Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, July 1999, p. 4170-4175, Vol. 181, No. 14
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Increased rrn Gene Dosage Causes
Intermittent Transcription of rRNA in Escherichia
coli
Justina
Voulgaris,1
Sarah
French,2
Richard L.
Gourse,3
Craig
Squires,4 and
Catherine L.
Squires4,*
Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia
University, New York, New York 100271;
Department of Microbiology, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, Virginia 229082;
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
Wisconsin 537063; and Department of
Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of
Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 021114
Received 11 February 1999/Accepted 5 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
When the number of rRNA (rrn) operons in an
Escherichia coli cells is increased by adding an
rrn operon on a multicopy plasmid, the rate of rRNA
expression per operon is reduced to maintain a constant concentration
of rRNA in the cell. We have used electron microscopy to examine rRNA
transcription in cells containing a multicopy plasmid carrying
rrnB. We found that there were fewer RNA polymerase
molecules transcribing the rrn genes, as predicted from
previous gene dosage studies. Furthermore, RNA polymerase molecules
were arranged in irregularly spaced groups along the operon. No
apparent pause or transcription termination sites that would account
for the irregular spacing of the groups of polymerase molecules were
observed. We also found that the overall transcription elongation rate
was unchanged when the rrn gene dosage was increased. Our
data suggest that when rrn gene dosage is increased,
initiation events, or promoter-proximal elongation events, are
interrupted at irregular time intervals.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The synthesis of rRNA is a tightly
regulated process (reviewed in references 8 and
14). One approach to studying this regulation has
been to increase (18) or decrease (7) the gene
dosage of the rrn operons and observe the influence of this imbalance on rrn expression. Jinks-Robertson and coworkers
(18) demonstrated that, when the number of rrn
operons is increased by addition of rrnB or rrnD
on a multicopy plasmid, the rate of rRNA synthesis per cell remains the
same. They demonstrated that the maintenance of the same amount of rRNA
per cell, despite a greater number of rrn operons, is the
result of reduced expression from the individual rrn
operons. This reduction in expression from individual operons in the
presence of increased rrn gene dosage does not result from
limiting RNA polymerase concentration or from the titration of some
other protein factor required for rRNA transcription (7, 15, 18,
21, 28). The regulation of expression of the individual
rrn operons by an increase in rrn copy number was
termed feedback control, and it was proposed that an excess of
ribosomes might be the regulating factor. Later experiments suggested
that the overall translational capacity of the cell, not ribosome
concentration per se, is the effector of feedback control
(6).
Gourse and coworkers (13) isolated various DNA fragments
containing rrn regulatory regions and fused them to a
lacZ reporter gene to show that the P1 promoter is necessary
and sufficient as a target for feedback control. These authors proposed
that feedback control is the mechanism by which growth rate-dependent control of rRNA transcription is achieved. Growth rate-dependent control is the process by which the rate of synthesis of rRNA per unit
amount of protein increases with the square of the growth rate
(19).
Reduction of rrn gene dosage has also been studied. Condon
and coworkers (7) showed that deleting four of the seven
rrn operons led to a 2.3-fold increase in expression from
the remaining operons. They showed by electron microscopy that part of
the increase in expression was the result of loading more RNA
polymerase molecules onto the remaining operons. In addition, they
found an increase in the transcription elongation rate and proposed
that this increased rate would allow faster promoter clearance, making
room for additional initiating RNA polymerase molecules and thus
enhancing the increase in initiation (7, 8).
Recently, Gaal and coworkers (11) proposed that the
concentration of the initiating nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) might be
an effector of growth rate-dependent control. These authors showed that
rrn P1 promoters require higher concentrations of the
initiating NTP (GTP for rrnD and ATP for the remaining six rrn operons) than typical promoters to stabilize the
promoter open complex. They found that ATP and GTP concentrations
increased with increasing growth rate and that this increase was
correlated with increased synthesis of rRNA. Their model suggests that
when the rrn gene dosage is increased, initially the
production of excess rRNA leads to increased translational activity and
hence increased consumption of ATP and GTP. The drop in ATP and GTP concentrations would then reduce transcription at the rrn
promoters, resulting in the observed decrease in expression.
In this study, we have used electron microscopy to compare cells
containing the normal number of rrn operon copies with cells harboring an rrnB operon on a multicopy plasmid and thus
containing more copies per cell. We show that in the control strain the
RNA polymerase molecules were regularly spaced along the operon. In the
rrn plasmid-containing strain, polymerase molecules were
arranged in groups that were unevenly distributed along the
rrn operons with large gaps of DNA lacking polymerases
between groups. We termed this phenomenon "gapping." Gapping did
not result from specific pausing or termination sites within the
structural genes, nor was it the result of a change in the overall
transcription elongation rate. In addition, we confirmed that the
number of RNA polymerase molecules on the operons of the strain
containing the rrn plasmid was reduced relative to that for
the strain containing the normal number of rrn operons
(13, 18). We propose that increased rrn gene
dosage results in intermittent interruptions of transcription at the
promoter-proximal end of the rrn operon, causing the
observed gapped arrangement of polymerases on the DNA.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and plasmids.
All experiments were done in the host
strain HB101 (pro leu thi lacY hsdR hsdM endA recA rpsL20 ara-14
galK2 xyl-5 mtl-1 supE44) (2). Plasmid pNO1301 is a
pBR322 derivative that contains the entire rrnB operon
(18). Plasmid pBR322 was from Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.
(Piscataway, N.J.).
Electron microscopy.
Miller chromatin spreads were prepared
from strains grown at 37°C to mid-log phase in Luria-Bertani medium
with 50 to 60 µg of ampicillin per ml. Growth rates were 1.3 doublings per h for the strain containing pBR322 and 1.2 doublings per
h for the strain containing pNO1301. Cells were harvested, lysed, and
centrifuged onto carbon-coated electron microscope grids, as described
by French and Miller (10). Grids were viewed in a JEOL 100C
transmission electron microscope. rRNA operons were identified by their
"double Christmas tree" morphology. Measurements of RNA polymerase
distributions were made from printed micrographs by using a Numonics
Corporation (Montgomeryville, Pa.) 2200 digitizer tablet and Jandel
Scientific (San Rafael, Calif.) SigmaScan software. Measurements in
centimeters were converted to kilobases by using Ernest F. Fullman,
Inc. (Latham, N.Y.), replica gratings (2,160 lines/µm) or by using
the lengths of rRNA operons as internal standards. Calculations were
based on a value of 2.94 kb/µm for B-form DNA (27) and a
compaction ratio of 1.2 to 1.3 times the B-form DNA length for
bacterial chromatin (10).
RNA dot blot analysis.
Cultures were grown at 37°C in MOPS
(morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) minimal media supplemented with 0.2%
glucose, 0.5% Casamino Acids, and 10 µg of thiamine per ml and
containing 200 µg of ampicillin per ml. Growth rates were 1.4 doublings per h for the strain containing pBR322 and 1.2 doublings per
h for the strain containing pNO1301. Total RNA was isolated from
log-phase cultures with an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, Calif.). RNA
(0.5 to 2.0 µg) was deposited on duplicate Zeta-Probe GT nylon
membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.) and UV cross-linked.
Oligonucleotides complementary to tRNATrp or
rpoB RNA were 5'-end labeled with 32P by using
T4 kinase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) and [
-32P]ATP. Hybridization and washing procedures were
as described by Sambrook et al. (23). Hybridization of
probes to the immobilized RNA was measured on a Molecular Dynamics
(Sunnyvale, Calif.) PhosphorImager. Values for binding of the
tRNATrp probe were normalized by using values obtained with
the rpoB probe.
Rate of rrn transcription elongation.
rRNA chain
elongation rates were measured by an adaptation of the method of Molin
(20). Cells were grown at 37°C in MOPS medium supplemented
with 0.2% glucose, 0.5% Casamino Acids, 10 µg of thiamine per ml,
and 30 µg of tryptophan per ml and containing 200 µg of ampicillin
per ml. When the optical density at 420 nm was 0.15, the cultures were
labeled with [14C]adenine (1 µCi/ml, 287 mCi/mmol;
Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.). After an additional two generations
(optical density at 420 nm, 0.6), the cultures were labeled with
[3H]adenine (20 µCi/ml, 30 Ci/mmol; ICN, Irvine,
Calif.). Rifampin (100 µg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) was added at the
same time as the [3H]adenine. One-milliliter samples were
taken every 10 s and pipetted into 0.4 ml of boiling lysis buffer
(1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 mM NaCl, 8 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]). After
4 min in the lysis buffer, RNA was purified by phenol extraction, DNase
treatment, and ethanol precipitation. The RNA was hybridized in
duplicate to a Zeta-Probe GT nylon membrane containing 1.6 µg of a
111-bp DNA probe for tRNATrp. The probe was generated by
PCR from plasmids containing the rrnC operon and was
purified on an agarose gel before being deposited on and cross-linked
to the membrane.
 |
RESULTS |
Electron microscopy provides a direct means of observing
transcriptional activity in cells and can reveal patterns not readily detected by biochemical methods. In this work, we used electron microscopy to study the changes in transcription of the rrn
operons under the condition of increased rrn gene dosage. We
found changes in both the pattern and number of RNA polymerase
molecules on these operons. We also determined that the change in
pattern was not caused by an overall change in transcription elongation
rate or by transcription arrest at specific sites in the structural genes.
Influence of rrn dosage on the distribution of
transcribing RNA polymerases.
To determine how an increase in
rrn gene dosage might influence the transcription pattern of
the rrn operons, we prepared chromatin spreads from strains
containing either pNO1301, which carries the entire rrnB
operon, or pBR322, the control vector. In Miller chromatin spreads,
rrn operons can be identified by their distinctive "double
Christmas tree" morphology (Fig. 1A). In the strain containing the control vector pBR322, the RNA polymerase molecules were positioned regularly along the rrn operons
(Fig. 1A). In the strain containing the rrnB plasmid
pNO1301, however, we observed large regions of the rrn DNA
that were devoid of RNA polymerases (compare Fig. 1A with B and C; Fig.
2). We termed this phenomenon
"gapping." The gaps were irregularly distributed along the
chromosome, separating groups of transcribing RNA polymerases. The
lengths of both gaps and groups varied considerably.

View larger version (206K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Electron micrographs of rrn operons from
plasmid-containing strains. (A) Chromosomal rrn operon from
strain containing pBR322; (B) plasmid rrnB operon from
strain containing pNO1301; (C) chromosomal operon from strain
containing pNO1301. rrn operons are 5.5 kb in length.
|
|

View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Chromosomal rrn operons from the strain
containing pNO1301. The identity of several of the rrn
operons can be determined by their proximity to certain structural
genes with characteristic transcript patterns (10). The
operons pictured here are rrnD (A), rrnB (B), and
rrnE (C). rrn operons are 5.5 kb in length.
|
|
Distribution of RNA polymerase molecules in a strain with pNO1302
(
18), a derivative of pNO1301 in which an internal portion
of the
rrn operon is deleted, was similar to distribution of
RNA
polymerase molecules in the strain containing pBR322 (data not
shown). This result is consistent with the observations that expression
of intact rRNA is required for feedback (
15,
18) and that
gapping results from
feedback.
To quantify the observed gapping, we arbitrarily defined a gap as a
space that would accommodate three or more RNA polymerase
molecules.
Sixty-three percent of the
rrn operons in the strain
containing pNO1301 (373 operons observed) showed gaps, versus
only 23%
of the
rrn operons in the strains containing pBR322 (287
operons observed). Furthermore, there was an average of four gaps
on
both the chromosomal and plasmid operons in the strain containing
pNO1301, compared to less than one gap per operon in the strain
containing
pBR322.
The gap lengths ranged from 250 to 1,000 bp, with most lengths between
250 and 500 bp (Fig.
3). While gap and
group lengths
were highly dispersed, the interpolymerase distance
within groups
in the strain containing pNO1301 remained similar to the
interpolymerase
distance found in the pBR322 strain (approximately 60 bp) (Fig.
4). This result showed that the
difference in the number of RNA
polymerase molecules per operon (see
below) was accounted for
by the gaps and not by an average increase in
the distance between
polymerases.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Size gaps observed on the rrn operons. A gap
is defined as the space that would be filled by three RNA polymerase
molecules, which is about 240 bp measured from the center of the RNA
polymerase preceding the gap to the center of the RNA polymerase
following the gap. (We used 60 bp, the mode of interpolymerase distance
on rrn operons from the strain containing pBR322 [Fig. 4],
as the space occupied by one RNA polymerase molecule.) (A) Chromosomal
rrn operons in strain containing pBR322 (n = 19 operons measured); (B) chromosomal operons in strain containing
pNO1301 (n = 30); (C) plasmid rrnB operons
in strain containing pNO1301 (n = 16).
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Interpolymerase spacing, determined by measuring the
distance from polymerase center to polymerase center between adjacent
RNA polymerase molecules. (A) pBR322 (n = 19 operons
measured); (B) pNO1301 (n = 28).
|
|
Distribution of gaps along the DNA.
If specific pause or
termination sites caused some RNA polymerases to fall off the DNA,
creating a gap in the polymerase distribution, we would expect to see
the gaps at the same sites on the many rrn operons observed.
We found, however, that the gaps did not consistently appear at any
particular region along the rrn operons (Fig.
5). This result suggested that neither
pausing nor termination at a specific site caused the gapping
phenomenon. However, we might not have detected a pause if it occurred
in the first few hundred base pairs of the operon.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Gaps between groups of RNA polymerase molecules are
randomly distributed along the operon and are not correlated with any
specific site. The y axis shows the total number of
polymerases observed at 110-bp intervals along the rrn
operons, assuming an average rrn operon length of 5.5 kb.
(A) Strain containing pBR322 (n = 19 chromosomal
operons); (B) strain containing pNO1301 (n = 30).
|
|
Transcription elongation rate.
We measured the rate of
transcription elongation in both strains to determine if a change in
elongation rate in the strain containing pNO1301 could explain the
gapping. The rate of appearance of tRNATrp in the strains
containing pNO1301 and pBR322 was measured. The gene for
tRNATrp is found only once on the Escherichia
coli genome, at the 3' end of rrnC, and it is
transcribed as part of the rrnC operon (Fig.
6A). Cell cultures were first uniformly
labeled with [14C]adenine. Two generations after the
14C labeling, the cultures were labeled with
[3H]adenine and transcription initiation was inhibited by
the addition of rifampin. This experiment measured the average
elongation rate of the RNA polymerase molecules that are present on the
operon at the time of rifampin addition. Only polymerases that were
engaged in transcription at the time of the [3H]adenine
and rifampin addition could polymerize 3H-labeled RNA.
Samples were taken every 10 s, and total cellular RNA was isolated
and hybridized to an unlabeled DNA probe for tRNATrp. The
3H signal at successive time points increased until the
promoter-proximal polymerase reached the end of rrnC and
transcribed tRNATrp. After the promoter-proximal polymerase
reaches the end of the operon, no further increase in 3H
signal should occur; thus, the time taken to reach the plateau shown in
Fig. 6B equals the time necessary to transcribe the entire length of
rrnC. We found that rrnC transcription elongation
times were identical in the strains containing either pNO1301 or
pBR322, both reaching the plateau in 70 s, yielding an elongation
rate of 78 nucleotides (nt)/s (Fig. 6B) (see Discussion for calculation of elongation rate). We concluded that the gapping observed by electron
microscopy was unrelated to the overall rate of transcription elongation.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
(A) Schematic of the rrnC operon. Note the
unique tRNATrp gene at the 3' end of the operon. (B)
Transcription elongation rates of the rrnC operons in the
strains containing either pNO1301 (circles) or pBR322 (squares).
Although the steady-state level of tRNATrp in the strain
containing pNO1301 was about 30% lower than that in the strain
containing pBR322, the plateaus are at the same value in this plot
because both the 3H and 14C values are
measurements of the tRNATrp levels; the
3H/14C corrected value cancels out the
difference between the two strains. The uncorrected plots for
3H and for 14C both showed a 0.7-fold
difference in the level of tRNATrp (data not shown),
suggesting that rRNA stability did not differ between the two
strains.
|
|
Influence of rrn gene dosage on number of RNA
polymerases per operon.
From the electron micrographs used to
measure RNA polymerase gapping, we counted the number of RNA polymerase
molecules per ribosomal operon. The number (mean ± standard
deviation) of RNA polymerase molecules on the operons in the strain
containing pNO1301 was 46 ± 9, compared to an average of 70 ± 11 RNA polymerase molecules on the operons in the strain containing
pBR322. Thus, as measured by electron microscopy, the number of RNA
polymerase molecules per rrn operon resulting from the
increased gene dosage was 66% of that observed for a strain not
subject to increased gene dosage.
Using RNA dot blot analysis of rRNA synthesis, we found that the
reduced number of RNA polymerases per operon was proportional
to the
reduction of rRNA produced per operon in the strain containing
pNO1301.
Total cellular RNA was probed with a
32P-labeled
oligonucleotide complementary to tRNA
Trp. Because the
unique copy of the tRNA
Trp gene is in
rrnC, the
level of tRNA
Trp expression reflected the level of
expression of the
rrnC operon.
We found that the level of
expression of
rrnC in the strain containing
pNO1301 was 69% ± 7% of that in the strain containing pBR322.
This relative decrease
in
rrnC expression in the strain containing
the
rrn plasmid, as measured by RNA dot blot analysis, was in
excellent agreement with the ratio of the number of RNA polymerase
molecules in the strain containing pNO1301 to that in the strain
containing pBR322, as described above, and is consistent with
earlier
measurements (
12,
13,
18).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have provided a picture of the rrn
transcription process while the operons are being down-regulated by
feedback control. The major features of this picture are as follows.
(i) RNA polymerases were distributed along the DNA in groups that were
separated by gaps. (ii) Polymerase groups and gaps were unevenly distributed on the DNA with no indication of postinitiation pause or
termination sites. (iii) The polymerases moved at the same transcription elongation rate in the presence of feedback control as in
its absence. (iv) Finally, feedback-controlled rrn operons had decreased numbers of polymerases on their DNA. Although this picture does not identify the mechanism underlying feedback control, it
does eliminate pausing and termination within the structural genes as
possible causes. Our results are most consistent with a model in which
intermittent initiation or clearance of the promoter-proximal region
leads to a pattern of RNA polymerase gapping and grouping, fewer
polymerases per operon, and, consequently, reduced transcription per operon.
Polymerase gapping as a promoter-proximal event.
Our failure
to observe unique sites where polymerases either are backed up (pause
sites) or fall off (termination sites) has ruled out the possibility of
elongation control features over most of the operon. This includes
antitermination, since a defect in this system results in a clear
polarity of expression of the 16S and 23S genes (1, 17, 22).
We did not observe recurring gaps at any specific sites in the 373 operons examined, and there was no progressive 5'-3' decrease in
numbers of polymerases that would be indicative of polarity (Fig. 5).
In addition, the fact that we found no change in the transcription rate
during feedback control also argues against regulation via the
antitermination system. The BoxA motif of the antitermination system
increases the overall transcription elongation rate of RNA polymerase
(25). We therefore would have expected that down-regulation
of antitermination would have reduced the rate of transcription.
Within groups of polymerases in feedback-controlled cells, we found
that the average interpolymerase distance was identical
to the
interpolymerase distance in non-feedback-controlled cells
(60 nt). We
have previously noted that interpolymerase distances
can be shorter
than we observed here, as demonstrated by a strain
in which four of the
seven
rrn operons are deleted (
7), suggesting
that different control mechanisms may be involved when
rrn
operons
are in excess as opposed to deficit. The unaltered
interpolymerase
distance and the unaltered overall rate of
transcription further
suggest that the elongation process is not
influenced by the mechanism
that causes
gapping.
The cultures examined in this work were grown in rich media. The
feedback response has been observed in cultures grown in
minimal media
(
13,
18). However, when a strain without an
rrn-containing plasmid was cultured in minimal medium, RNA
polymerase
molecules appeared more widely spaced on the DNA and gaps
were
not readily apparent (
9). One interpretation of these
data
is that nutrient limitation reduces the number of RNA polymerases
per operon by a different mechanism than does an increase in
rrn gene dosage. Another interpretation is that the gapping
phenomenon
occurs only within a limited range of rRNA transcription
initiation
frequencies and that during nutrient limitation the additive
effects
of negative feedback and lower growth rate put the rRNA
initiation
frequency outside of the limited range in which gapping can
occur.
Our results are consistent with the location of the feedback control
mechanism at some promoter-proximal feature, e.g., the
P1 promoter, and
are inconsistent with control via blockages to
elongation that occur
beyond the control region. Feedback-controlled
cells load polymerases
onto the DNA in groups of several polymerases
at a time separated by
gaps during which no loading occurs. The
rate at which individual
polymerases traverse the entire
rrn operon
and the
interpolymerase distance within groupings are identical
in both
feedback-controlled and non-feedback-controlled cells.
The same
molecular event that inhibits transcription initiation
at the P1
promoter and therefore accounts for the reduced number
of RNA
polymerase molecules per operon observed in feedback-controlled
cells
could lead to the gapping observed here. It is also possible
that gaps
occur because promoter-proximal elongation events are
affected by the
reduction in transcription
initiation.
Possible effectors of the gapping phenomenon.
We propose that
gapping is caused by events at or near the 5' end of the rrn
operon, such as promoter-proximal elongation blockage or fluctuating
concentrations of an effector molecule that influences initiation.
Recent evidence (11) suggests that the concentrations of ATP
and GTP, which change with the growth rate, may play an important role
in regulation of the rrn operons and could explain feedback
control. If feedback control results from this "NTP-sensing"
mechanism, the gaps that we observed in the presence of increased
rrn gene dosage could reflect fluctuations in the
concentration of NTPs available for initiation. However, it has not yet
been established that feedback inhibition results from regulation by
the concentration of the initiating NTP (26). Therefore,
other effectors and processes could be involved, directly or
indirectly, in the gapping process, e.g., including, ppGpp, which has
been implicated in many rrn control schemes (5), or promoter opening and closing, which might be controlled by a
cooperative mechanism in which the first polymerase initiates with
difficulty (low probability) and subsequent polymerases initiate more
easily (16).
Estimating the gap time between bursts of transcription.
Under
feedback control conditions, we found that transcription of rRNA is
intermittently turned on and off, as demonstrated by the gaps along the
DNA between groups of RNA polymerase molecules. For the purpose of
modeling, we use the term "initiation" to refer to events that
occur within the first 120 bp of the operon. We have calculated the
average frequency of initiation and then estimated the time between
grouped initiation events. The average initiation frequency was
calculated as the number of polymerases on the operon (electron
microscopy data) divided by the time it takes one polymerase to
transcribe the operon (transcription rate data). Thus, for the strain
containing pNO1301, the frequency of initiation was about 46 polymerases/70 s, or 0.66 initiation/s, compared to 70 polymerases/70 s
(1.0 initiation/s) for the strain containing pBR322. The
rrnC initiation rate for the strain containing pBR322 is
close to that found by Condon et al. (7) in a different wild-type strain that did not carry a plasmid (0.88 initiation/s).
The time between grouped initiations that results in the gaps between
RNA polymerase molecules can then be estimated. The
rrnC
operon is 5,450 bp long. Thus, the rate of transcription
elongation by
RNA polymerase was 5,450 nt/70 s (78 nt/s), within
the range of values
determined by other workers (70 to 90 nt/s)
(
3,
7,
20,
24).
At an elongation rate of 78 nt/s and
a gap length range of 250 to 1,000 bp, the time between groups
of initiation events, i.e., the gap time,
was 3 to 13 s. Such
remarkably slow recovery times are consistent
with the control
of the initiation process by polymerase cooperativity
as mentioned
above (
16). Such a control mechanism has been
simulated by Bremer
and Ehrenberg and matches our observed gapping well
when a low
probability of initiation is used for the first polymerase
and
subsequent polymerases are initiated with a higher probability
(
4).
Summary.
We have shown here that in the presence of an
rrn-containing plasmid, both the number and distribution of
RNA polymerase molecules transcribing the rrn operons change
relative to that observed in a wild-type cell. We showed that the
gapped distribution of the RNA polymerase molecules in the strain with
increased rrn gene dosage is not related to specific pause
or termination sites or to a change in the overall elongation rate. Our
data suggest that the timing between the groups of RNA polymerases is
determined at the early stages of transcription (initiation or
immediate promoter-proximal events) of the rrn operons.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank H. Bremer for communicating his computer simulations of
cooperative RNA polymerase initiation and M. Gottesman for generously
hosting J.V. in his laboratory.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM24751
to C.L.S. and GM37048 to R.L.G.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of
Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. Phone: (617) 636-6947. Fax: (617) 636-0337. E-mail:
csquires_rib{at}opal.tufts.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aksoy, S.,
C. L. Squires, and C. Squires.
1984.
Evidence for antitermination in Escherichia coli rRNA transcription.
J. Bacteriol.
159:260-264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bolivar, F., and K. Backman.
1979.
Plasmids of Escherichia coli as cloning vectors.
Methods Enzymol.
68:245-267[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bremer, H., and P. P. Dennis.
1996.
Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate, p. 1553-1569.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 4.
|
Bremer, H., and M. Ehrenberg.
1995.
Guanosine tetraphosphate as a global regulator of bacterial RNA synthesis: a model involving RNA polymerase pausing and queuing.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1262:15-36[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cashel, M.,
D. R. Gentry,
V. J. Hernandez, and D. Vinella.
1996.
The stringent response, p. 1458-1496.
In
F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 6.
|
Cole, J. R.,
C. L. Olsson,
J. W. B. Hershey,
M. Grunberg-Manago, and M. Nomura.
1987.
Feedback regulation of rRNA synthesis in Escherichia coli: requirement for initiation factor IF2.
J. Mol. Biol.
198:383-392[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Condon, C.,
S. French,
C. Squires, and C. L. Squires.
1993.
Depletion of functional ribosomal RNA operons in Escherichia coli causes increased expression of the remaining intact copies.
EMBO J.
12:4305-4315[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Condon, C.,
C. Squires, and C. L. Squires.
1995.
Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli.
Microbiol. Rev.
59:623-645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
| French, S. L. Unpublished results.
|
| 10.
|
French, S. L., and O. L. Miller, Jr.
1989.
Transcription mapping of the Escherichia coli chromosome by electron microscopy.
J. Bacteriol.
171:4207-4216[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gaal, T.,
M. S. Bartlett,
W. Ross,
C. L. Turnbough, Jr., and R. L. Gourse.
1997.
Transcription regulation by initiating NTP concentration: rRNA synthesis in bacteria.
Science
278:2092-2097[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Gaal, T., and R. L. Gourse.
1990.
Guanosine 3'-diphosphate 5'-diphosphate is not required for growth rate-dependent control of rRNA synthesis in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:5533-5537[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gourse, R. L.,
H. A. de Boer, and M. Nomura.
1986.
DNA determinants of rRNA synthesis in E. coli: growth rate dependent regulation, feedback inhibition, upstream activation, antitermination.
Cell
44:197-205[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Gourse, R. L.,
T. Gaal,
M. S. Bartlett,
J. A. Appleman, and W. Ross.
1996.
rRNA transcription and growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in Escherichia coli.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
50:645-677[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Gourse, R. L.,
Y. Takebe,
R. A. Sharrock, and M. Nomura.
1985.
Feedback regulation of rRNA and tRNA synthesis and accumulation of free ribosomes after conditional expression of rRNA genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:1069-1073[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Guptasarma, P.
1996.
Cooperative relaxation of supercoils and periodic transcriptional initiation within polymerase batteries.
Bioessays
18:325-332[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Heinrich, T.,
C. Condon,
T. Pfeiffer, and R. K. Hartmann.
1995.
Point mutations in the leader boxA of a plasmid-encoded Escherichia coli rrnB operon cause defective antitermination in vivo.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3793-3800[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Jinks-Robertson, S.,
R. L. Gourse, and M. Nomura.
1983.
Expression of rRNA and tRNA genes in Escherichia coli: evidence for feedback regulation by products of rRNA operons.
Cell
33:865-876[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Maaloe, O., and N. O. Kjeldgaard.
1966.
Control of macromolecular synthesis: a study of DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis in bacteria.
Benjamin, New York, N.Y.
|
| 20.
|
Molin, S.
1976.
Ribosomal RNA chain elongation rates in Escherichia coli, p. 333-339.
In
N. Kjeldgaard, and O. Maaloe (ed.), Control of ribosome synthesis (Alfred Benzon Symposium IX). Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Nomura, M.,
D. M. Bedwell,
M. Yamagishi,
J. R. Cole, and J. M. Kolb.
1987.
RNA polymerase and regulation of RNA synthesis in Escherichia coli: RNA polymerase concentration, stringent control, and ribosome feedback regulation, p. 137-149.
In
W. S. Reznikoff, R. R. Burgess, J. E. Dahlberg, C. A. Gross, M. T. Record, Jr., and M. P. Wickens (ed.), RNA polymerase and the regulation of transcription. Elsevier, New York, N.Y.
|
| 22.
|
Pfeiffer, T., and R. K. Hartmann.
1997.
Role of the spacer BoxA of Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA operons in efficient 23 S rRNA synthesis in vivo.
J. Mol. Biol.
265:385-393[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., p. 754-755.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 24.
|
Vogel, U., and K. F. Jensen.
1994.
The RNA chain elongation rate in Escherichia coli depends on the growth rate.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2807-2813[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Vogel, U., and K. F. Jensen.
1995.
Effects of the antiterminator Box A on transcription elongation kinetics and ppGpp inhibition of transcription elongation in Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:18335-18340[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
| Voulgaris, J., et al. Unpublished results.
|
| 27.
|
Watson, J. D., and F. H. C. Crick.
1953.
The structure of DNA.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
18:123-130[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Yamagishi, M.,
H. A. de Boer, and M. Nomura.
1987.
Feedback regulation of rRNA synthesis: a mutational alteration in the anti-Shine-Dalgarno region of the 16 S rRNA gene abolishes regulation.
J. Mol. Biol.
198:547-550[Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, July 1999, p. 4170-4175, Vol. 181, No. 14
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Dennis, P. P., Ehrenberg, M., Fange, D., Bremer, H.
(2009). Varying Rate of RNA Chain Elongation during rrn Transcription in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol.
191: 3740-3746
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cabrera, J. E., Jin, D. J.
(2006). Active Transcription of rRNA Operons Is a Driving Force for the Distribution of RNA Polymerase in Bacteria: Effect of Extrachromosomal Copies of rrnB on the In Vivo Localization of RNA Polymerase. J. Bacteriol.
188: 4007-4014
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, K., Holland-Staley, C. A., Cunningham, P. R.
(2001). Genetic Approaches to Studying Protein Synthesis: Effects of Mutations at {Psi}516 and A535 in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. J. Nutr.
131: 2994S-3004
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Voulgaris, J., Pokholok, D., Holmes, W. M., Squires, C., Squires, C. L.
(2000). The Feedback Response of Escherichia coli rRNA Synthesis Is Not Identical to the Mechanism of Growth Rate-Dependent Control. J. Bacteriol.
182: 536-539
[Abstract]
[Full Text]