J Bacteriol, March 1998, p. 1496-1503, Vol. 180, No. 6
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
and
Department of Microbiology and Molecular
Genetics, University of Texas Health Science
Center
Houston, Houston, Texas 77030
Received 21 August 1997/Accepted 3 January 1998
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anoxygenic photosynthetic growth of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 requires a functional fnrL gene, which encodes the anaerobic regulator, FnrL. Using transcriptional fusions to the puc operon in which the upstream FNR consensus-like sequence is either present or absent, we obtained results that suggest that FnrL has both a direct and an indirect role in puc operon expression. In addition to FnrL, several other factors, including the two-component Prr regulatory system and the transcriptional repressor PpsR, are known to mediate oxygen control of photosynthesis gene expression in this organism. Therefore, we examined the relationship between FnrL and these other regulatory elements. Our results indicate that while mutations of prr or ppsR can lead to an increase in expression of some photosynthesis genes under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, regardless of the presence or absence of FnrL, there remains an absolute requirement for a functional fnrL gene for photosynthetic growth. We examined the potential role(s) of FnrL in photosynthetic growth by considering several target genes which may be required for this growth mode.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In recent years, a number of factors that mediate oxygen control of photosynthesis (PS) gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1, including the two-component Prr regulatory system (6, 7, 17), the PpsR repressor (11, 22, 23) and AppA antirepressor (10, 12), the tspO gene product (27), and the product of the fnrL gene (30), have been identified. The Prr regulatory system consists of a sensor histidine kinase encoded by prrB that responds to decreased oxygen tension and functions through the response regulator encoded by prrA (6, 7), although a target DNA sequence for PrrA has not been identified. The ppsR gene product functions as a transcriptional repressor under both aerobic and photosynthetic conditions, and an intact palindrome with the sequence motif TGTN12ACA is required for PpsR activity (11, 22, 23). The activity of PpsR, in turn, appears to be modulated by the appA gene product, which may be directly responsive to redox changes brought about by changes in oxygen tension and light intensity (12). The tspO gene encodes an outer membrane-localized polypeptide that appears to dampen the course of derepression of a number of PS genes in response to a decline in external oxygen. FnrL is the R. sphaeroides homolog of the Escherichia coli anaerobic regulatory protein, Fnr. The similarity of the helix-turn-helix motif of FnrL to the corresponding region in other members of the Fnr family of proteins (30) predicts the DNA recognition sequence TTGATN4ATCAA. This motif has been identified within the upstream sequences of several operons (29, 30), and we have determined for the hemA gene, whose upstream sequences contain an FNR consensus sequence, that FnrL increases transcription when oxygen tension is reduced (30).
Other factors that appear to be either signal generators or sensors have been identified. Analysis of the phenotype(s) associated with mutations in the ccoNOQP and/or rdxBHIS operons suggest that these operons encode proteins which form membrane-localized complexes that can generate or respond to a redox signal or intermediate indicative of a change from aerobiosis to anaerobiosis (21, 31). This signal or its absence ultimately results in increased transcription of PS genes under highly aerobic conditions in strains mutant for the membrane-responsive redox carriers. We have proposed that this altered transcriptional response is mediated through both FnrL and the Prr two-component activation system (31). Additionally, studies of the tspO gene product (27), which is the R. sphaeroides homolog of the eukaryotic peripheral benzodiazopene receptor (28), indicates it may play a role in oxygen control mediated through PpsR/AppA, since the spectrum of downstream activities of TspO and PpsR are similar.
Thus, do all of these regulatory genes belong to single or multiple regulatory circuit(s)? The TspO, PpsR, and AppA proteins appear to be involved exclusively in the regulation of PS gene expression. In contrast, the Prr system, in addition to being involved in PS gene expression (6, 7), is involved in the regulation of genes involved in both CO2 and N2 fixation (14, 24). Because photosynthesis is an obligately anaerobic process in R. sphaeroides, the precise role of the fnrL gene product is more difficult to ascertain, since the absence of FnrL results in a phenotype whereby the mutant is unable to grow both photosynthetically and by anaerobic respiration. However, recent studies involving a comparison of FnrL null strains of both R. sphaeroides and R. capsulatus clearly reveals that anoxygenic photosynthesis can be separated from general anaerobiosis when the role of FnrL is considered (29).
The pucBA genes of R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 encode the structural polypeptides of one of the two antenna complexes of the photosynthetic apparatus. These genes have previously been identified as a potential target for regulation by FnrL, since the upstream sequence of this operon contains sequences with similarity to the FNR consensus sequence (16). To more clearly define the role of FnrL in mediating oxygen control of PS gene expression, we determined whether fnrL plays a role in regulating the final levels of puc operon expression, and if so, at what point(s) such control is exercised.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains and plasmids. The R. sphaeroides and E. coli strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Additional details pertaining to some of the plasmids are described in Results.
|
Growth conditions. E. coli (19) and R. sphaeroides (4, 5) were cultured according to previously described protocols unless otherwise indicated. Growth of R. sphaeroides was monitored with a Klett-Summerson colorimeter with a no. 66 filter (1 Klett unit = 107 cells per ml). Alternatively, cell optical densities at 660 nm (OD660) were determined with a UV-1601PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Columbia, Md.). When appropriate, either to provide selection for plasmids or to select for various recombinant strains, media were supplemented with antibiotics. Final concentrations for R. sphaeroides were 0.8 µg of tetracycline per ml and 50 µg of kanamycin, spectinomycin, and streptomycin (St) per ml; for E. coli, the final concentrations were 15 µg of tetracycline per ml, 50 µg of kanamycin, spectinomycin, and streptomycin per ml, and 100 µg of ampicillin per ml.
DNA manipulations and analyses. Plasmid isolation was carried out according to standard protocols or manufacturers' instructions, with plasmid Wizard (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.) or Prep-a-Gene (Bio-Rad) kits. Restriction endonuclease treatment and other enzymatic treatment of DNA fragments and plasmids were performed according to standard procedures or following manufacturers' instructions, with enzymes purchased from New England BioLabs, Inc. (Beverly, Mass.), Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals (Indianapolis, Ind.), Bethesda Research Laboratories Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, Md.), and Promega. DNA analysis was performed by using standard electrophoretic techniques. Southern hybridization of R. sphaeroides genomic DNA was performed as previously described (30). Labeling of DNA probes and detection of hybridizing sequences by chemiluminescence were performed with a NEBlot Phototope kit purchased from New England BioLabs.
Conjugation. Plasmid mobilization into R. sphaeroides was performed as previously described (4). To introduce plasmids into strains of R. sphaeroides, triparental matings with E. coli HB101(pRK2013) (8) as a helper strain were used.
Construction of PpsR-FnrL null mutant strains.
The plasmid
used for introducing the ppsR::
Kmr
mutation into FnrL
mutant strain JZ1692 (Table 1),
p714SmH::Kmr::mob, is
described in Table 1. Exconjugants in which all or portions of plasmid
p714SmH::Kmr::mob had been
integrated into the chromosome by homologous recombination were
selected for by using the kanamycin resistance (Kmr) marker
of the
cartridge within the ppsR coding sequences. Candidates of even-numbered crossovers were then scored for by using
the outside drug marker, tetracycline. The presence of appropriate DNA
sequences in recombinant strains JZ1844, JZ1846, and JZ1847 (Table 1)
was confirmed by Southern hybridization analysis (results not shown).
-Galactosidase assays.
Assays of
-galactosidase
activity were performed on crude cell extracts as described previously
(26), using reagent-grade o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside, purchased
from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.) as the substrate.
-Galactosidase activity in R. sphaeroides is expressed in
units, where 1 U corresponds to 1 µmol of
o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside hydrolyzed
per min per mg of protein.
Spectral analysis of cell extracts. Crude cell-free lysates were prepared either by sonication in ICM buffer (10 mM KPO4, 1 mM EDTA [pH 7.2]) as previously described (25) or by passage through a French pressure cell (26). Spectra were recorded with a Shimadzu UV-1601PC spectrophotometer. The levels of B875 and B800-850 complexes were determined by the method of Meinhardt et al. (20).
Pigment extraction and analysis. Pigments were extracted from R. sphaeroides cells and quantitated as described by Cohen-Bazire et al. (2).
Protein determinations. Protein concentrations of cell extracts were determined with the Pierce (Rockford, Ill.) bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent. As a reference, bovine serum albumin was used.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Analysis of puc operon expression in wild-type and
FnrL
mutant strains.
Two regulatory domains of the
puc operon have been defined through the studies of Lee and
Kaplan (16): the upstream regulatory sequences, spanning
nucleotides (nt)
629 to
150 relative to the +1 site of
transcription, and the downstream regulatory sequences, spanning nt
150 to the +1 site of transcription. An extensive analysis of these
domains with respect to puc expression indicates the
presence of as many as seven unique regulatory elements
(16). Sequences similar to the FNR consensus sequence are
located at nt
148 to
135, which partially overlap an integration
host factor (IHF) binding site (Fig. 1A).
To determine whether FnrL is involved in the regulation of
puc expression, we used two different
puc::lacZ transcriptional fusion
plasmids: pCF200, in which upstream sequences from nt
629 to +175
relative to the start site of transcription of the puc
operon are positioned in front of a promoterless lacZ gene,
and pCF250, which contains nt
92 to +175 relative to the start site
of transcription of the puc operon similarly positioned in
front of the lacZ gene (Table 1 and Fig. 1A). Because
FnrL
mutant strains are unable to grow either
photosynthetically or anaerobically in the dark with dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) (29, 30), we have analyzed puc expression
in response to diminishing oxygen tension. This analysis consisted of
growing cells to low cell density while sparging with a mixture of 30%
O2-69% N2-1% CO2 mixture. At
time zero, the gas mixture was changed to 2% O2-97% N2-1% CO2; at various intervals, cell samples
were removed and
-galactosidase activity present in crude cell
extracts was determined. The kinetics of
-galactosidase production
for wild-type 2.4.1 and FnrL
mutant strains bearing the
two different puc::lacZ transcriptional fusion plasmids, following the shift to low oxygen, are shown in Fig.
1B. For pCF200, which contains the FNR consensus-like sequence, the
level of LacZ induction in the FnrL
mutant after 4 h
is approximately 65% of the wild-type level, which is virtually
identical to the level of
-galactosidase activity present in
wild-type cells containing pCF250, which lacks the FNR consensus-like
sequence. On the other hand, expression from pCF250 in the
FnrL
mutant showed no induction of
-galactosidase
activity following the shift from high to low oxygen. This experiment
was performed three additional times with similar results, as
summarized in Table 2. These results
suggest that FnrL normally activates puc operon expression
when oxygen tensions are reduced to below threshhold levels. However,
our analysis also suggests that there are at least two components which
contribute to FnrL-mediated puc expression. These
contributions are distinguishable when the results obtained for pCF200
are compared to those obtained for pCF250.
|
|
mutant strains. These results strongly support the
conclusion that FnrL is involved, either directly or indirectly, in
generalized PS gene expression leading to spectral complex formation.
Such a conclusion is further supported by analysis of wild-type strains carrying multiple copies of the wild-type fnrL gene. A
spectral analysis of membrane extracts from wild-type cells bearing the plasmid vector pRK415 alone, grown in 30% oxygen, revealed that the
levels of B800-850 and B875 complexes were 0.16 (±0.05) and 0.25 (±0.19) nmol per mg of crude membrane protein, respectively. In
contrast, the level of B800-850 and B875 complexes present under
identical conditions in wild-type cells bearing pUI1970, which carries
the wild-type fnrL gene, were 0.44 (±0.22) and 1.30 (±0.08) nmol per mg of crude membrane protein, respectively. Thus, while we have obtained evidence to suggest that FnrL directly activates
puc expression when oxygen tension is reduced, these results
further indicate that FnrL, in addition, has a broader role in the
regulation of PS gene expression.
|
Phenotypic analysis of PpsR
FnrL
mutants.
While the evidence described above directly indicates
that PS genes are regulated by FnrL, it is well established that there are other regulators which mediate oxygen control of PS gene expression in R. sphaeroides. One of these regulators is the
transcriptional repressor encoded by the ppsR gene (11,
22, 23). It has been shown previously that disabling the
ppsR gene in an otherwise wild-type background leads to a
derepression of photopigment genes and puc operon expression
under both aerobic and photosynthetic conditions (23). Thus,
we addressed the question of whether relieving PpsR repression is able
to overcome the FnrL
block to photosynthetic growth. We
examined the consequences for growth characteristics of
FnrL
mutant strains when a disruption (with an omega
cassette) of the ppsR gene was also introduced.
mutants are stable and can grow under anaerobic and
photosynthetic conditions, this result indicates that it is the absence
of functional FnrL that prevents colony formation under
anaerobic-dark/DMSO or photosynthetic conditions. Photopigment analysis
of two structurally confirmed PpsR
FnrL
double mutant strains obtained under aerobic conditions, JZ1846 and
JZ1847 (see Materials and Methods and Table 1), revealed that
carotenoid levels were approximately 13-fold higher than in the
PpsR+ FnrL
mutant, JZ1844 (Table
4). Bacteriochlorophyll (Bchl) levels were also elevated in the PpsR
FnrL
mutant
strains. However, these levels were not consistent between the two
independent double-mutant isolates, JZ1846 and JZ1847 (Table 4). This
inconsistency in Bchl levels is not unexpected since, as has been
observed previously, strains producing photosynthetic membranes under
aerobic conditions are highly unstable and accumulate mutations in PS
genes which include Bchl biosynthetic genes (6, 17). When
tested individually, none of these strains were able to grow
photosynthetically. Therefore, while disabling ppsR leads to
a derepression of certain PS genes even in the absence of FnrL, this
derepression alone is insufficient to bypass the FnrL requirement for
photosynthetic growth.
|
Phenotypic consequences of introducing the prrB78
allele in trans into an FnrL
mutant.
In
addition to PpsR, which negatively regulates the expression of certain
PS genes under aerobic conditions, the Prr regulatory system mediates
the activation of PS gene expression in response to lowering oxygen
tension. Thus, while both of these effectors mediate oxygen control of
PS gene expression, they respond differently to changes in oxygen
tension.
mutant strain, JZ1678.
FnrL
exconjugants containing plasmid pUI1650 were
obtained only under aerobic conditions (Table 3), and colonies failed
to appear on plates incubated under anaerobic (dark/DMSO) or
photosynthetic conditions. When the prrB78 allele was
introduced in trans into wild-type cells under anaerobic
conditions, the cells were quite stable. However, under aerobic
conditions, an array of differentially pigmented colonies arose
(6). True wild-type exconjugants bearing the
prrB78 allele can be visually identified by a deep red
pigmentation associated with the synthesis of photopigments under
aerobic conditions. Instability in the presence of oxygen was also
associated with the introduction of pUI1650 into JZ1678, indicating
that the prrB78 allele in trans was affecting
photopigment gene expression in the FnrL
mutant as well.
Nevertheless, these cells are incapable of photosynthetic growth, which
suggests that FnrL is indispensable even in the presence of the
prrB78 allele.
Presence of photosynthetic membranes in FnrL
mutants
bearing the prrB78* allele in trans under
aerobic conditions.
To quantitatively compare the effects on PS
gene expression of prrB78 in trans in the
presence and absence of FnrL, we needed to obtain a stable, pure
culture of both wild-type 2.4.1 and JZ1678 containing pUI1650. However,
as noted here and elsewhere (6), the presence of the
prrB78 allele results in genetic instability, due to the
formation of spectral complexes containing Bchl in the presence of
oxygen. Restreaking wild-type exconjugants for stable single-colony
isolates continued to give rise to a multiplicity of either differently
pigmented or variegated colonies. However, one JZ1678 exconjugant
colony type, which was more pigmented than JZ1678 exconjugants
containing the vector alone, could be successfully purified, suggesting
that either the FnrL
mutant background tolerated the
prrB78 allele better than wild-type 2.4.1 or the
prrB78 allele was modified. To distinguish between these two
possible explanations, plasmid DNAs isolated from two independent
stable JZ1678 exconjugants were reintroduced into both JZ1678 and
wild-type 2.4.1. Unlike the parent plasmid pUI1650, bearing the
prrB78 allele, the plasmid DNAs which had been passaged through JZ1678 produced virtually stable exconjugants with only rare
pigmentation variants when introduced into either wild-type 2.4.1 or
JZ1678. While the wild-type 2.4.1 exconjugants were visually more
highly pigmented than cells without plasmid or containing only vector
DNA, they were less pigmented than those exconjugants that could be
identified among the exconjugants derived from unpassaged plasmid
pUI1650.
