Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, January 1999, p. 212-217, Vol. 181, No. 1
Departamento de Biología, Facultad de
Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Received 18 May 1998/Accepted 29 October 1998
The gene coding for the immunity protein (mceB) and the
structural gene of microcin E492 (mceA), a
low-molecular-weight channel-forming bacteriocin produced by a strain
of Klebsiella pneumoniae, have been characterized. The
microcin gene codes for a precursor protein of either 99 or 103 amino
acids. Protein sequencing of the N-terminal region of microcin E492
unequivocally identified this gene as the microcin structural gene and
indicated that this microcin is synthesized as a precursor protein that
is cleaved at either amino acid 15 or 19, at a site resembling the
double-glycine motif. The gene encoding the 95-amino-acid immunity
protein (mceB) was identified by cloning the DNA segment
that encodes only this polypeptide into an expression vector and
demonstrating the acquisition of immunity to microcin E492. As
expected, the immunity protein was found to be associated with the
inner membrane. Analysis of the DNA sequence indicates that these genes
belong to the same family as microcin 24, and they do not share
structural motifs with any other known channel-forming bacteriocin. The
organization of the microcin- and immunity protein-encoding genes
suggests that they are coordinately expressed.
Microcin E492 is a
low-molecular-weight channel-forming bacteriocin (21)
produced by Klebsiella pneumoniae that is active on strains
of the family Enterobacteriaceae (7, 8). All of
the other low-molecular-weight channel-forming bacteriocins that have
been described are from gram-positive bacteria, among them the
lantibiotic nisin and lactococcins A and B, which are nonlantibiotic
heat-stable bacteriocins (reviewed in references 1,
19, and 33). Recently, there has been a
renewed interest in the study of the mechanism of action of different
bacteriocins and the effect of chemical modifications because
understanding the strategies used by bacteriocins to kill specific
bacteria may be useful in the design of antibiotics for pharmaceutical use (3). In order to better understand the mechanism of
action, export, processing, and possible posttranslational modification of microcin E492, the genes needed for immunity protein and microcin production, which encompass a 13-kb DNA fragment, were cloned and
expressed in Escherichia coli (35). Studies of
the genetic determinants of all microcin systems, with the exception of
microcins H47 and E492, have shown that these determinants are encoded
on plasmids encompassing DNA segments of less than 6 kb. Microcins H47
(15) and E492 (35), however, are both
chromosomally encoded on DNA fragments of more than 10 kb. Preliminary
studies of random transposition mutagenesis of the cloned microcin E492
system suggest that most of the 13-kb fragment is needed for the
production of active microcin, indicating that this system may involve
more components for the production of active microcin than other
systems already described. In previous work, we demonstrated that the microcin E492 immunity protein is located inside a 3-kb ClaI
DNA fragment (35). Here we report that, in addition to the
immunity protein gene, the microcin structural gene is also encoded in this region. The deduced amino acids sequence indicates that no similarity exits between this sequence and that of any known
channel-forming bacteriocin, and thus, it appears that this microcin
defines a novel class of low-molecular-weight pore-forming bacteriocin
which is not related to colicin-like channel-forming bacteriocins from gram-negative microorganisms or to channel-forming bacteriocins from
gram-positive bacteria. On the other hand, it was found that microcin
E492 shares some characteristic cleavage site features with
lactococcins and related bacteriocins found in gram-positive bacteria,
as in the case of colicin V (12, 17). Insight into how the
immunity protein- and microcin-encoding genes are organized will enrich
our understanding of the coordinated regulation of these genes during
stationary phase (35).
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
The strains, vectors, and
recombinant plasmids used in this work are described in Table
1. E. coli K38pGP1-2 and pT7-7
were kindly provided by S. Tabor (Harvard Medical School).
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification and Properties of the Genes Encoding
Microcin E492 and Its Immunity Protein
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results & Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Microcin E492 assay on plates.
To determine the capacity of
the strains used to produce microcin E492, 2 × 107
sensitive E. coli BL21(DE3)/p11
2 bacteria were overlaid
onto Luria broth-(LB)-ampicillin (100 µg/ml) plates with 3 ml of soft agar. Single colonies to be checked were transferred with a toothpick onto the seeded plates. After overnight incubation, the colonies producing microcin E492 were surrounded by clear growth inhibition zones.
Microcin immunity test. Aliquots (50 to 300 µl) of cultures to be tested for immunity were grown in LB-ampicillin, mixed with 3 ml of top agar, and overlaid onto LB plates. Five-microliter volumes of serial dilutions of purified microcin were tested (23). Immune cells did not show any inhibition halo. The purified microcin used for this test was prepared as described by de Lorenzo (7).
DNA isolation and manipulation. Standard techniques were used for the cloning, transformation, preparation, and restriction analysis of plasmid DNA from E. coli (2, 28).
Nucleotide sequencing and analysis. Both strands were entirely sequenced from plasmid pBSC-47 (Bluescript vector) by using automated sequencing technology from ABI, in accordance with the manufacturer's directions, at Chiron Corporation (Emeryville, Calif.). Sequence analysis was performed with the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group package, version 9.1 (10), at CEM, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile. Sequence comparisons were performed with the TBLASTN, BLASTN, FASTA, and GAP programs.
Expression and localization of immunity protein MceB. The mceB gene was amplified by PCR from pBSC-47. The forward primer (5'CGGATAAAAC*ATATGACATTACTTTCATTTGG3') generated a NdeI restriction site at the mceB initiation codon (underlined). The reverse primer (5'AAAGCAAGAA*TTC*AGTCCTTTTGACTAATTTC3') was designated to be 15 bp downstream of the mceB stop codon and contained an EcoRI site (underlined). Nucleotides with asterisks indicate the changes made to create the restriction sites. The resulting 0.3-kb product was inserted into the corresponding sites of expression vector pT7-7 to give p157 with the correct in-frame reading phase to produce the 95-amino-acid product. The recombinant vector was introduced into E. coli K38pGP1-2, grown to mid-exponential phase in LB plus kanamycin-ampicillin, transferred to M9 minimal medium (24) minus methionine, and incubated for 30 min. The immunity protein was induced by shifting the temperature to 42°C for 20 min. Rifampin was added to a final concentration of 200 µg/ml, and the culture was incubated further for 10 min at 42°C. [35S]methionine (50 µCi; ICN Translabel) was then added, and the incubation was continued for 15 min. The bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation, washed once with TEN buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl), and immediately processed.
To assess the location of the immunity protein in either the soluble or particulate fraction, cells were resuspended in 1/20 volume of TEN buffer plus 2-mg/ml lysozyme and incubated for 30 min to allow cell lysis. The incubation mixture was adjusted to give final concentrations of 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM MgCl2, 100-µg/ml DNase, and 10-µg/ml RNase, and incubation was continued for 20 min on ice. Four cycles of freezing (liquid nitrogen) and thawing (room temperature) were performed. The lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min; the supernatant corresponded to the soluble fraction, and the pellet corresponded to the particulate fraction. Each fraction was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) as described by Schägger and von Jagow (29). Separation of the inner and outer membrane fractions was performed by selective solubilization with Triton X-100. Cells were grown in LB plus kanamycin-ampicillin to mid-exponential phase at 30°C, induced for 5 h at 42°C, collected by centrifugation, washed twice with TEN buffer, and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)-2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride-10-mM MgCl2-100-µg/ml DNase-10-µg/ml RNase. Cellular disruption was achieved by sonic oscillation (100 W, 4 × 1 min), and disrupted cells were kept on ice for 30 min. After centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, the supernatant was further centrifuged at 105,000 × g for 120 min at 4°C to obtain the membrane fractions. The supernatant corresponded to the soluble fraction, and the pellet (inner and outer membrane fractions) was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)-10 mM MgCl2-2% Triton X-100 and incubated for 45 min at 37°C to allow solubilization of the inner membrane proteins. This suspension was centrifuged at 105,000 × g for 90 min at 4°C. The supernatant contained the inner membrane proteins, while the pellet (Triton X-100-insoluble fraction) corresponded to the outer membrane fraction. Each fraction was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (29).N-terminal microsequencing. Microcin E492 was transferred from polyacrylamide gels onto a polyvinylidene difluoride sequencing membrane (Bio-Rad) for N-terminal sequencing by following the manufacturer's instructions. The portion of the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane containing the microcin band (without staining) was cut out and microsequenced. N-terminal Edman microsequencing was done with an Applied Biosystems 477A sequencer equipped for on-line high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of the phenylthiohydantoin derivatives at the Protein Chemistry Service, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequence reported here has been submitted to the GenBank database under accession no. AF063590.
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cloning and sequence analysis of mceA and
mceB genes.
In a previous study, we used deletion
analysis to demonstrate that the genetic determinant(s) required for
immunity to microcin E492 are encoded in a 3-kb ClaI
fragment (35). This fragment, obtained from pJAM434
(35), was cloned into the ClaI site of pBluescript (pBSC-47). This DNA segment could be cloned only in one
orientation and conferred immunity to microcin E492. The DNA sequence
between the EcoNI and BamHI sites of the cloned
ClaI fragment is shown in Fig.
1. Two overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) were identified. The first, designated mceB, encoded
a 95-amino-acid polypeptide with a theoretical molecular weight of
10,943 and corresponds to the microcin E492 immunity protein. The
second, mceA, encoded a polypeptide of either 103 amino
acids with a theoretical molecular weight of 10,091 if the first
methionine is used as the start codon or a 99-amino-acid polypeptide
with a theoretical molecular weight of 9,562 if the methionine at
position 5 is used as the start codon. One of these polypeptide (or
both) would correspond to nonprocessed microcin E492. The assignment of
these genes (see below) was done experimentally. A putative promoter
region with characteristic features, such as AT-rich stretches and two
likely
10 (AATAAT) and
35 (TTGACG) regions with 17 bp between them, was identified in the 5' region. The first
ORF, corresponding to mceB, has a potential ribosome binding site with a Shine-Dalgarno sequence (AACGGAT) 7 bp upstream
of the ATG initiation codon. The two genes (mceA and
-B) overlap by either 23 or 11 nucleotides (depending on the
start codon), with a +1 shift for the mceA gene. No
independent promoter or ribosome binding site for mceA could
be identified if the translation starts in the first methionine, but if
translation initiation occurs at the methionine in position 5, a good
consensus for a Shine-Dalgarno sequence (TGGAGC) 5 bp
upstream of this methionine can be found. Thus, it is more likely that
translation initiation occurs at the methionine in position 5. It is
possible that these genes are transcriptionally and translationally
coupled, and this is consistent with the in vivo studies reported by
Wilkens et al. (35) showing that microcin and the immunity
protein are expressed only during the exponential phase of growth. An
exhaustive analysis of the DNA sequence upstream of the putative
promoter by using the computer programs FASTA and BLASTN was performed to search for sequence similarities. No obvious known regulation sites
were found, although some similarities to E. coli and
Bacillus subtilis genomic sequences with unknown functions
were observed. However, it is interesting that there are two direct
repeats that overlap the putative
35 region indicated between
arrowheads in Fig. 1.
|
The genes encoding microcin E492 and its immunity protein are homologous to those of the microcin 24 system. Analysis of the sequences of mceA and mceB by using the computer programs FASTA and TBLASTN revealed that the two corresponding ORFs belong to a novel family of bacteriocins and that each presents significant similarities to only one protein in the GenBank database. mceA turned out to be homologous to mtfS, the structural gene of microcin 24, isolated from an E. coli uropathogenic strain (25), while mceB is a homolog of mtfI, a gene encoding the microcin 24 immunity protein (25). Information concerning microcin 24 is only available in GenBank. The deduced amino acid sequences were compared by using the GAP program (Fig. 2). The MtfS and MceA proteins are 90 and 103 amino acids (for comparison, we will use the sequence that starts at the first methionine), respectively, with an identity of 52% and a similarity of 59%. On the other hand, MtfI and MceB are very similar in size (93 and 95 amino acids, respectively), with an identity of 39% and a similarity of 56%. These results strongly suggest that both microcins belong to the same family and probably have an ancestor in common. No information is available about the mechanism of action of microcin 24, but due to its similarity to microcin E492, it is possible to speculate that the target of microcin 24 is probably also the cytoplasmic membrane. The five determinants needed for the production of microcin 24 and its immunity protein are encoded in a 5.3-kb DNA segment (25), while the microcin E492 system is encoded in a 13-kb segment. The difference in size may reflect the complexity of the microcin E492 system, an idea supported by preliminary results with random Tn5 mutagenesis that suggest that between six and eight cistrons (besides the structural gene) encoded in the 13-kb DNA fragment are needed for the production of active microcin (4). In this respect, microcin E492 is also different from colicin V, which mechanism of action at the inner membrane level could be related to microcin E492. Only four plasmid genes, spanning 4.5 kb of DNA, are required for colicin V synthesis, export, and immunity (14, 19). The similarity between the sequences of the microcin protein and the immunity protein of microcins 24 and E492 that suggests that these proteins have an ancestor in common is also present at the level of gene organization. In both cases, the immunity protein- and microcin-encoding genes seem to be under the control of the same promoter, and the C-terminal coding region of the immunity protein overlaps the N terminus of microcin, with a frameshift in the ORF of the microcin protein. As with the transcription of the two converging operons in colicin V, transcription of the mtfI/mtfS operon of microcin 24 also could be under the control of the Fur protein, which binds to DNA at a specific sequence called the Fur box (9), because a sequence similar to a Fur box was found in the mtfI/mtfS promoter region (25). Although microcin E492 expression is regulated by the presence of iron in the growth medium (26), no site for the Fur repressor was found in an extensive region upstream (240 bp) of the mceB gene.
|
|
N-terminal amino acid sequencing of microcin E492. The amino acid sequence determined by microsequencing of the N-terminal region of microcin E492 cloned in E. coli was X-X-Thr-Asp-Pro-Asn-Thr-Glu-Leu-Leu-Asn-Asp-Leu. The two first amino acids could not be identified due to interference, so it was not until cycle 3 that the amino acids were clearly identified. The same interference was observed with microcin E492 from K. pneumoniae purified by high-performance liquid chromatography (34). This result indicates that the primary translation product of mceA is a precursor that is processed to remove the first 15 or 19 amino acids. Thus, the processed microcin E492 molecule would be an 84-amino-acid polypeptide with a predicted molecular weight of 7,887.
Similarity between cleavage sites of microcin E492 and those of
colicin V and lactococcins.
Microcin E492 was found to share many
cleavage site features with colicin V and lactococcins and related
bacteriocins found in gram-positive bacteria. These features (12,
17) include the presence of Gly residues in position
2 or
1
relative to the processing site. Most of the sequences contain the
double-glycine motif, with the exception of lactococcin DR, which
contains a glycine-alanine motif (17). Analysis of several
leader peptides of the double-glycine motif showed that seven amino
acids are found to be conserved in more than half of the aligned leader peptides (17): glycine in position
1, glycine in position
2, isoleucine in position
4, leucine in position
7, glutamic acid in position
8, serine in position
11, and leucine in position
12.
From these amino acids, microcin E492 presents glycine in position
2,
leucine in position
7, and serine in position
11. The aspartic acid
in position
8 is a conservative amino acid substitution for glutamic
acid, and isoleucine in position
12 is a conservative amino acid
substitution for leucine. Other similarities were found among the
cleavage sites of microcin E492, colicin V, and lactococcins and
related bacteriocins. The first is a cleaved leader sequence of 15 to
20 amino acids (microcin E492 has an either 15- or 19-amino-acid leader
peptide). The second is a predicted
-helical structure over most of
the leader sequence. The prediction was made by using the
Chou-and-Fasman (5) and Levitt (22) methods (data
not shown). This analysis suggested that leader sequence residues 1 to
16 are mostly
-helical and are followed by a
-turn that begins at
amino acid 17 (data not shown). It is necessary to point out that these
studies were done only for comparison, as these methods are frequently
used when comparing these properties of bacteriocins. The third is a
predicted
-turn that begins one to three amino acids before the
cleavage site (amino acid
3, in this case), which would expose the
cleavage site to allow cutting by the specific peptidase. The fourth is the fact that the processed products, in all of these cases, are small,
heat-stable protein bacteriocins (43 to 88 amino acids in length) which
function by increasing membrane permeability in target cells.
Genetic identification and localization of immunity protein MceB. To demonstrate unequivocally that mceB is the gene that encodes a protein that confers immunity to microcin E492, the DNA fragment containing only the ORF coding for the 95-amino-acid immunity protein was cloned into an expression vector. For this purpose, the pT7-7 expression vector under the control of T7 RNA polymerase was employed. The DNA segment coding only for the immunity protein was PCR amplified and cloned into pT7-7 (see Materials and Methods). Cells transformed with this recombinant vector (p157) acquired immunity to microcin E492, in contrast with the control transformed with pT7-7, which was not immune to microcin, demonstrating that this gene is enough to confer immunity to a high-titer microcin suspension. This construct was first introduced in E. coli XL1-Blue, in order to screen for the cloned immunity gene in a background where no expression was expected, but surprisingly, it was found that these cells acquired immunity to microcin E492. Although expression under the control of a T7 promoter is thought to be completely restricted to cells that express T7 RNA polymerase, there are reports (30) demonstrating that it is possible to find basal T7 RNA polymerase-independent expression of genes situated downstream from a T7 promoter. This very low level of expression would be enough to confer immunity to microcin E492. The pT7 system allows specific radioactive labeling of the protein under the control of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter (32; see Materials and Methods), and we took advantage of this characteristic to determine the localization of the immunity protein. For these experiments, the host strain E. coli BL21(DE3) was not suitable, because these cells segregated the immunity character. This strain does not tightly regulate the expression of T7 RNA polymerase (which is under the control of the lac promoter), resulting in a basal expression of 20 to 30% with respect to that of the fully induced protein. Overexpression of this protein seems to be harmful for the host cells, which, in turn, develop a mechanism to bypass its expression. This interpretation is consistent with the fact that the 3-kb ClaI DNA fragment could be cloned in pBluescript in one only orientation, in which the immunity and microcin genes are opposite to the lac promoter, probably because the cells could not tolerate high-level expression of these proteins. For this reason, we used the tightly regulated system of E. coli K38pGP1-2, in which the T7 RNA polymerase gene is under the control of promoter PL, and thus permitted induction by a temperature shift just before protein labeling (32). E. coli K38pGP1-2 harboring p157 was immune to a microcin suspension with the highest titer available (106 U/ml). Figure 4A shows SDS-PAGE of the soluble and particulate fractions of a bacterial extract in which the immunity protein has been induced and the corresponding autoradiograph (Fig. 4B). This protein was clearly identified in the autoradiograph as the only labeled protein, and as expected, it was located in the particulate fraction, which contains the inner and outer membrane fractions.
|
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Catherine Connelly and Stanley Maloy for critical reading of the manuscript and José Manuel Andreu and Juan Evangelio for the facilities provided for microsequencing of microcin E492. We are also indebted to Carlos Medina for helpful discussions and to Claudio Hetz and María José Chiucholo for their help in different stages of this work. The excellent technical assistance of Marcela Vargas is acknowledged.
This work was supported by grant 1961009 from the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile. Phone: 56-2-678-7338. Fax: 56-2-271-3891. E-mail: rolagos{at}abello.dic.uchile.cl.
Permanent address: Facultad de Ciencias, Campus San Andrés,
Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción,
Concepción, Chile.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Abee, T. 1995. Pore-forming bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria and self-protection mechanisms of producer organisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 129:1-10[Medline]. |
| 2. | Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1992. Short protocols in molecular biology, 2nd ed. Greene Publishing Associates and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 3. | Baba, T., and O. Schneewind. 1998. Instruments of microbial warfare: bacteriocin synthesis, toxicity and immunity. Trends Microbiol. 6:66-71[Medline]. |
| 4. | Baeza, M., C. Hetz, C. Villota, J. E. Villanueva, and R. Lagos. Unpublished data. |
| 5. | Chou, P. Y., and G. D. Fasman. 1978. Empirical predictions of protein conformation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47:251-276[Medline]. |
| 6. | Cramer, W. A., J. B. Heymann, S. L. Schendel, B. N. Deriy, F. S. Cohen, P. A. Elkins, and C. V. Stauffacher. 1995. Structure-function of the channel-forming colicins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24:611-641[Medline]. |
| 7. | de Lorenzo, V. 1984. Isolation and characterization of microcin E492 from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Arch. Microbiol. 139:72-75[Medline]. |
| 8. |
de Lorenzo, V., and A. Pugsley.
1985.
Microcin E492, a low-molecular-weight peptide antibiotic which causes depolarization of the Escherichia coli cytoplasmic membrane.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
27:666-669 |
| 9. |
de Lorenzo, V.,
S. Wee,
M. Herrero, and J. B. Neilands.
1987.
Operator sequences of the aerobactin operon of plasmid ColV-K30 binding the ferric uptake regulation (fur) repressor.
J. Bacteriol.
169:2624-2630 |
| 10. | Devereux, J., P. Haeberli, and O. Smithies. 1984. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:387-395. |
| 11. | Eisenberg, D., E. Scharwz, M. Komaromy, and R. Wall. 1984. Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot. J. Mol. Biol. 179:125-142[Medline]. |
| 12. | Fath, M., L. H. Zhang, J. Rush, and R. Kolter. 1994. Purification and characterization of colicin V from Escherichia coli culture supernatants. Biochemistry 33:6911-6917[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Fath, M. J., and R. Kolter.
1993.
ABC transporters: bacterial exporters.
Microbiol. Rev.
57:995-1017 |
| 14. | Fath, M. J., R. Skvirky, L. Gilson, H. K. Mahanty, and R. Kolter. 1992. The secretion of colicin V, p. 331-348. In R. James, C. Lazdunski, and F. Pattus (ed.), Bacteriocins, microcins, and lantibiotics. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. |
| 15. |
Gaggero, C.,
F. Moreno, and M. Laviña.
1993.
Genetic analysis of microcin H47 antibiotic system.
J. Bacteriol.
175:5420-5427 |
| 16. |
Geli, V., and C. Lazdunski.
1992.
An -helical hydrophobic hairpin as a specific determinant in protein-protein interaction occurring in Escherichia coli colicin A and B immunity systems.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6432-6437 |
| 17. |
Havarstein, L. S.,
H. Holo, and I. F. Nes.
1994.
The leader peptide of colicin V shares consensus sequences with leader peptides that are common among peptide bacteriocins produced by Gram-positive bacteria.
Microbiology
140:2383-2389 |
| 18. |
Hofmann, K., and W. Stoffel.
1993.
TMbase a database of membrane spanning protein segments.
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
347:166.
|
| 19. | Kolter, R., and F. Moreno. 1992. Genetics of ribosomally synthesized peptide antibiotics. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 46:141-163[Medline]. |
| 20. | Kyte, J., and R. F. Doolittle. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157:105-132[Medline]. |
| 21. | Lagos, R., M. Wilkens, C. Vergara, X. Cecchi, and O. Monasterio. 1993. Microcin E492 forms ion channels in phospholipid bilayer membranes. FEBS Lett. 321:145-148[Medline]. |
| 22. | Levitt, M. 1978. Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. Biochemistry 17:4277-4285[Medline]. |
| 23. | Mayr-Harting, A., A. J. Hedges, and C. W. Berkeley. 1972. Methods for studying bacteriocins. Methods Microbiol. 7A:315-422. |
| 24. | Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics, p. 431-433. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 25. | O'Brien, G. J., and H. K. Mahanty. 1996. GenBank accession no. U47048. |
| 26. | Orellana, C., and R. Lagos. 1996. The activity of microcin E492 from Klebsiella pneumoniae is regulated by a microcin-antagonist. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 136:297-303[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Pugsley, A. P.,
F. Moreno, and V. de Lorenzo.
1986.
Microcin-E492-insensitive mutants of Escherichia coli K12.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
132:3253-3259 |
| 28. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 29. | Schägger, H., and G. von Jagow. 1987. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166:368-379[Medline]. |
| 30. | Somerville, R. L., T.-L. Ni Shieh, B. Hagewood, and J. Cui. 1991. Gene expression from multicopy T7 promoter vectors proceeds at single copy rates in the absence of T7 RNA polymerase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181:1056-1062[Medline]. |
| 31. |
Song, H. Y., and W. A. Cramer.
1991.
Membrane topography of ColE1 gene products: the immunity protein.
J. Bacteriol.
173:2935-2943 |
| 32. |
Tabor, S., and C. C. Richardson.
1985.
A bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase/promoter system for controlled exclusive expression of specific genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:1074-1078 |
| 33. | Venema, K., G. Venema, and J. Kok. 1995. Lactococcal bacteriocins: mode of action and immunity. Trends Microbiol. 3:299-304[Medline]. |
| 34. | Wilkens, M., and R. Lagos. Unpublished data. |
| 35. |
Wilkens, M.,
J. E. Villanueva,
J. Cofré,
J. Chnaiderman, and R. Lagos.
1997.
Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of genetic determinants for production of and immunity to microcin E492 from Klebsiella pneumoniae.
J. Bacteriol.
179:4789-4794 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»