Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 1999, p. 4326-4333, Vol. 181, No. 14
Department of Biotechnology, All India
Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India
Received 30 November 1998/Accepted 3 May 1999
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a slow-growing pathogen
and is characterized by a low content of RNA per unit of DNA. rRNAs represent a major proportion of the total RNA pool, and the entire requirement for rRNA is met by transcription from a single
rrn operon that is driven by two promoters, P1 and P3. This
study attempted to analyze the specific role of the rrn
promoter in determining the characteristically low levels of RNA in
M. tuberculosis. For this purpose, the activity of the
M. tuberculosis rrn promoter as a function of the growth
rate was studied by rrn-lacZ promoter fusion,
hybridization, and primer extension analysis in M. smegmatis. rrn promoter signals were faithfully recognized in M. smegmatis cultures harboring the rrn-lacZ promoter
construct. In M. smegmatis cultures that displayed doubling
times varying between 3.06 and 6.5 h, Mycobacterium
tuberculosis is the causative agent of tuberculosis and is
characterized by slow growth. The study of ribosome regulation is
extremely relevant to understanding the molecular basis of the slow
growth of this organism, since protein synthesis, so critical to
growth, is dependent on ribosomes. M. tuberculosis cultures
contain small amounts of RNA per unit content of DNA; the total RNA
content varies only twofold between stationary-phase cultures and
actively growing cells (38). The reasons underlying this
lack of responsiveness can be addressed by directly analyzing rRNA
transcriptional activity since rRNA comprises the majority (~80%) of
the total RNA pool of a mycobacterial cell. The production of rRNA is
determined by the number of rrn operons, the number of
promoters, the nature of the promoter elements, and the efficiency with
which the operons are transcribed. Since rRNAs represent a relatively
stable population, breakdown is less likely to constitute a major
regulatory mechanism and the regulation of rRNA synthesis is expected
to occur at the level of RNA chain initiation. In earlier studies from
our laboratory, we demonstrated that fast-growing (M. smegmatis) and slow-growing (M. tuberculosis)
mycobacteria follow a similar pattern of bacterial growth comprising
the lag, logarithmic, and stationary phases, with maximum rRNA levels
found during the logarithmic phase of growth (7). The
M. tuberculosis rrn operon is driven by twin promoters
designated P1 and P3 (21); transcription start points (tsp),
an RNase III-processing site, and the +1 of mature 16S rRNA were mapped
in our laboratory (37). In Escherichia coli, rRNA
synthesis is a rate-limiting step in ribosome production since
r-protein expression is regulated by feedback mechanisms sensitive to
the rRNA concentration (31). In several bacteria including
E. coli, the number of ribosomes varies linearly with the
growth rate, µ, over a range of conditions. This phenomenon has been
termed growth rate-dependent control (GRDC) of ribosome synthesis, and
it serves to maintain the cellular pool of ribosomes at a level
commensurate with the requirement of the cell for protein synthesis at
all times (18). GRDC of rRNA biosynthesis has been most
extensively studied in E. coli and has been shown to occur
at the level of rrn expression (2, 12, 16, 17, 24, 30,
34). The exact mechanism by which GRDC is attained is still under
active investigation, although a large body of evidence implies a role
for ppGpp and/or some translation-linked event (12). Since
the rrn operon of M. tuberculosis is expressed
from dual promoters, as in other eubacteria including E. coli (12) and Bacillus subtilis
(35), we asked whether regulatory mechanisms operating in
E. coli and B. subtilis, such as GRDC, may be
applicable to M. tuberculosis rrn promoters. This study was
designed to analyze the ability of the M. tuberculosis rrn
promoters to respond to variations in the growth rate. To determine if
the rRNA promoter sequence and structure per se impose any constraints
on their usage, their activity was analyzed in M. smegmatis,
a mycobacterial species often used as a surrogate host to study
M. tuberculosis gene expression. We report (i) fidelity in
usage and in the differential activity of the M. tuberculosis rrn P1 and P3 promoters and (ii) GRDC of the M. tuberculosis
rrn promoters in cultures of M. smegmatis bearing
rrn-lacZ constructs. The minimal role of the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter per se in determining the slow growth of
M. tuberculosis is discussed.
Strains and plasmids.
Jack Crawford, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga., provided M. smegmatis
LR222. A. K. Tyagi, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi,
India, generously provided promoter selection vectors pSD7 and pSD5B.
Construction of rrn-cat and rrn-lacZ
fusions.
For the construction of the rrn-lacZ promoter
fusion (Fig. 1), the
rrn upstream sequence (816 bp) was amplified by inverse PCR
(37) and a ~650-bp fragment was cloned into a
XbaI site located upstream of the lacZ gene in
pSD5B (26). The ligation mixture was electroporated into
E. coli, and the transformants were plated on Luria-Bertani
agar containing kanamycin (25 µg/ml) and
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis rrn
Promoters: Differential Usage and Growth Rate-Dependent
Control

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-galactosidase activity
increased ~sixfold in proportion to the growth rate (µ). There was
a corresponding increase in the amount of lacZ-specific
mRNA, while the plasmid copy number remained essentially unchanged. For
any given µ, the P3 promoter was ~twofold more efficiently utilized
than the P1 promoter. Since both promoters of the M. tuberculosis
rrn operon are regulatable as a function of growth rate in
M. smegmatis cultures, it is implied that the inherent
structure or sequence of the rrn promoter per se is not
primarily responsible for the observed lack of modulation of RNA
synthesis in M. tuberculosis.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal). Cloning of the rrn promoter in the right orientation
(pSD5B.16SR) with respect to lacZ produced blue colonies,
and cloning in the opposite orientation (pSD5B.16SW) produced white
colonies. Plasmid DNA was isolated from the transformants and
electroporated into M. smegmatis to generate strains
containing promoter-fusion constructs with the rrn promoter
cloned in both orientations.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
(A) Schematic representation of the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter. The top line shows the genomic
organization of the rrn operon in M. tuberculosis
(not to scale). The middle line shows the PstI fragment
spanning the rrn promoter region. The region encompassed by
the PstI and Sau3AI sites (mapping downstream of
+1 of 16S rRNA) was amplified by inverse PCR as detailed previously
(37) and cloned in pGEM3Zf (+) to generate pAV16S.2. tsp a
and c represent the start points and direction of transcription from
the P1 and P3 rrn promoters, respectively, and are denoted
by thin and thick arrows, respectively; the nomenclature of P1 promoter
for tsp a and P3 promoter for tsp c corresponds to that by
Gonzalez-y-Merchand et al. (21). d and +1 represent the
experimentally determined RNase III-processing site and the start of
the mature transcript, respectively (37). The lower part of
the figure represents the restriction fragments cloned in promoter
fusion vectors pSD5B (26) in the right (pSD5B.16SR) and
wrong (pSD5B.16SW) orientations. (B) Nucleotide sequence of the
rrn promoter of M. tuberculosis. The numbers on
the right are according to Cole et al. (11) for the M. tuberculosis genome. The sequence of the PCR-amplified fragment
including the promoter region, +1 mature 16S rRNA start site, and 78 bp
of coding region is shown. tsp a and c and their respective promoters
are indicated by arrowheads and highlighted boxes, respectively. The
experimentally determined RNase III recognition sequence is highlighted
and the cleavage site `d' is indicated (37). The location
and orientation of the primer-annealing sites are indicated by arrows.
The Sau3AI sites mark the fragment that was cloned in
plasmid pSD7. (C) Comparison of the primer-annealing regions in
M. tuberculosis (Mtb) and M. smegmatis rrnA (Msm
A) and rrnB (Msm B) operons. The sequence of the RNA-like
strand is shown. Identical residues are marked by vertical lines.
Culture conditions. M. smegmatis was maintained on Lowenstein-Jensen medium. A loopful was inoculated into 10 ml of Youmans and Karlsons (YK) liquid medium containing kanamycin (25 µg/ml) and Tween 80 (0.2%) and supplemented with 0.5% glycerol (YKKTG) in a 50-ml conical flask at 37°C with vigorous shaking. This primary inoculum was subcultured once more in YKKTG to obtain vigorously growing cells. Cells from the second subculture were used to initiate the cultures used to evaluate the growth rate dependence of the rrn promoter. YKKT (100-ml flasks in triplicate) containing either 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, or 0.01% glycerol were inoculated with twice-subcultured M. smegmatis harboring either pSD5B.16SR or pSD5B.16SW to an initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.04 to 0.06 and incubated with shaking at 37°C. To establish the growth curve and growth rates, aliquots were taken every 4 h and the OD600 was measured over a period of 40 h. The cultures were appropriately diluted for OD measurement within the linear range. The growth rate, µ, was calculated from the equation µ = 1/g, where g is the time in which the initial mass, M0, of a bacterium doubles as a consequence of cell division (9). For a typical growth curve, see Fig. 2.
Isolation of RNA from M. smegmatis. M. smegmatis strains containing rrn-lacZ promoter fusion constructs were cultured as described above in YK medium supporting a range of growth rates. The growth of all cultures was arrested at 20 h by adding sodium azide (to a final concentration of 10 mM), and cells were harvested at 4°C. RNA was isolated as described previously (3). The quality and quantity of the RNA were evaluated by electrophoresis on formaldehyde-agarose gels, by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nm, and by PCR to test for DNA contamination (28).
-Galactosidase assays.
In parallel with RNA isolation,
M. smegmatis culture aliquots were sonicated and assayed for
-galactosidase activity as described previously (29).
Briefly, harvested cell pellets derived from 1-ml culture aliquots were
resuspended in 0.25 to 0.5 ml of 0.25 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and sonicated
(total sonication time of 3 to 4 min with a pulse of 30 s
alternating with 30 s of rest). The amount of protein in clarified
cell lysates was estimated (8). Triplicate aliquots of cell
extracts were used for measurement of
-galactosidase activity, which
was calculated and expressed in nanomoles per minute per milligram of
protein. Total RNA was isolated from the cultures in parallel, and
-galactosidase-specific mRNA levels were also determined.
Estimation of lacZ mRNA. The purity of the RNA used in the hybridizations was assessed by PCR. Any residual DNA contamination was removed by DNase treatment. The samples were considered to be free from DNA when no amplification of plasmid DNA was obtained in the absence of reverse transcriptase (28). Serial dilutions (500 ng to 500 pg) of total RNA isolated from M. smegmatis cells harvested at different growth rates (from three independent cultures) were dot blotted onto nylon membranes in duplicate as described. Briefly, 1 µg of RNA was taken and serially diluted with sterile water to the required concentrations. To each RNA sample, denaturing mixture containing 50% formamide, 7% formaldehyde, and 1× SSC (0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate) was added, and the RNA was denatured at 68°C for 15 min, chilled on ice, and neutralized with 2 volumes of 20× SSC. RNA dot blots on nylon membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) were prepared with a 96-well vacuum manifold. After the slots were rinsed with 10× SSC, the blots were air dried and fixed by UV irradiation. The blots were individually hybridized to 32P-labeled lacZ- and kanamycin-specific probes in 5× SSC-50% formamide-5× Denhardt's solution-50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8)-200 µg of salmon sperm DNA per ml-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). After 16 h at 42°C, the blots were subjected to series of washings, with a final wash at 65°C in 0.2× SSC-0.2% SDS, and subjected to autoradiography. To quantitate the extent of RNA hybridization, the dots were cut and counted individually in scintillation fluid. The individual mean counts of triplicate filters obtained with 100, 50, and 25 ng of RNA dotted for pSD5B.16SR and pSD5B.16SW were determined and plotted against the growth rate.
Determination of plasmid copy number.
The plasmid copy
numbers in triplicate cultures of M. smegmatis growing at
different rates (µ = 0.150 to 0.296 for cultures containing
pSD5B.16SR and µ = 0.159 to 0.298 for cultures containing pSD5B.16SW) were determined by the hybridization method (1). Briefly, M. smegmatis sonicates containing various amounts
of protein (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 µg) were spotted in duplicate onto nitrocellulose membranes as described previously (1).
Sonicated pSD5B plasmid DNA (ranging from 0.1 to 819.2 ng) was spotted
alongside in duplicate. Plasmid DNA (6.4 ng) spiked with M. smegmatis sonicates (0.1 to 51.2 µg of protein equivalent) was
also spotted in duplicate. Probe pSD5B was dephosphorylated, end
labelled with [
-32P]ATP, and hybridized to the
immobilized RNA in 50% formamide-5× SSC-5× Denhardt's
solution-50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-200 µg of denatured salmon sperm
DNA per ml. The filters were washed in 2× SSC-0.1% SDS at room
temperature and 0.2× SSC-0.2% SDS at 65°C and subjected to
autoradiography. Numbers of plasmid copies are expressed as nanograms
of plasmid DNA per microgram of total protein in M. smegmatis sonicates.
Primer extension.
Total RNA (10 µg) isolated from M. smegmatis cultures growing at different rates and containing
pSD5B.16SR, pSD5B.16SW, or pSD5B (vector control) was used in primer
extension experiments with primers T4In3 and T4In5. Briefly, the RNA
sample and 106 cpm of
-32P-labelled primer
were mixed, resuspended in 20 µl of
piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)
(PIPES) hybridization mixture, transferred to siliconized glass
capillaries, denatured at 95°C for 5 min, and incubated at 55°C
(primer T4In5) or 58°C (primer T4In3) in a water bath for 8 h.
Despite perfect sequence homology of T4In3 primer at its 3' end to
sequences of the rrnA operon of M. smegmatis
(Fig. 1C), good specificity in primer extension was retained on account of the stringent temperature (58°C) used for annealing primer to RNA
and the sequence divergence at the 5' end of the primer. Reaction
mixtures were subsequently transferred to sterile Eppendorf tubes,
cleaned, and subjected to primer extension with 200 U of Superscript II
(Gibco BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.) at 42°C for 90 min. After RNase
treatment, phenol-chloroform extraction, and ethanol precipitation, the
products were run on a 6% polyacrylamide-7 M urea gel alongside a
sequencing ladder generated with the same primers and corresponding
plasmid constructs. Primer extension experiments were performed with
two individual RNA preparations for each growth rate. For a
representative figure, see Fig. 4.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a preliminary experiment, a ~310-bp Sau3AI
fragment (Fig. 1A) mapping between
233 and +74 relative to the +1 of
mature 16S rRNA and containing P1 and P3 rrn promoters was
cloned into the promoter selection vector pSD7 (13) to
generate pSD7.16S. This fragment supported an extremely high
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity (16,669 nmol/min/mg of
protein) in M. smegmatis (data not shown) in comparison to
the relatively low activity observed for randomly cloned promoters of
M. tuberculosis (5 to 2,500 nmol/min/mg of protein) in
M. smegmatis, with the majority of promoters displaying activity in the range of 5 to 100 nmol/min/mg of protein
(13).
Growth rate dependence of the rrn promoter(s) of
M. tuberculosis.
For the analysis of the rrn
promoter, a ~650-bp rrn promoter-containing fragment was
subcloned upstream of the lacZ reporter gene in shuttle
plasmid vector pSD5B, a low-copy-number plasmid that is maintained at
~3 copies per mycobacterial cell (32) (Fig. 1A). Blue and
white colonies of M. smegmatis transformants were obtained
on a Luria-Bertani agar plate containing X-Gal and 20 µg of kanamycin
per ml. When cloned in the right orientation (pSD5B.16SR), the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter drove
-galactosidase expression,
yielding blue colonies, whereas when cloned in the wrong orientation
(pSD5B.16SW), white colonies were obtained, clearly indicating that the
promoter was functional in one direction only.
-galactosidase activity. The growth curves followed the expected
pattern and yielded a range of growth rates (µ = 0.153 to
0.327), which were required to study the growth rate-dependence
of rrn promoter (Fig. 2). The
generation time of M. smegmatis cultures corresponding to the growth rates of 0.153 to 0.327 was in the range of 6.49 h to
3.06 h, respectively. The rrn promoter, when cloned in
the right orientation (pSD5B.16SR), gave the steep positive slope of activity with increasing growth rate which is characteristic of GRDC
(Fig. 3A). M. smegmatis carrying the rrn promoter cloned in the wrong
orientation (pSD5B.16SW) showed negligible activity over a range of
growth rates (data not shown). The presence of the fusions used in this
study did not appear to impose any metabolic load, since there were no
differences in the growth rates of cultures carrying or not carrying
the plasmids.
|
|
Variation of
-galactosidase transcript levels with growth
rate.
To confirm that the growth rate-dependent response seen for
M. tuberculosis rrn promoters cloned into pSD5B reflected
the transcriptional activity of the promoters, the level of
lacZ mRNA at different growth rates was directly determined
by dot blot hybridization of RNA isolated from M. smegmatis cultures harvested at the same time point at which
-galactosidase activity was measured. The level of lacZ
mRNA in cells carrying the rrn promoter cloned in the right
orientation (pSD5B.16SR) increased in a growth rate-dependent manner. In contrast, hybridization with the kanamycin probe did not
increase with an increase in µ for either pSD5B.16SR or pSD5B.16SW (Fig. 3B). These findings confirmed that (i) the increase in
-galactosidase activity with an increase in growth rate was due to
enhanced transcriptional activity of the M. tuberculosis rrn
promoter and (ii) the presence of the rrn promoter did not
modulate kan gene transcription from the same plasmid.
Association of growth rate with plasmid copy number.
Because a
plasmid system was used to study rrn-lacZ transcription, we
considered the possibility that fluctuations in plasmid copy number
with different growth rates would present as a growth rate-dependent
response. Others have found that growth conditions and strengths of
inserted promoters can significantly affect the copy number (1,
36). Therefore, an estimate of the amount of plasmid DNA per unit
of total cellular protein was obtained for promoter-fusion clones
containing the rrn promoter as described in Materials and
Methods. It is clear that the amount of plasmid DNA remained
essentially unaltered as the growth rate increased; thus, it could not
account for the increase seen in lacZ mRNA and
-galactosidase specific activity (Fig. 3C).
Faithful recognition and growth rate-dependent usage of M. tuberculosis rrn promoters in M. smegmatis.
The
utilization of the M. tuberculosis rrn P1 and P3 promoters
was assessed by primer extension experiments with M. smegmatis cells carrying rrn-lacZ fusion constructs
(right and wrong orientations and vector alone) grown in different
media to achieve a range of growth rates. With this technique, which
uses an excess of end-labelled primer to generate cDNAs complementary
to RNA, the strength of the signal from the extended product obtained
is a reflection of the concentration of that particular RNA species within the cell at the time of harvesting. Comparison of the signal strengths enables one to evaluate the strengths of multiple promoters for a single operon such as the rrn operon of M. tuberculosis. Primers T4In5 and T4In3 were used to assess
transcription from the P1 and P3 promoters. Primer T4In5 had little
sequence homology to either rrn operon of M. smegmatis and was specific for the rrn-lacZ transcript
generated from plasmid construct pSD5B.16SR (Fig. 1B and C). This
primer enabled the detection of two major products, tsp a and tsp c,
corresponding to the P1 and P3 promoters, respectively, and two minor
products (Fig. 4). The major products comigrated with RNA products a and c obtained with genomic RNA of
M. tuberculosis H37Rv and H37Ra (Fig. 4B). The upstream tsp a (primer extension product of ~190 bases) was directed by the P1
promoter while the tsp c (primer extension product of ~110 bases) was
directed by the P3 promoter, as demonstrated previously (21,
37). The P3 tsp was preceded by the E. coli
70
10 and
35 consensus motifs TATTAG and
TTGACT, respectively (Fig. 1B); the sequence, position, and
spacing between them closely resembled those of the P2 promoter of
rrn operons from E. coli and B. subtilis. In contrast, the putative P1 promoter was composed of an
E. coli
70-like
10 motif but lacked a
35
sequence (Fig. 1B) and resembled the bulk of M. tuberculosis
promoters (4). In M. tuberculosis as well as in
M. smegmatis, the signal from tsp a was weaker than that
from tsp c, suggesting that the P3 promoter was the better utilized of
the two promoters (Fig. 4). Transcript d, a product of RNase
III-mediated processing, was generated only with genomic RNA of
M. tuberculosis (Fig. 4B, lane 6), consistent with the requirement of a panhandle structure between sequences flanking 16S
rRNA. From the above experiments, it was clear that (i) the rrn promoter is very strong and thus distinct from the
majority of M. tuberculosis promoters and (ii) the
rrn promoter is faithfully expressed in M. smegmatis.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
M. tuberculosis in vivo would most probably be limited for oxygen and nutrients and therefore would display rather long generation times. However, in laboratory-grown cultures, these constraints do not exist and yet M. tuberculosis divides every ~18 h on average and M. smegmatis divides every 3 to 5 h. It is reasonable to think that multiple properties of the tubercle bacillus contribute to its slow growth. First, the unique composition of the mycobacterial envelope is likely to present permeability barriers. Since cell wall lipids constitute a high proportion of the dry weight of mycobacteria (6) and cell wall synthesis imposes a considerable energy demand on the cell, its biosynthetic rate may also be limiting for growth. Second, RNA chain growth in M. tuberculosis was ~10 times lower than that in E. coli, and the low transcription rate was attributed to a low rate of transcription initiation; rates for M. smegmatis were not determined (25). This was reflected in a rather low content of RNA per unit of DNA compared to that in other bacteria. Thus, in M. bovis and M. tuberculosis, the RNA/DNA ratio varied between only 1:1 and 2:1, while in M. smegmatis, it reached 5:1 in rapidly growing cultures (38). The G+C content of mycobacterial DNA, particularly that of the promoter regions, has been suggested as another constraint for the low rate of transcription; the upstream regions of mycobacterial genes have a higher G+C content than do the corresponding regions from M. smegmatis (4). rRNA gene dosage is also considered a critical factor influencing growth. Slow growers such as M. tuberculosis depend entirely for their total ribosome pool on a single rrn operon driven by two promoters, while fast growers including M. smegmatis typically have two rrn operons per genome (5) and possess multiple promoters to increase their capacity for rRNA synthesis (22).
We have demonstrated the exceptional strength of the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter in comparison with the bulk of M. tuberculosis promoters. We addressed whether the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter has some unique sequence or structure
which precludes its modulation in conditions of varying nutrient
supply. M. smegmatis was chosen as a surrogate host for this
purpose since (i) unlike M. tuberculosis, it is equipped to
regulate its RNA synthesis rates in response to nutrient supply
(38) and (ii) it would provide a milieu devoid of the
constraints impeding the growth of M. tuberculosis. M. smegmatis has been proposed to be a good surrogate host for the study of M. tuberculosis transcriptional activity, protein
expression, and some aspects of genetics. This is because the
efficiency and fidelity of transcriptional recognition, at least for
vegetative promoters, is conserved in M. tuberculosis and
M. smegmatis (4). In the present study, the usage
of M. tuberculosis rrn promoters was determined by primer
extension analysis with genome-derived RNA from logarithmic-phase
cultures of M. tuberculosis and comparing the signals with
those obtained with plasmid-derived transcripts from M. smegmatis cultures harboring the rrn-lacZ construct.
The results indicate that fidelity of transcription initiation and usage of M. tuberculosis rrn P1 and P3 promoters was
maintained in M. smegmatis. The P3 promoter was by far the
stronger rrn promoter in M. tuberculosis as well
as in M. smegmatis. The G+C content of the promoter region
mapping from +1 to
50 relative to the tsp showed an inverse
correlation with promoter strength; it was 50 and 58% for the P3 and
P1 promoters, respectively (Fig. 1), substantiating the observation
that the high G+C content of mycobacterial promoters may have a bearing
on their lower activity (4).
A surprising finding was that both the P1 and P3 promoters of the M. tuberculosis rrn operon were under GRDC. In contrast, in E. coli and B. subtilis, only one of the two promoters of intact rrn operons is under GRDC (12, 15), although promoter dissection experiments have demonstrated that the downstream P2 promoter also is regulatable by growth rate in E. coli, albeit to a lower extent than P1 (17, 20). Thus, the features in the DNA sequence that govern GRDC of the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter appear to be present around both promoters. AT-rich and upstream activating elements, Fis-binding sites, and GC discriminator sequences are characteristic features of E. coli rrn operons (12, 27, 30, 31, 33) and are involved in their regulation. Since these sequences and the Fis-encoding gene were not present in the M. tuberculosis rrn promoter or genome (11), some unique mechanism(s) is suggested for regulation. The upstream regions of rrn operons in M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis are predicted to form similar secondary structures to generate potential binding sites for putative trans-acting proteins (21). It is possible that these putative trans-acting factors that participate in recognition of the structure and sequence of the rrn promoter regions are present in M. smegmatis but not in M. tuberculosis. A noteworthy observation was that the two promoters exhibited differential usage; the P3 promoter was ca. twice as active as the P1 promoter at all growth rates. The purpose of a weak upstream P1 promoter that is poorly expressed at all growth rates remains a puzzle. It is functionally equivalent to the downstream P2 promoter of E. coli rrn operons in relation to low level constitutive expression. Since M. tuberculosis possesses only one rrn operon, a possible advantage of having a stronger downstream promoter than upstream promoter is that promoter occlusion effects would be minimized and rRNA transcription would be maximized. On the other hand, in E. coli, which possesses seven rrn operons, the downstream P2 promoter is subject to occlusion by transcription from the P1 promoter (17).
In the context of differential usage, it may be noted that the
experiments described in this report were performed with M. smegmatis cultures grown at various growth rates. The M. smegmatis cultures grown at µ
0.234 were in logarithmic phase,
while those cultured in media containing limiting amounts of glycerol,
i.e., 0.05 and 0.01% glycerol (µ
0.20), reached stationary phase
at 20 h of incubation, the time point at which the experiments
described in this study were performed (Fig. 2). While our manuscript
was in review, Gonzalez-y-Merchand et al. reported that the rate of rRNA transcription initiation from either the P1 or the P3 promoter varied little regardless of whether M. tuberculosis cultures
were in the logarithmic or stationary phase of growth (23).
These findings confirmed the observation made nearly three decades ago that RNA-DNA ratios of M. tuberculosis cultures altered only
marginally as a function of growth rate (38). A recent
report stated that in stationary-phase M. tuberculosis
cells, the P1 promoter rather than the P3 promoter assumes charge of
rrn transcription in a SigF-dependent manner, suggesting
that sigma factor-dependent regulation of the rrn operon
occurs in M. tuberculosis (10).
Despite the caveats in studying the regulation of mycobacterial genes from slow growers in rapid growers, these cross-species experiments have clearly shown that the P1 and P3 promoters of the rrn operon of M. tuberculosis are both regulatable over a range of growth rates in the environment provided by M. smegmatis. In conclusion, the present study clearly indicates that rrn promoter sequence and structure do not play a significant role in determining the low levels of RNA in M. tuberculosis. Other factors such as replication, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis and/or permeability, dosage of rRNA genes, and absence of trans-acting proteins, probably serve as primary factors in determining the inability of the tubercle bacillus to respond to changes in nutrient supply.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
J.S.T. thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, for research support.
The expert help of Deepak Saini in the preparation of the figures is sincerely acknowledged. A. K. Tyagi is sincerely thanked for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India. Phone: 91-11-6524491. Fax: 91-11-6862663. E-mail: jst{at}aiims.ernet.in or jstyagi{at}hotmail.com.
Present address: Department of Medical Biochemistry & Genetics,
Texas A&M University College of Medicine, College Station, TX
77843-1114.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Adams, C. W., and G. W. Hatfield.
1984.
Effects of promoter strengths and growth conditions on copy number of transcription-fusion vectors.
J. Biol. Chem.
259:7399-7403 |
| 2. |
Bartlett, M. S., and R. L. Gourse.
1994.
Growth rate-dependent control of the rrnB P1 core promoter in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5560-5564 |
| 3. | Bashyam, M. D., and A. K. Tyagi. 1994. An efficient and high-yielding method for the isolation of RNA from mycobacteria. BioTechniques 17:834-836[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Bashyam, M. D.,
D. Kaushal,
S. K. Dasgupta, and A. K. Tyagi.
1996.
A study of the mycobacterial transcriptional apparatus: identification of novel features in promoter elements.
J. Bacteriol.
178:4847-4853 |
| 5. | Bercovier, H., O. Kafri, and S. Sela. 1986. Mycobacteria possess a surprisingly small number of ribosomal RNA genes in relation to the size of their genome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 136:1136-1141[Medline]. |
| 6. | Besra, G. S., and D. Chatterjee. 1994. Lipids and carbohydrates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis., p. 285-306. In B. R. Bloom (ed.), Tuberculosis. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 7. | Bhargava, S. 1991. Molecular analysis of mycobacterial genome. Ph.D. thesis. University of Delhi, Delhi, India. |
| 8. | Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of dye-binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254[Medline]. |
| 9. | Brock, T. D., M. T. Madigan, J. M. Martinko, and J. Parker (ed.). 1994. Growth and its control, p. 321-360. In Biology of microorganisms., 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. |
| 10. | Chen, J., and W. Bishai. 1998. Identification of SigF-dependent genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, p. 501. In Abstracts of the 98th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1998. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 11. | Cole, S. T., R. Brosch, J. Parkhill, et al. 1998. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393:537-544[Medline]. |
| 12. |
Condon, C.,
C. Squires, and C. L. Squires.
1995.
Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli.
Microbiol. Rev.
59:623-645 |
| 13. |
Dasgupta, S. K.,
M. D. Bashyam, and A. K. Tyagi.
1993.
Cloning and assessment of mycobacterial promoters by using a plasmid shuttle vector.
J. Bacteriol.
175:5186-5192 |
| 14. | Dasgupta, S. K., M. D. Bashyam, and A. K. Tyagi. 1998. Expression systems for study of mycobacterial gene regulation and development of recombinant BCG vaccines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 246:797-804[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Deneer, H. G., and G. B. Spiegelman.
1987.
Bacillus subtilis rRNA promoters are growth rate regulated in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
169:995-1002 |
| 16. |
Dickson, R. R.,
T. Gaal,
H. A. de Boer,
P. L. deHaseth, and R. L. Gourse.
1989.
Identification of promoter mutants defective in growth rate-dependent regulation of rRNA transcription in E. coli.
J. Bacteriol.
171:4862-4870 |
| 17. | Gafny, R., S. Cohen, N. Nachaliel, and G. Glaser. 1994. Isolated P2 rRNA promoters of E. coli are strong promoters that are subject to stringent control. J. Mol. Biol. 243:152-156[Medline]. |
| 18. | Gausing, K. 1977. Regulation of ribosome production in E. coli: synthesis and stability of ribosomal RNA and of ribosomal protein mRNAs at different growth rates. J. Mol. Biol. 115:335-354[Medline]. |
| 19. | Gausing, K. 1980. Regulation of ribosome biosynthesis in E. coli, p. 693-718. In G. Chambliss, G. R. Craven, J. Davis, L. Kahan, and M. Nomura (ed.), Ribosomes: structure, function and genetics. University Park Press, Baltimore, Md. |
| 20. | Glaser, G., P. Sarmientos, and M. Cashel. 1983. Functional interrelationship between two tandem E. coli ribosomal RNA promoters. Nature 302:74-76[Medline]. |
| 21. | Gonzalez-y-Merchand, J. A., M. J. Colston, and R. A. Cox. 1996. The rRNA operons of Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: comparison of promoter elements and of neighbouring upstream genes. Microbiology 142:667-674[Abstract]. |
| 22. |
Gonzalez-y-Merchand, J. A.,
M. J. Garcia,
S. Gonzalez-Rico,
M. J. Colston, and R. A. Cox.
1997.
Strategies used by pathogenic and nonpathogenic mycobacteria to synthesize rRNA.
J. Bacteriol.
179:6949-6958 |
| 23. |
Gonzalez-y-Merchand, J. A.,
M. J. Colston, and R. A. Cox.
1998.
Roles of multiple promoters in transcription of ribosomal DNA: effects of growth conditions on precursor rRNA synthesis in mycobacteria.
J. Bacteriol.
180:5756-5761 |
| 24. | Gourse, R. L., H. A. deBoer, and M. Nomura. 1986. DNA determinants of rRNA synthesis in E. coli: growth rate dependent regulation, feedback inhibition, upstream activation, antitermination. Cell 44:197-205[Medline]. |
| 25. |
Harshey, R. M., and T. Ramakrishnan.
1977.
Rate of ribonucleic acid chain growth in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv.
J. Bacteriol.
129:616-622 |
| 26. | Jain, S., D. Kaushal, S. K. DasGupta, and A. K. Tyagi. 1997. Construction of shuttle vectors for genetic manipulation and molecular analysis of mycobacteria. Gene 190:37-44[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Josaitis, C. A.,
T. Gaal, and R. L. Gourse.
1995.
Stringent control and growth rate-dependent control have nonidentical promoter sequence requirements.
Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA
92:1117-1121 |
| 28. | Kinger, A. K., A. Verma, and J. S. Tyagi. 1993. A method for the isolation of pure intact RNA from mycobacteria BioTechniques 14:724-725[Medline]. |
| 29. | Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 30. | Miura, A., J. H. Krueger, S. Itoh, H. A. deBoer, and M. Nomura. 1981. Growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in E. coli expression of the lacZ and galK genes fused to ribosomal promoters. Cell 25:773-782[Medline]. |
| 31. | Nomura, M. R., R. L. Gourse, and G. Baughman. 1984. Regulation of the synthesis of ribosomes and ribosomal components. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53:75-115[Medline]. |
| 32. |
Ranes, M. G.,
J. Rauzier,
M. Lagranderie,
M. Gheorghiu, and B. Gicquel.
1990.
Functional analysis of pAL5000, a plasmid from Mycobacterium fortuitum: construction of a "mini" mycobacterium Escherichia coli shuttle vector.
J. Bacteriol.
172:2793-2797 |
| 33. |
Ross, W.,
K. K. Gosnik,
J. Salomon,
K. Igarashi,
C. Zou,
A. Ishihama,
K. Severinov, and R. L. Gourse.
1993.
A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by submit of RNA polymerase.
Science
262:1407-1413 |
| 34. |
Sarmientos, P., and M. Cashel.
1983.
Carbon starvation and growth rate-dependent regulation of the Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA promoters: differential control of dual promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:7010-7013 |
| 35. |
Stewart, G., and K. Bott.
1983.
DNA sequence of the tandem ribosomal RNA promoter for B. subtilis operon rrnB.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:6289-6300 |
| 36. | Stueber, D., and H. Bujard. 1982. Transcription from efficient promoters can interfere with plasmid replication and diminish expression of plasmid specified genes. EMBO J. 1:1399-1404[Medline]. |
| 37. | Verma, A., A. K. Kinger, and J. S. Tyagi. 1994. Functional analysis of transcription of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 16S rDNA-encoding gene. Gene 148:113-118[Medline]. |
| 38. | Winder, F. G. 1982. Mode of action of the antimycobacterial agents and associated aspects of the molecular biology of the mycobacteria, p. 353-438. In C. Ratledge, and J. Stanford (ed.), The biology of mycobacteria, vol. I. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |