![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, July 1999, p. 4114-4117, Vol. 181, No. 13
Division of Cellular Biology, Department of
Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research
Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
Received 8 February 1999/Accepted 20 April 1999
Oligopeptides are transported into Bacillus subtilis by
two ABC transport systems, App and Opp. Transcription of the operon encoding the Opp system was found to occur during exponential growth,
whereas the app operon was induced at the onset of
stationary phase. Transcription of both operons was completely
curtailed by overproduction of the ScoC regulator from a multicopy
plasmid and was enhanced in strains with the scoC locus
deleted. ScoC, a member of the MarR family of transcription regulators,
is known from previous studies to be a negative regulator of
sporulation and of protease production that acts by binding directly to
the promoters of the genes it regulates. Since peptide transport is essential for inactivation of the negative regulation of sporulation by
Rap phosphatases, the control of ScoC transcription repression activity
plays a crucial role in the initiation of sporulation.
Initiation of sporulation is
regulated by the cellular level of the phosphorylated Spo0A
transcription factor produced by the phosphorelay signal transduction
system (3). Regulation of the Spo0A phosphorylation level
occurs by a combination of transcription control of key components of
the phosphorelay and regulation of the flow of phosphate through the
system (9). Control of phosphate flow through the
phosphorelay depends on a myriad of regulatory circuits which involve
kinases and phosphatases (19, 22).
Mutations in the opp oligopeptide transport system result in
decreased sporulation, suggesting that a peptide molecule of some kind
must be transported from outside the cell to complete a regulatory
circuit involved in the initiation of sporulation (25, 28).
In studies designed to identify the target of the transported peptide,
suppressors restoring sporulation in a strain with a deletion in the
opp operon were sought (12). The suppressors revealed the existence of genes for a second oligopeptide transport system, app, on the Bacillus subtilis chromosome.
The App system is inactive in the common laboratory strain BS168
because of a frameshift mutation in the gene for the peptide-binding
protein AppA. The App and Opp transport systems show some specificity differences; the Opp system, but not the App system, can transport tripeptides. Otherwise, there seem to be no specificity differences between the two systems for transport of tetra- or pentapeptides or the
peptides involved in sporulation or competence.
The targets of the peptides involved in sporulation have been clearly
delineated as the Rap phosphatases (22-24). Pentapeptides exported from the cell need to be reimported into the cell to complete
the regulatory circuit controlling Rap phosphatases, which prevent
sporulation by dephosphorylating the Spo0F~P phosphorelay component
(21). The sporulation defect of opp mutants of
BS168 results from the inability to transport the controlling
pentapeptides. Thus, oligopeptide transport systems are essential for
regulatory functions, as well as serving to nonspecifically transport
peptides for anabolic and catabolic purposes.
In the study reported here, the opp and app
operons were found to be differentially controlled by growth phase and
coregulated by the ScoC transcription factor. scoC was
originally described as a sporulation control locus (5) and
has also been known as hpr (8) and cat
(10).
In order to study the timing and level of transcription of both the
app and opp operons, promoter-bearing restriction
fragments from both operons were cloned in front of a promoterless
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
ScoC Regulates Peptide Transport and Sporulation
Initiation in Bacillus subtilis
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
-galactosidase gene and integrated into the amylase gene. The
strains used are described in Table 1.
Cultures were grown in Schaeffer's sporulation medium and sampled at
hourly intervals for determination of growth and -galactosidase
activity. Transcription from the opp promoter was observed
to increase during the growth phase up to T0, or the beginning of stationary phase (Fig.
1A). A spo0A mutation was
found to elevate the final level of transcription, and this stimulation
was due (at least partially) to AbrB, since a spo0A abrB
double mutant showed a lower rate than a spo0A mutant.
TABLE 1.
B. subtilis strains used in this study
View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
(A) Time course of -galactosidase activity of the
opp-lacZ fusion construct (representative of a typical
experiment) in the following strains: parental strain JH14279 (
),
spo0A12 mutant strain JH14280 (
),
abrB::Tn917 mutant strain JH14282
(
), and spo0A12 abrB::Tn917 mutant
strain JH14286 (
). Time zero is the time of transition from
vegetative growth to stationary phase. -Galactosidase activity in
strains harboring lacZ fusion constructs was assayed as
previously described (6). Specific activity is expressed in
Miller units (17). (B) Time course of -galactosidase
activity of the app-lacZ fusion construct (representative of
a typical experiment) in the following strains: parental strain JH14270
(), spo0A12 mutant strain JH14281 (),
abrB::Tn917 mutant strain JH14283
(), and spo0A12 abrB::Tn917 mutant
strain JH14285 ().
In contrast to opp, the app operon was not transcribed during the growth phase but was sharply induced about 30 min before T0 (Fig. 1B). A spo0A mutation in this case drastically reduced this induction, and expression in a spo0A abrB double mutant was stimulated above the wild-type level. This is the now-classical pattern of a promoter repressed by AbrB.
The effects of several sporulation genes on the transcription of the opp operon were tested with little or no evidence of a consistent pattern. However, a mutation in the scoC gene was found to stimulate transcription of the opp and app operons approximately twofold without affecting the timing of the transcription (Fig. 2).
|
The scoC mutation utilized here inactivates the functions of ScoC, suggesting that ScoC may repress transcription of the operon. To test this notion, expression of the opp operon was assayed in a strain bearing the scoC gene on a multicopy plasmid. In this strain, the expression of the opp operon was shut off and the strain bearing a similar plasmid containing only the promoter for scoC but not an intact scoC gene was unaffected in opp expression (Fig. 3A). This result mimics the effects of these plasmids on sporulation and protease production (26).
|
Identical experiments were carried out with a strain carrying an app-lacZ fusion. The scoC multicopy plasmid completely shut off expression of the app genes (Fig. 3B). The promoter-alone plasmid still expressed the app operon but, in this case, showed twofold less transcription than was observed in the strain with only the vector. Thus, ScoC is highly effective in repressing both of the oligopeptide permease operons.
The phenotypic effects of multicopy scoC on protease production and sporulation are reminiscent of the phenotypes resulting from SinR repression activity (7). SinR is known to repress sporulation when overexpressed, and it was shown to bind specifically to the spo0A promoter and to inhibit transcription of the spoIIG gene (4, 13). ScoC is known to bind to the promoter of SinI, which serves to regulate the activity of SinR (11). Therefore, multicopy scoC could exert its effects on the app and opp operons through SinR by repressing SinI expression. In order to test this possibility, app-lacZ and opp-lacZ fusions were constructed in a sinR mutant strain into which the multicopy scoC plasmid had been transformed. Both app expression (Fig. 4) and opp expression (data not shown) were unchanged by the sinR mutation.
|
In view of the importance of oligopeptide transport in the regulation of sporulation, it was of interest to understand the mechanisms controlling the expression of peptide uptake systems. The oligopeptide permease operon was expressed during the exponential phase of growth, reaching a maximum value at the beginning of stationary phase and decreasing thereafter. Expression was enhanced by the spo0A mutation, and some of the observed enhancement was lost in an abrB spo0A strain. In contrast, app transcription was induced at the end of growth and this expression was repressed by AbrB. Since AbrB levels are repressed by Spo0A~P, the level of phosphorylation of this sporulation regulator is a factor in determining whether the app operon is expressed. However, both operons must respond to other regulators to fully explain the growth phase dependence of each.
Deletion of the scoC locus results in enhanced expression of the app and opp operons, while a multicopy scoC plasmid represses both operons. Therefore ScoC is a repressor of oligopeptide uptake. The promoter regions of the app and opp operons contain consensus ScoC binding sites (11), but no promoter binding studies have been carried out to prove a direct interaction. Other, unidentified, regulators must be responsible for the timing of the expression of these operons and the observed growth phase dependence of their expression.
ScoC is a member of the MarR family of negative regulators named for their control of multiple antibiotic resistance genes in gram-negative bacteria (18). This family contains a conserved sequence of amino acid residues consistent with a similar tertiary structure for all members. Extrapolating from other members of the family, it appears that these regulators act in a negative fashion and are inactivated by small-molecule effectors. This would be consistent with the observed effects of scoC mutations on sporulation and on expression of proteases and oligopeptide permeases. In the absence of hypothetical effectors, ScoC is a repressor of sporulation acting in at least two ways: by repressing peptide permease synthesis, thereby allowing Rap phosphatases to short circuit the phosphorelay, and by repressing sinI transcription to allow uninhibited SinR to repress some sporulation genes. The end result is a deficiency of Spo0A~P needed to induce sporulation.
A sinR mutation does not overcome the sporulation deficiency of multicopy ScoC, indicating that SinR is not the major or only reason for the phenotype (11a). Loss of the oligopeptide transport systems due to a multicopy scoC plasmid predominantly affects the activity of the RapA phosphatase, since the sporulation deficiency of an opp app mutant is suppressed by a rapA mutation (27). However, a rapA deletion does not suppress sporulation in a strain bearing a multicopy scoC plasmid, indicating that ScoC has effects on other, unidentified sporulation genes (22a).
A major question left unanswered is the nature of the hypothetical effector molecule for ScoC. Based on the reactivity of certain members of the MarR family with phenolic compounds, it has been postulated that naturally occurring toxic compounds may be the effector molecules for this family of regulators (18). Mutations in scoC are known to relieve catabolite repression of sporulation, suggesting that catabolites may repress sporulation by preventing formation of the effector molecule for ScoC. There are no obvious candidates for this hypothetical effector of ScoC.
The reason this bacterium has two separate systems for oligopeptide uptake remains elusive. While the BS168 strain carries a frameshift mutation in the app operon, this is a peculiarity of the laboratory strain, as sequence studies of other B. subtilis strains (e.g., Bacillus natto) revealed the absence of this mutation (11a). Structural studies of the periplasmic oligopeptide binding protein OppA indicates there is little or no basis for amino acid sequence specificity in the active site of this protein (30). While substrate specificity may not be the reason for the redundancy in seemingly identical systems, regulation of transcription is different in the two systems, suggesting a requirement under all conditions of growth.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported, in part, by grants GM19416 and GM55594 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, USPHS.
We thank Mark Strauch for pointing out putative ScoC binding sites in the app promoter region.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, NX-1, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Phone: (858) 784-7905. Fax: (858) 784-7966. E-mail: hoch{at}scripps.edu.
Publication 12189-MEM from the Department of Molecular and
Experimental Medicine at The Scripps Research Institute.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Text
References
|
|---|
| 1. |
Anagnostopoulos, C., and J. Spizizen.
1961.
Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
81:741-746 |
| 2. |
Birnboim, H. C., and J. Doly.
1979.
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
7:1513-1523 |
| 3. | Burbulys, D., K. A. Trach, and J. A. Hoch. 1991. The initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by a multicomponent phosphorelay. Cell 64:545-552[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Cervin, M. A.,
R. J. Lewis,
J. A. Brannigan, and G. B. Spiegelman.
1998.
The Bacillus subtilis regulator SinR inhibits spoIIG promoter transcription in vitro without displacing RNA polymerase.
Nucleic Acids Res.
26:3806-3812 |
| 5. | Dod, B., and G. Balassa. 1978. Spore control (Sco) mutations in Bacillus subtilis. III. Regulation of extracellular protease synthesis in the spore control mutations Sco C. Mol. Gen. Genet. 163:57-63. |
| 6. |
Ferrari, E.,
D. J. Henner,
M. Perego, and J. A. Hoch.
1988.
Transcription of Bacillus subtilis subtilisin and expression of subtilisin in sporulation mutants.
J. Bacteriol.
170:289-295 |
| 7. |
Gaur, N. K.,
E. Dubnau, and I. Smith.
1986.
Characterization of a cloned Bacillus subtilis gene that inhibits sporulation in multiple copies.
J. Bacteriol.
168:860-869 |
| 8. |
Higerd, T. B.,
J. A. Hoch, and J. Spizizen.
1972.
Hyperprotease-producing mutants of Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
112:1026-1028 |
| 9. | Hoch, J. A. 1993. Regulation of the phosphorelay and the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:441-465[Medline]. |
| 10. | Ito, J., and J. Spizizen. 1973. Genetic studies of catabolite repression insensitive sporulation mutants of Bacillus subtilis. Colloq. Int. Cent. Nat. Rech. Sci. 227:81-82. |
| 11. |
Kallio, P. T.,
J. E. Fagelson,
J. A. Hoch, and M. A. Strauch.
1991.
The transition state regulator Hpr of Bacillus subtilis is a DNA-binding protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:13411-13417 |
| 11a. | Koide, A. Unpublished data. |
| 12. | Koide, A., and J. A. Hoch. 1994. Identification of a second oligopeptide transport system in Bacillus subtilis and determination of its role in sporulation. Mol. Microbiol. 13:417-426[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Mandic-Mulec, I.,
L. Doukhan, and I. Smith.
1998.
The Bacillus subtilis SinR protein is a repressor of the key sporulation gene spo0A.
J. Bacteriol.
177:4619-4627 |
| 14. |
Mandic-Mulec, I.,
N. Gaur,
U. Bai, and I. Smith.
1992.
Sin, a stage-specific repressor of cellular differentiation.
J. Bacteriol.
174:3561-3569 |
| 15. | Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook. 1982. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 16. | Marmur, J. 1961. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J. Mol. Biol. 3:208-218. |
| 17. | Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics, p. 352-355. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 18. | Miller, P. F., and M. C. Sulavik. 1996. Overlaps and parallels in the regulation of intrinsic multiple-antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 21:441-448[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Ohlsen, K. L.,
J. K. Grimsley, and J. A. Hoch.
1994.
Deactivation of the sporulation transcription factor Spo0A by the Spo0E protein phosphatase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:1756-1760 |
| 20. | Perego, M. 1993. Integrational vectors for genetic manipulation in Bacillus subtilis, p. 615-624. In A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 21. |
Perego, M.
1997.
A peptide export-import control circuit modulating bacterial development regulates protein phosphatases of the phosphorelay.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:8612-8617 |
| 22. | Perego, M. 1998. Kinase-phosphatase competition regulates Bacillus subtilis development. Trends Microbiol. 6:366-370[Medline]. |
| 22a. | Perego, M. Unpublished data. |
| 23. | Perego, M., P. Glaser, and J. A. Hoch. 1996. Aspartyl-phosphate phosphatases deactivate the response regulator components of the sporulation signal transduction system in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 19:1151-1157[Medline]. |
| 24. | Perego, M., C. G. Hanstein, K. M. Welsh, T. Djavakhishvili, P. Glaser, and J. A. Hoch. 1994. Multiple protein aspartate phosphatases provide a mechanism for the integration of diverse signals in the control of development in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 79:1047-1055[Medline]. |
| 25. | Perego, M., C. F. Higgins, S. R. Pearce, M. P. Gallagher, and J. A. Hoch. 1991. The oligopeptide transport system of Bacillus subtilis plays a role in the initiation of sporulation. Mol. Microbiol. 5:173-185[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Perego, M., and J. A. Hoch.
1988.
Sequence analysis and regulation of the hpr locus, a regulatory gene for protease production and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis.
J. Bacteriol.
170:2560-2567 |
| 27. |
Perego, M., and J. A. Hoch.
1996.
Cell-cell communication regulates the effects of protein aspartate phosphatases on the phosphorelay controlling development in Bacillus subtilis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:1549-1553 |
| 28. |
Rudner, D. Z.,
J. R. Ladeaux,
K. Breton, and A. D. Grossman.
1991.
The spo0K locus of Bacillus subtilis is homologous to the oligopeptide permease locus and is required for sporulation and competence.
J. Bacteriol.
173:1388-1398 |
| 29. | Schaeffer, P., J. Millet, and J. P. Aubert. 1965. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 54:701-711. |
| 30. |
Tame, J. R. H.,
G. N. Murshudov,
E. J. Dodson,
T. K. Neil,
G. G. Dodson,
C. F. Higgins, and A. J. Wilkinson.
1994.
The structural basis of sequence-independent peptide binding by OppA protein.
Science
264:1578-1581 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |
, parental strain
JH14279 or JH14270; 
, scoC::cat
mutant strain JH14272 or JH14271.
;
scoC promoter) was grown in Schaeffer's sporulation medium
containing chloramphenicol at 5 µg/ml. 