exconjugants of prrB78* were again
obtained on plates only under aerobic conditions.
|
mutant strains with respect to PS gene expression,
in that photosynthetic complexes are present even under highly aerobic
conditions. However, given the inability of this strain to produce
colonies under photosynthetic conditions, it appears that the presence
of the photosynthetic membranes alone cannot induce photosynthetic
growth when fnrL is disabled. Thus, we believe that there
are additional points of regulatory control that require, either
directly or indirectly, the intervention of FnrL for their expression
and which are essential for photosynthetic growth. The presence of the
wild-type prrB allele present in multicopy in either
wild-type 2.4.1 or the FnrL
mutant JZ1678 also led to the
development of photosynthetic membranes under these same conditions,
but the pigment-protein complexes were present at significantly lower
concentrations than in the presence of multiple copies of the
prrB78* allele (Table 5).
|
Growth of wild-type 2.4.1 and FnrL
mutant strains
following a shift from aerobic to photosynthetic conditions.
As
shown in Fig. 3A, we monitored the growth
of wild-type cells bearing either the vector plasmid or the vector
carrying one of three different alleles of prrB, following a
shift from highly aerobic conditions to anaerobic photosynthetic
conditions. For the analysis of wild-type cells bearing pUI1650, as
previously demonstrated, plasmid pLK-1 was also present, to provide
positive selection for the presence of the prrB78 allele
(6). Cells containing pLK-1 and pUI1650 were grown in the
presence of kanamycin at 300 µg/ml, the maximum level of resistance
observed for these cells. This is somewhat less than the maximum
resistance observed for PRRB78(pLK-1), bearing the prrB78
mutation on the chromosome, which under aerobic conditions can grow in
the presence of kanamycin at 450 µg/ml (6). By selecting
for growth in the presence of high levels of kanamycin, we can enrich
for a population of cells containing the prrB78 allele,
which, in addition to producing photosynthetic membranes under aerobic
conditions, elevates expression of the Kmr gene, due to the
fact that Kmr gene expression is under PS gene control.
|
mutant strains
bearing either the vector plasmid or the wild-type prrB
(pUI1649) or prrB78* (pUI1650*) allele. As shown in Fig. 3B,
the results for the FnrL
mutant strain bearing the vector
alone are similar to those for wild-type cells except that the former
do not recover from the lag period and therefore do not grow
photosynthetically. In the case of JZ1678(pUI1649), unlike the
wild-type cells, there is a pronounced lag in growth of up to 7 h
following the shift to photosynthetic conditions before growth resumes.
In contrast, when prrB78* is present in multicopy in JZ1678,
there is no lag observed following the shift to anaerobiosis in liquid
cultures. Thus, it appears that prrB78* is sufficient to
poise the cells under aerobic conditions for photosynthetic growth,
regardless of the presence or absence of FnrL.
As shown in Fig. 3C, after extended incubation under photosynthetic
conditions, the wild-type cells bearing the vector alone had recovered
from the lag in growth and had undergone several culture doublings.
However, during the same period, the culture of the FnrL
mutant strain bearing the vector had not yet doubled in optical density. For each of the strains used, at least three independent isolates were analyzed. All showed growth patterns similar to the
examples presented in Fig. 3.
Since FnrL
mutants bearing pUI1650* failed to form
colonies under photosynthetic conditions, the basis for the growth of
the liquid culture of FnrL
mutant strain JZ1678 bearing
pUI1650* under photosynthetic conditions was investigated. Plasmid-free
segregants were isolated by culturing the FnrL
mutant
strain bearing pUI1650* in the absence of antibiotic and under aerobic
conditions. Eight segregants, which scored as tetracycline sensitive,
were then analyzed individually for the ability to form colonies under
aerobic and photosynthetic conditions. Among these, three isolates
showed similar growth under both conditions. We believe that these
results indicate that the increase in optical density observed for the
liquid culture of JZ1678 (pUI1650*) was attributable to an extragenic
suppressor mutation(s) which arose during the course of incubation of
the nonrevertible FnrL
mutant strain under photosynthetic
conditions. While photosynthetically competent pseudorevertants
eventually arose from liquid cultures of FnrL
mutant
strains bearing the vector alone (for example, Fig. 3C) or the
wild-type prrB gene, or in the absence of any plasmid
(results not shown), it appears that the presence of photosynthetic
membranes under aerobic conditions in the FnrL
mutant
strain bearing the prrB78* allele allowed the
FnrL
mutant strain to bypass the normal lag phase while
transiting from aerobic to photosynthetic growth. Thus, suppressor
mutations accumulated more rapidly in this population than in those
populations requiring the normal 7- to 8-h lag prior to the resumption
of growth.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results indicate that FnrL has a dual role in the regulation
of PS gene expression: (i) Transcriptional fusions between DNA
sequences containing FNR consensus sequences and the lacZ gene indicate that FnrL probably acts at the FNR consensus sequence to
regulate transcription of the puc operon in response to
changes in oxygen levels. Within the upstream sequences of the
puc operon, the putative target sequence is thought to be
TTGTCN4TTCAA (16), which overlaps the binding
site of IHF (16 and 18). Previous work has established by both in vivo and in vitro analyses that the IHF
binding site plays a critical role in the enhanced control of
puc operon transcription by oxygen and light
(18). Because this transcriptional response involves a
direct interaction between the functionally separate upstream and
downstream regulatory sequences of the puc operon (16,
17), IHF binding might induce bending of the DNA molecule
enabling interaction between FnrL and RNA polymerase to occur, leading
to activation of transcription, in a manner resembling transcriptional
activation of
54 promoters. (ii) FnrL also appears to
have an additional role in the regulation of puc operon
expression, as well as in photosynthetic growth in general. We show
here that a transcriptional fusion between puc upstream
sequences entirely devoid of the FNR consensus sequence remains
responsive to the presence of FnrL under conditions of low oxygen, but
in the absence of FnrL, puc operon transcription is greatly
diminished.
We have also shown here that the FnrL requirement for photosynthetic growth cannot be bypassed through either the absence of the PS repressor gene product, PpsR, or the presence of the trans-dominant prrB78* allele. In the FnrL+ background, either one of these mutations is capable of causing the formation of functional photosynthetic membranes under aerobic conditions, as indicated by the absence of any growth lag when such cells are subjected to stringent photosynthetic growth conditions following a shift from aerobic growth. It is also readily apparent that the presence of photosynthetic membranes in the presence of oxygen gives rise to strains which are genetically unstable. These same strains, however, are quite stable under anaerobiosis and show no growth impairment under those conditions.
What then is the critical role of FnrL in photosynthetic growth? Our
results indicate that for R. sphaeroides 2.4.1, there must
be PS genes which absolutely require FnrL-mediated regulation under the
photosynthetic growth mode. Genes and/or operons which we might
consider in this regard are those having upstream FNR consensus
sequences. These include the ccoNQOP operon and the ctaD and ctaCBGE operons (29), which
encode the cbb3 and aa3 cytochrome c terminal oxidases, respectively. It has
previously been demonstrated that Cco
mutant strains are
altered in PS gene expression; i.e., expression of both the
puc and puf operons is elevated under aerobic
conditions, and spectral complexes are present (21, 31). We
proposed that the mechanism of Cco action may involve the production of
an active redox component, which signals the Prr regulon and thereby
leads to altered regulation of PS gene expression (21, 31).
However, we have shown here that although prrB78* is
dominant to FnrL
in the development of photosynthetic
membranes, the presence of photosynthetic membranes alone cannot
restore photosynthetic growth in the absence of a functional
fnrL. It should be noted that unlike the Prr system, PpsR
derepression of PS genes does not appear to involve FnrL activity.
Rather, another effector, namely, AppA, may be involved in
communicating anaerobiosis to this regulator (12). However,
even here, the absence of a functional PpsR repressor is insufficient
to overcome the fnrL mutation with respect to photosynthetic
growth. Therefore, the mutation in fnrL is dominant to
mutations which are known to result in constitutive formation of
photosynthetic membranes.
Other genes that may require increased expression under photosynthetic
conditions, and which have upstream FNR consensus sequences (29,
30), include the tetrapyrrole and Bchl biosynthetic genes hemA, hemZ, hemN, and bchE.
Thus, the absence of FnrL may not permit the accelerated formation of
tetrapyrrole intermediates or Bchl, essential for photosynthetic
membranes, at levels that are adequate for anaerobic photosynthetic
growth. We have already demonstrated a role for FnrL in the anaerobic
regulation of hemA expression (30). Other workers
(3, 9) have shown that inactivation of the hemN
gene (previously referred to as hemF) of R. sphaeroides, which encodes one of two isozymes of the
oxygen-independent coproporphyrinogen III oxidase (the other isozyme
being encoded by hemZ), leads to an inability to grow
photosynthetically. Interestingly, while the upstream sequences of the
bchE genes of Rhodobacter capsulatus (GenBank
accession no. Z11165) and R. sphaeroides both contain the
target motif for PpsR (whose homolog in R. capsulatus is
CrtJ), neither the bchE nor the hemA gene of
R. capsulatus contains upstream FNR consensus sequences, nor
has a second hemN/hemZ gene been found. The fact that
FnrL
mutant strains of R. capsulatus are not
altered in the ability to grow under photosynthetic conditions
(29) potentially implicates these three genes. Whether it is
FnrL regulation of the expression of one or another of these genes
singly or in combination that is required for photosynthetic growth of
R. sphaeroides is not known. However, these observations
establish a clear focus for future studies.
It is possible to isolate suppressor strains that bypass the FnrL requirement for photosynthetic growth, as was shown here and elsewhere (30). Identification of these loci, together with analysis of those genes described above which are likely to be regulated by FnrL, will be critical to developing a full understanding of the regulatory components required for photosynthetic growth in this organism.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. Eraso for kindly providing plasmids pUI1650, pUI1649, and pLK-1. We also thank M. Gomelsky for providing plasmid p714SmH::Kmr::mob, and we thank M. Gomelsky and N. Mouncey for helpful discussions.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM15590 from the National Institutes of Health.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Health Science Center
Houston, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 500-5502. Fax: (713) 500-5499. E-mail:
skaplan{at}utmmg.med.uth.tmc.edu.
Permanent address: Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland
University, Rochester, MI 48309.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Chory, J.,
T. J. Donohue,
A. R. Varga,
A. Staehelin, and S. Kaplan.
1984.
Induction of the photosynthetic membranes of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides: biochemical and morphological studies.
J. Bacteriol.
159:540-554 |
| 2. | Cohen-Bazire, G., W. R. Sistrom, and R. Y. Stanier. 1957. Kinetic studies of pigment synthesis by non-sulfur purple bacteria. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 49:25-68. |
| 3. | Coomber, S. A., R. M. Jones, P. M. Jordan, and C. N. Hunter. 1992. A putative anaerobic coproporphyrinogen III oxidase in Rhodobacter sphaerroides. I. Molecular cloning, transposon mutagenesis and sequence analysis of the gene. Mol. Microbiol. 6:3159-3169[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Davis, J.,
T. J. Donohue, and S. Kaplan.
1988.
Construction, characterization, and complementation of a puf mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
170:320-329 |
| 5. |
Donohue, T. J.,
A. G. McEwan, and S. Kaplan.
1986.
Cloning, DNA sequence, and expression of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides cytochrome c2 gene.
J. Bacteriol.
168:962-972 |
| 6. |
Eraso, J. M., and S. Kaplan.
1995.
Oxygen-insensitive synthesis of the photosynthesis membranes of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: a mutant histidine kinase.
J. Bacteriol.
177:2695-2706 |
| 7. |
Eraso, J. M., and S. Kaplan.
1994.
prrA, a putative response regulator involved in oxygen regulation in photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
176:32-43 |
| 8. |
Figurski, D. H., and D. R. Helinski.
1979.
Replication of an origin containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:1648-1652 |
| 9. | Gibson, L. C. D., P. McGlynn, M. Chaudhri, and C. N. Hunter. 1992. A putative anaerobic coproporphyrinogen III oxidase in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. II. Analysis of a region of the genome encoding hemF and the puc operon. Mol. Microbiol. 6:3171-3186[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Gomelsky, M., and S. Kaplan.
1995.
appA, a novel gene encoding a trans-acting factor involved in the regulation of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.
J. Bacteriol.
177:4609-4618 |
| 11. |
Gomelsky, M., and S. Kaplan.
1995.
Genetic evidence that PpsR from Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 functions as a repressor of puc and bchF expression.
