This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol, May 1998, p. 2475-2483, Vol. 180, No. 9
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Molecular Mechanism of Heat Shock-Provoked Disassembly of the Coliphage lambda  Replication Complex

Alicja Wegrzyn,1 Anna Herman-Antosiewicz,2 Karol Taylor,1,2 and Grzegorz Wegrzyn2,*

Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (University of Gdansk),1 and Department of Molecular Biology, Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, University of Gdansk,2 80-822 Gdansk, Poland

Received 28 August 1997/Accepted 28 January 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We have found previously that, in contrast to the free O initiator protein of lambda  phage or plasmid rapidly degraded by the Escherichia coli ClpP/ClpX protease, the lambda O present in the replication complex (RC) is protected from proteolysis. However, in cells growing in a complete medium, a temperature shift from 30 to 43°C resulted in the decay of the lambda O fraction, which indicated disassembly of RC. This process occurred due to heat shock induction of the groE operon, coding for molecular chaperones of the Hsp60 system. Here we demonstrate that an increase in the cellular concentration of GroEL and GroES proteins is not in itself sufficient to cause RC disassembly. Another requirement is a DNA gyrase-mediated negative resupercoiling of lambda  plasmid DNA, which counteracts DNA relaxation and starts to dominate 10 min after the temperature upshift. We presume that RC dissociates from lambda  DNA during the negative resupercoiling, becoming susceptible to the subsequent action of GroEL/S and ClpP/ClpX proteins. In contrast to lambda cro+, in lambda cro- plasmid-harboring cells, the RC reveals heat shock resistance. After temperature upshift of the lambda crots plasmid-harboring cells, a Cro repressor-independent control of lambda  DNA replication and heat shock resistance of RC are established before the period of DNA gyrase-mediated negative supercoiling. We suggest that the tight binding of RC to lambda  DNA is due to interaction of RC with other DNA-bound proteins, and is related to the molecular basis of the lambda cro- plasmid replication control.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The studies on the bacteriophage lambda  DNA early (theta , or circle-to-circle) replication in Escherichia coli have been greatly stimulated by the availability of the phage lambda -derived plasmids, called originally lambda dv (for a review, see reference 17). The lambda  plasmids may be produced from lambda  phage DNA by cutting out and circularization of the lambda  replication region oRpR-cro-cII-O-P. The origin of replication, orilambda , is situated in the middle of the O gene, and the pR promoter-initiated transcription plays a dual role: it is required for the synthesis of lambda  replication proteins, O and P, as well as for the transcriptional activation of orilambda (for reviews, see references 14 and 30). The binding of Cro repressor to the oR operator represents an autoregulatory loop, which is assumed to play an important role in the control of lambda  plasmid replication (17). The cII protein, so important for the lysis-or-lysogeny decision in the early development of phage lambda , is dispensable for lambda  plasmid replication. The lambda  O protein, the initiator of lambda  DNA replication, is rapidly degraded in vivo by the E. coli ClpP/ClpX protease (3, 8, 46), but it becomes protected from proteolysis in the pathway of the lambda  replication complex (RC) assembly (21, 34, 42). This event occurs after interaction of the lambda P-DnaB helicase complex with the O initiator bound to orilambda at the step of the lambda O-lambda P-DnaB preprimosome formation (34). The next step, the release of DnaB helicase from lambda P-mediated inhibition, is performed by DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE proteins, the molecular chaperones of the Hsp70 system (2, 6, 48). The action of DnaB helicase loaded between transiently separated (due to transcriptional activation of orilambda ) complementary strands of lambda  DNA permits the binding of at least DnaG primase and the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, leading to the assembly of a functional lambda  RC (1, 32, 43-45, 48).

The studies on the in vitro-reconstituted lambda  plasmid DNA replication led to an attractive model suggesting that the lambda  RC functional in elongation resembles that of its host, E. coli: both complexes would be devoid of the respective initiator proteins, lambda O or DnaA, and the respective DnaB helicase inhibitors, lambda P or DnaC. Moreover, it is tacitly assumed that in both systems, lambda  and the E. coli chromosome, the RC would be completely disassembled after one round of replication. By implication, the next round of replication should depend on the binding of the initiator, lambda O or DnaA, to orilambda or oriC, respectively (14). However, the present in vitro system of lambda  plasmid DNA replication may not exactly reflect the conditions occurring in the cell and is not suitable for studying more than one replication round.

We developed two systems for blocking the de novo assembly of the lambda  RC. In amino acid-starved E. coli relA cells, there was no synthesis of the rapidly destroyed lambda O initiator (33, 35, 36) and in E. coli wild-type (wt) cells growing in a complete medium, the lambda Pts1 mutation (in the presence of the dnaA+ allele) blocked RC assembly at 43°C (33, 36, 44). Density shift and other experiments demonstrated that in both systems lambda  plasmid DNA replication does occur and occurs linearly: only one of two plasmid daughter copies was able to initiate the next round of replication (28, 33, 36, 40). This replication could occur due to RCs assembled before the onset of amino acid starvation or temperature upshift, respectively. It was dependent on lambda O, as well as on DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE chaperone functions (33, 35, 36, 40, 41). We concluded that the assembled RC, containing lambda O and probably also lambda P, is not disassembled after termination of a round of replication (30, 40). This multiprotein complex (or at least the part that protects lambda O from proteolysis) is inherited by one of two lambda  plasmid daughter copies at each round of replication (29, 36). In amino acid-starved E. coli relA cells, the "old" RC-driven replication ceases after several rounds (39), but in E. coli wt cells growing in a complete medium, this replication does not seem to be time restricted (36). The above studies, together with the observation that neither the absence of nor the presence of excess lambda O-digesting ClpP/ClpX protease affects lambda  plasmid or phage replication (27), rule out the model of lambda O binding to orilambda as the crucial event in the control of initiation frequency.

In amino acid-starved E. coli relA cells, the Cro-mediated regulation did not work, probably due to titration out of Cro by the growing number of oR operator sequences (40, 41). In E. coli wt cells growing in complete medium, the replication of lambda crotsPts1 plasmid after a temperature upshift was studied; hence, Cro regulation also did not work in this system (36). However, when the same procedure was applied to E. coli wt harboring lambda cro+Pts1, plasmid replication was blocked and RC disassembly (judged from proteolysis of the otherwise stable lambda O) was observed (36). The disassembly of RC also occurred for E. coli wt harboring lambda cro+P+. Examination of this phenomenon revealed that for RC disassembly observed in lambda cro+ plasmid-harboring wt cells, heat shock induction of the groE operon, coding for molecular chaperones of the Hsp60 system, is indispensable (37). This was the first observation that the Hsp60 chaperone proteins, known to mediate deaggregation of denatured protein aggregates, may also disassemble in vivo a highly organized protein structure (dispensable for cell survival) under stress caused by temperature upshift.

Here we present our study on the disassembly of RC, which emphasizes the role of DNA gyrase-mediated negative resupercoiling of lambda  plasmid DNA, which counteracts DNA relaxation that occurs immediately after the temperature upshift (20). It seems that the negative resupercoiling of lambda  plasmid DNA results in dissociation of RC that now becomes disassembled with the help of GroEL and GroES chaperone proteins. This finding allowed us to extend our studies on the lambda crots plasmid and to formulate a hypothesis concerning heat shock resistance of RC when Cro repressor function is absent.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacterial strains, plasmids, phages, and gene fusions. Most of the experiments (all except the gene fusion experiments) were performed in an E. coli MG1655 genetic background (12). Particular mutations were transferred by P1 transduction by the method of Silhavy et al. (25). The mutant strains used were BM270 (groEL44 linked to Tn10), obtained from C. Georgopoulos and M. Zylicz (see also reference 37); HI515 (nalA26), described by Ikeda et al. (11) and provided by K. Sekimizu and Y. Ogata; and CAG354 [rpoD800(Ts) linked to Tn10], described by Liebke et al. (16) and obtained from C. Gross. To achieve expression of the groE operon from plasmid pGELS2 (see below), it was necessary to remove a tetA gene activity from a tetracycline-resistant strain (like the groEL44 mutant). This was performed by the method of Bochner et al. (5). Plasmid pGELS1 was constructed by cloning the groE operon from pOF39 (7) into the pCattTrE18 vector (constructed in the laboratory of W. Szybalski [University of Wisconsin] by M. Koob). Plasmid pGELS2 is a derivative of pGELS1 lacking the groE promoter region; thus, transcription of groEL and groES genes is exclusively dependent on the ptetA promoter activity. Details of the construction of pGELS1 and pGELS2 are provided in Fig. 1. Plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda , pKB2 (wt), and pRLM4 (as pKB2 but crots) were described by Kur et al. (15) and Wold et al. (47), respectively. Experiments with gene fusions were performed with a Delta lac strain (WAM106) described by Thomas and Glass (31). The single-copy pL-lacZ fusion carried on cryptic lambda cI857 prophage was provided by D. Court. The single-copy fusion of the sigma 32-dependent groE promoter with lacZ was described by Benvenisti et al. (4) and obtained from A. B. Oppenheim. Single-stranded DNA of phage M13mp18lambda I (29) was used as a template for preparation of the labeled probe used in Northern blotting experiments. Phage lambda clb2 (from our collection) was also used.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Construction of pGELS1 and pGELS2.

DNA techniques. All DNA manipulations (molecular cloning and preparation of labeled probes for Northern blotting) were carried by the methods of Sambrook et al. (24).

lambda O protein decay. Decay of the lambda O protein was measured as described previously (34, 37, 42). Briefly, bacteria harboring a lambda  plasmid were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine and the label was chased by addition of excess of unlabeled L-methionine (time zero in the figures). The samples were withdrawn at the indicated times, the bacteria were lysed, and the cellular lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-lambda O serum. Then the isotope-labeled proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12.5% polyacrylamide) and visualized by autoradiography. The bands of the lambda O protein remaining after the different chase times were quantitated by densitometry.

Changes in plasmid DNA linking number. Changes in lambda  plasmid DNA linking number after a temperature shift were monitored by the method of Ogata et al. (20). Briefly, samples of the bacterial culture were withdrawn at the indicated times and chilled immediately by being transferred into probes containing equal volume of ice. Plasmid DNA was isolated by the alkali lysis method (24) and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose) in TBE buffer (24) containing 15 µg of chloroquine per ml (electrophoresis was performed at 2 V per cm of gel length). The changes in the average linking number of plasmid DNA (Delta tau ) were calculated by the method of Keller (13).

Analysis of the level of pR-tR2 transcripts. Estimation of the amounts of the pR-tR2 transcripts relative to the level of rRNA (internal RNA control) and to the level of lambda  plasmid (template DNA) was performed as described previously (19, 29). Briefly, samples containing the same bacterial mass (estimated by measurement of the optical density at 575 nm of the culture) were withdrawn at the indicated times. Each sample was divided in two parts. RNA was isolated from the first part (see reference 29 for a detailed description of the procedure), and plasmid DNA was isolated by the alkali lysis method (24) from the second part. The relative level of rRNA was estimated densitometrically on the basis of analysis of ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. The pR-tR2 transcripts were detected by Northern blotting and quantitated by densitometry (the template for labeling of the probe designed to detect these transcripts was single-stranded DNA isolated from phage M13mp18lambda I). The amount of lambda  plasmid DNA was estimated on the basis of densitometric analysis of DNA bands after agarose gel electrophoresis and staining with ethidium bromide, by the method of Herman et al. (9). The relative values presented in the figure were calculated by the method of Obuchowski et al. (19) by dividing the relative intensity of bands on a particular blot by the relative intensity of ethidium bromide-stained rRNA bands and then by dividing by the relative amount of lambda  plasmid. A value of 1 corresponds to the relative value calculated for the sample taken from the culture of bacteria harboring wild-type lambda  plasmid (pKB2) at 30°C (time zero), and the other values are expressed relative to this value.

Estimation of the relative amount of lambda  plasmid. The relative amount of lambda  plasmid DNA per bacterial mass was estimated as described by Herman et al. (9) (see above). A value of 1 corresponds to the relative value calculated for the sample taken from the culture of bacteria harboring wild-type lambda  plasmid (pKB2) at 30°C (time zero).

Measurement of beta -galactosidase activity. The activity of beta -galactosidase was measured by the method of Miller (18).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Fine-tuned expression of the groE operon. We assumed that RC disassembly may be due not only to an increased cellular concentration of GroEL/S chaperone proteins but also to some other concomitant process(es) (to be discovered), both induced by heat shock. To verify this hypothesis, it was important to raise the cellular concentration of GroEL/S proteins while keeping the temperature constant. This aim has been achieved by construction of a plasmid, pGELS2 (Fig. 1), containing the groE operon under the exclusive control of the promoter ptetA, responsible for the expression of tetracycline resistance in the Tn10 transpozon. The pGELS2 plasmid contains the tetR gene coding for the tetracycline repressor that blocks the ptetA-initiated transcription in the absence of the antibiotic. Autoclaved chlortetracycline, aCT, which has lost its antibiotic functions, inactivates TetR repressor (5, 23, 26) causing transcription of the groE operon and efficient synthesis of GroEL and GroES proteins (Fig. 2). The effect of increasing concentration of aCT on the level of GroEL/S in the pGELS2-harboring E. coli groEL44 cells was investigated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Its densitometric evaluation led to the conclusion that the level of GroEL at an aCT concentration of 0.05 µg/ml was equivalent to its level in plasmidless cells under the conditions used in our experiments before the temperature shift from 30 to 43°C; aCT at 2.0 µg/ml resulted in a three- to fourfold-higher level of GroEL (data not shown). The aCT-mediated derepression of the groE operon resulted in the production of functional GroEL/S chaperone proteins, as revealed by their activity in phage lambda  development (Table 1). It is worth noting that these proteins have been discovered due to their involvement in phage lambda  morphogenesis (for a review, see reference 22). At concentrations as low as 0.01 µg/ml, aCT caused derepression of the ptetA promoter, as revealed by the expression of the groE operon from pGELS2 (Table 1); at high aCT concentrations (e.g., 25 µg/ml), the system seems to be useful for the production of a high concentration of the desired protein in bacteria (Fig. 2, lane 9).


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Overproduction of GroEL and GroES proteins from plasmids pOF39, pGELS1, and pGELS2. Bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani medium at 30°C. When indicated, the culture was transferred to 43°C or treated with aCT (final concentration, 25 µg/ml) and incubated further for 60 min. Cell lysates were separated on 12.5% polyacrylamide gels, and protein bands were visualized by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. Lanes: M, molecular mass standards (from top to bottom, 94, 67, 43, 30, 20.1, and 14.4 kDa), 1, MG1655; 2, MG1655/pOF39; 3, MG1655/pOF39 after a shift to 43°C; 4, MG1655/pCattTrE18; 5, MG1655/pCattTrE18 treated with aCT; 6, MG1655/pGELS1; 7, MG1655/pGELS1 treated with aCT; 8, MG1655/pGELS2; 9, MG1655/pGELS2 treated with aCT. The positions of GroEL and GroES are indicated.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Suppression of the effect of the groEL44 mutation on phage lambda  growth at 30°C and bacterial growth at 43°C by expression of the groE operon from plasmid pGELS2

Role of an increased GroEL/S chaperonin concentration. It was then possible to perform heat shock experiments with lambda  plasmid-harboring and pGELS2 plasmid-harboring groEL44 cells that could produce a functional GroEL protein exclusively due to aCT-mediated derepression of the groE operon of pGELS2. The aCT was added at the time of the temperature upshift. In the pulse-chase experiments in Fig. 3 (also see Fig. 4, 5, 7, and 9), the decay of lambda O protein occurring immediately after the start of isotope chasing at 30°C (time zero) represents ClpP/ClpX-mediated proteolysis of an excess of synthesized free lambda O (27, 42). The stable fraction of lambda O corresponds to lambda O protected from this protease by other components of the orilambda -bound lambda O-lambda P-DnaB preprimosome or RC (34, 37). There was no RC disassembly in the absence of aCT (Fig. 3A) or at an aCT concentration of 0.05 µg/ml (Fig. 3B), which should result in a level of functional GroEL equivalent to that present in wt cells before the heat shock (see above). However, when aCT was added to 2.0 µg/ml (see above), RC disassembly was observed (Fig. 3C). The same result was obtained at an aCT concentration of 25 µg/ml (Fig 3D). The above results support our previous finding that one of the requirements of heat shock-provoked RC disassembly is the induction of the groE operon (37). We were then ready to ask whether an increase of the concentration of GroEL/S chaperone proteins alone is sufficient to cause RC disassembly. As shown in Fig. 4, the answer was negative.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Decay of the lambda O protein at 30°C (triangles) and after a shift to 43°C (circles) in the groE44 mutant harboring lambda cro+ (pKB2) and pGELS2 plasmids, untreated (A) or treated with aCT at 0.05 µg/ml (B), 2 µg/ml (C), or 25 µg/ml (D) at the time of the temperature shift (arrow).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Decay of the lambda O protein at 30°C in the groE44 mutant harboring lambda cro+ (pKB2) and pGELS2 plasmids, untreated (triangles) or treated with aCT at 25 µg/ml (circles) at the time indicated by the arrow.

Role of DNA gyrase-mediated negative supercoiling. What else, besides induction of the groE operon, is changing after heat shock that is required for lambda  plasmid RC disassembly? We turned our attention to changes in supercoiling of plasmid DNA, known to occur after a temperature shift from 30 to 50°C (20), and started to study the effect of DNA gyrase inhibitors on RC disassembly under our standard experimental conditions. The disassembly of RC (Fig. 5A) was blocked by each of two DNA gyrase inhibitors, nalidixic acid (Fig. 5B) and coumermycin (Fig. 5C). The specificity of action of nalidixic acid was checked in an experiment performed with a nalidixic acid-resistant mutant, nalA26 (Fig. 5D). Gyrase may cause DNA relaxation or negative supercoiling; both processes are inhibited by nalidixic acid, in contrast to coumermycin, which specifically inhibits the ATP-dependent negative supercoiling of DNA (for a review, see reference 14).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   Decay of the lambda O protein at 30°C (triangles) and after a shift to 43°C (circles) in the wild-type strain (A to C) and the nalA26 mutant (D) harboring lambda cro+ (pKB2) plasmid, untreated (A), or treated with 100 µg of nalidixic acid per ml (B and D) or 50 µg of coumermycin per ml (C) at the time of the temperature shift (arrow).

The heat shock-provoked changes in supercoiling of lambda  plasmid DNA are shown in Fig. 6. Measurement of changes in the average linking number of plasmid DNA revealed that immediately after the shift from 30 to 43°C there was a rapid DNA relaxation, attaining its peak value after 10 min. The maximal change that occurred in the absolute superhelical density of the plasmid population after the temperature shift was estimated to about 10 to 20% (data not shown). Then a process of negative resupercoiling began that restored the original state of supercoiling about 90 min after the temperature upshift. Each of the two DNA gyrase inhibitors nalidixic acid and coumermycin caused an even more rapid DNA relaxation, leading to a much more relaxed state of lambda  plasmid DNA (Delta tau  > 10) that persisted to the end of the experiment (results not shown). These results indicate that another enzyme, probably topoisomerase I (20), is responsible for the observed relaxation. The DNA gyrase-mediated negative supercoiling seemed to counteract DNA relaxation from the time of temperature upshift and began to dominate after 10 min. We conclude that the process which is inhibited by nalidixic acid or coumermycin is necessary for RC disassembly. The only candidate for such a process is DNA gyrase-mediated negative resupercoiling. Since this process is specifically inhibited by coumermycin, in subsequent presentations the results obtained with nalidixic acid are not shown; in all cases they matched those obtained with coumermycin.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   Changes in the average linking number (Delta tau ) of lambda cro+ (pKB2) plasmid DNA in the wild-type strain at 30°C (triangles) and after a shift to 43°C (squares). The values are estimated relative to the linking number observed for the pKB2 plasmid at time zero in bacteria growing at 30°C. The temperature shift is indicated by an arrow.

lambda crots plasmid: heat shock resistance of RC requires pR-initiated transcription. The results presented in previous sections with bacteria harboring the lambda cro+ plasmid led us to propose a model assuming that DNA gyrase-mediated lambda  DNA negative resupercoiling (occurring after initial plasmid relaxation caused by a temperature upshift) results in dissociation of RC from lambda  DNA. We suggest that RC disassembly helped by GroEL/S chaperone proteins then occurs and that lambda O is no longer protected and becomes hydrolyzed by ClpP/ClpX protease. It was now possible to ask why the temperature upshift does not cause RC disassembly in lambda crots plasmid-harboring cells. The Cro repressor blocks the pR-initiated transcription required for initiation of lambda  plasmid replication as well as for Cro synthesis (30). According to the generally accepted model (17), the transient derepression event that should occur due to dilution of Cro in the growing cell volume should produce a wave of transcription leading to a round of replication. Synthesis of Cro would restore the initial, silent state of lambda  plasmid. In contrast to the lambda cro+-harboring cells, the pR-initiated transcription should be constantly derepressed in lambda crots plasmid-harboring bacteria at 43°C. Therefore, an obvious question was whether unhindered transcription from pR is indeed required for RC stability.

In a study of the heat shock resistance of RC in lambda crots plasmid-harboring cells (Fig. 7A), we found that 25 µg of rifampin per ml (generally used for inhibition of transcription) added at the time of temperature upshift caused RC disassembly (Fig. 7B), which was blocked by coumermycin (Fig. 7C). Addition of rifampin 10 min before the temperature upshift did not change the results (not shown). These results were rather unexpected, since it was previously demonstrated that disassembly of RC requires the synthesis of at least GroEL and GroES proteins (37), and one might predict that the addition of rifampin should result not only in the inhibition of transcription but also in the abolition of production of new protein molecules. However, we found that under the conditions of our experiments, the amount of GroEL synthesized in the presence of rifampin (Fig. 8) was sufficient to cause RC disassembly. Upon the shift from 30 to 43°C, rifampin at 25 µg/ml completely blocked lacZ expression from a pL-lacZ fusion (repressed at 30°C by a temperature-sensitive cI857 protein whose gene was also present on the same single-copy fusion) but was allowed some beta -galactosidase synthesis when lacZ was fused to the sigma 32-dependent groE promoter (results not shown). Therefore, it seems that rifampin at 25 µg/ml does not efficiently inhibit the initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigma 32 (Esigma 32), which is engaged in the groE operon transcription after heat shock.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.   Decay of the lambda O protein at 30°C (triangles) and after a shift to 43°C (circles) in the wild-type strain harboring lambda crots (pRLM4) plasmid, untreated (A) or treated with 25 µg of rifampin per ml (B) or 25 µg of rifampin per ml and 50 µg of coumermycin per ml (C) at the time of the temperature shift (arrow).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.   Relative level of the GroEL protein in the wt strain after a shift from 30 to 43°C (arrow). Bacteria were untreated (triangles) or treated with 25 µg of rifampin per ml (squares) at the time of the temperature shift.

The importance of unhindered transcription from the pR promoter for heat shock resistance of RC in lambda crots plasmid-harboring bacteria was supported in experiments performed with an E. coli rpoDts mutant. The rpoD gene codes for the sigma 70 subunit of RNA polymerase that recognizes most of the host and phage promoters, including the pR promoter. After the temperature upshift, the groE operon is expressed due to the rpoH-encoded sigma 32 subunit, but Esigma 32 cannot recognize the pR promoter. As expected, in lambda crots plasmid-harboring E. coli rpoDts cells, a temperature upshift caused RC disassembly (Fig. 9). This process was blocked, as usual, by DNA gyrase inhibitors (results not shown). The kinetics of the lambda O protein decay was somewhat slower in cells harboring lambda crots plasmid than in those harboring the wild-type lambda  plasmid (Fig. 9). This could perhaps be explained by some residual activity of the rpoDts gene product at 43°C, since rifampin (which should block activity of Esigma 70 almost completely) caused the lambda O protein decay in the lambda crots-harboring cells as efficiently as in lambda cro+-harboring bacteria (Fig. 7B).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9.   Decay of the lambda O protein at 30°C (triangles) and after a shift to 43°C (circles) in the rpoD800(Ts) mutant harboring lambda cro+ (pKB2) (A) or lambda crots (pRLM4) (B). The temperature shift is indicated by the arrows.

lambda crots plasmid: kinetics of transcription and replication. In lambda crots plasmid-harboring cells, the plasmid was stably maintained after the temperature upshift (36) and the release from Cro repression did not lead to uncontrolled lambda  DNA replication, in contrast to the situation that would be expected on the basis of previously proposed model (17), in which the Cro repressor autoregulatory loop plays a crucial role in the regulation of replication and maintenance of lambda  plasmids in E. coli (see below). Therefore, transcription of the O-P region, leading to the synthesis of lambda  replication proteins and to activation of orilambda situated in the middle of the O gene, should be controlled by a Cro-independent system. It was interesting to check how rapidly this control is established after the temperature upshift. A convenient measure of the transcription of the O-P region is the level of the pR-tR2 transcript; the tR2 terminator is situated downstream of the P gene. The level of the pR-tR2 transcripts, calculated per plasmid copy, increased up to 10 min after the temperature upshift (Fig. 10). Since this level results from the synthesis and decay of the transcript, one may assume that its synthesis attained its peak even earlier. The rapid decrease in the level of the pR-tR2 transcripts and its stabilization observed later (Fig. 10) reveal an important element of a Cro-independent control system.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10.   Relative level of the pR-tR2 transcripts normalized to the level of rRNA (internal RNA control) and to the amount of plasmid (i.e., template) DNA in the wt strain harboring lambda cro+ (pKB2) (triangles) or lambda crots (pRLM4) (squares) plasmid after a shift from 30 to 43°C (arrow).

A parallel examination of the lambda crots plasmid DNA revealed that after the temperature upshift from 30 to 43°C, it has already attained the level specific for 43°C (about twice as high as at 30°C) in 10 min (Fig. 11). Since the plasmid DNA content was calculated in relation to the constant bacterial mass estimated by measurement of the optical density of the bacterial culture, small disturbances occurring immediately afterward may be attributed to the change in the average cell size that follows the temperature upshift. The simplest interpretation of the results presented in Fig. 11 is that all plasmid copies, released suddenly from the Cro repression, perform one round of replication. The increased plasmid copy number, 55 to 60 per cell, persists and is characteristic for lambda crots plasmids at 43°C. We checked that the kinetics of the heat shock-provoked changes in supercoiling of lambda crots plasmid DNA is similar to that of lambda cro+; Delta tau attains its highest value 10 min after the temperature upshift (results not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 11.   Relative level of plasmid DNA per bacterial mass in the wt strain harboring lambda cro+ (pKB2) (triangles) or lambda crots (pRLM4) (squares) plasmid after a shift from 30 to 43°C (arrow).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The results presented for the lambda cro+ plasmid demonstrate that heat shock-provoked disassembly of the lambda O initiator-containing structure, RC, requires both DNA gyrase-mediated negative supercoiling of plasmid DNA and induction of the groE operon. We have no data concerning the temporal sequence of action of DNA gyrase and GroEL/S chaperone proteins. However, the most probable scenario is that at first the RC dissociates from lambda  DNA due to gyrase-mediated negative resupercoiling, which occurs after plasmid relaxation caused by a temperature upshift (Fig. 12A). Then disassembly of the free RC, helped by the GroEL/S proteins, may occur, exposing lambda O to the action of ClpP/ClpX protease. We assume that, this chain of events cannot start earlier than 10 min after the temperature shift from 30 to 43°C, since the negative resupercoiling of the heat shock-relaxed plasmid DNA begins at this time (Fig. 6).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 12.   Proposed mechanism of heat shock-provoked disassembly of the lambda  replication complex in bacteria harboring lambda cro+ plasmid (A) and of heat shock resistance of the lambda  replication complex in bacteria harboring lambda crots plasmid (B). In the case of a lambda cro-null plasmid, the lambda  replication complex should also interact with other DNA-bound proteins before temperature upshift. See the text for details.

An obvious and unanswered question is how the GroE chaperone system distinguishes between the DNA-bound and free states of RC, acting exclusively in the latter case on this viral protein structure. The exact composition of the structure which protects the lambda O protein from proteolysis, referred to as RC, is not yet known, but it was demonstrated that this structure must contain at least lambda O, lambda P, and DnaB proteins (34). Therefore, perhaps the crucial role in the process of distinguishing among the different states of RC by the GroE system is played by the surface of RC formed by sequential binding of RC components (lambda O, lambda P, DnaB, etc.) to orilambda and their mutual interactions, which change due to the action of DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE chaperone proteins. After dissociation of RC from lambda  DNA, this part of the RC surface may appear conformationally unnatural (possibly with exposed hydrophobic groups) and become prone to GroEL/GroES attack.

The knowledge accumulated in the study of heat shock-provoked disassembly of RC in lambda cro+ plasmid-harboring cells allowed us to look for the cause of the heat shock resistance of RC in the case of the lambda crots plasmid (36) (see above). This feature appears to be characteristic of lambda cro- plasmids as supported by an experiment with a recently constructed lambda cro-null plasmid (10). In this case, the pR-initiated transcription, unhindered by Cro repression, could occur all the time, i.e., before and after the temperature upshift. We found that the RC is heat shock resistant in lambda cro-null plasmid-harboring bacteria (38). We postulate that dissociation of RC from lambda  DNA during the negative resupercoiling does not occur, because RC is more tightly bound to DNA than in the case of the lambda cro+ plasmid, possibly due to interaction with other DNA-bound proteins (Fig. 12B). One of the potential candidates for such proteins may be the host DnaA protein. This protein stimulates the activity of the pR promoter (43). Several putative DnaA-binding sequences were found in the lambda  replication region, and one of them is located near pR (30). Therefore, one may assume a competition between Cro and DnaA in binding to the region of this promoter. If DnaA is able to interact with components of lambda  RC, it might stabilize this structure more efficiently in the absence of Cro function. An alternative hypothesis is that the heat shock resistance of RC under cro mutant conditions (when pR-initiated transcription is more efficient due to the lack of the Cro repressor) is based on the assumption of positive supercoiling in front of RNA polymerase, which might counteract the DNA gyrase-mediated negative resupercoiling. However, the observations that in lambda crots plasmid-harboring cells the very intensive pR-initiated transcription and lambda  DNA replication caused by the temperature upshift terminates before the period of DNA gyrase-mediated negative resupercoiling (compare Figs. 6, 10, and 11) do not support this hypothesis. On the other hand, they suggest that the heat shock resistance of RC and the replication control specific for lambda crots plasmid at 43°C are established within 10 min after the temperature upshift and before the process of negative resupercoiling of lambda  plasmid DNA.

The construction of the lambda cro-null plasmid, which is stably maintained in E. coli (10), and our observation that the copy number of the lambda crots plasmid increases only a few times at 43°C relative to 30°C are in contrast to previously reported findings that Cro function is a key element in the regulation of lambda  plasmid replication since it is necessary for the stable maintenance of such a plasmid (17). However, the older data came from experiments with lambda  plasmids produced in vivo, called lambda dv, which usually contained relatively large fragments of phage lambda  genome, including the cI gene (coding for a strong repressor of pR). Currently used lambda  plasmids (including those used in this work) were constructed in vitro and do not contain this gene. These differences between the lambda plasmids used previously and in this work may be responsible for the differences between the results obtained previously (17) and those presented in this paper.

As mentioned above, in lambda crots plasmid-harboring cells, the heat shock resistance of RC should be established before the period of DNA gyrase-mediated negative supercoiling of plasmid DNA, which begins 10 min after the temperature shift from 30 to 43°C. In the same 10-min period, a Cro-independent control of lambda  plasmid replication is established. If the Cro-mediated repression of the pR promoter, and thus the Cro autoregulatory loop, were the crucial process in the control of lambda  plasmid replication, as suggested previously (17), one should expect a rapid and continuous increase in the lambda crots plasmid copy number after a temperature upshift. However, the release of the pR promoter from Cro repression does not result in a runaway plasmid replication. On the contrary, after rapid doubling in copy number, the plasmid DNA replication proceeds in step with the growth of host cells (Fig. 11) providing a new argument in favor of the existence of a Cro-independent control of replication. We assume that the wave of the pR-initiated and tR2-terminated transcription occurring shortly after inactivation of the cro gene product, which activates orilambda , is responsible for the rapid doubling of the plasmid copy number (Fig. 10 and 11). However, this transcription soon falls off and proceeds further at a constant level (Fig. 10). This level may reflect the transcriptional activation of orilambda that should occur to ensure replication in the Cro-independent system of replication control, as described previously (36). The low level of the pR-tR2 transcripts in the absence of the functional Cro repressor may mean that the pR-initiated transcription is inhibited, prematurely terminated, or paused on the way to orilambda and finally to tR2. Since there is no reason to suspect that activation of the pR promoter by DnaA protein is abolished under these conditions, the pausing of RNA polymerase seems to serve as the best working hypothesis concerning the model of the Cro-independent control. It is tempting to speculate that, the paused RNA polymerase and other DNA-bound proteins (for example DnaA, as discussed above) can interact with the orilambda -bound RC, forming a complex which may sequester orilambda during most of the cell cycle and can be responsible for the block of reinitiation of replication which is characteristic for lambda cro mutant plasmids (36, 38). Although the molecular mechanism of the Cro-independent control awaits elucidation, the data presented here suggest that strong binding of RC to lambda  DNA (proposed in this work on the basis of the heat shock resistance of RC) is one of the elements of this control.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank D. Court, C. Georgopoulos, C. Gross, A. B. Oppenheim, Y. Ogata, K. Sekimizu, and M. Żylicz for providing bacterial strains and M. Koob for providing plasmid pCattTrE18. We are grateful to W. Szybalski for his advice to use the TetR-ptetA system, to K. Sekimizu and Y. Ogata for discussions, and to K. Sekimizu for advice about the analysis of plasmid DNA linking number.

This work was supported by the University of Gdansk (grant BW-1190-5-0252-7 to A.W.) and the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research (grant 6 P04A 051 08 to K.T. and G.W.).

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Biology, University of Gdansk, Kladki 24, 80-822 Gdansk, Poland. Phone: 48 (58) 346 3014. Fax: 48 (58) 301 0072. E-mail: wegrzyn{at}biotech.univ.gda.pl.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Alfano, C., and R. McMacken. 1989. Ordered assembly of nucleoprotein structures at the bacteriophage lambda  replication origin during the initiation of DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem. 264:10699-10708[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Alfano, C., and R. McMacken. 1989. Heat shock protein-mediated disassembly of nucleoprotein structures is required for the initiation of bacteriophage lambda  DNA replication. J. Biol. Chem. 264:10709-10718[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Bejarano, I., Y. Klemes, R. Schoulaker-Schwarz, and H. Engelberg-Kulka. 1993. Energy-dependent degradation of lambda O protein in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:7720-7723[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Benvenisti, L., S. Koby, A. Rutman, H. Giladi, T. Yura, and A. B. Oppenheim. 1995. Cloning and primary sequence of the rpoH gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene 155:73-76[Medline].
5. Bochner, B. R., H. C. Huang, G. L. Schieven, and B. Ames. 1980. Positive selection for loss of tetracycline resistance. J. Bacteriol. 143:926-933[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Dodson, M., R. McMacken, and H. Echols. 1989. Specialized nucleoprotein structures at the origin of replication of bacteriophage lambda : protein association and disassociation reactions responsible for localized initiation of replication. J. Biol. Chem. 264:10719-10725[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Fayet, O., J.-M. Louarn, and C. Georgopoulos. 1986. Suppression of the Escherichia coli dnaA46 mutation by amplification of the groEL and groES genes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202:435-445[Medline].
8. Gottesman, S., W. P. Clark, V. de Crecy-Legard, and M. R. Maurizi. 1993. ClpX, an alternative subunit of the ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli: sequence and in vivo activities. J. Biol. Chem. 268:22618-22626[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9. Herman, A., A. Wegrzyn, and G. Wegrzyn. 1994. Differential replication of plasmids during stringent and relaxed response of Escherichia coli. Plasmid 32:89-94[Medline].
10. Herman-Antosiewicz, A., S. Srutkowska, K. Taylor, and G. Wegrzyn. Replication and maintenance of lambda  plasmids devoid of the Cro repressor autoregulatory loop in Escherichia coli. Plasmid, in press.
11. Ikeda, H., K. Moriya, and T. Matsumoto. 1981. In vitro study of illegitimate recombination: involvement of DNA gyrase. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 46:399-408.
12. Jensen, K. F. 1993. The Escherichia coli "wild types" W3110 and MG1655 have an rph frameshift mutation that leads to pyrimidine starvation due to low pyrE expression levels. J. Bacteriol. 175:3401-3407[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Keller, W. 1975. Determination of the number of superhelical turns in simian virus 40 DNA by gel electrophoresis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:4876-4880[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Kornberg, A., and T. A. Baker. 1992. In DNA replication. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, N.Y.
15. Kur, J., I. Górska, and K. Taylor. 1987. Escherichia coli dnaA initiation function is required for replication of plasmids derived from coliphage lambda. J. Mol. Biol. 198:203-210[Medline].
16. Liebke, H., C. Gross, W. Walter, and R. Burgess. 1980. A new mutation rpoD800, affecting the sigma subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase is allelic to two other sigma mutants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 177:277-282[Medline].
17. Matsubara, K. 1981. Replication control system in lambda  dv. Plasmid 5:32-52[Medline].
18. Miller, J. H. 1972. In Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
19. Obuchowski, M., A. Wegrzyn, A. Szalewska-Palasz, M. S. Thomas, and G. Wegrzyn. 1997. An RNA polymerase alpha  subunit mutant impairs N-dependent transcriptional antitermination in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 23:211-222[Medline].
20. Ogata, Y., T. Mizushima, K. Kataoka, T. Miki, and K. Sekimizu. 1994. Identification of DNA topoisomerases involved in immediate and transient DNA relaxation induced by heat shock in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 244:451-455[Medline].
21. Pawlowicz, A., G. Wegrzyn, and K. Taylor. 1993. Effect of coliphage lambda  P gene mutations on the stability of the lambda O protein, the initiator of lambda  DNA replication. Acta Biochim. Pol. 40:29-31[Medline].
22. Polissi, A., L. Goffin, and C. Georgopoulos. 1995. The Escherichia coli heat shock response and bacteriophage lambda  development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 17:159-169[Medline].
23. Posfai, G., M. Koob, Z. Hradecna, N. Hasan, M. Filutowicz, and W. Szybalski. 1994. In vivo excision and amplification of large segments of the Escherichia coli genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2392-2398[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. In Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
25. Silhavy, T. J., M. L. Berman, and L. W. Enquist. 1984. In Experiments with gene fusions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
26. Skerra, A. 1994. Use of the tetracycline promoter for the tightly regulated production of a murine antibody fragment in Escherichia coli. Gene 151:131-135[Medline].
27. Szalewska, A., G. Wegrzyn, and K. Taylor. 1994. Neither absence nor excess of lambda O initiator-digesting ClpXP protease affects lambda  plasmid or phage replication in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 13:469-474[Medline].
28. Szalewska-Palasz, A., and G. Wegrzyn. 1994. An additional role of transcriptional activation of orilambda in the regulation of lambda  plasmid replication in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 205:802-806[Medline].
29. Szalewska-Palasz, A., A. Wegrzyn, A. Herman, and G. Wegrzyn. 1994. The mechanism of the stringent control of lambda  plasmid DNA replication. EMBO J. 13:5779-5785[Medline].
30. Taylor, K., and G. Wegrzyn. 1995. Replication of coliphage lambda DNA. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 17:109-119[Medline].
31. Thomas, M. S., and R. E. Glass. 1991. Escherichia coli rpoA mutation which impairs transcription of positively regulated systems. Mol. Microbiol. 5:2719-2725[Medline].
32. Wegrzyn, A., and G. Wegrzyn. 1995. Transcriptional activation of orilambda regulates lambda  plasmid replication in amino acid-starved Escherichia coli cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214:978-984[Medline].
33. Wegrzyn, A., G. Wegrzyn, and K. Taylor. 1995. Plasmid and host functions required for lambda  plasmid replication carried out by the inherited replication complex. Mol. Gen. Genet. 247:501-508[Medline].
34. Wegrzyn, A., G. Wegrzyn, and K. Taylor. 1995. Protection of coliphage lambda O initiator protein from proteolysis in the assembly of the replication complex in vivo. Virology 207:179-184[Medline].
35. Wegrzyn, A., K. Taylor, and G. Wegrzyn. 1996. The cbpA chaperone gene function compensates for dnaJ in lambda  plasmid replication during amino acid starvation of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 178:5847-5849[Abstract/Free Full Text].
36. Wegrzyn, A., G. Wegrzyn, A. Herman, and K. Taylor. 1996. Protein inheritance: lambda  plasmid replication perpetuated by the heritable replication complex. Genes Cells 1:953-963. [Abstract]
37. Wegrzyn, A., G. Wegrzyn, and K. Taylor. 1996. Disassembly of the coliphage lambda  replication complex due to heat shock induction of the groE operon. Virology 217:594-597[Medline].
38. Wegrzyn, A., G. Wegrzyn, and K. Taylor. Unpublished data.
39. Wegrzyn, G. 1995. Amplification of lambda  plasmids in Escherichia coli relA mutants. J. Biotechnol. 43:139-143[Medline].
40. Wegrzyn, G., and K. Taylor. 1992. Inheritance of the replication complex by one of two daughter copies during lambda  plasmid replication in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 226:681-688[Medline].
41. Wegrzyn, G., P. Neubauer, S. Krueger, M. Hecker, and K. Taylor. 1991. Stringent control of replication of plasmids derived from coliphage lambda . Mol. Gen. Genet. 225:94-98[Medline].
42. Wegrzyn, G., A. Pawlowicz, and K. Taylor. 1992. Stability of coliphage lambda  DNA replication initiator, the lambda O protein. J. Mol. Biol. 226:675-680[Medline].
43. Wegrzyn, G., A. Szalewska-Palasz, G. Wegrzyn, M. Obuchowski, and K. Taylor. 1995. Transcriptional activation of the origin of coliphage lambda  DNA replication is regulated by the host DnaA initiator function. Gene 154:47-50[Medline].
44. Wegrzyn, G., A. Wegrzyn, I. Konieczny, K. Bielawski, G. Konopa, M. Obuchowski, D. R. Helinski, and K. Taylor. 1995. Involvement of the host initiator function dnaA in the replication of coliphage lambda . Genetics 139:1469-1481[Abstract].
45. Wegrzyn, G., A. Wegrzyn, A. Pankiewicz, and K. Taylor. 1996. Allele specificity of the Escherichia coli dnaA gene function in the replication of plasmids derived from phage lambda . Mol. Gen. Genet. 252:580-586[Medline].
46. Wojtkowiak, D., C. Georgopoulos, and M. Żylicz. 1993. Isolation and characterization of ClpX, a new ATP-dependent specificity component of the Clp protease of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 268:22609-22617[Abstract/Free Full Text].
47. Wold, M. S., J. B. Mallory, J. D. Roberts, J. N. LeBowitz, and R. McMacken. 1982. Initiation of bacteriophage lambda  DNA replication in vitro with purified lambda  replication proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:6176-6180[Abstract/Free Full Text].
48. Żylicz, M., D. Ang, K. Liberek, and C. Georgopoulos. 1989. Initiation of lambda  DNA replication with purified host- and bacteriophage-encoded proteins: the role of the DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE heat shock proteins. EMBO J. 8:1601-1608[Medline].


J Bacteriol, May 1998, p. 2475-2483, Vol. 180, No. 9
0021-9193/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Narajczyk, M., Baranska, S., Szambowska, A., Glinkowska, M., Wegrzyn, A., Wegrzyn, G. (2007). Modulation of {lambda} plasmid and phage DNA replication by Escherichia coli SeqA protein. Microbiology 153: 1653-1663 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wegrzyn, G.