J Bacteriol, April 1998, p. 2262-2264, Vol. 180, No. 8
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Biochemical and Biophysical Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-5934
Received 20 October 1997/Accepted 16 February 1998
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A family of mutants overexpressing the Serratia marcescens extracellular nuclease has been known for decades. A number of these alleles are characterized here at the molecular level, and the mutant genes are identified, yielding a likely model for their phenotype. The known mutations exert their effect indirectly on nucA expression by elevating the basal SOS response of the cell. Mutations have been found in xerC and uvrD, both of which result in partial SOS induction. A classic nucsu allele, that of strain W1050, is also likely to be in xerC.
| |
TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The production of extracellular nuclease is one of the defining attributes of Serratia marcescens and other Serratia species. However, nuclease is only one of a number of extracellular proteins expressed by species of Serratia; others include proteases, chitinases, lipases, and a bacteriocin called marcescin. Unlike these other secreted proteins, the extracellular nuclease does not appear to be subject to substrate or catabolite regulation. Nuclease is instead regulated by growth phase (4, 16), as is the synthesis of many other extracytoplasmic degradatory proteins, toxins, and bacteriocins (1, 8, 10, 11).
Many of the extracellular proteins of Serratia nevertheless share some common regulatory pathways with nuclease, and pleiotropic regulatory mutants that exert effects on nuclease, lipase, chitinase, and marcescin have been identified (4, 12, 17, 18). One such mutant, which abolishes nuclease production and reduces chitinase and lipase activity, has been shown to be in the Serratia recA gene (2). Consistent with SOS control, a LexA binding site is located in the nuclease gene nucA promoter region (4). SOS regulation has also been shown for other extracellular proteins, such as the pectin lyase of Erwinia carotovora (14). Other alleles abolishing nuclease as well as bacteriocin production define a novel regulatory locus, nucC, which is closely related to the ogr gene of temperate phage P2 (7, 13). The nucC operon is also growth phase and SOS regulated independently of nucA.
Yet another class of pleiotropic mutants overexpresses these proteins (4, 17, 18). These overexpression mutants (called nucsu [17]) display no noticeable growth defect. They remain SOS inducible and are growth phase regulated. These alleles appear to fall into at least two categories based on their relative levels of nuclease overexpression. However, the nature of these mutations and the genes they represent have previously not been determined. The molecular characterization of these mutants is the focus of this work.
Mutant description. We previously described (4, 12) the isolation of transposon Tn5 insertion mutations made in the wild-type S. marcescens strain SM6 that displayed altered nuclease halo sizes on DNase indicator plates. Among these were mutations that abolish expression of the nuclease (nucA) gene; these mutations map to the transcriptional activator gene nucC (13) as well as to recA. Other mutations displaying increased nuclease halo sizes were also described previously (4); these include mutants nucsu93 and nucsu95, which express nearly 50-fold more nuclease than SM6, and nucsu161, which expresses about 10-fold as much nuclease as SM6. Similar mutants had previously been described, and one of these, W1050 (U. Winkler), which we use routinely, is derived from SM6(F' prolac) and carries a chemically induced pleiotropic mutation causing the overexpression of nuclease as well as other extracellular enzymes (17, 18).
As a preliminary characterization, Southern blot analysis of the mutants was performed after digestion of mutant strain genomic DNA with EcoRI (EcoRI does not cut in Tn5) and probed with a radiolabeled 3.3-kb HindIII fragment from Tn5. This analysis (data not presented) showed that the insertions of nucsu93 and nucsu95 were on the same-size fragment of about 25 kb and that the nucsu161 insertion was on a 9.5-kb fragment. The kanamycin resistance determinant of Tn5 allowed easy cloning of fragments spanning Tn5 from each of these mutants.DNA sequence analysis. Sequence data obtained with a primer to the end of Tn5 revealed that two of the mutants, nucsu93 and nucsu95, indeed have Tn5 insertions in the same gene and at essentially the same site. This gene has significant sequence identity to Escherichia coli xerC (5). XerC is a subunit of the XerCD site-specific recombinase that serves to monomerize chromosomes and plasmids prior to cell division (3). The DNA flanking the insertion in nucsu161 shows significant sequence identity to the E. coli uvrD gene. UvrD is DNA helicase II, which unwinds double-stranded DNA and is important in DNA replication, recombination, and repair (9). In E. coli, the xerC and uvrD genes are closely linked.
The entire region of interest was recovered as a single
clone from
a genomic SM6
library by probing the library with a fragment
flanking the Tn5 insertion from
nucsu161. Three fragments from this
clone
were subcloned, and from them, the nucleotide sequence of
xerC and uvrD was determined from both strands by
ABI Prizm DyeTerminator chemistry and run on the ABI 377 automated
sequencer. The map of the region is shown in Fig.
1.
|
Measuring SOS induction. Why do Tn5 insertions in xerC and uvrD lead to nuclease overexpression? The simplest explanation is that these mutants are partially induced for their SOS response, resulting in induction of nucA transcription, since the nucA promoter is SOS inducible (4). E. coli strains with mutations in either xerC or uvrD show partial SOS induction (15a).
To test this, a recA-lacZ transcriptional fusion on the plasmid pMB684 was used to monitor SOS induction in the S. marcescens strains. Cultures were grown aerobically in Luria broth with 1 mg of ampicillin per ml at 30°C. In Table 1, the
-galactosidase activities of
each strain harboring the tester plasmid are presented. All of the
nucsu mutants show a large increase in
-galactosidase activity compared to the wild-type SM6. W1050 is
lacZ+, which prevented us from accurately
measuring SOS induction in this strain; however, its induction ratio is
comparable to those of the strongest mutants (4). Another
phenotype of SOS-induced cells is the formation of long filamentous
cells. The nucsu mutants and W1050 were all
examined by phase-contrast light microscopy. All strains had a number
of filamentous cells that were abnormally long compared to those of the
SM6 control strain.
|
Suppression of the nuclease overexpression phenotype. Since S. marcescens xerC and uvrD have a high degree of similarity to their E. coli homologs, we tested whether the E. coli genes carried on multicopy plasmids could suppress the phenotype. Plasmid pSD105 carrying E. coli xerC and pET11d-H2wt carrying E. coli uvrD (9) were transformed into the different mutant and control strains. In Table 1, nuclease activity produced by these transformants is shown. SM6 containing these plasmids had no change in nuclease activity, whereas nucsu93, nucsu95, and W1050 containing pSD105 now produced wild-type levels of nuclease. Plasmid pET11d-H2wt had no effect on nuclease activity of strain W1050. From this, we conclude that the W1050 mutation is also in xerC. We were unable to obtain stable transformants of nucsu93 or nucsu95 with this plasmid. The nucsu161 mutant containing pET11d-H2wt also produced wild-type nuclease levels, but pSD105 had no effect in this strain. These data show that the E. coli homologs specifically suppress the nuclease overexpression phenotype; therefore, the nuclease overexpression phenotype is in fact due to the Tn5 insertion mutations and not to a secondary mutation elsewhere.
Conclusions. In this work, we demonstrate that most nuclease overexpression mutants (nucsu) are likely due to an indirect effect on transcription of nucA by the SOS system. The mutant phenotype is a result of partial induction of the SOS system caused by the mutation. Here we have sequenced two genes in which such mutations have been identified, xerC and uvrD. These genes are very similar to their E. coli homologs (5), and complementation data show that the E. coli genes are able to functionally replace the defective S. marcescens genes. The ability of E. coli XerC to repress the nuclease overexpression in W1050 suggests that it is also a xerC mutant.
We had previously suggested that these mutations may represent direct or indirect repressors of nucA expression (4, 13). Here we have demonstrated that this not correct. The nucA gene is regulated positively by the Ogr homolog NucC and negatively by LexA. Although growth phase clearly plays a role in the temporal regulation of nuclease production (16), likely due to accumulation of an extracellular factor (16a) like a homoserine lactone analog (6, 11), we do not know whether the regulatory factors responsible for this act directly at the nucA promoter, through NucC, or through the SOS system.Nucleotide sequence accession number. The DNA sequence has been deposited in GenBank (accession no. AF028736).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank David Sherratt for providing pSD105 and Steven Matson for pET11d-H2wt, Susan Hardin and Leslie Jones for the use of and assistance with their ABI 377 automated sequencer, and Ulrich Strych for many helpful discussions.
This work was supported by the Welch Foundation and grants from the Texas Advanced Research Program.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemical and Biophysical Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5934. Phone: (713) 743-8377. Fax: (713) 743-8351. E-mail: benedik{at}uh.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Atlung, T.,
A. Nielsen, and F. G. Hansen.
1989.
Isolation, characterization, and nucleotide sequence of appY, a regulatory gene for growth-phase-dependent gene expression in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
171:1683-1691 |
| 2. |
Ball, T. K.,
C. R. Wasmuth,
S. C. Braunagel, and M. J. Benedik.
1990.
Expression of Serratia marcescens extracellular proteins requires recA.
J. Bacteriol.
172:342-349 |
| 3. | Blakely, G., S. Colloms, G. May, M. Burke, and D. J. Sherratt. 1991. Escherichia coli XerC recombinase is required for chromosomal segregation at cell division. New Biol. 3:789-798[Medline]. |
| 4. | Chen, Y. C., G. L. Shipley, T. K. Ball, and M. J. Benedik. 1992. Regulatory mutants and transcriptional control of the Serratia marcescens extracellular nuclease gene. Mol. Microbiol. 6:643-651[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Colloms, S. D.,
P. Sykora,
G. Szatmari, and D. J. Sherratt.
1990.
Recombination at ColE1 cer requires the Escherichia coli xerC gene product, a member of the lambda integrase family of site-specific recombinases.
J. Bacteriol.
172:6973-6980 |
| 6. | Eberl, L., M. K. Winson, C. Sternberg, G. S. Stewart, G. Christiansen, S. R. Chhabra, B. Bycroft, P. Williams, S. Molin, and M. Givskov. 1996. Involvement of N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone autoinducers in controlling the multicellular behaviour of Serratia liquefaciens. Mol. Microbiol. 20:127-136[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Ferrer, S.,
M. B. Viejo,
J. F. Guasch,
J. Enfedaque, and M. Regue.
1996.
Genetic evidence for an activator required for induction of colicin-like bacteriocin 28b production in Serratia marcescens by DNA-damaging agents.
J. Bacteriol.
178:951-960 |
| 8. |
Genilloud, O.,
F. Moreno, and R. Kolter.
1989.
DNA sequence, products, and transcriptional pattern of the genes involved in production of the DNA replication inhibitor microcin B17.
J. Bacteriol.
171:1126-1135 |
| 9. | George, J. W., R. M. Brosh, Jr., and S. W. Matson. 1994. A dominant negative allele of the Escherichia coli uvrD gene encoding DNA helicase II. J. Mol. Biol. 235:424-435[Medline]. |
| 10. | Givskov, M., and S. Molin. 1992. Expression of extracellular phospholipase from Serratia liquefaciens is growth-phase-dependent, catabolite-repressed and regulated by anaerobiosis. Mol. Microbiol. 6:1363-1374[Medline]. |
| 11. | Givskov, M., L. Eberl, and S. Molin. 1997. Control of exoenzyme production, motility and cell differentiation in Serratia liquefaciens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 148:115-122. |
| 12. |
Hines, D. W.,
P. N. Saurugger,
G. M. Ihler, and M. J. Benedik.
1988.
Genetic analysis of extracellular proteins of Serratia marcescens.
J. Bacteriol.
170:4141-4146 |
| 13. | Jin, S., Y. C. Chen, G. E. Christie, and M. J. Benedik. 1996. Regulation of the Serratia marcescens extracellular nuclease: positive control by a homolog of P2 Ogr encoded by a cryptic prophage. J. Mol. Biol. 256:264-278[Medline]. |
| 14. |
McEvoy, J. L.,
H. Murata, and A. K. Chatterjee.
1992.
Genetic evidence for an activator required for induction of pectin lyase in Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora by DNA-damaging agents.
J. Bacteriol.
174:5471-5474 |
| 15. | Miller, J. H. 1972. . Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 15a. | Sherratt, D., and S. Matson. Personal communication. |
| 16. |
Suh, Y.,
S. Jin,
T. K. Ball, and M. J. Benedik.
1996.
Two-step secretion of extracellular nuclease in Serratia marcescens.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3771-3778 |
| 16a. | Suh, Y., and M. J. Benedik. Unpublished data. |
| 17. | Winkler, U. 1968. Mutants of Serratia marcescens defective or superactive in the release of a nuclease, p. 187-201. In H. G. Wittman, and H. Schuster (ed.), Molecular genetics. Springer, Berlin, Germany. |
| 18. | Winkler, U., and K. Timmis. 1973. Pleiotropic mutations in Serratia marcescens which increase the synthesis of certain exocellular proteins and the rate of spontaneous prophage excision. Mol. Gen. Genet. 124:197-206[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |