Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, August 1999, p. 4676-4679, Vol. 181, No. 15
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Succinate Dehydrogenase (Sdh) from
Bradyrhizobium japonicum Is Closely Related to
Mitochondrial Sdh
David J.
Westenberg* and
Mary Lou
Guerinot
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth
College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
Received 21 January 1999/Accepted 13 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The sdhCDAB operon, encoding succinate dehydrogenase,
was cloned from the soybean symbiont Bradyrhizobium
japonicum. Sdh from B. japonicum is phylogenetically
related to Sdh from mitochondria. This is the first example of a
mitochondrion-like Sdh functionally expressed in
Escherichia coli.
 |
TEXT |
In the Bradyrhizobium
japonicum-soybean (Glycine max) symbiosis, the
plant host provides the bacterial partner with the dicarboxylates succinate, fumarate, and malate as carbon and energy sources (5, 10, 11). Bradyrhizobial mutants that lack a
C4-dicarboxylate uptake system develop nodules that are no
longer able to fix nitrogen, clearly demonstrating a critical role for
dicarboxylates in the symbiosis (6). Because dicarboxylates
are assimilated via enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, we
have focused our attention on succinate dehydrogenase, a TCA cycle
enzyme that is necessary for growth on succinate as a sole source of
carbon and energy. Sdh and the related enzyme fumarate reductase (Frd)
have been studied in a number of systems, most notably in
Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and beef
heart mitochondria (1). Sdh catalyzes the oxidation of
succinate to fumarate, and this reaction is coupled to the reduction of
ubiquinone to ubiquinol. Ubiquinol then transfers electrons to the
electron transport chain for aerobic respiration. All Sdh complexes
contain two catalytic subunits: SdhA, which forms the catalytic site
for succinate oxidation and covalently binds flavin; and SdhB, which
binds three iron sulfur centers (1). Most Sdh enzymes
contain one (SdhC) or two (SdhC and SdhD) additional subunits that
serve to attach the catalytic subunits to the inner side of the
cytoplasmic membrane (1). The membrane-spanning subunits are
also proposed to be involved in interaction of the enzyme with quinones
(4, 13).
In this article, we report the cloning and sequencing of the
sdhCDAB genes from B. japonicum. In addition, we
investigate the close phylogenetic relationship between B. japonicum Sdh and eukaryotic Sdh and describe the functional
expression of B. japonicum Sdh in E. coli.
Characterization of the succinate dehydrogenase
(sdhCDAB) operon from B. japonicum.
A PCR
product, amplified from B. japonicum genomic DNA
with primers to regions of sdhA from Paracoccus
denitrificans (PD1, 5'-TCGCACACGGTCGCGGCGCAAGGC-3'; and
PD3, 5'-CCTTCGCCGCGCGCGCCTTC-3') was used to identify a
5.2-kb EcoRV fragment that carried all four sdh
genes in the gene order sdhCDAB (Fig.
1). There is an overlap between the last
codon of the sdhC gene and the first codon of the
sdhD gene, and there is a 103-base gap between the last
codon of the sdhA gene and the first codon of the
sdhB gene. The sdhB gene is followed by a
rho-independent transcriptional terminator, consistent with
sdhB as the final gene in the operon. The 5'
end of the B. japonicum sdhCDAB transcript was determined by
primer extension analysis (7) to begin 56 bases before the predicted start codon of sdhC (Fig. 1). The
35 and
10
regions upstream of the transcriptional start bear some similarity to a
proposed B. japonicum consensus promoter
(3). Despite the similarity of the B. japonicum
consensus sequences to those of E. coli, the
B. japonicum sdh promoter was not functional in
E. coli (data not shown). However, all four subunits could
be synthesized when an E. coli promoter was placed
upstream of the sdhC gene (see below), consistent with the
four sdh genes forming an operon.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Physical map of the 5.2-kb EcoRV fragment
encoding the entire B. japonicum sdhCDAB operon. The top
line indicates the size of the DNA fragment in kilobase pairs. The
second line represents the relative position of the genes coding for
the individual subunits of the Sdh enzyme plus an additional incomplete
open reading frame which encodes a protein with similarity to the
R. leguminosarum gstR gene product. The arrows indicate the
direction of transcription. The last line shows the nucleotide sequence
of the promoter region and 5' untranslated leader sequence with the
start of transcription indicated as +1 and the start of translation for
the sdhC gene underlined. The consensus B. japonicum "housekeeping" promoter sequence is indicated
beneath the sdhCDAB sequence with the six critical bases
underlined. An asterisk marks bases within the sdhCDAB
sequence that match the consensus. (B) Determination of the
sdhCDAB transcriptional start site by primer extension
analysis. Twenty micrograms of total RNA from cells grown under either
iron-sufficient or iron-deficient conditions was hybridized to a primer
complementary to the beginning of the sdhC coding region.
The DNA sequencing ladder was generated by using the same primer. The
nucleotide sequence of the coding strand is indicated to the left of
the DNA sequencing ladder.
|
|
B. japonicum Sdh activity and sdh gene
expression.
Membranes prepared from B. japonicum cells
(4) grown under iron- or heme-limited conditions
(8) lack measurable Sdh activity (Fig.
2). This is consistent with the known
properties of other Sdhs, which contain multiple iron sulfur centers
and b-type cytochromes. sdh mRNA is undetectable
in iron-deficient cells (Fig. 1B), consistent with Sdh abundance being
controlled at the level of gene expression. Surprisingly, B. japonicum cells grown under oxygen-limited conditions contain
elevated levels of Sdh enzyme (Fig. 2). This expression pattern is in
contrast to that seen for E. coli, in which
sdhCDAB expression is decreased under oxygen limitation
(9). This discrepancy may reflect a requirement for B. japonicum Sdh under oxygen-limited conditions for metabolism
of succinate, a major source of carbon and energy in the nodules.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Sdh activity of membranes prepared from B. japonicum cells grown under various physiological conditions.
Membranes were isolated from cells grown under the described growth
conditions and assayed for succinate-dependent reduction of
phenazinemethosulfate (PMS). Each data point represents the average of
at least three independent assays. Standard error bars are shown.
|
|
The relationship of B. japonicum Sdh to mitochondrial
Sdh.
The predicted amino acid sequences of all available SdhA and
SdhB subunits were aligned, and phylogenetic relationships (displayed as cladograms) were estimated (Fig. 3).
All eukaryotic sequences form a single clade (indicated in Fig. 3 by
the boxes) that also includes sequences from prokaryotes belonging to
the
-subgroup of the proteobacteria (boldface in Fig. 3), including
B. japonicum. This similarity is consistent with the
endosymbiont theory of mitochondrial origin, which proposes that
mitochondria evolved from symbiotic bacteria belonging to the
-subgroup of the proteobacteria (14). Therefore, B. japonicum Sdh may serve as an excellent model enzyme for analysis
of mitochondrial complex II.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Phylogenetic relationships of all publicly available,
predicted SdhA or FrdA and SdhB or FrdB amino acid sequences. Sequences
were aligned by using the GCG program PILEUP, distances were calculated
by using PAUP, and trees were drawn by using neighbor joining. (A) The
predicted SdhA or FrdA sequences used for the organism and subunit were
as follows (with accession numbers in parentheses): Acidianus
ambivalens SdhA (AJ005961), Aquifex aeolicus SdhA
(AE000697), Arabidopsis thaliana SdhA (AJ001809),
Archaeoglobus fulgidus SdhA (AE001057), Ascaris
suum FrdA (D30650), Bacillus subtilis SdhA (P08065),
Bos taurus SdhA (P31039), Bradyrhizobium
japonicum SdhA (AF007569), Caenorhabditis elegans SdhA
(Q09508), Caenorhabditis elegans FrdA (U23514),
Candida albicans SdhA (Y10377), Chlamydia
trachomatis SdhA (AE001330), Coxiella burnetii SdhA
(P51054), Dirofilaria immitis SdhA (S78630),
Drosophila melanogaster SdhA (Y09064), Escherichia
coli FrdA (J01611), Escherichia coli SdhA (P10444),
Haemophilus influenzae FrdA (P44894), Helicobacter
pylori FrdA (O06913), Homo sapiens SdhA (P31040),
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum FrdA (AE000910),
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Thiol:FrdA (AJ000941),
Methanococcus jannaschii FrdA (Q60356), Mus
musculus SdhA, Mycobacterium leprae SdhA (U00022),
Mycobacterium tuberculosis FrdA (Q10760),
Mycobacterium tuberculosis SdhA (AL021841),
Natronobacterium pharaonis SdhA (Y07709),
Paenibacillus macerans SdhA (Y08563), Paracoccus
denitrificans SdhA (Q59661), Plasmodium falciparum SdhA
(D86573), Proteus vulgaris FrdA (P20922), Rickettsia
prowazekii SdhA (P31038), Rhodoferax fermentans FrdA
(AB015757), Rhodospirillum rubrum SdhA (AB015756),
Saccharomyces cerevisiae FrdA (JC5123), Saccharomyces
cerevisiae SdhA (Q00711), Saccharomyces cerevisiae FrdA
(JC5123), Schizosaccharomyces pombe SdhA (D89263),
Schizosaccharomyces pombe FrdA (Z99292), Shewanella
putrefaciens FrdA (Q02469), Shewanella putrefaciens
SdhA (Y13760), Sulfolobus acidocaldarius SdhA (Y09041),
Synechocystis sp. SdhA (D90906), Wolinella
succinogenes FrdA (P17412), and Wolinella succinogenes
FrdA (Y10581). (B) The predicted SdhB sequences used were as follows:
Acidianus ambivalens SdhB (AJ005961), Agaricus
bisporus SdhB (Y15942), Aquifex aeolicus FrdB
(AE000695), Arabidopsis thaliana SdhB (P21915),
Archaeoglobus fulgidus SdhB (AE001057), Ascaris
suum SdhB (AB008568), Bacillus subtilus SdhB (P08066),
Bradyrhizobium japonicum SdhB (AF007569),
Caenorhabditis elegans SdhB (AB008569), Chlamydia
trachomatis SdhB (AE001330), Chondrus crispus SdhB
(P48932), Coxiella burnetii SdhB (P51053), Cyanidium
caldarium SdhB (P48933), Drosophila melanogaster SdhB
(P21914), Escherichia coli FrdB (P00364), Escherichia
coli SdhB (P07014), Haemonchus contortus SdhB (X75822),
Haemophilus influenzae FrdB (P44893), Helicobacter
pylori FrdB (O06914), Homo sapiens SdhB (P21912),
Methanococcus jannaschii FrdB (Q57557),
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum FrdB (AE000937),
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Thiol:FrdA (AJ000942),
Mus musculus SdhB, Mycobacterium leprae SdhB
(S73040), Mycobacterium tuberculosis FrdB (Q10761),
Mycobacterium tuberculosis SdhB (AL021841),
Mycosphaerella graminicola SdhB (O42772),
Natronobacterium pharaonis SdhB (Y07709), Neisseria
gonorrhoeae SdhB (J03844), Paenibacillus macerans SdhB
(Y08563), Paracoccus denitrificans SdhB (Q59662),
Plasmodium falciparum SdhB (D86574), Pleurotus
ostreatus SdhB (AB007361), Porphyra purpurea SdhB
(P80477), Proteus vulgaris FrdB (P20921), Rattus
norvegicus SdhB (P21913), Reclinomonas americana SdhB
(P80480), Rickettsia prowazekii SdhB (3860614),
Rhodoferax fermentans FrdB (AB015757), Saccharomyces
cerevisiae SdhB (P21801), Schizosaccharomyces pombe
SdhB (Z99091), Shewanella putrefaciens SdhB (Y13760),
Sulfolobus acidocaldarius SdhB (Y09041),
Synechococcus sp. strain PCC7002 SdhB (AF052290),
Synechocystis sp. SdhB (D90909), Synechocystis
sp. SdhB (D64003), Thermoplasma acidophilum SdhB (S34619),
Ustilago maydis SdhB (P32420), Vibrio cholera
SdhB (AJ231124), and Wolinella succinogenes FrdB (P17596).
Note that the Mus musculus SdhA and SdhB sequences were
derived by combining the sequences of several overlapping EST clones.
The accession numbers for the various fragments are as follows: SdhA,
W97337, W59232, AA048847, AA103522, AA028724, and W90791; and SdhB,
AA050217 and AA109032.
|
|
Several organisms contain both Sdh and Frd enzymes, and it is proposed
that the duplicate sequences arose from a gene duplication
(
1). The Sdh and Frd sequences are generally separated into
distinct clades, but this trend is not consistent. However, sequences
in the mostly Sdh clade have the gene order
sdh- or
frdCDAB and
sequences in the primarily Frd clade have the
gene order
frd-
or
sdhABCD. In this respect, gene
order correlates well with the
cladogram structure. Outlying sequences
have the gene order
sdh-
or
frdCAB (these enzymes
have one C subunit that is equivalent
to the CD subunits of other
enzymes), indicating that the four-subunit
enzymes may have evolved
from the three-subunit enzymes. The
sdh genes from two
organisms,
Synechocystis sp. and
Rickettsia
prowazekii,
are not found in an
operon.
The archaeal sequences form a heterogeneous group appearing in at least
three separate clades. The methanogenic archaea appear
in one clade;
Acidianus ambivalens,
Sulfolobus acidocaldarius,
and
Aquifex aoelicus appear in a second clade; and
Archaeoglobus fulgidis,
Thermoplasma acidophilum,
and
Natronobacterium pharaonis appear in a third clade. In
some of the archaea, the genes do
not form an operon
(
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum,
Methanococcus jannaschii, and
A. aoelicus), two have the gene order
sdhABCD (
A. fulgidis and
S. acidocaldarius), and another has the
gene
order
sdhCDBA (
N. pharaonis).
M. thermoautotrophicum also has
the unique distinction of having two
fumarate reductase enzymes,
one of which is a thiol/fumarate reductase.
The predicted amino
acid sequences of the
M. thermoautotrophicum Frds are very closely
related, indicating a
recent gene duplication leading to two genes
with different
specificities.
The diversity of Sdh and Frd structure at the level of subunit
composition, gene order, and activity suggests that these enzymes
have
evolved rapidly. The mechanism for this rapid evolution is
not readily
apparent, but could involve lateral gene transfer
and warrants further
investigation.
Complementation of an E. coli sdh frd double
mutant.
The B. japonicum sdhCDAB operon under the
control of a heterologous promoter (the IPTG
[isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside]-inducible trc promoter of plasmid pTrc99A) (2)
complements E. coli DW35 (an sdh frd double
mutant) (12) for growth on minimal succinate medium (Fig.
4). However, the doubling time is longer
than the doubling time of DW35 transformed with the E. coli
sdhCDAB operon (10 h versus 2 h). Even DW35 transformed with
the E. coli frdABCD operon has a shorter doubling
time in minimal succinate medium than the same strain transformed with
B. japonicum sdhCDAB (Fig. 4). The doubling time was
consistent over a wide range of IPTG concentrations (10 µM to 10 mM),
indicating that insufficient expression levels are not the reason for
slow growth (data not shown). This was confirmed by determination of
abundance of membrane-associated flavin. (DW35 lacks
membrane-associated covalent flavin
diagnostic for Sdh and Frd, the
only membrane-associated enzymes with a covalent flavin.)
Membrane-associated flavin indicates that the abundance of Sdh in
the membrane of DW35 complemented with the B. japonicum sdhCDAB operon is equivalent to the abundance of Sdh in
the membrane of DW35 complemented by the E. coli
sdhCDAB operon (data not shown). The slow growth may
simply reflect the respiration rate in the more slowly growing B. japonicum. The activity of respiratory enzymes may be optimized to
the respiratory chain in which they operate and could act as a
rate-limiting step when expressed in another bacterium.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Complementation of an E. coli sdh frd double
mutant strain DW35. DW35 was transformed with plasmids carrying
either the wild-type E. coli sdhCDAB operon ( ),
the wild-type E. coli frdABCD operon ( ), the B. japonicum sdhCDAB operon ( ), or a vector alone as a control
( ). OD600, optical density at 600 nm.
|
|
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The nucleotide sequence
data reported in this paper have been submitted to GenBank and have
been assigned accession no. AF007569.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Mark McPeek for help with analysis of sequence alignments
and critical reading of the manuscript; Gary Cecchini for E. coli and P. denitrificans sdhCDAB-containing plasmids,
the P. denitrificans sdhCDAB sequence, and many helpful
suggestions; and Rob McClung for critically reading the manuscript.
This work was supported by a postdoctoral grant (NRICGP 94-37305-0620)
from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to D.J.W.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biological Sciences, University of Missouri
Rolla, Rolla, MO 65409. Phone: (573) 341-4798. Fax: (573) 341-4821. E-mail:
djwesten{at}umr.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ackrell, B. A. C.,
M. K. Johnson,
R. P. Gunsalus, and G. Cecchini.
1992.
Structure and function of succinate dehydrogenase and fumarate reductase, p. 229-297.
In
F. Mueller (ed.), Chemistry and biochemistry of flavoenzymes, vol. 3. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 2.
|
Amann, E.,
B. Ochs, and K.-J. Abel.
1988.
Tightly regulated tac promoter vectors useful for the expression of unfused and fused proteins in Escherichia coli.
Gene
69:301-315[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Beck, C.,
R. Marty,
S. Kläusli,
H. Hennecke, and M. Göttfert.
1997.
Dissection of the transcription machinery for housekeeping genes of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.
J. Bacteriol.
179:364-369[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Cecchini, G.,
C. R. Thompson,
B. A. C. Ackrell,
D. J. Westenberg,
N. Dean, and R. P. Gunsalus.
1986.
Oxidation of reduced menaquinone by the fumarate reductase complex in Escherichia coli requires the hydrophobic FrdD peptide.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:8898-8902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Day, D. A., and L. Copeland.
1991.
Carbon metabolism and compartmentation in nitrogen-fixing legume nodules.
Plant Physiol. Biochem.
29:185-201.
|
| 6.
|
El-Din, A.
1992.
A succinate transport mutant of Bradyrhizobium japonicum forms ineffective nodules on soybeans.
Can J. Microbiol.
38:230-234[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Hartz, D.,
D. S. McPheeters,
R. Traut, and L. Gold.
1988.
Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes.
Methods Enzymol.
164:419-425[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Page, K.
1994.
Ph.D. dissertation.
Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H..
|
| 9.
|
Park, S. J.,
C. P. Tseng, and R. P. Gunsalus.
1995.
Regulation of succinate dehydrogenase (sdhCDAB) operon expression in Escherichia coli in response to carbon supply and anaerobiosis: role of ArcA and Fnr.
Mol. Microbiol.
15:473-482[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Rosendahl, L.,
A. R. Glenn, and M. J. Dilworth.
1991.
Organic and inorganic inputs into legume root nodule nitrogen fixation, p. 259-291.
In
M. J. Dilworth, and A. R. Glenn (ed.), Biology and biochemistry of nitrogen fixation. Elsevier, New York, N.Y.
|
| 11.
|
Vance, C. P., and G. H. Heichel.
1991.
Carbon in N2 fixation: limitation or exquisite adaptation.
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
42:373-392.
|
| 12.
|
Westenberg, D. J.,
R. P. Gunsalus,
B. A. C. Ackrell, and G. Cecchini.
1990.
Electron transfer from menaquinol to fumarate: fumarate reductase anchor polypeptide mutants of Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:19560-19567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Westenberg, D. J.,
R. P. Gunsalus,
B. A. C. Ackrell,
H. Sices, and G. Cecchini.
1993.
Escherichia coli fumarate reductase frdC and frdD mutants: identification of amino acid residues involved in catalytic activity with quinones.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:815-822[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Yang, D.,
H. Oyaizu,
G. J. Olsen, and C. R. Woese.
1985.
Mitochondrial origins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:4443-4447[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, August 1999, p. 4676-4679, Vol. 181, No. 15
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.