Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, May 1999, p. 3220-3225, Vol. 181, No. 10
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Differential Expression of Nonagglutinating
Fimbriae and MR/P Pili in Swarming Colonies of Proteus
mirabilis
Roger K.
Latta,1
Annic
Grondin,1
Harold C.
Jarrell,1
G. Rod
Nicholls,2 and
Luc R.
Bérubé1,*
Institute of Biological Sciences, National
Research Council Canada,1 and Electron
Microscopy Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Ottawa,2 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Received 17 November 1998/Accepted 26 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The expression of nonagglutinating fimbriae (NAF) and
mannose-resistant/Proteus-like (MR/P) pili in swarming
colonies of Proteus mirabilis was investigated. Elongated
swarmer cells do not express pili, and the relative number of bacteria
expressing NAF during swarming and early consolidation phases was very
low (<5%). Relative expression of NAF in a terrace increased to
approximately 30% at 48 h. We also determined the expression of
NAF and MR/P pili in two phenotypically distinguishable regions of each
terrace. The expression of both NAF and MR/P pili was always higher in the region closer (proximal) to the middle of the colony than in the
distal region of the terrace. The relative numbers of bacteria expressing NAF or MR/P pili in the proximal region were between 39.1 and 63% and between 5.9 and 7.7%, respectively. In the distal region,
expression levels were between 20.8 and 27.3% and between 3.7 and
5.6%, respectively. A time course experiment testing NAF expression in
both the proximal and distal regions of a terrace indicated that NAF
expression in the proximal regions was always higher than in the distal
regions and increased to a plateau 40 to 50 h after the start of
the swarming phase for any given terrace. These results indicate that
expression of NAF or MR/P pili in swarming colonies of P. mirabilis is highly organized, spatially and temporally. The
significance of this controlled differentiation remains to be uncovered.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bacteria, in their natural habitats,
prefer to live in colonies (9). This observation also
applies to pathogenic bacteria, which are often found in microcolonies
on the surfaces of epithelial tissues (7). Colonies of
bacteria grown on laboratory media can exhibit a high degree of
organization that is characterized by phenotypically distinguishable
regions, such as concentric circles, pie-shaped sectors, and fractal
patterns (4, 23, 24).
Some modes of colony development are redundant and can be observed
across taxa. One such mode of colony development is swarming. Organisms
in which swarming is observed include Proteus,
Serratia, vibrios, bacilli, and clostridia (24).
These bacteria can differentiate from short, vegetative "swimmer"
cells to elongated, highly flagellated forms called swarmer cells
(14). These swarmer cells are responsible for the
multicellular spreading on surfaces that gives swarming colonies their
characteristic pattern of concentric terraces (see Fig. 1).
The formation of swarming colonies by Proteus mirabilis is
particularly well documented (3, 5, 10, 22). The phenomena of swarming (migration) and consolidation (reversion to vegetative cells) result in a colony exhibiting characteristic terraces
arranged in a circular geometry. According to Rauprich and
coworkers (22), the process is made up of five distinct
phases. These are the lag phase, the first swarming phase, the first
consolidation phase, the second and following swarming phases, and the
second and following consolidation phases. The limits of each terrace
are defined by the intervals between the onset of migration in
successive swarm phases.
The products of a large number of genes are believed to take part in
the swarming process (1). However, little is known about the
role played by pili in the establishment of swarming colonies. In an
effort to better define the role of pili during swarming and
consolidation, we have investigated the expression of nonagglutinating
fimbriae (NAF) and mannose resistant/Proteus-like (MR/P)
pili during the formation of swarming colonies of P. mirabilis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strain and culture.
P. mirabilis 7570 has
been isolated from a patient with struvite urolithiasis. P. mirabilis was routinely grown on Luria agar plates supplemented
with 0.2% glucose. Swarming colonies of P. mirabilis were
initiated by inoculating 105 bacteria in 1 µl in the
middle of a petri dish containing 1.5% agar. The agar plates were then
incubated at 37°C for the appropriate length of time. The length of
the bacteria was determined with a Reichert phase-contrast microscope
fitted with an eyepiece micrometer. Twenty bacteria were measured per determination.
Detection of NAF and MR/P pilus expression.
To measure the
proportion of bacteria expressing a particular pilus in a given
population, we have used the procedure of Nowicki et al.
(19) with slight modifications. Briefly, bacteria from different regions of swarming colonies were harvested with a loop, resuspended in 0.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in Eppendorf tubes, and centrifuged for 2 min at 12,000 × g. The
pellet was resuspended in 0.1 ml of PBS. Ten microliters of this
suspension was put on a microscope slide, air dried at room
temperature, and fixed for 30 min with 95% methanol. Anti-NAF or
anti-MR/P-pilus mouse monoclonal antibodies (26) were
diluted 1:1 with a solution of 50% PBS-glycerol, and 4 µl of the
diluent was added to the dried sample. The slides were then incubated
at room temperature for 45 min followed by three washes with 50 µl of
PBS. Seven microliters of fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies (Caltag
Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.) was added to each slide. The slides
were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 45 min followed by
three washes with 50 µl of PBS. A drop of 50% PBS-glycerol was
added to the sample, which was then covered with a glass coverslip. The
slides were examined with an Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus America
Inc., Lake Success, N.Y.) equipped with a fluorescence illuminator. The
number of bacteria expressing the pili and the total number of bacteria
(typically 50 to 100) were counted in five different fields for each
sample. The results are reported as the percentage of bacteria
expressing pili [calculated as follows: (number of bacteria expressing
pili/total number of bacteria) × 100].
Electron microscopy.
Samples for electron microscopy were
prepared as follows. P. mirabilis was grown on agar as
described above. Samples were taken from different regions of the swarm
colonies with a sterile loop and suspended in water or PBS. A drop of
the cell suspension was deposited on a Formvar carbon-coated grid and
allowed to dry at room temperature. A drop of 1% uranyl acetate (in
water) was deposited on the dried sample for 2 to 5 min, after which
the excess liquid (if any) was blotted off. Samples were then analyzed with a Philips model E-M 300 electron microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Swarming colonies of P. mirabilis were obtained by
inoculating 105 bacteria in the center of an agar plate. A
typical colony is shown in Fig. 1. In the
48-h colony, the terraces formed by the successive waves of swarming
and consolidation can be clearly distinguished. We further observed two
phenotypically distinguishable regions within each terrace, an opaque
rim and a bright rim. The center of the colony is completely bright,
and the first terrace starts with an opaque rim. Thus, the opaque rim
corresponds to what we termed the proximal part of the terrace,
relative to the colony center. The bright rim corresponds to the distal
part. The proximal and distal regions are only faintly discernible at the end of the swarming period for a given terrace but become more
evident as the terrace becomes older. It has been shown that internal
waves are formed within the expanding swarmer cell population (22). These waves of swarmer cells originate from the
previous terrace and successively propagate into the newly formed
terrace. The waves are one cell thick and are piled up at the edge of
the terrace in such a way that the bottom layer extends outward, the one above it extends less, and successive layers each extend less than
the one below. Furthermore, islands of cells with different thicknesses
are formed at the edge of the terrace. The brightness of the distal
area most likely arises because of light scatter at the boundaries of
these successive layers and islands of cells (22). The
pitted appearance of the edge of the second terrace in Fig. 1A and of
the outermost terrace in Fig. 1B is most likely due to these islands of
cells.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Swarm colony of P. mirabilis 7570. Bacteria
(105) were inoculated in the middle of the agar plate and
allowed to grow for 20 h (A) and 48 h (B).
|
|
A typical colony growth curve is shown in Fig.
2. It exhibits the characteristic pattern
which arises as a result of swarming and consolidation cycles. An
initial lag phase of 5 h was observed in the growth of the colony;
it was followed by the first swarming, which spanned 2 h. During
this first swarming, the colony diameter expanded at a rate of
approximately 33 µm/min. The duration of the first consolidation was
approximately 1.5 h. The rate of colony expansion in the second
and subsequent swarming phases was much higher, approximately 150 µm/min. An increase in the rate of colony expansion in the second and
subsequent swarming phases has also been observed by Rauprich and
coworkers (22). This cycle of swarming and consolidation was
repeated five or six times under our growth conditions. After the last
cycle, the colony occupied the entire surface of the agar. Esipov and
Shapiro (12) have proposed a mathematical model to describe
the kinetics of P. mirabilis swarm colony development. In
the model that best describes their experimental data, they have
assumed that swarmer cells have a fixed maximal age
(
max) and that the swarmer cells become septate upon
reaching this age. Esipov and Shapiro's numerical model allowed us to
estimate
max and other parameters characteristic of our experiment's growth conditions. The period required to complete one
swarming and consolidation phase was on average equal to approximately 5 h, based on our colony's growth curve. This, according to the mathematical model, corresponds to a
max of
approximately 4.5 h. From this
max, again by the
mathematical model, the ratio of the consolidation period to the total
period was found to be close to 0.6. This is in good agreement with our
results, which indicate that the consolidation and swarming periods are
roughly equal (
2.5 h).
We used anti-NAF and anti-MR/P-pilus antibodies to probe the presence
of both pili at the surfaces of bacterial cells. To achieve this, cells
were smeared on a microscope slide and exposed to the antibody. A
fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled secondary antibody was used to
detect bacteria expressing NAF or MR/P pili (see Materials and
Methods). A photomicrograph of a typical field of view obtained by
fluorescence microscopy with this technique is shown in Fig.
3. Cells expressing NAF appear bright and
can be clearly visualized.
We probed the expression of NAF during the swarming and consolidation
phases of a given terrace (we took the fourth terrace). To do this, a
strip of agar corresponding to the width of the terrace was cut out at
the outer edge of a colony. The strips from different plates were cut
out at different times, starting at the beginning of the swarming and
continuing up to 48 h. The bacteria on the strips were recovered,
and the proportion of bacteria expressing NAF was measured (Fig.
4A). We also measured the average length
of these bacteria (Fig. 4B). Clearly, the curves are the mirror image
of one another, indicating that the septation of swarmer cells into
swimmer cells is paralleled by an increase in the proportion of
NAF-expressing bacteria. That is, swarmer cells do not express (or
express very few) NAF. Similar results were obtained for MR/P pili. We
further demonstrated, using electron microscopy, that swarmer cells do
not express pili at all (Fig. 5).
Interestingly, when the two curves of Fig. 4 were analyzed in more
detail, they were found to exhibit variations in their rate of change
(variations in their slopes) at times corresponding to the end or the
beginning of the swarming and consolidation phases. Thus, an initial
rapid decrease in average cell length that lasted approximately 2 h, or the equivalent of the swarming period, was observed. An equally
rapid increase in the proportion of NAF-expressing cells was observed
during the same period. This increase was followed by a lower rate of
decrease in average cell length that also lasted approximately 2 h, or the equivalent of the consolidation period. During this period,
there was no change in the proportion of bacteria expressing NAF. Then
followed a more rapid decrease of the average cell length that lasted
approximately 4 h. The proportion of NAF-expressing bacteria
increased rapidly and substantially during this postconsolidation
period. Finally, there was a very slow decrease in average cell length
over several hours, which was paralleled by a significant reduction in
the rate of increase of NAF-expressing bacteria. The correlation
between the kinetics of the proportion of NAF-expressing bacteria and average bacterial size strongly suggests that NAF are expressed only on
a subpopulation of cells of a specific size. The kinetics also indicate
that most of the differentiation into NAF-expressing bacteria occurs
after the consolidation phase, over a period of time several times that
of a complete swarming-plus-consolidation period, the latter lasting
approximately 4 h.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Changes in relative number of bacteria expressing NAF
and bacterial cell length in the fourth terrace as a function of
time.
|
|

View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Electron microscopy photographs of P. mirabilis. (A) Hyperflagellated swarmer cell. An arrow points to a
flagellum (magnification, ×28,500). (B) Higher magnification of the
boxed area from panel A. Note the complete absence of pili
(magnification, ×119,700). (C) Swimmer cell exhibiting a very high
number of pili, which are indicated by arrows (magnification,
×119,700).
|
|
We also probed the expression of NAF and MR/P pili in the proximal and
distal regions of terraces. The proportion of bacteria expressing NAF
was always higher in the proximal region (Table 1). MR/P pili followed a similar pattern
of expression, although the relative number of bacteria expressing MR/P
pili was very low.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Relative numbers of bacteria expressing NAF and MR/P pili
in the proximal and distal regions of terraces in swarm colonies
of P. mirabilis
|
|
The average relative numbers of bacteria expressing NAF were
approximately 50 and 25% in the proximal and distal regions, respectively. In the colony center, the phenotype of which is very
similar to the distal, bright parts of terraces, the proportion of
NAF-expressing bacteria was 27%. Thus, the bright phenotype can be
correlated with a lower expression of NAF. All terraces exhibited
similar levels of expression. Interestingly, MR/P pilus expression was
also approximately two times higher in the proximal parts than in the
distal parts of terraces 1 and 2. This may suggest that the expression
of NAF and MR/P pilus genes are controlled by a common regulatory
element. However, due to the very low relative number of bacteria
expressing MR/P pili, the uncertainty of the measurements is relatively
large. A relatively low number of bacteria expressing MR/P pili
(between 0 and 5%), relative to the number expressing NAF (between 10 and 50%), was also observed under broth culture conditions
(17).
The kinetics of NAF expression in both the proximal and the distal
regions, beginning at the onset of the consolidation phase (Fig.
6), indicate that the relative number of
NAF-expressing bacteria is always higher in the proximal region. The
rapid increase in the relative number of NAF-expressing bacteria
observed for the whole terrace during the 10 to 20 h following
consolidation (Fig. 4A) is reflected in the kinetics of NAF expression
in both the proximal and distal regions.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Relative numbers of bacteria expressing NAF as a
function of time in the proximal (dotted line) and distal (solid line)
regions of terrace 4. Bacteria were harvested at the end of the swarm
phase. Results are the means ± standard deviations of three
experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present paper, we have demonstrated that NAF and MR/P pili
are differentially expressed in the terraces of swarming colonies of
P. mirabilis. The proportion of bacteria expressing either
pilus was higher in the proximal region of each terrace. In our
experiments, pili were not expressed on hyperflagellated swarmer cells.
A similar observation was made in a study on P. mirabilis by
Hoeniger (14), in which it was shown that only a small
fraction (less than 10%) of bacteria grown on solid agar expressed
both pili and flagella at the same time. Our results suggest that pili
are expressed at the surfaces of bacteria that are relatively small,
which appear at specific times in the development of swarming colonies.
Most likely, pili are expressed on bacteria that have reached a certain
stage of differentiation in the overall differentiation-dedifferentiation cycle of P. mirabilis.
Not all of the bacteria in any particular region of a terrace express
NAF or MR/P pili. This clearly indicates that the density of
pilus-expressing bacteria is tightly controlled. The control of MR/P
pilus expression has been elucidated, in part, at the molecular level
and appears to be controlled by an invertase, MrpI, capable of
inverting the orientation of the mrpA promoter (2). MrpI is analogous to FimB and FimE of Escherichia
coli, which are also invertases regulating the expression of type
1 pilus structural genes (15, 16, 18). Interestingly,
differential expression of type 1 pili in colonies of E. coli has also been observed (20). In E. coli, bacteria expressing type 1 pili were located along radii in
circular colonies. It is well known that the FimE and FimB genes are
under the control of the global regulatory factors Lrp (leucine
regulatory protein) (6), IHF (integration host factor)
(11), and the histone-like protein H-NS (21). Given the homology between MrpI and FimB/FimE and their similar functions in controlling gene expression, Lrp, IHF, and H-NS could also
play roles in MrpI expression. In addition, Hay and coworkers (13) have demonstrated the involvement of Lrp in swarming by transposon mutagenesis and suggested a role for Lrp in flagellation and
swarming. The inverse relationship between pilus expression and
flagellation further supports the possible involvement of Lrp in the
expression of pili. Identification of the factors affecting these
global regulatory proteins and their localization within P. mirabilis colonies could further our understanding of the spatial distribution of pilus-expressing bacteria. Although the gene coding for
NAF (also referred to as UCA) has been cloned (8), the regulation of its expression has not yet been elucidated at the molecular level.
It is not clear what role pili play in swarm colonies of P. mirabilis. Pili forming a network interconnecting the bacteria have been observed in colonies of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
This interconnection via pili has been proposed to enhance
communication and the exchange of genetic material (25).
Intracellular communication and activation of specific genes have been
shown to occur when pili interact with specific receptors
(27). Alternatively (or in addition), such a network of pili
could play a structural role by contributing to the maintenance of
specific three-dimensional organizations of bacteria at diverse stages
of differentiation, much like the cellular organization of mammalian
organs is supported by connective tissue. This three-dimensional
connection of bacteria via pili could perhaps explain the bright (low
proportion of pilus-expressing bacteria) and opaque (high proportion of
pilus-expressing bacteria) phenotypes observed in our swarming colonies.
Since pili are often implicated in adhesion and flagella are used for
locomotion, it is logical to propose an inverse correlation between the
expression of pili and that of flagella. This would imply that the
proportion of bacteria which express flagella is higher in the distal
region of each terrace, since this region contains the swarmer bacteria
that migrate into the adjacent terrace. In good agreement with this
hypothesis, we have observed that a large proportion of bacteria from
the distal region is mobile, whereas most, if not all, bacteria from
the proximal region are immobile (data not shown).
This study constitutes the first exploration of the spatial
organization of pili in swarming colonies of P. mirabilis.
Elucidation of the molecular details of pilus expression may lead to a
better understanding of the role of pili in pathogenesis. More
generally, it is another step toward understanding, at the molecular
level, the mechanisms controlling colony development.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: 100 Sussex Dr.,
Rm. 3005, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada. Phone: (613) 993-5900. Fax: (613) 952-9092. E-mail: luc.berube{at}nrc.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allison, C., and C. Hughes.
1991.
Closely linked genetic loci required for swarm cell differentiation and multicellular migration of Proteus mirabilis.
Mol. Microbiol.
5:1975-1982[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bahrani, F. K., and H. L. T. Mobley.
1994.
Proteus mirabilis MR/P fimbrial operon: genetic organization, nucleotide sequence, and conditions for expression.
J. Bacteriol.
176:3412-3419[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Belas, R.
1996.
Proteus mirabilis and other swarming bacteria, p. 183-219.
In
J. A. Shapiro, and M. Dworkin (ed.), Bacteria as multicellular organisms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
|
| 4.
|
Ben-Jacob, E.
1997.
From snowflake formation to growth of bacterial colonies. II. Cooperative formation of complex colonial pattern.
Contemp. Phys.
38:205-224.
|
| 5.
|
Bisset, K. A.
1973.
The zonation phenomenon and structure of the swarm colony in Proteus mirabilis.
J. Med. Microbiol.
9:429-433.
|
| 6.
|
Blomfield, I. C.,
P. J. Calie,
K. J. Eberhardt,
M. S. McClain, and B. I. Eisenstein.
1993.
Lrp stimulates phase variation of type 1 fimbriation in Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
175:27-36[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Cheng, K.-J.,
R. T. Irvin, and J. W. Costerton.
1981.
Autochthonous and pathogenic colonization of animal tissues by bacteria.
Can. J. Microbiol.
27:461-490[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cook, S. W.,
N. Mody,
J. Valle, and R. Hull.
1995.
Molecular cloning of Proteus mirabilis uroepithelial cell adherence (uca) genes.
Infect. Immun.
63:2082-2086[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Costerton, J. W.,
K. J. Cheng,
G. G. Geesey,
T. I. Ladd,
J. C. Nickel,
N. Dasgupta, and T. J. Marrie.
1987.
Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
41:435-464[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Douglas, C. W., and K. A. Bisset.
1976.
Development of concentric zones in Proteus swarm colony.
J. Med. Microbiol.
9:497-500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Eisenstein, B. I.,
D. S. Sweet,
V. Vaughn, and D. I. Freidman.
1987.
Integration host factor is required for the DNA inversion that controls phase variation in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:6506-6510[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Esipov, S. E., and J. A. Shapiro.
1998.
Kinetic model of Proteus mirabilis swarm colony development.
J. Math. Biol.
36:249-268.
|
| 13.
|
Hay, N. A.,
D. J. Tipper,
D. Gygi, and C. Hughes.
1997.
A nonswarming mutant of Proteus mirabilis lacks the Lrp global transcriptional regulator.
J. Bacteriol.
179:4741-4746[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hoeniger, J. F. M.
1965.
Development of flagella by Proteus mirabilis.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
40:29-42.
|
| 15.
|
Klemm, P.,
B. J. Jorgensen,
I. van Die,
H. DeRee, and H. Bergmans.
1985.
The fim genes responsible for synthesis of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli cloning and genetic organization.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
199:410-414[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Klemm, P.
1986.
Two regulatory fim genes, fimB and fimE, control the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli.
EMBO J.
5:1389-1393[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Latta, R. K.,
M. J. Schur,
D. L. Tolson, and E. Altman.
1998.
The effect of growth conditions on in vitro adherence, invasion, and NAF expression by Proteus mirabilis 7570.
Can. J. Microbiol.
44:896-904[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
McClain, M. S.,
I. C. Blomfield, and B. I. Eisenstein.
1991.
Roles of fimB and fimE in site-specific DNA inversion associated with phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
173:5308-5314[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Nowicki, B.,
M. Rhen,
V. Väisänen-Rhen,
A. Pere, and T. K. Korhonen.
1984.
Immunofluorescence study of fimbrial phase variation in Escherichia coli KS71.
J. Bacteriol.
160:691-695[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Nowicki, B.,
M. Rhen,
V. Väisänen-Rhen,
A. Pere, and T. K. Korhonen.
1985.
Organization of fimbriate cells in colonies of Escherichia coli strain 3040.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
131:1263-1266[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Olsen, P. B.,
M. A. Schembri,
D. L. Gally, and P. Klemm.
1998.
Differential temperature modulation by H-NS of the fimB and fimE recombinase genes which control the orientation of type 1 fimbrial phase switch.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
162:17-23[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Rauprich, O.,
M. Matsushita,
C. J. Weijer,
F. Siegert,
S. E. Esipov, and J. A. Shapiro.
1996.
Periodic phenomena in Proteus mirabilis swarm colony development.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6525-6538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Shapiro, J. A.
1992.
Pattern and control in bacterial colony development.
Sci. Prog.
76:399-424[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Shapiro, J. A.
1995.
The significance of bacterial colony patterns.
Bioessays
17:597-607[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Todd, W. J.,
G. P. Wray, and P. J. Hitchcock.
1984.
Arrangement of pili in colonies of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
J. Bacteriol.
159:312-320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Tolson, D. L.,
B. A. Harrison,
R. K. Latta,
K. K. Lee, and E. Altman.
1997.
The expression of nonagglutinating fimbriae and its role in Proteus mirabilis adherence to epithelial cells.
Can. J. Microbiol.
43:709-717[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Zhang, J. P., and S. Normak.
1996.
Induction of gene expression in Escherichia coli after pilus mediated adherence.
Science
273:1234-1236[Abstract].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, May 1999, p. 3220-3225, Vol. 181, No. 10
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pearson, M. M., Sebaihia, M., Churcher, C., Quail, M. A., Seshasayee, A. S., Luscombe, N. M., Abdellah, Z., Arrosmith, C., Atkin, B., Chillingworth, T., Hauser, H., Jagels, K., Moule, S., Mungall, K., Norbertczak, H., Rabbinowitsch, E., Walker, D., Whithead, S., Thomson, N. R., Rather, P. N., Parkhill, J., Mobley, H. L. T.
(2008). Complete Genome Sequence of Uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis, a Master of both Adherence and Motility. J. Bacteriol.
190: 4027-4037
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Inoue, T., Shingaki, R., Hirose, S., Waki, K., Mori, H., Fukui, K.
(2007). Genome-Wide Screening of Genes Required for Swarming Motility in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol.
189: 950-957
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meslet-Cladiere, L. M., Pimenta, A., Duchaud, E., Holland, I. B., Blight, M. A.
(2004). In Vivo Expression of the Mannose-Resistant Fimbriae of Photorhabdus temperata K122 during Insect Infection. J. Bacteriol.
186: 611-622
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Martínez, A., Torello, S., Kolter, R.
(1999). Sliding Motility in Mycobacteria. J. Bacteriol.
181: 7331-7338
[Abstract]
[Full Text]