol. Rev. 53:109-120[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
24. Takayanagi, Y., K. Tanaka, and H. Takahashi. 1994. Structure of the 5' upstream region and the regulation of the rpoS gene of Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 243:525-531[Medline].
25. Teich, A., and P. Neubauer. Unpublished data.


Journal of Bacteriology, December 1998, p. 6203-6206, Vol. 180, No. 23
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hengge-Aronis, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hengge-Aronis, R.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS