Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 1999, p. 4216-4222, Vol. 181, No. 14
Department of Biochemistry, The University of
Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
39216-4505,1 and Department of Molecular
Cell Physiology, BioCentrum Amsterdam, Free University, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands2
Received 17 February 1999/Accepted 3 May 1999
The biosynthesis of methylamine dehydrogenase (MADH) from
Paracoccus denitrificans requires four genes in addition to
those that encode the two structural protein subunits, mauB
and mauA. The accessory gene products appear to be required
for proper export of the protein to the periplasm, synthesis of the
tryptophan tryptophylquinone (TTQ) prosthetic group, and formation of
several structural disulfide bonds. To accomplish the heterologous
expression of correctly assembled MADH, eight genes from the
methylamine utilization gene cluster of P. denitrificans,
mauFBEDACJG, were placed under the regulatory control of
the coxII promoter of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and introduced into R. sphaeroides by using a
broad-host-range vector. The heterologous expression of MADH was
constitutive with respect to carbon source, whereas the native
mau promoter allows induction only when cells are grown in
the presence of methylamine as a sole carbon source and is repressed by
other carbon sources. The recombinant MADH was localized exclusively in
the periplasm, and its physical, spectroscopic, kinetic and redox
properties were indistinguishable from those of the enzyme isolated
from P. denitrificans. These results indicate that
mauM and mauN are not required for MADH or TTQ
biosynthesis and that mauFBEDACJG are sufficient for TTQ
biosynthesis, since R. sphaeroides cannot synthesize TTQ. A
similar construct introduced into Escherichia coli did not
produce detectable MADH activity or accumulation of the
mauB and mauA gene products but did lead to
synthesizes of amicyanin, the mauC gene product. This
finding suggests that active recombinant MADH is not expressed in
E. coli because one of the accessory gene products is not
functionally expressed. This study illustrates the potential utility of
R. sphaeroides and the coxII promoter for
heterologous expression of complex enzymes such as MADH which cannot be
expressed in E. coli. These results also provide the
foundation for future studies on the molecular mechanisms of MADH and
TTQ biosynthesis, as well as a system for performing site-directed
mutagenesis of the MADH gene and other mau genes.
Tryptophan tryptophylquinone (TTQ)
is the prosthetic group of methylamine dehydrogenase (MADH) from
several methylotrophic and autotrophic bacteria (13, 14, 20)
and aromatic amine dehydrogenase from Alcaligenes faecalis
(18). TTQ is formed by the posttranslational modification of
two tryptophan residues of the polypeptide chain. Two atoms of oxygen
are incorporated into the indole ring of one of the tryptophan
residues, and a covalent bond is formed between the indole rings of the
two tryptophan residues (22) (Fig.
1). The mechanism by which MADH
biosynthesis occurs is not known, but it does require the action of
other proteins, the expression of which is subject to the same genetic
regulation as the structural genes for the enzyme. The methylamine
utilization (mau) gene cluster of Paracoccus
denitrificans contains several genes (Table
1), at least four of which encode
proteins that are required for biosynthesis of MADH, in addition to the
two MADH structural genes (10, 28). Thus, the heterologous
expression of recombinant MADH cannot be accomplished by simply cloning
the MADH structural genes and introducing them into another host. Homologous expression of a single mau structural gene in
P. denitrificans after inactivation of the corresponding
chromosomal gene is also problematic because of the nature of the
native mau promoter. MADH is expressed only when P. denitrificans is grown on methylamine as a sole source of carbon.
The mau genes are repressed in the presence of any other
carbon source, such as succinate or methanol (20, 28). Since
a primary reason for developing an expression system for MADH is to
perform site-directed mutagenesis to study structure-function
relationships, it is not feasible for the expression system to require
active MADH for growth. It would then be impossible to produce any MADH
mutants which lacked sufficient activity to support cell growth. These
concerns necessitated construction of an expression system which lacked
the native MADH regulatory element and included all genes required for
the complete synthesis of MADH under the control of a different
promoter which was not controlled by methylamine levels.
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Heterologous Expression of Correctly Assembled
Methylamine Dehydrogenase in Rhodobacter
sphaeroides
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Structure of TTQ. The residue numbers for the two
gene-encoded tryptophan residues which are modified to form TTQ are for
the enzyme from P. denitrificans.
TABLE 1.
Functions of mau genes
As a first step toward elucidating the molecular details of the mechanism of TTQ biosynthesis and performing structure-function studies of MADH by site-directed mutagenesis, we have developed a system for the heterologous expression of correctly assembled MADH that is constitutive with respect to carbon source. Rhodobacter sphaeroides was chosen as a host because it is phylogenetically similar to P. denitrificans (32) but does not utilize methylamine as a carbon source (23). Since this organism has not routinely been used for heterologous expression of foreign proteins, a novel expression vector was designed. The coxII promoter for subunit II of cytochrome oxidase from R. sphaeroides was used to control the expression of the necessary components of the P. denitrificans mau gene cluster. This promoter is regulated by oxygen concentration and is unaffected by carbon source (7). We report here that expression of P. denitrificans genes mauFBEDACJG in R. sphaeroides yields the synthesis of active MADH which is indistinguishable from the native MADH of P. denitrificans. When a similar construct with mauFBEDACJG was placed in Escherichia coli, amicyanin, the mauC gene product, was expressed but MADH was not detected. The likely reasons for this are discussed.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Growth of cells and media.
The bacterial strains and
plasmids used in this study are listed in Table
2. For molecular biology experiments,
E. coli cells were grown in liquid culture or on agar plates
in LB medium at 37°C, and R. sphaeroides and P. denitrificans cells were grown in Sistrom's medium A
(26) at 30°C. For expression of recombinant proteins, the
following growth media were used. E. coli BL21(DE3) cells
were grown aerobically at 30°C in LB medium, supplemented with 100 µM CuSO4. When expression of proteins was under the
control of the lac promoter, 1.6 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added
4 h prior to harvesting. These conditions have previously been
shown to optimize plasmid-driven amicyanin production in these cells
(15). P. denitrificans and R. sphaeroides were grown aerobically at 30°C in mineral salts
medium (8), supplemented with 0.6 mM NaHCO3, 1.6 µM CuSO4, 0.5 g of yeast extract per liter, and 50 mM succinate as a carbon source. When appropriate, antibiotics were
added to the following final concentrations: ampicillin, 100 µg/ml;
spectinomycin, 50 µg/ml; streptomycin, 50 µg/ml; kanamycin, 25 µg/ml; and tetracycline, 10 µg/ml for E. coli and 1 µg/ml for P. denitrificans and R. sphaeroides.
|
Molecular biology methods. Plasmid DNA was isolated from cell cultures by using miniprep kits from Qiagen or Gibco BRL. Larger cell culture volumes were processed by using the Promega midiprep system. Restriction and modification enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs. DNA fragments were isolated from agarose gels by using a Bio-Rad Prep-a-Gene or Gibco BRL Concert kit and were ligated by using the Pharmacia Ready-To-Go system. Competent E. coli JM109 cells were purchased from Promega. E. coli S17-1 cells were made competent by the method of Chung and Miller (11). DNA sequencing was performed by the dideoxy method, using an Amersham T7 Sequenase Quick-Denature kit. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed with a Stratagene Quik-Change kit. Primers for sequencing and site-directed mutagenesis were obtained from Cybersyn. DNA sequence information was analyzed with the DNA Strider 1.0 and Clone Manager 4.0 computer programs.
Conjugations were performed by mixing plasmid-containing E. coli S17-1 cells with R. sphaeroides or P. denitrificans cells in a small amount of LB medium and placing them on a 0.45-µm-pore-size cellulose membrane on an LB plate with no antibiotics. Cells were washed off the membrane after 4 to 6 h with a small amount of Sistrom's medium and were then plated on Sistrom's medium containing appropriate antibiotics to select for exconjugates. In contrast to previous results (16), wild-type P. denitrificans cells were found to conjugate with reasonable efficiencies with this method.Assaying coxII promoter activity in E. coli.
To assess the ability of the coxII promoter from
R. sphaeroides to function in E. coli,
plasmid-driven expression of
-galactosidase activity was assayed in
E. coli DH5
F' cells. The negative control, pRKK200 (Table
2), contains the lacZ gene with no promoter. The positive
control, pRK415-1, contains the lacZ gene with its normal lac promoter. Plasmid pRKKcoxII contains the
coxII promoter from R. sphaeroides directly
upstream of the lacZ gene. DH5
F' cells have a partial
deletion of the chromosomal
-galactosidase gene and so produce no
background
-galactosidase activity. Cells were grown aerobically in
LB media to an optical density at 600 nm of approximately 0.4. IPTG was
added to the positive control to induce the lac promoter.
-Galactosidase activity was assayed in 0.1-ml aliquots of cells
cultures as described in reference 24.
Construction of plasmids for the expression of MADH. The strategy for constructing plasmids for the expression of MADH is summarized in Fig. 2. The source of the genes for MADH expression was pMAU1K, a plasmid containing the entire mau locus that was originally isolated from the chromosome of P. denitrificans (28). The mau locus has been completely sequenced, and the functions of many of the gene products either are known or have been inferred from their sequences (9, 28-31) (Table 1). A 6.6-kb fragment containing the genes mauFBEDACJG was cut out of pMAU1K by using BsaAI and ApaI and inserted into both pBluescript II (pBSII) SK and pBSII KS, each of which had been opened with SmaI and ApaI. The BsaAI site occurs 164 bases upstream of the MauF protein start codon. During the cloning manipulations, 81 bases on the 5' end of this fragment were lost, fortuitously leaving another blunt end which could be ligated with the SmaI site of the pBSII vectors. Since BsaAI and SmaI produce blunt ends, this ligation resulted in loss of the SmaI site. Sequencing confirmed that the final constructs contained 83 bases of the intergenic region on the 5' side of mauF. The pBSII KS construct pMEG994 was used for further cloning manipulations. The pBSII SK construct pMEG993, which contains the mau genes in an orientation downstream of the lac promoter, was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells to test for expression of MADH.
|
Purification of proteins. With each bacterium, the periplasmic fraction of the cells was prepared as described previously (12) for P. denitrificans. To further fractionate cells, the spheroplasts which remained after the periplasm preparation were sonicated and then centrifuged to yield a supernatant that contained the cytoplasmic fraction and a pellet that contained the membrane fraction. MADH was purified from the periplasmic extracts by ion-exchange chromatography followed by gel filtration chromatography as described previously (12).
Biochemical characterization of recombinant MADH. The steady-state kinetic activity of MADH was assayed as previously described (12). Previously described methods were also used for transient kinetic studies in which stopped-flow spectroscopy was used to determine the binding constants as well as microscopic reaction rate constants for the reduction of MADH by methylamine (6) and oxidation of MADH by amicyanin (4, 5). The redox potential of MADH was determined spectrochemically as described previously (33). Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed by standard methods, and Western blot analyses were performed with polyclonal antibodies that had been raised against purified MADH from P. denitrificans.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of recombinant MADH.
Plasmid pMEG986 was introduced
via conjugation with E. coli S17-1 cells into R. sphaeroides and P. denitrificans to test for MADH
expression in these bacteria. The relative efficiency of heterologous
expression of MADH in R. sphaeroides and homologous expression of MADH in P. denitrificans are summarized in
Table 3. The highest level of expression
of recombinant MADH was observed with R. sphaeroides, which
normally does not synthesize MADH. The level of MADH produced by
R. sphaeroides containing pMEG986, when grown on succinate
as a carbon source, was approximately 35 mg/100 g (wet weight) of
cells. This is about 20% of the level of MADH normally produced by
wild-type P. denitrificans when grown on methylamine as a
sole source of carbon and possibly an indication of the relative
strengths of the P. denitrificans mau and R. sphaeroides coxII promoters. When P. denitrificans with
no plasmid was grown on succinate as a carbon source, no MADH was
detected. Interestingly, in P. denitrificans containing
pMEG986, a very low level of homologous expression of MADH was observed
during growth on succinate. The actual level was approximately 3% of
that produced by R. sphaeroides containing pMEG986, when
grown on succinate. This result suggests that the coxII
promoter from R. sphaeroides does not function nearly as
well in P. denitrificans as it does in R. sphaeroides.
|
Localization of MADH in the periplasm. Native MADH is normally localized in the periplasm of P. denitrificans. The export of MADH across the bacterial inner membrane most likely does not occur via the standard Sec protein export pathway. The product of the mauB gene, which codes for the small TTQ-bearing subunit of MADH, contains a relatively unusual 57-residue-long signal sequence (10). This sequence includes a recently characterized double-arginine motif (3) that is translocated by the gene products of a special tatABCD operon (25). It is also possible that at least one of the other mau gene products is required to assist in this specialized export and processing of the MADH small subunit. When MADH was expressed in R. sphaeroides, 100% of the detectable activity of MADH was present in the periplasmic fraction. The spheroplasts which remained after separation of the periplasmic fraction were subjected to sonication and further analysis. No MADH activity was detected in the cytoplasmic or membrane fractions. For comparison with a cytoplasmic marker, malate dehydrogenase activity (1) was assayed in each fraction. The distribution of this cytoplasmic marker was 34, 64, and 2%, respectively, in the periplasmic, cytoplasmic, and membrane fractions. Thus, while it appears that the fractionation procedure does release some cytoplasmic protein into the periplasmic fraction, the absence of any MADH in the cytoplasmic fraction clearly indicates that it is localized exclusively in the periplasm.
Characterization of recombinant MADH. During purification of recombinant MADH, the positions at which it was eluted during ion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration chromatography were the same as observed during the purification of the native MADH from P. denitrificans, suggesting no significant perturbation of structure. The purified recombinant MADH was analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under denaturing and nondenaturing conditions and compared with MADH from P. denitrificans. The recombinant and natural proteins were indistinguishable from each other.
The kinetic properties of the recombinant MADH were analyzed by steady-state and transient kinetic methods, and the kinetic parameters were compared with those for the natural MADH from P. denitrificans (Table 4). The following kinetic parameters were found to be indistinguishable for the recombinant and natural MADHs: the steady-state kcat and Km for methylamine, Kd for amicyanin, and limiting first-order rate constants for the reduction by methylamine and oxidation by amicyanin of dithionite-reduced and substrate-reduced MADH. The oxidation-reduction midpoint potential for the two-electron oxidized-reduced couple of the recombinant MADH was also the same as that for the natural protein.
|
Lack of MADH expression in E. coli. Plasmids pMEG987 and pMEG993 were introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells by transformation to test for expression of MADH. No MADH activity was detected in E. coli cells which harbored pMEG987 (Table 3). However, these cells did express amicyanin, the mauC gene product. This is of interest because in this construct, synthesis of amicyanin indicates that transcription and translation of at least mauF through mauC must have occurred (Fig. 2). Antibodies to the MADH subunits were used in Western blot analyses to test for their presence in the periplasmic, cytoplasmic, and membrane fractions of these cells. No significant levels of either subunit in any of these cell fractions were detected. The lack of significant cross-reactive protein in the cytoplasm rules out the possibility that inclusion bodies had formed, and the absence of significant cross-reactive protein in the membrane fraction indicates that it was not accumulating there due to a defect in translocation. These results suggest that if the mauB and mauA gene products are synthesized, then they are rapidly degraded.
The expression of amicyanin in E. coli with pMEG987 suggests that the coxII promoter of R. sphaeroides is functional in E. coli. To confirm this, the activity of this promoter was directly assayed. A construct (pRKKcoxII) with the lacZ gene under the control of the coxII promoter (17) was transformed into E. coli, and the coxII-driven lacZ expression was measured by using a colorimetric assay for
-galactosidase activity in cell
extracts (24). The observed levels of
-galactosidase
activity were well above control levels. Thus, the expression of
amicyanin by cells with pMEG987 can definitely be attributed to the
activity of the coxII promoter that lies upstream of
mauC, as well as mauB and mauA, which
are the structural genes for the MADH subunits.
E. coli was also transformed with pMEG993, which contains
mauFBEDACJG downstream of the lac promoter and in
the correct orientation for expression. Neither MADH nor amicyanin
expression was observed in these cells. This was surprising since the
lac promoter has been used previously to express recombinant
amicyanin in E. coli from constructs containing
mauC directly after the promoter (15). Thus, it
appears that some feature of the region between the promoter and the
start of mauF in pMEG993 must prevent the initiation of transcription or translation of the mau genes in this construct.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our goal was to construct a vector which contained all genes necessary for the heterologous expression, biosynthesis, and assembly of MADH and which was under the control of a foreign promoter that was neither dependent on methylamine nor repressed by other carbon sources. This was achieved by placing mauFBEDACJG from the mau gene cluster of P. denitrificans under the control of the coxII promoter from R. sphaeroides in a broad-range-host vector and expressing these genes in R. sphaeroides. In the course of this study, we gained important information about the assembly of MADH and the potential utility of R. sphaeroides and the coxII promoter for the heterologous expression of foreign proteins.
These results prove that the genes mauFBEDACJG are sufficient for the complete biosynthesis of MADH and that the genes mauM and mauN are not required. While the genes mauFBEDACJG provide the genetic information necessary for MADH biosynthesis, certain specific features of the host bacterium are also necessary for correct biosynthesis and assembly of MADH. This is illustrated by the fact that these genes in pMEG987 did not support synthesis of a functional MADH in E. coli, while amicyanin was produced. The reason for this is not clear, but several aspects of the biosynthesis of MADH appear unusual. The product of the mauB gene, which codes for the small TTQ-bearing subunit of MADH, possesses an unusual 57-residue-long signal sequence (9, 10) which exhibits a double-arginine motif (3) that is translocated by the gene products of the special tatABCD operon (25). It has been proposed that signal sequences such as this may be characteristic of periplasmic proteins which possess complex redox cofactors (3). E. coli does possess the tatABCD operon (25) and in principle should be able to process the mauB signal sequence. Thus, the inability to synthesize a functional and stable MADH in E. coli must be related to other unusual features of MADH biosynthesis. From their deduced sequences, the mauE product appears to be a membrane protein (29), the mauD product may be involved in disulfide bond processing (29), and the mauG product may be a heme-bearing peroxidase (10, 29). These gene products may play essential roles in translocation of the MADH small subunit across the membrane, formation of the six disulfide bonds which are present in that subunit, and oxygenation reactions that are required for TTQ biosynthesis. If synthesis, assembly and proper localization of any of these accessory gene products are not accomplished by E. coli, then functional MADH expression will be unsuccessful. It was previously shown (29) by Western blot analysis that P. denitrificans cells which possessed mutations in either mauE or mauD were devoid of the MADH small subunit and had reduced levels of the large subunit. Amicyanin levels in these mutants, however, were comparable to wild-type levels. It may be that E. coli lacks certain endogenous proteins, cofactors, or specific features of its membrane that prevent the functional expression of one of these accessory gene products, which in turn prevents the correct posttranslational processing and assembly of MADH. The inability to detect significant amounts of either MADH subunit in E. coli extracts which contained amicyanin expressed from pMEG987 is probably due to the rapid degradation of incorrectly assembled or modified subunits. Such special requirements for the proper processing of accessory gene products are apparently satisfied by R. sphaeroides, which does allow the expression of the functional P. denitrificans MADH.
The mau genes allow P. denitrificans to grow on methylamine as a sole source of carbon (28-30). R. sphaeroides is incapable of growth with methylamine as its sole source of carbon. This raises the question of whether providing this bacterium with the ability to synthesize MADH would be sufficient to enable it to utilize methylamine as a metabolic carbon source. R. sphaeroides containing pMEG986 was unable to grow with methylamine as a sole carbon source under the growth conditions used in this study (data not shown). It was previously shown that R. sphaeroides can use methanol as a sole carbon source, but only under anaerobic photosynthetic growth conditions (2, 23). Anaerobic conditions are necessary to induce adequate levels of formaldehyde dehydrogenase (2), which is needed to convert the methanol-derived formaldehyde to formate, which is further oxidized to CO2 to support autotrophic growth. Unfortunately, it was not possible to determine whether MADH could support methylamine-dependent growth under these anaerobic conditions because the coxII promoter used in our constructs will function only under aerobic conditions.
This work demonstrates the potential value of R. sphaeroides as a host for heterologous expression of proteins, especially complex proteins such as MADH that cannot be expressed in E. coli. The coxII promoter in constructs similar to pMEG986 should be suitable for heterologous expression of other gene products in R. sphaeroides. While the levels of MADH synthesis in R. sphaeroides were lower than those in the native P. denitrificans when induced by methylamine, this is more likely a reflection of the strength of the native mau promoter than a weakness of the coxII promoter. The level of protein expression which was obtained in this way was sufficient for biochemical characterization of MADH, and it should be sufficient for characterization of other heterologous proteins that cannot be expressed in standard systems.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Zhenyu Zhu for determining the redox potential of
recombinant MADH and Timothy Donohue of the University of
Wisconsin
Madison for supplying pRKK200 and pRKKcoxII.
This work was supported by NIH grant GM-41574.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author: Department of Biochemistry, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State St., Jackson, MS 39216-4505. Phone: (601) 984-1516. Fax: (601) 984-1501. E-mail: vdavidson{at}biochem.umsmed.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alefounder, P. R., and S. J. Ferguson. 1980. The location of dissimilatory nitrite reductase and the control of dissimilatory nitrate reductase by oxygen in Paracoccus denitrificans. Biochem. J. 192:231-240[Medline]. |
| 2. | Barber, R. D., and T. J. Donohue. 1998. Function of a glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase in Rhodobacter sphaeroides formaldehyde oxidation and assimilation. Biochemistry 37:530-537[Medline]. |
| 3. | Berks, B. C. 1996. A common export pathway for proteins binding complex redox cofactors. Mol. Microbiol. 22:393-404[Medline]. |
| 4. | Bishop, G. R., H. B. Brooks, and V. L. Davidson. 1996. Evidence for a tryptophan tryptophylquinone aminosemiquinone intermediate in the physiologic reaction between methylamine dehydrogenase and amicyanin. Biochemistry 35:8948-8954[Medline]. |
| 5. | Brooks, H. B., and V. L. Davidson. 1994. Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of a physiologic intermolecular electron transfer reaction between methylamine dehydrogenase and amicyanin. Biochemistry 33:5696-5701[Medline]. |
| 6. | Brooks, H. B., L. H. Jones, and V. L. Davidson. 1993. Stopped-flow kinetic and deuterium kinetic isotope effect studies of the quinoprotein methylamine dehydrogenase from Paracoccus denitrificans. Biochemistry 32:2725-2729[Medline]. |
| 7. | Cao, J., J. Shapleigh, R. Gennis, A. Rezvin, and S. Ferguson-Miller. 1991. The gene encoding cytochrome c oxidase subunit II from Rhodobacter sphaeroides; comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence with sequences of corresponding peptides from other species. Gene 101:133-137[Medline]. |
| 8. | Chang, J. P., and J. G. Morris. 1962. Studies on the utilization of nitrate by Micrococcus denitrificans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 29:301-310. |
| 9. | Chistoserdov, A., C. Boyd, F. S. Mathews, and M. E. Lidstrom. 1992. The genetic organization of the mau gene cluster of the facultative autotroph Paracoccus denitrificans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 184:1181-1189[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Chistoserdov, A. Y.,
L. V. Chistoserdova,
W. S. McIntire, and M. E. Lidstrom.
1994.
Genetic organization of the mau gene cluster in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1: complete nucleotide sequence and generation and characteristics of mau mutants.
J. Bacteriol.
176:4052-4065 |
| 11. | Chung, C. T., and R. H. Miller. 1993. Preparation and storage of competent E. coli cells. Methods Enzymol. 218:621-627[Medline]. |
| 12. | Davidson, V. L. 1990. Methylamine dehydrogenases from methylotrophic bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 188:241-246[Medline]. |
| 13. | Davidson, V. L. 1993. Methylamine dehydrogenase, p. 73-95. In V. L. Davidson (ed.), Principles and applications of quinoproteins. Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y. |
| 14. | Davidson, V. L., H. B. Brooks, M. E. Graichen, L. H. Jones, and Y.-L. Hyun. 1995. Detection of intermediates in TTQ enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 258:176-190[Medline]. |
| 15. | Davidson, V. L., L. H. Jones, M. E. Graichen, F. S. Mathews, and J. P. Hosler. 1997. Factors which stabilize the methylamine dehydrogenase-amicyanin electron transfer complex revealed by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry 36:12733-12738[Medline]. |
| 16. | DeVries, G. E., N. Harms, J. Hoogendijk, and A. H. Stouthamer. 1989. Isolation and characterization of Paracoccus denitrificans mutants with increased conjugation frequencies and pleiotropic loss of a n(GATC)n DNA-modifying property. Arch. Microbiol. 152:52-57. |
| 16a. | Fairburn, C., and J. P. Hosler. Unpublished data. |
| 17. |
Flory, J. E., and T. J. Donohue.
1997.
Transcriptional control of several aerobically induced cytochrome structural genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
Microbiology
143:3101-3110 |
| 18. |
Govindarai, S.,
E. Eisenstein,
L. H. Jones,
L. Sanders-Loehr,
A. Y. Chistoserdov,
V. L. Davidson, and S. L. Edwards.
1994.
Aromatic amine dehydrogenase, a second tryptophan tryptophylquinone enzyme.
J. Bacteriol.
176:2922-2929 |
| 19. |
Husain, M., and V. L. Davidson.
1985.
An inducible periplasmic blue copper protein from Paracoccus denitrificans. Purification, properties and physiological role.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:14626-14629 |
| 20. |
Husain, M., and V. L. Davidson.
1987.
Purification and properties of methylamine dehydrogenase from Paracoccus denitrificans.
J. Bacteriol.
169:1712-1717 |
| 21. | Keen, N. T., S. Tamaki, D. Kobayashi, and D. Trollinger. 1988. Improved broad-host-range plasmids for DNA cloning in Gram-negative bacteria. Gene 70:191-197[Medline]. |
| 22. |
McIntire, W. S.,
D. E. Wemmer,
A. Y. Chistoserdov, and M. E. Lidstrom.
1991.
A new cofactor in a prokaryotic enzyme: tryptophan tryptophylquinone as the redox prosthetic group in methylamine dehydrogenase.
Science
252:817-824 |
| 23. | Quayle, J. R., and N. Pfennig. 1975. Utilization of methanol by Rhodospirillaceae. Arch. Microbiol. 102:193-198[Medline]. |
| 24. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 25. | Sargent, F., E. G. Bogsch, N. R. Stanley, M. Wexler, C. Robinson, B. C. Berks, and T. Palmer. 1998. Overlapping functions of components of a bacterial Sec-independent protein export pathway. EMBO J. 17:3640-3650[Medline]. |
| 26. | Simon, R., U. Priefer, and A. Puhler. 1983. A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Bio/Technology 1:784-791. |
| 27. |
Sistrom, W. R.
1960.
A requirement for sodium in the growth of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
22:778-785 |
| 28. | Van der Palen, C. J., D. J. Slotboom, L. Jongejan, W. N. Reijnders, N. Harms, J. A. Duine, and R. J. Van Spanning. 1995. Mutational analysis of mau genes involved in methylamine metabolism in Paracoccus denitrificans. Eur. J. Biochem. 230:860-871[Medline]. |
| 29. | Van der Palen, C. J., W. N. Reijnders, S. de Vries, J. A. Duine, and R. J. Van Spanning. 1997. MauE and MauD proteins are essential in methylamine metabolism of Paracoccus denitrificans. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 72:219-228. |
| 30. | Van Spanning, R. J., C. W. Wansell, W. N. Reijnders, L. F. Oltmann, and A. H. Stouthamer. 1990. Mutagenesis of the gene encoding amicyanin of Paracoccus denitrificans and the resultant effect on methylamine oxidation. FEBS Lett. 275:217-220[Medline]. |
| 31. | Van Spanning, R. J., C. J. Van der Palen, D. J. Slotboom, W. N. Reijnders, A. H. Stouthamer, and J. A. Duine. 1994. Expression of the mau genes involved in methylamine metabolism in Paracoccus denitrificans is under the control of a LysR-type transcriptional activator. Eur. J. Biochem. 226:201-210[Medline]. |
| 32. |
Woese, C. R.
1987.
Bacterial evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
51:221-271 |
| 33. |
Zhu, Z., and V. L. Davidson.
1998.
Redox properties of tryptophan tryptophylquinone enzymes. Correlation with structure and reactivity.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:14254-14260 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»