J. Bacteriol.
177:1634-1637 |
| 12. |
Gomelsky, M., and S. Kaplan.
1997.
Molecular genetic analysis suggesting interactions between AppA and PpsR in regulation of photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.
J. Bacteriol.
179:128-134 |
| 13. | Jessee, J. 1986. New subcloning efficiency competent cells: >1 × 106 transformants/µg. Focus 8:9. |
| 14. |
Joshi, H. M., and F. R. Tabita.
1996.
A global two component signal transduction system that integrates the control of photosynthesis, carbon dioxide assimilation, and nitrogen fixation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:14515-14520 |
| 15. | Keen, N. T., S. Tamaki, D. Kobayashi, and D. Trollinger. 1988. Improved broad-host-range plasmids for DNA cloning in gram-negative bacteria. Gene 70:191-197[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Lee, J. K., and S. Kaplan.
1992.
cis-acting regulatory elements involved in oxygen and light control of puc operon transcription in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
174:1146-1157 |
| 17. |
Lee, J. K., and S. Kaplan.
1992.
Isolation and characterization of trans-acting mutations involved in oxygen regulation of puc operon transcription in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
174:1158-1171 |
| 18. |
Lee, J. K.,
S. Wang,
J. M. Eraso,
J. Gardner, and S. Kaplan.
1993.
Transcriptional regulation of puc operon expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Involvement of an integration host factor-binding sequence.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:24491-24497 |
| 19. | Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook. 1982. . Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 20. | Meinhardt, S. W., P. J. Kiley, S. Kaplan, A. R. Crofts, and S. Harayama. 1985. Characterization of light-harvesting mutants of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. I. Measurement of the efficiency of light energy transfer from light-harvesting complexes to the reaction center. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 236:130-139[Medline]. |
| 21. |
O'Gara, J. P., and S. Kaplan.
1997.
Evidence for the role of redox carriers in photosynthesis gene expression and carotenoid biosynthesis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1951-1961 |
| 22. | Penfold, R. J., and J. M. Pemberton. 1991. A gene from the photosynthetic gene cluster of Rhodobacter sphaeroides induces in trans suppression of bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoid levels in R. sphaeroides and in R. capsulatus. Curr. Microbiol. 23:259-263. |
| 23. |
Penfold, R. J., and J. M. Pemberton.
1994.
Sequencing, chromosomal inactivation, and functional expression of ppsR, a gene which represses carotenoid and bacteriochlorophyll synthesis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2869-2876 |
| 24. |
Qian, Y., and F. R. Tabita.
1996.
A global signal transduction system regulates aerobic and anaerobic CO2 fixation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
J. Bacteriol.
178:12-18 |
| 25. |
Sabaty, M., and Kaplan.
1996.
mgpS, a complex regulatory locus involved in the transcriptional control of the puc and puf operons in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.
J. Bacteriol.
178:35-45 |
| 26. | Tai, T.-N., W. A. Havelka, and S. Kaplan. 1988. A broad-host-range vector system for cloning and translational lacZ fusion analysis. Plasmid 19:175-188[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Yeliseev, A. A., and S. Kaplan.
1995.
A sensory transducer homologous to the mammalian peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor regulates photosynthetic membrane complex formation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:21167-21175 |
| 28. |
Yeliseev, A. A.,
K. E. Krueger, and S. Kaplan.
1997.
A mammalian mitochondrial drug receptor functions as a bacterial "oxygen" sensor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:5101-5106 |
| 29. |
Zeilstra-Ryalls, J. H.,
K. Gabbert,
R. Kranz, and S. Kaplan.
1997.
Analysis of the fnrL gene and its function in Rhodobacter capsulatus.
J. Bacteriol.
179:7264-7273 |
| 30. |
Zeilstra-Ryalls, J. H., and S. Kaplan.
1995.
Aerobic and anaerobic regulation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: the role of the fnrL gene.
J. Bacteriol.
177:6422-6431 |
| 31. |
Zeilstra-Ryalls, J. H., and S. Kaplan.
1996.
Control of hemA expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: regulation through alterations in cellular redox state.
J. Bacteriol.
178:985-993 |
| 32. | Zeilstra-Ryalls, J. H., and S. Kaplan. 1996. Unpublished observations. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |