JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bebenek, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drake, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bebenek, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drake, J. W.

Journal of Bacteriology, May 1999, p. 3123-3128, Vol. 181, No. 10
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0

Bacteriophage T4 rnh (RNase H) Null Mutations: Effects on Spontaneous Mutation and Epistatic Interaction with rII Mutations

Anna Bebenek, Leslie A. Smith, and John W. Drake*

Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Received 22 January 1999/Accepted 15 March 1999


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The bacteriophage T4 rnh gene encodes T4 RNase H, a relative of a family of flap endonucleases. T4 rnh null mutations reduce burst sizes, increase sensitivity to DNA damage, and increase the frequency of acriflavin resistance (Acr) mutations. Because mutations in the related Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD27 gene display a remarkable duplication mutator phenotype, we further explored the impact of rnh mutations upon the mutation process. We observed that most Acr mutants in an rnh+ strain contain ac mutations, whereas only roughly half of the Acr mutants detected in an rnhDelta strain bear ac mutations. In contrast to the mutational specificity displayed by most mutators, the DNA alterations of ac mutations arising in rnhDelta and rnh+ backgrounds are indistinguishable. Thus, the increase in Acr mutants in an rnhDelta background is probably not due to a mutator effect. This conclusion is supported by the lack of increase in the frequency of rI mutations in an rnhDelta background. In a screen that detects mutations at both the rI locus and the much larger rII locus, the r frequency was severalfold lower in an rnhDelta background. This decrease was due to the phenotype of rnh rII double mutants, which display an r+ plaque morphology but retain the characteristic inability of rII mutants to grow on lambda  lysogens. Finally, we summarize those aspects of T4 forward-mutation systems which are relevant to optimal choices for investigating quantitative and qualitative aspects of the mutation process.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The bacteriophage T4 rnh gene encodes Rnh, an RNase H that removes the RNA primers of DNA replication (11). This nuclease, whose structure has been determined by X-ray crystallography (21), acts as a 5'-to-3' exonuclease on RNA-DNA and DNA-DNA duplexes and also as a flap endonuclease (2). An rnh null mutation (rnhDelta ) reduces total DNA synthesis only slightly, causing instead an accumulation of short, nascent DNA fragments and reducing the burst size roughly twofold (10). rnhDelta is partly complemented by the host rnhA gene, whose impairment reduces the rnhDelta mutant burst size to about 10% of normal, while rnhDelta is more strongly complemented by the 5'-exonuclease function encoded by the host polA gene, whose impairment almost abolishes the rnhDelta mutant burst size (10). In addition to its role in DNA replication, Rnh acts in recombination repair: rnhDelta increases sensitivity to the lethal effects of both UV radiation and the topoisomerase inhibitor 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide (m-AMSA), and this survival defect is epistatic to mutations in two genes required for T4 recombination repair, uvsW and uvsX (33).

T4 Rnh is related by sequence and/or structure to a family of flap endonucleases that includes examples from the archaebacteria Methanococcus jannaschii (13) and Pyrococcus furiosus (12), a eubacterium, a mammal, and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA repair protein RAD27 (reviewed in references 26 and 30). These endonucleases remove the single-stranded flaps that can arise either as a result of displacement synthesis past the beginning of an Okazaki fragment or during genetic recombination and/or repair. However, T4 Rnh flap endonuclease is strongly inhibited by the gene-32 single-stranded-DNA-binding protein whereas its RNase H activity is not (2). In the T4 multiprotein in vitro DNA replication system, Rnh preferentially uses its 5'-exonuclease activity rather than its flap endonuclease to remove primers and adjacent DNA from the 5' end of lagging-strand fragments (3). A rad27 mutation has a strong mutator phenotype at microsatellite and minisatellite sequences (14, 16) and a remarkable duplication mutator activity (31). These duplications comprised 5 to 108 bp, arose at sequences flanked by repeats of 2 to 12 bp, and were proposed to occur in a process triggered by the failure to excise DNA flaps bearing short, separated sequence repeats.

Defects in genes of T4 DNA metabolism often result in a mutator phenotype (8). Thus, T4 rnhDelta mutations might display mutator activity, and this activity might include a bias toward duplications. An rnh null mutation was reported previously to increase the frequency of T4 acriflavin-resistant (Acr) mutants (10). While such an increase might result from mutator activity, the relation between mutant frequency and mutation rate is often complicated and can be strikingly distorted when a mutational target (such as the ac gene whose knockout generates acriflavin resistance) interacts with a gene (such as rnh) whose product is involved in DNA metabolism. Acriflavin itself is both a topoisomerase inhibitor (19, 24) and a powerful mutagen (22). Because of the unknown impact of these potential interactions and also in order to determine whether a T4 rnh mutator activity had a duplication bias, we decided that the increase in Acr mutant frequency in an rnh- background should be examined in some detail. The unexpectedly complex results of this investigation are described here.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Strains. The translated portion of the rnh gene comprises 915 bp. The rnhDelta (10-777) mutation, obtained from Ken Kreuzer, is an in-frame deletion of codon-encoding bases 10 through 777 which leaves intact a middle-mode promoter near the end of rnh and is thus unlikely to affect downstream genes (33). The rnhDelta (352-847) mutation (renamed from the original) (10) removes this middle-mode promoter; in addition, because it disrupts the reading frame, it retains the first 117 rnh codons and then adds VAKFIHIL before encountering an ochre stop codon. The rI, rII, and rV mutants are from the Drake collection; rIIUV58 is hyperrevertible by proflavin (5). The rnh mutants are in a T4D background, and the r mutants are from the Drake collection in a T4B background.

The Escherichia coli strains are from the Drake collection. B cells are su-, and tight mutations of all the major T4 r loci produce the r plaque morphology (large, sharp-edged plaques) on B cells. B40 suI+ cells are B cells containing an amber-suppressing allele. BB cells are su-; rII mutants produce an r+ plaque morphology on BB cells. KB cells are K-12(lambda ) and restrict the growth of T4 rII mutants.

Media and growth conditions. Luria-Bertani (LB) medium and Drake agars (4) were used throughout at 37°C. Stocks were grown with BB cells.

Scoring rnhDelta alleles. Individual plaques were resuspended in 40 µl of water, and the rnh gene in each was amplified by PCR. A 1,034-bp sequence (including primers) was amplified from -99 through 935 where the AUG initiation codon begins with bp 1. The upstream primer was 5'-TGAAAACACAATAGGAGCCCG-3' (-99 through -79), and the downstream primer was 5'-TTTAGCCATTATTCACCTC-3' (917 through 935). The PCR consisted of 25 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 62°C, 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension time of 10 min at 72°C with Display Taq polymerase (Display System Biotech). PCR products were separated on a 1.2% agarose gel. The rnhDelta (10-777) mutation produces a product of 266 bp; the rnhDelta (352-847) mutation produces a product of 538 bp.

Screening and sequencing Acr mutants. T4 stocks were plated on BB cells with acriflavin neutral (Sigma) at 0.2 µg/ml in the top agar and 0.5 µg/ml in the bottom agar to select Acr mutants and on unsupplemented agars to score total phages when an Acr mutant frequency was desired; the plates were incubated overnight. To obtain Acr mutants of independent origin, individual acriflavin-sensitive plaques were isolated and a single Acr mutant was isolated from each; the rnh+ background was T4B.

The sequence of the ac gene (formerly open reading frame 52.2) (32) comprises 156 bp encoding 51 amino acids plus an ochre termination codon and extending from T4 genomic coordinate 165493 through 165338 (17). To determine their ac sequences, each mutant plaque was resuspended in 40 µl of water and its ac gene was PCR amplified with the upstream primer 5'-TCGAAGAAATGAACCGTATGT-3' (complementary to 165618 through 165638) and the downstream primer 5'-CTACCAATAAAGCAGCAAGGG-3' (complementary to 165294 through 165314). The PCR consisted of 25 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 50°C, 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension time of 10 min at 72°C with Display Taq polymerase. PCR products were purified with the Qiagen purification kit. Sequencing was performed with an ABI Prizm 377 automatic sequencer with the above upstream PCR primer and the dRhodamine terminator cycle sequencing kit (PE Applied Biosystems).

Test for acriflavin mutagenicity. Working under yellow light to avoid photodynamic effects, we used rIIUV58 in an rnh+ or an rnhDelta (352-847) background to infect concentrated log-phase BB cells at 5 × 108/ml at a multiplicity of infection of 5 in LB broth at 37°C on a rotary shaker. At t = 6 min after infection, another multiplicity of infection of 5 was applied. At t = 10 min, acriflavin was added to 0 or 1 µg/ml. At t = 30 min, the mixture was diluted 80-fold in LB broth, and incubation was continued. Phage development was terminated at t = 90 min by adding chloroform. rIIUV58+ revertant frequencies were determined by plating phages on KB cells (on which only rII+ phages grow) and on BB cells (on which all phages grow).

Screening r mutants. When T4 is plated on B cells, large, sharp-edged plaque morphology mutants can be observed. These are called r mutants for rapid growth, although the number of phage particles per plaque is reduced. The r phenotype results from loss of lysis inhibition, and r mutations can arise at any of several loci. About 70% of spontaneous r mutants contain mutations at the rII locus; about 25% contain mutations at the rI locus; and the remainder contain rIII, rV, unmapped, or leaky or rapidly reverting rII mutations. Although the rII locus is about 10-fold larger than the rI locus, rII missense mutations are poorly detected whereas rI missense mutations are better detected, so that the observed ratio of rII to rI mutants is only about threefold. A typical median r mutant frequency scored by plating on B cells is roughly 6 × 10-4 in a high-titer stock grown in BB cells but is twofold to threefold lower in a resuspended plaque. We picked and restreaked all r and ambiguous plaques to verify their phenotypes.

rII mutants produce the r+ plaque morphology on BB cells. Thus, when T4 is plated on BB cells, most of the r mutants contain rI mutations. A typical median r mutant frequency in a resuspended plaque plated on BB cells is roughly 2 × 10-5.

Details of plating procedures for detecting r mutants have been described elsewhere (4). Because of the clonal nature of the distribution of mutant frequencies among stocks, the best measure of a mutant frequency is the median rather than the mean; the mean is excessively sensitive to the small proportion of stocks with high mutant frequencies, particularly jackpots. Medians from five stocks are about 95% reproducible to within twofold (25), and those from seven stocks are about 95% reproducible to within about 1.5-fold. When stocks contain similar numbers of T4 particles, ratios of mutation rates are the same as ratios of mutant frequencies. For simplicity, therefore, we present frequencies rather than rates.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Mutation to Acr. We wished first to redetermine Acr mutant frequencies in the wild-type and rnhDelta backgrounds and then to characterize the mutations at the level of DNA sequence. The Acr mutant frequency was previously estimated to increase 10-fold (from about 4 × 10-6) in an rnhDelta (352-847) background compared to an rnh+ background (10). Using the treatment protocol described in reference 10 but substituting BB cells for B cells, we observed a wide range (2 × 10-6 to 20 × 10-6) of median Acr frequencies in several experiments in an rnh+ background; in particular, we were plagued by a variable background of tiny plaques on the selection plates. Our Acr frequencies were 5 × 10-6 to 37 × 10-6 in rnhDelta (10-777) and 1 × 10-6 to 50 × 10-6 in rnhDelta (352-847). Ratios of Acr mutants in rnhDelta versus rnh+ were 0.5 to 20 for rnhDelta (10-777) and 0.5 to 10 for rnhDelta (352-847).

In order to identify possible changes in the rates of specific kinds of Acr mutations, we turned to DNA sequencing. We plated wild-type and (both) rnhDelta strains in the absence of acriflavin, suspended well-separated plaques (of large to small rather than pinpoint size), replated these low-titer stocks in the presence of acriflavin, picked a single Acr mutant from each stock, PCR enriched the ac DNA, and sequenced. [We analyzed similar numbers of Acr mutants in rnhDelta (10-777) and rnhDelta (352-847) backgrounds and discerned no differences between the two backgrounds in all that follows.] T4-infected cells take up acridines at an increased rate compared to uninfected cells, and ac mutations arise in a gene whose inactivation prevents this uptake (27). The fractions of ac mutants among Acr mutants were different in the rnh+ and rnhDelta backgrounds (Table 1). In the wild-type background, 94% of Acr mutants contained ac mutations, a result indistinguishable from the 68 of 76 mutants (89%) reported previously (32). In the rnhDelta background, however, only 57% of Acr mutants contained ac mutations. The locations and Ac sensitivities of the non-ac mutations were not investigated and remain unknown, but our primers amplify 125 nucleotides before the start codon and 23 nucleotides after the termination codon, so that the observed acriflavin resistance is unlikely to result from a defect in ac function; similar mutations described previously arose in a small region linked to ac (32). Our result suggests that roughly half of the previously described increase in Acr mutants in an rnhDelta background (10) has nothing to do with mutation at the ac locus.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Characteristics of Acr mutantsa

The two ac mutational spectra are shown in Fig. 1 (which does not display several large mutations that are described in the figure legend). None of the mutations are complex (that is, mixtures of two or more base pair substitutions, insertions, and/or deletions). These spectra do not approach saturation, so that many of the smaller differences tend to be uninformative. However, the spectra are notable for the several sites and regions sporting multiple mutations in both rnh+ and rnhDelta backgrounds. In addition, there is one apparent difference between mutation frequencies in the two rnh backgrounds at position 108 (three additions and four deletions in rnh+ versus no mutations in rnhDelta ). A notable observation of multiple differences with little change in total mutation rate has been described elsewhere for differing gene-43 backgrounds (32). A much larger collection of ac mutations would have to be characterized to determine whether any of the differences in the two rnh backgrounds are real.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Spectra of spontaneous ac mutations in rnh+ (above sequence) and rnhDelta (below sequence) genetic backgrounds. Capital letters indicate base pair substitutions, boldface indicates insertions, and lowercase letters indicate deletions. The sequence is the ac gene from ATG (positions 1 through 3) encoding the initiation codon through TAA (positions 153 to 156) encoding the ochre termination codon; every 10th base is underlined and numbered beneath when possible. When an insertion or deletion could have arisen between two or more short repeated sequences, the mutation is placed in the middle of the wild-type repeats. Two or more adjacent added or deleted bases represent a single mutation, and repeated mutations are stacked. There are no complex mutations containing mixtures of base pair substitutions, insertions, and/or deletions. Note that several mutations are not shown: deletions of 32 bases between TTTT at 59 through 62 and at 91 through 94 that occurred three times in rnh+ and twice in rnhDelta and one addition of 99 bases that occurred once in rnhDelta (see text).

The classes of mutations are summarized in Table 2. In contrast to Table 1, there is no significant difference between the frequencies of the various kinds of mutations recovered from the two genetic backgrounds; when comparisons were made between the 11 categories of observed base pair substitutions and additions and deletions of base pairs, df = 10, chi 2 = 10.5, and P = 0.40. Few mutator mutations produce mutations identical to those arising in the nonmutator background. It therefore seems likely that the previously reported increase in Acr mutants in an rnhDelta background (10) was due at least in part to the non-ac mutants that are specifically selected in that background and perhaps to other less well characterized factors.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Kinds of ac mutations arising in different rnh backgrounds

Given the duplication propensity of the yeast rad27 mutator mentioned earlier, it is notable that the proportion of duplication mutations in the two sets of ac mutations is virtually identical (10 of 61 in the rnh+ background and 5 of 30 in the rnhDelta background). These duplications are shorter than most of those observed in the yeast rad27 mutator: the T4 duplications included 12 of 1 bp, 6 of 2 bp, and 1 each of 3, 4, 6, and 10 bp in the rnh+ background and 3 of 1 bp, 2 of 2 bp, and 1 each of 4, 5, and 99 bp in the rnhDelta background. All of the addition mutations were tandem duplications. These can be of two general types: those in which no flanking sequence repeats existed in the wild-type sequence and those apparently arising from repeats. The latter can be described as RiRright-arrow RiRiR where R is a repeated sequence (which can be as short as a single base pair) and i is an intervening sequence between the repeats. Such mutations can arise by slipped mispairing (29) and are characteristic of the yeast rad27 duplication mutations (31). Of the 22 insertions in the rnh+ background, 12 have slippage-like structure and are additions of only 1 or 2 bases. Of the eight insertions in the rnhDelta background, three have slippage-like structure, three are additions of only 1 or 2 bases, and one is an addition of 99 bases where R is CATTT at positions 32 through 36 and 131 through 135. Only this single mutation of the 30 additions resembles the duplications arising in the yeast rad27 mutator.

Tests for acriflavin mutagenicity in the screen for Acr mutants. Acriflavin is a mixture of 3,6-diamino-10-methylacridinium chloride and 3,6-diaminoacridine (proflavin), both of which are strong frameshift mutagens when present during T4 replication (22). Thus, the acriflavin test might be intrinsically mutagenic. Furthermore, because acridines preferentially mutate and promote breakage at topoisomerase sites in T4 DNA (19, 24), and because an rnh mutation may interfere with the repair of such breakage (33), the acriflavin test may preferentially kill or mutate replicating genomes carrying an rnh defect.

This possibility was tested by comparing acriflavin-induced reversion of rIIUV58 in rnhDelta and rnh+ backgrounds (see Materials and Methods). rIIUV58 was chosen because its reversion is unusually strongly promoted by proflavin mutagenesis (5). The results of three experiments appear in Table 3. The variation is typical of experiments involving mutagenesis with acridines but the trend is clear: acriflavin (at a concentration twice that used in our measurements of Acr frequencies, but for a shorter time) is slightly more mutagenic (2.1-fold on average) in an Delta rnh background than in an rnh+ background. Although rnh mutations typically reduce burst sizes, no reduction was seen in these particular experiments. Proflavin treatments also typically reduce burst sizes, and the reduction was slightly greater (85 versus 74%) in the rnhDelta background. The small difference in relative net mutagenesis observed with this very sensitive target suggests that the Ac test is not significantly more mutagenic to rnhDelta than to rnh+ strains. This surmise is supported by the lack of any increase in the frequency of base pair additions or deletions among ac mutants in the rnhDelta background compared to the rnh+ background (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Effect of rnhDelta on acriflavin-induced mutation

Absence of an rnh effect on mutation from r+ to rI. Most r mutants detected on E. coli BB cells bear rI mutations. The rI-encoded protein appears to sense superinfection and to carry out the first step in establishing lysis inhibition (23) but is not obviously involved in DNA metabolism. The 97-codon rI locus is large enough to fairly sample average mutation rates. Therefore, in order to determine whether an rnhDelta mutation affects rates of spontaneous mutation in a gene other than ac, we scored frequencies of r mutants on BB cells. The results appear in Table 4. Two entries per rnh genotype appear for mutant frequencies: values for sharp-edged plaques displaying the classical r phenotype and values also including slightly fuzzy-edged plaques (sr, for "semi-r") which we anticipated would be caused by leaky missense mutants. To confirm this conjecture, we isolated eight such sr plaques and sequenced them; four contained rI missense mutations, one contained a frameshift mutation near the end of the gene, and three contained no rI mutation. Therefore, the values in the "r + sr" column were computed by multiplying the sr contribution by five-eighths. Mutant frequencies such as those in Table 4 based on seven stocks are usually reproducible to about 1.5-fold (25). The data in Table 4 reveal no rnhDelta mutator activity on the rI gene.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4.   Effect of rnhDelta on rI mutant frequencies

Epistasis between rnh and rII mutations. Before undertaking the experiments detailed in Tables 3 and 4, we sought to determine the frequencies of r plaque morphology mutants in stocks plated on E. coli B cells. On B cells, roughly 70% of spontaneous r mutants carry typical rII mutations; about 25% carry rI mutations; and the remainder carry leaky or rapidly reverting rII mutations, rIII mutations, or r mutations at other less well characterized loci. Because the rII locus comprises about 3,135 bp, the frequency of r mutants is usually much higher on B cells than on BB cells, even though missense mutations are more efficiently detected in rI than in rII. Thus, an r-mutant screen on B cells was expected to be a simple, sensitive test for mutator activity in rnhDelta mutants. The results appear in Table 5. Contrary to our expectations, frequencies of r mutants are clearly reduced severalfold in a rnhDelta background. (The data suggest that this effect may differ in magnitude between the two different rnhDelta alleles, but this possibility was not further explored.)

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5.   Effect of rnhDelta on r mutant frequencies scored on E. coli B cells

Because our results with the ac and rI systems gave no hint of an antimutator effect, we suspected that the reduced frequencies of r mutants in Table 5 reflected some special property of rnh rII double mutants such as synthetic lethality or epistasis. This suspicion was supported by the results of crosses of the form rnhDelta  × r where r = rII versus rI or rV. If recombinant rnhDelta r double mutants were lethal or indetectable, then the frequency of r mutants should fall in the cross progeny compared to the parental mix. We observed no change in r frequencies in rnhDelta crosses against rI or rV (average progeny/parental ratio = 1.02) but a marked decrease in rnhDelta crosses against rII mutants (average progeny/parental ratio = 0.48) with both rnhDelta mutations. In addition, because the rnhDelta allele causes small plaques, we collected numerous progeny with a small-r (sharp-edged) phenotype and tested them for the rnhDelta allele by PCR; we found none.

We next performed crosses between rnhDelta mutants and five different rII amber mutants with B40 suI+ host cells for the cross and for plating the progeny (so that all progeny necessarily displayed the r+ plaque morphology). Ten small-plaque progeny were isolated from each cross. These were tested for inability to grow on E. coli su- K(lambda ) cells, a characteristic of most rII mutations; among the nongrowers, we screened for the presence of the rnhDelta allele by PCR. Each of the crosses readily yielded progeny that appeared to bear both mutant alleles. These progeny were backcrossed against the original rII parent to confirm the identity of the rII allele. Thus, rII mutations (including the frameshift mutation rIIUV58 described previously) display an r+ plaque morphology in the presence of an rnh null allele but do not regain the ability to grow on K(lambda ) cells.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Apparent lack of an rnhDelta effect on mutation rates. The evidence as a whole indicates that bacteriophage T4 rnh null mutations do not affect mutation rates to an appreciable extent. No change was detected with the rI system, and the increase in mutant frequency reported previously with the Acr system is unlikely to reflect a corresponding increase in mutation rate for three reasons. First, we did not find a reliable increase in the frequency of Acr mutants by the reference protocol (10), although an alternative protocol (32) appears to be more robust. (We used a different strain of B cells, namely, BB or B Berkeley, but we have no reason to suspect that B and BB would behave differently in rnhDelta phage infections.) Second, while most Acr mutants in an rnh+ background contain ac mutations, many in an rnhDelta background do not. Third, there was no discernible difference in the kinds of ac mutants produced in the two backgrounds, whereas most mutator mutants display specificity. Therefore, either the host DNA polymerase I 5'-exonuclease activity that moderately complements the loss of Rnh or the host RNase H that weakly complements the loss (10) seems to provide any fidelity components that might be missing in an rnh mutant.

Note, however, that changes in mutational specificity can occur without changes in mutation rate (6, 32). The data in Table 2 can exclude only major changes in mutational specificity. However, they do appear to exclude any strong slippage-like duplication bias in an rnhDelta background.

Epistasis between rnh and rII mutations. Just as a mutator effect was shown to be an unlikely explanation for an increased Acr mutant frequency in an rnhDelta background, an antimutator effect was shown not to be the cause of a decreased r mutant frequency in an rnhDelta background. Instead, the severalfold decrease in the median r mutant frequency in stocks plated on B cells reflected the unanticipated r+ plaque morphology of rII rnhDelta double mutants, although such double mutants retain the typical inability of rII mutants to grow on a lambda  lysogen.

The rII locus interacts with several other loci important in DNA metabolism (20, 23, 28). rII mutations produce the r+ plaque morphology when accompanied by a 49tsC9 (Holliday resolvase) mutation or by the gene-32 (single-stranded-DNA-binding protein) mutation 32tsL171. Conversely, rII mutations partly suppress 32tsL171 and also suppress gene-30 (DNA ligase) mutations. Thus, rII function is extensively connected to DNA metabolism, albeit in poorly understood ways. Indeed, the two rII-encoded proteins not only are associated with the cell membrane but also cosediment with the huge multiprotein DNA replication complex (9). The failure of rII mutations to express the r plaque morphology on BB and K-12 host cells suggests that the rII locus has only an indirect role in lysis inhibition (23). However, this pattern of interactions with DNA metabolism highlights the need for caution when using the rII system as a mutational reporter gene (7, 8).

The ac mutational spectrum. Because our spectra are based on only 91 mutations distributed among many sites and classes, it is premature to analyze the ac mutational spectrum in detail. In any case, this is not the purpose of the present report, and we leave such analysis to our colleague and ac champion Lynn Ripley (32). Note, however, that the pooled North Carolina and 43+ New Jersey ac mutations may differ. The two sets were obtained by somewhat different selection procedures that may have affected the efficiency of recovering missense mutations, which comprised 17 of 34 of the North Carolina base pair substitutions but 27 of 33 of the New Jersey base pair substitutions. The distribution of mutations among classes may be different in the two collections (df = 13, chi 2 = 22.4, P = 0.050), but if they are, much of the difference is due to five Gright-arrowC (Glyright-arrowArg) mutations at position 112 that are unique to the New Jersey collection; if those five mutations are not considered, df = 12, chi 2 = 15.7, and P = 0.21.

Optimal T4 targets for forward mutation. The sensitivity of a mutation test reflects the magnitude of changes produced by physical or chemical treatments or genetic modifiers. The specificity of a mutation test reflects the information that it provides about what kinds of mutations arise and where. Reversion tests tend to maximize sensitivity and specificity but may provide uncharacteristic responses conditioned by the local DNA sequence in which the reverting base pairs reside; some potential responses may escape detection altogether, and little or no information is generated concerning the effects of local DNA sequence. In contrast, forward-mutation tests may display reduced sensitivity because only certain kinds of mutations tend to be increased experimentally, but such tests may display high sensitivity with regard to effects of local sequence on mutation. Currently, there are three useful T4 targets for forward mutation, rII, ac, and rI, each with its particular advantages and disadvantages (Table 6).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6.   T4 forward-mutation systems

Until recently, the most frequently used T4 mutation system employed the powerful rII locus, which can be used to measure both forward mutation and reversion. A large amount of information is available about both spontaneous and induced mutation in the rII locus. However, this system has several drawbacks. One is lack of information about the biochemical roles of the rII-encoded proteins (reviewed in reference 28 and largely unchanged since then), including their equivocal role in lysis inhibition (23). Another is the involvement of rII function in DNA metabolism, as detailed above. A third is the large size of rII, so that very large numbers of mutants must be isolated when it is desirable to identify preferentially mutable sites, and mutations must be mapped before they can be sequenced efficiently. A fourth is the inefficiency with which missense mutations are detected.

The ac and rI systems share the advantages of small size and relatively efficient detection of missense mutations (1, 23, 32). (We will describe several aspects of the rI system in more detail in a later article.) Small size has two advantages, ease of sequencing and ease of detecting differential mutability from site to site. The ac system is the easiest for collecting mutants of independent origin but may be difficult to quantitate, and the Acr screen may perturb DNA metabolism. The rI system seems to be totally independent of DNA metabolism (although crucial for lysis inhibition, which leads to more, apparently quite normal DNA synthesis). The main drawback of the rI system is the low frequency of spontaneous mutants, which renders quantitation and mutant collection tedious; however, this problem disappears under conditions that increase mutant frequencies by 10-fold or more.

We also investigated the alc system, in which forward mutations can be selected by plating on a specific host (18). Unfortunately, the resulting alc plaques are small under a variety of plating conditions, so that quantitation is difficult. In addition, alc mutations cause T4 DNA to contain ordinary cytosine instead of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, a difference that perturbs DNA metabolism.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Nancy Nossal and Ken Kreuzer for providing their rnhDelta mutants, Nancy Nossal for helpful discussions during the course of the investigation, and Joe Haseman and Judi Fleming for assistance in statistical testing. Lynn Ripley, Dmitry Gordenin, and Roel Schaaper provided invaluable critical comments at various stages of the evolution of this article.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Molecular Genetics E3-01, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. E-mail: drake{at}niehs.nih.gov.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Bebenek, A., H. K. Dressman, and J. W. Drake. Unpublished results.
2. Bhagwat, M., L. J. Hobbs, and N. G. Nossal. 1997. The 5'-endonuclease activity of bacteriophage T4 RNase H is stimulated by the T4 gene 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein, but its flap-endonuclease is inhibited. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28523-28530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Bhagwat, M., and N. G. Nossal. Unpublished results.
4. Conkling, M. A., and J. W. Drake. 1984. Isolation and characterization of conditional alleles of bacteriophage T4 genes uvsX and uvsY. Genetics 107:505-523[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Drake, J. W. 1963. Properties of ultraviolet-induced rII mutants of bacteriophage T4. J. Mol. Biol. 6:268-283.
6. Drake, J. W. 1993. General antimutators are improbable. J. Mol. Biol. 229:8-13[Medline].
7. Drake, J. W., and L. S. Ripley. 1983. The analysis of mutation in bacteriophage T4: delights, dilemmas, and disasters, p. 312-320. In C. K. Mathews, E. M. Kutter, G. Mosig, and P. B. Berget (ed.), Bacteriophage T4. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
8. Drake, J. W., and L. S. Ripley. 1994. Mutagenesis, p. 98-124. In J. D. Karam (ed.), The molecular biology of bacteriophage T4. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
9. Greenberg, G. R., P. He, J. Hilfinger, and M.-J. Tseng. 1994. Deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate synthesis and phage T4 DNA, p. 14-27. In J. D. Karam (ed.), The molecular biology of bacteriophage T4. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
10. Hobbs, L. J., and N. J. Nossal. 1996. Either bacteriophage T4 RNase H or Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I is essential for phage replication. J. Bacteriol. 178:6772-6777[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Hollingsworth, H. C., and N. G. Nossal. 1991. Bacteriophage T4 encodes an RNase H which removes RNA primers made by the T4 DNA replication system in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1888-1897[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12. Hosfield, D. J., C. D. Mol, B. Shen, and J. A. Tainer. 1998. Structure of the DNA repair and replication endonuclease and exonuclease FEN-1: coupling DNA and PCNA binding to FEN-1 activity. Cell 95:135-146[Medline].
13. Hwang, K. Y., K. Baek, H.-Y. Kim, and Y. Cho. 1998. The crystal structure of flap endonuclease-1 from Methanococcus jannaschii. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:707-713[Medline].
14. Johnson, R. E., G. K. Kovali, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash. 1995. Requirement of the yeast RTH1 5' to 3' exonuclease for the stability of simple repetitive DNA. Science 269:238-240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Koch, R. E., and J. W. Drake. 1970. Cryptic mutants of bacteriophage T4. Genetics 65:379-390[Free Full Text].
16. Kokoska, R. J., L. Stefanovic, H. T. Tran, M. A. Resnick, D. A. Gordenin, and T. D. Petes. 1998. Destabilization of yeast micro- and minisatellite DNA sequences by mutations affecting a nuclease involved in Okazaki fragment processing (rad27) and DNA polymerase delta  (pol3-t). Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2779-2788[Abstract/Free Full Text].
17. Kutter, E., T. Stidham, B. Guttman, E. Kutter, D. Batts, S. Peterson, T. Djavakhishvili, F. Arisaka, V. Mesyanzhinov, W. Rüger, and G. Mosig. 1994. Genomic map of bacteriophage T4, p. 491-518. In J. D. Karam (ed.), The molecular biology of bacteriophage T4. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
18. Kutter, E., T. White, M. Kashlev, M. Uzan, J. McKinney, and B. Guttman. 1994. Effects on host genome structure and expression, p. 357-368. In J. D. Karam (ed.), The molecular biology of bacteriophage T4. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
19. Masurekar, M., K. N. Kreuzer, and L. S. Ripley. 1991. The specificity of topoisomerase-mediated DNA cleavage defines acridine-induced frameshift within a hotspot in bacteriophage T4. Genetics 127:453-462[Abstract].
20. Mosig, G. 1994. Homologous recombination, p. 54-84. In J. D. Karam (ed.), The molecular biology of bacteriophage T4. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
21. Mueser, T. C., N. G. Nossal, and C. C. Hyde. 1996. Structure of bacteriophage T4 RNase H, a 5' to 3' RNA-DNA and DNA-DNA exonuclease with sequence similarity to the RAD2 family of eukaryotic proteins. Cell 85:1101-1112[Medline].
22. Orgel, A., and S. Brenner. 1961. Mutagenesis of bacteriophage T4 by acridines. J. Mol. Biol. 3:762-768[Medline].
23. Paddison, P., S. T. Abedon, H. K. Dressman, K. Gailbreath, J. Tracy, E. Mosser, J. Neitzer, B. Guttman, and E. Kutter. 1998. The roles of the bacteriophage T4 r genes in lysis inhibition and fine-structure genetics: a new perspective. Genetics 148:1539-1550[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Ripley, L. S., J. S. Dubins, J. G. deBoer, D. M. DeMarini, A. M. Bogerd, and K. N. Kreuzer. 1988. Hotspot sites for acridine-induced frameshift mutations in bacteriophage T4 correspond to sites of action of the T4 type II topoisomerase. J. Mol. Biol. 200:665-680[Medline].
25. Santos, M. E., and J. W. Drake. 1994. Rates of spontaneous mutation in bacteriophage T4 are independent of host fidelity determinants. Genetics 138:553-564[Abstract].
26. Shen, B., Z. Qiu, D. Hosfield, and J. A. Tainer. 1998. Flap endonuclease homologs in archaebacteria exist as independent proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:171-173[Medline].
27. Silver, S. 1965. Acriflavin resistance: a bacteriophage mutation affecting the uptake of dye by the infected bacterial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 53:24-30[Free Full Text].
28. Singer, B. S., S. T. Shinedling, and L. Gold. 1983. The rII genes: a history and a prospectus, p. 327-333. In C. K. Mathews, E. M. Kutter, G. Mosig, and P. B. Berget (ed.), Bacteriophage T4. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
29. Streisinger, G., Y. Okada, J. Emrich, J. Newton, A. Tsugita, E. Terzaghi, and M. Inouye. 1966. Frameshift mutations and the genetic code. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 31:77-84[Medline].
30. Symington, L. S. 1998. Homologous recombination is required for the viability of rad27 mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:5589-5595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
31. Tishkoff, D. X., N. Filosi, G. M. Gaida, and R. D. Kolodner. 1997. A novel mutation avoidance mechanism dependent on S. cerevisiae RAD27 is distinct from DNA mismatch repair. Cell 88:253-263[Medline].
32. Wang, F. J., and L. S. Ripley. 1998. The spectrum of acridine resistant mutants of bacteriophage T4 reveals cryptic effects of the tsL141 DNA polymerase allele on spontaneous mutagenesis. Genetics 148:1655-1665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Woodworth, D. L., and K. N. Kreuzer. 1996. Bacteriophage T4 mutants hypersensitive to an antitumor agent that induces topoisomerase-DNA cleavage complexes. Genetics 143:1081-1090[Abstract].


Journal of Bacteriology, May 1999, p. 3123-3128, Vol. 181, No. 10
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bebenek, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drake, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bebenek, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drake, J. W.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS