Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, August 1999, p. 5075-5080, Vol. 181, No. 16
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Characterization of Binding Sequences for
Butyrolactone Autoregulator Receptors in Streptomycetes
Hiroshi
Kinoshita,
Tomohiro
Tsuji,
Hiroomi
Ipposhi,
Takuya
Nihira,* and
Yasuhiro
Yamada
Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School
of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka
565-0871, Japan
Received 16 February 1999/Accepted 24 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
BarA of Streptomyces virginiae is a specific receptor
protein for a member of butyrolactone autoregulators which binds to an
upstream region of target genes to control transcription, leading to
the production of the antibiotic virginiamycin M1 and S. BarA-binding DNA sequences (BarA-responsive elements [BAREs]), to
which BarA binds for transcriptional control, were restricted to 26 to
29-nucleotide (nt) sequences on barA and barB
upstream regions by the surface plasmon resonance technique, gel shift
assay, and DNase I footprint analysis. Two BAREs (BARE-1 and BARE-2) on
the barB upstream region were located 57 to 29 bp (BARE-1)
and 268 to 241 bp (BARE-2) upstream from the barB
translational start codon. The BARE located on the barA
upstream region (BARE-3) was found 101 to 76 bp upstream of the
barA start codon. High-resolution S1 nuclease mapping
analysis revealed that BARE-1 covered the barB
transcription start site and BARE-3 covered an autoregulator-dependent
transcription start site of the barA gene. Deletion and
mutation analysis of BARE-2 demonstrated that at least a 19-nt sequence
was required for sufficient BarA binding, and A or T residues at the
edge as well as internal conserved nucleotides were indispensable. The
identified binding sequences for autoregulator receptor proteins were
found to be highly conserved among Streptomyces species.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Streptomyces virginiae
produces two types of antibiotics, virginiamycins M1 and S,
both of which act synergistically as irreversible inhibitors of protein
synthesis and show bactericidal activity against gram-positive
bacteria (1). The production of the two antibiotics is
induced by nanomolar concentrations of virginiae butanolides (VBs),
members of low-molecular-weight Streptomyces hormones called
butyrolactone autoregulators (14, 24, 27, 29). The signal of
VBs is transmitted to the cell through binding of VBs to the specific
receptor protein butyrolactone autoregulator receptor (BarA)
(19). BarA possesses a helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif on
its amino terminus (5, 11), and in-frame deletion of the
motif in the genome of S. virginiae resulted in a
loss-of-function mutant with respect to the VB-dependent induction of
virginiamycin production (18). In vitro experiments
confirmed that BarA binds to DNA sequences in the absence of VB and
dissociates from DNA by binding with VB (10), suggesting
that the DNA-binding ability is central to the role of BarA as a
mediator of the VB signal.
In a previous report (10), we demonstrated that BarA binds
specifically to upstream regions of the barA gene itself and also to the downstream barB gene, which codes for a putative
transcriptional regulator deduced from the homology with BarA. The aim
of the present study was to localize precisely the target DNA sequences of BarA (BarA-responsive elements [BAREs]) as well as to evaluate by
deletion and mutation analysis the essential nucleotides in BARE. Three
identified BAREs were all A-T rich and showed potential for forming a
partial palindrome. Deletion and mutation analyses revealed a minimum
BARE of 19-nucleotide (nt) sequences with several essential nucleotides
for BarA binding.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains, culture media, and cultivation conditions.
S.
virginiae MAFF10-06014 (National Food Research Institute, Ministry
of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tsukuba, Japan) was grown at
28°C as described previously (4, 9). VB-C6 was
added at 8 h of cultivation to a final concentration of 300 nM,
comparable to that produced by S. virginiae (VB activity of 32 to 150 U/ml, which is equivalent to 85 to 150 nM VB-A or 425-750 nM
VB-C6). For genetic manipulation, Escherichia
coli DH5
was used. For expression of the barA gene,
E. coli BL21(DE3)/pLysS was used as the host. DNA
manipulations in E. coli were performed as described by
Sambrook et al. (23).
Chemicals.
All chemicals were of reagent or high-performance
liquid chromatography grade and were purchased from either Nacali
Tesque, Inc. (Osaka, Japan), Takara Shuzo Co. (Shiga, Japan), or Wako Pure Chemical Industrial, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).
Primer extension.
Primer extension analysis was performed as
described by Sambrook et al. (23). Total RNA was isolated by
a procedure reported by Hopwood et al. (6). Quantification
of the RNA was performed at an absorbance at 260 nm. The primer
5'-GAAGGCGCGTTCCTGTTTGGGTGTCAA-3', which is complementary to
nt +27 to +1 relative to the barB start codon, was 5'-end
labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase.
The unincorporated ATP was separated by using a Primer/Probe
purification kit (Advanced Genetic Technologies Co.).
32P-labeled primer was annealed to S. virginiae
RNA. Rous-associated virus 2 reverse transcriptase was used to extend
the reverse transcripts starting from the primer. For the sequencing
ladder, the 32P-labeled primer was used with a BcaBEST
dideoxy sequencing kit (Takara Shuzo); the StuI fragment
shown in Fig. 1 served as the template. The ladder and the RNA
primer-extended product were resolved on a 6% polyacrylamide-8 M urea gel.
S1 nuclease mapping.
Total RNA for S1 nuclease mapping was
isolated as described for primer extension experiments. Labeled DNA
fragments were produced for the identification of barA
transcriptional start sites (TSS). pAR489, which consisted of pUC19 and
a 2.8-kbp BamHI fragment containing the barA gene
(19), was digested with endonucleases SphI and
KpnI. An isolated fragment was then subcloned in pUC19, which provided the template for the PCR to prepare the labeled fragment, using M13 primer RV-N (Takara Shuzo) and 5'
[
-32P]ATP-labeled primer
5'-GCCCGTTCCTGTCGCACTGC-3'; the latter primer is
complementary to nt +44 to +25 relative to the barA start
codon. The labeled primer was also used for making DNA sequencing
ladders. RNA (50 µg) was dried with the 32P-labeled DNA
probes (100,000 cpm). Pellets were suspended in 20 µl of 3 M sodium
trichloroacetate buffer [40 mM
piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)
(PIPES), 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.0)]. Tubes were placed in a water bath that
was kept at 65°C for 15 min; they were then allowed to cool to 45°C
overnight. All subsequent steps were as described by Janssen et al.
(8).
Biosensor assays of protein-DNA interactions.
Protein-DNA
interaction was measured by the BIAcore system (Pharmacia Biosensor).
BIAcore utilizes surface plasmon resonance (SPR), a quantum mechanical
phenomenon which detects changes in the refractive index of incident
light close to the surface of a thin gold film on a glass support
(i.e., sensor chip) (2). The surface of the sensor chip is
covered with a carboxymethylated dextran polymer. One of the reactants
is linked either directly or indirectly to this polymer, by means of
the specific interaction between biotin and streptavidin, while the
other is introduced in flow over the surface. Binding of the soluble
ligand to the immobilized one leads to an increase in the ligand
concentration at the sensor surface, with a corresponding increase in
the refractive index. This change in refractive index alters the SPR in
an optically detectable manner. Binding is evaluated in arbitrary
response units (RU), and a linear relationship exists between the mass of ligand bound to the dextran matrix and the RU observed. A signal of
1,000 RU corresponds to a surface concentration change of approximately 1 ng/mm2.
An SA5 sensor chip (research grade; precoated with approximately 4,000 RU of streptavidin) was obtained from Pharmacia Biosensor. Synthesized
target DNA fragments were subcloned into the
KpnI-SacI site in pUC19. They were then
biotinylated by PCR with primers 5'-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3' and
biotin-5'-CAGGAAACA-GCTATGAC-3', located just outside the
multicloning site in pUC19. Seventy microliters of biotinylated DNA
(200 µg in 10 mM HEPES [pH 7.0]-1.0 M KCl) was injected over the
surface of the chip under a continuous flow of 5 µl/min of 10 mM
HEPES (pH 7.0) containing 1.0 M KCl and 0.005% (vol/vol) Tween 20.
Recombinant BarA (rBarA) was expressed and purified as described
previously (
19). During the interaction between rBarA and
DNA, 50 mM triethanolamine (TEA)-HCl (pH 7.0) containing 0.2 M
KCl and
0.005% (vol/vol) Tween 20 was used as the running buffer.
A 30-µl
sample (3.65 µM rBarA in 50 mM TEA-HCl [pH 7.0]) containing
0.2 M
KCl) was injected across the sensor surface on which the
corresponding
DNA fragment had been immobilized. All experiments
were performed at
25°C. Control DNA used in this experiment and
in gel shift assays was
the PCR fragment containing only the multicloning
site of pUC19
amplified with the above-mentioned
primers.
Gel shift assay.
The gel shift assay was carried out as
described previously (10). The DNA-protein binding reaction
was carried out with 250 pg of 32P-labeled double-stranded
fragments (10,000 to 20,000 cpm) and 1.1 µg (final concentration,
2.92 µM) of purified rBarA in 1× binding buffer [50 mM TEA-HCl (pH
7.0) containing 0.2 M KCl, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, and 1 µg of
poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC)] in a total volume of 15 µl. After
incubation at 25°C for 2 min, autoregulators (final concentration,
150 µM) were added, followed by a further 5-min incubation at 25°C.
The reaction mixture was subjected to electrophoresis at 4°C on a
high-ionic-strength gel containing 5% acrylamide and 0.167%
N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide with 50 mM Tris-Cl
(pH 8.5) containing 380 mM glycine and 2 mM EDTA as a running buffer.
Gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography.
DNase I footprint analysis.
DNase I footprint analyses were
carried out with 45 µl of the DNA-protein binding reaction mixture as
described above. After incubation at 25°C for 5 min, 5 µl of DNase
I solution (100 mM MgCl2, 50 mM CaCl2), with
several different amounts of DNase I (1.5 to 0.1 U) purchased from Life
Technologies Inc. (Rockville, Md.), was added to each reaction mixture,
which was then incubated for 1 min at 25°C. DNase digestion was
stopped by the addition of 400 µl of DNase I stop solution (150 mM
sodium acetate, 10 mM EDTA, 25 µg of tRNA [Boehringer Mannheim
Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.] per ml). Samples were then subjected to
phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. The resulting pellet was
resuspended in 5 µl of sequencing loading buffer and applied to a 6%
polyacrylamide gel.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
Sequences shown in
Fig. 1 have been assigned DDBJ, EMBL, and GenBank accession no. D3251.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Identification of BAREs by the SPR technique, gel shift assay, and
footprint analysis on barA and barB upstream
regions.
In a previous study (10), we found that the VB
receptor BarA bound to both upstream regions of the barA and
barB genes and regulated their expression depending on the
presence of VB. We concluded that at least two BAREs are present in the
barB upstream region: one in the 73-bp
AgeI-EheI region, and another in the 137-bp Nc137
fragment (NaeI-StuI region in Fig.
1) containing the barB
translation start codon. One BARE is also located in the 258-bp
fragment immediately upstream of the barA translational start codon (Fig. 1). To further localize BAREs, several fragments of
35 to 40 bp (PB01 to PB05) were synthesized from the two regions of the
barB gene (Table 1). PA01 was
constructed on the basis of the sequence of the barA
promoter region as a putative BARE, as judged from the homology of the
sequence of the barB promoter region. The synthesized
oligonucleotides were annealed with each complementary fragment and
cloned into pUC19. Biotin was introduced into the fragments by PCR with
a 5'-biotinylated universal primer, and the fragments were immobilized
on the sensor chip of a BIAcore system (see Materials and Methods for
detail). The biological interaction in SPR analysis was evaluated by
the maximum increase of SPR signal attained during the association
phase or by the level of signal slightly after the transition from
association phase to dissociation phase. With strengthening of the
interaction between the immobilized DNA and the free rBarA in the flow,
the SPR signal increases more steeply in the association phase and reaches a higher level. When shifted from the association phase to the
dissociation phase in which rBarA is absent, the signal drops suddenly
and then decreases gradually. The first drop reflects the release of
weakly bound rBarA, and the gradual decrease reflects the slow
dissociation of tightly bound rBarA. The synthesized oligonucleotides
PB01, PB02, PB04, and PA01 all showed steep increases and high maximum
levels of SPR signal during the association phase, while PB03 and PB05
showed levels of response similar to that of control DNA. Furthermore,
after being shifted to the dissociation phase, PB01, PB02, PB04, and
PA01 showed high levels of tightly bound rBarA, as evident from the
1,300 to 2,000 RU of slow decreasingly SPR signal, while responses of
PB03 and PB05 were negligible compared to that of the control DNA (Fig.
2A). Gel shift assays clearly confirmed
BarA binding to the fragments as well as dissociation of BarA from the
fragments in the presence of VB (Fig. 2B). From the intensity of the
shifted bands, PB01 and PA01 seemed to possess an affinity for BarA
higher than those of other fragments (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Restriction enzyme map around the barA (A)
and barB (B) promoter regions. Numbers indicate nucleotide
positions.
|
|


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Localization of BARE on barA and
barB promoters by the SPR technique. rBarA (3.65 µM) in 50 mM TEA-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.2 M KCl was introduced over the
surface of the sensor chip to analyze BarA binding to the indicated
fragments during the association phase (100 to 460 s). rBarA was
omitted from the flow during the dissociation phase (460 to 630 s). In each sensor chip, DNA corresponding to 800 to 1,000 RU was
immobilized. (B) Gel shift assay with oligonucleotides containing BARE.
In the rBarA row, a minus sign indicates that rBarA was omitted from
the binding reaction and a plus sign indicates that 2.92 µM rBarA was
present. In the VB row, a minus sign indicates that VB was not added to
the binding reaction and a plus sign indicates that 150 µM VB was
added. In all lanes, 125 pg of a 32P-labeled DNA probe was
electrophoresed. PB03, used as control DNA, showed no binding for BarA
in SPR analysis.
|
|
To precisely identify BARE, DNase I footprint analysis was also
performed for the
barA and
barB promoter regions.
When each
32P-labeled fragment was incubated with various
concentrations of
DNase I in the absence and presence of BarA,
BarA-dependent protection
of regions ranging from 26 to 29 bp in length
were evident (Fig.
3). The BarA-protected
regions derived from analyses of both coding
and noncoding strands are
listed in Table
2. These regions were
all A-T rich (41.4, 53.6, and
61.5% for BARE-1, -2, and -3, respectively),
despite the high GC
content of the
Streptomyces genome, and all
possessed
partial inverted repeat elements. Fragments (PB01, PB04,
and PA01)
shown to bind with BarA by SPR analysis and gel shift
assay contained
the DNase I-protected regions BARE-1, -2, and
-3, respectively (Fig.
2;
Tables
1 and
2). Although PB02 was
shown
to bind with BarA, the corresponding region was not protected
by BarA,
probably because of the low affinity of the PB02 region
toward BarA.
Alternatively, binding of BarA to BARE-2 might prevent
further access
of BarA to the PB02 region.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
DNase I footprint analysis on the barA and
barB promoter regions to identify BARE. rBarA (2.92 µM)
was added to the reaction mixture to detect the BarA-protected sequence
(+). The amount of DNase I was increased toward the right as indicated
by the upper triangle. The sequences around PB04 (BARE-1). PB01
(BARE-2), and PA01 (BARE-3) are in focus in panels a, b, and c.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Protected region in DNase I footprint analyses and
binding sites of autoregulator receptor protein from
Streptomyces species
|
|
TSS of barA and barB.
To clarify the
BarA-dependent regulation mechanism as regards the BAREs, TSS were
determined by either primer extension analyses or high-resolution S1
nuclease mapping. A single extension product of 58 nt from the C at
position 1504 was detected for the barB transcript only when
an autoregulator VB was present in the medium as the result of
derepression by the VB (10) (Fig.
4A). The barB TSS was present
21 bp upstream of the putative ribosome-binding sequence of
AGGAGTT, although neither a typical
35 nor
10 sequence was found in the proper position from the TSS (Fig.
5). BARE-1 corresponded to
22 to +3
relative to the barB TSS. Therefore, we postulated that BarA
represses the transcription of the barB gene in the absence
of VB by interfering with the binding of RNA polymerase. The second
BARE (BARE-2) in the barB upstream region was about 200 nt
away from the TSS. Although the physiological function of BARE-2 is not
clear, the double BAREs may coordinate the tight repression of the
barB gene by BarA.

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Identification of the barA and
barB TSS. (A) Primer extension analysis of the
barB transcripts in S. virginiae. Lanes T, G, C,
and A represent a sequencing ladder generated by the same primer. The
asterisk represents the TSS. Lanes: 1, RNA after 10-h cultivation; 2, RNA after 8-h cultivation followed by 2-h cultivation with added VB.
(B) High-resolution S1 mapping of the barA transcripts in
S. virginiae. Lanes A, C, G, and T represent a sequencing
ladder generated by the primer used for making the probe. Asterisks
indicated the VB-independent TSS, and the outlined letter indicated the
VB-dependent TSS. Lanes: 1, RNA after 10-h cultivation; 2, RNA after
12-h cultivation.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Locations of the BARE sequences in barA and
barB promoter regions. Sequences protected by BarA from
DNase I digestion are indicated by broken lines; locations of the TSS
of barA and barB are indicated by arrows;
putative 10 and 35 sequences for the constitutive barA
TSS are underlined; the putative ribosome-binding site (RBS) of
barB is boxed; translational start codons of barA
and a plausible start codon for barB are double
underlined.
|
|
For the
barA transcript, S1 nuclease mapping was used to
determine the TSS because the primer extension experiment revealed
no
signal, probably due to extension inhibition by a putative
secondary
structure. Three adjacent
barA transcripts were detected
with RNA from a 10-h culture, corresponding to initiations at
CGG
residues located 40 to 42 bp upstream of the
barA
translational
start codon (Fig.
4B and
5). Typical transcriptional
promoter
sequences, namely,

10 (TATCTA) and

35
(TTGACA), were found at
appropriate positions (Fig.
5). On
the other hand, with RNA from
12-h cultivation when
S. virginiae produced an autoregulator VB,
another transcript from an
A residue further upstream was detected.
This TSS lies in the middle of
BARE-3, and no typical

35 or

10
sequence was detected. We
demonstrated previously that
barA had
two modes of
transcription; one was constitutive and VB-independent
basal-level
transcription, and the other was VB-induced transcription
which was
evident from the enhanced transcript with internally
produced or
externally added VB (
10). The result of S1 nuclease
mapping
suggested that the larger transcript, starting from the
middle of
BARE-3, was responsible for the VB-dependent enhancement
of
transcription.
These results indicated that the BarA binding, in the absence of VB to
BAREs overlapping with transcriptional start sites,
resulted in
transcriptional repression of downstream genes. When
the autoregulator
VB is produced, it binds to BarA, thus forcing
BarA to dissociate from
BAREs. Hence, the approach of RNA polymerase
is enabled in order to
initiate
transcription.
Nucleotides in BARE essential for BarA binding.
To determine
the essential nucleotides in BARE, several deleted or modified BAREs
were synthesized based on the sequences of BARE-2 in the
barB promoter, because BARE-2 showed the highest symmetry
(Table 2). The oligonucleotides (PB011 to PB01d) used as probes are
listed in Table 1. The affinity toward BarA was investigated by the SPR
technique using a BIAcore system. The minimum length of BAREs was
determined to be 19 bp of PB013 (Fig. 6A
and Table 1). The affinity of PB011 and PB012 toward BarA was strong
and almost equal to that of PB01. However, PB013 showed a slightly
reduced affinity, as evident from the SPR profile at the dissociation
stage starting from 460 (Fig. 6A). Judging from the weak binding toward
PB013 and the lack of binding toward PB12, BarA seemed to require
consecutive A and T residues for sufficient binding to take place
(marked with asterisks in Table 1).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
SPR analysis of deleted (A) and mutated (B) versions of
BARE-2. rBarA (3.65 µM) in 50 mM TEA-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) containing
0.2 M KCl was introduced over the surface of the sensor chip to analyze
BarA-DNA interaction. Association phase, 100 to 460 s;
dissociation phase, 460 to 630 s. In each sensor chip, DNA
corresponding to 800 to 1,000 RU was immobilized.
|
|
Since BARE seemed to have palindromic structures with C as the center
of symmetry (double underlined on PB01 or BAREs; Tables
1 and
2),
mutated BAREs that have a symmetrical structure were
designed. No BarA
binding was detected on the probes covering
the left half (PB11), the
right half (PB13), or the mutant with
disrupted symmetry at both edges
(PB01d) (Fig.
6B). With PB01c,
a probe designed to form a complete
palindrome by changing only
4 nt in the right half, BarA binding was
significantly reduced
(Fig.
6B). These results suggested that the
palindromic structure
composed of A and T rows at both ends was
required but not sufficient
for recognition by BarA. In addition, the
internal nucleotides
substituted in PB01c were essential for
recognition by BarA. Conservation
of the inner sequences among BARE-1,
-2, and -3 also seemed to
indicate that these nucleotides are
indispensable for BarA
binding.
The binding characteristics of the above-mentioned fragments were
investigated by gel shift assay. Probes PB01, PB011, PB012,
and PB013
were all confirmed as capable of binding with BarA (Fig.
7). The shifted band of PB011 and PB012
was strong, whereas that
of PB01 was clear but weak. The shifted band
of PB013 migrated
only a little slower than did the free probe and
produced smear
bands as well. These results suggested that the affinity
with
BarA was strong in the case of PB011 and PB012, weaker with PB01,
and quite reduced in the case PB013. The smear bands with PB013
are
probably due to the specific binding with BarA, as evidenced
by the
fact that the shifted bands disappeared in the presence
of VB. Other
probes (PB11, PB12, and PB01d) showed no signs of
specific BarA
binding. This observation is in good agreement with
the results from
the SPR analyses. The unknown band shown in PB11
and PB01d was judged
to be nonspecific, because the mobility of
the band was too small and
the shift did not disappear in the
presence of VB. Probe PB01c showed a
very weak but definite BarA
binding in SPR analysis (probably because
of the high sensitivity
of SPR analysis, which can detect even a faint
interaction of
BarA with the probe) but no specific retardation in the
gel shift
assay.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Gel shift assay with oligonucleotides containing
modified BARE. In the rBarA row, a minus sign indicates that rBarA was
omitted from the binding reaction and a plus sign indicates that 2.92 µM rBarA was present. In the VB row, a minus sign indicates that VB
was not added to the binding reaction and a plus sign indicates that
150 µM VB was added. In all lanes, 125 pg of a
32P-labeled DNA probe was electrophoresed.
|
|
In
Streptomyces species, 10 butyrolactone autoregulators
classified into three groups (VB type, IM-2 type, and A-factor type)
(
3,
7,
13-16,
22,
25-28) have been identified, and three
receptor proteins corresponding to the three types of autoregulators
have been characterized (
19,
20,
30). The three receptors
(VB receptor BarA, IM-2 receptor FarA, and A-factor receptor ArpA)
show
high overall homology, especially of the N termini where
helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motifs are present. This finding
suggests
that similar DNA sequences may be recognized by these
autoregulator
receptors. Although artificial binding sequences
for ArpA were screened
from a random synthetic oligonucleotide
pool by PCR amplification
(
21), no genes containing the reported
ArpA-binding
sequences have been identified. In the case of FarA,
an IM-2 receptor,
the FarA-binding sequence was localized in the
farA promoter
region overlapping with the
farA TSS (
12). The
close alignment of BAREs, the FarA-binding sequence, and the artificial
ArpA-binding sequences (although their physiological relevance
is not
clear at present) suggests that the binding sequences are
all A-T rich,
are only partially palindromic with A and T rows
at both ends, and
share several highly conserved residues (Table
2). The well-conserved
target sequence for autoregulator receptors
as well as the wide
distribution of autoregulators in
Streptomyces suggest that
transcriptional regulation involving BARE-like sequences
is widespread
in this
genus.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. Phone: 81-6-6879-7433. Fax:
81-6-6879-7432. E-mail:
nihira{at}biochem.bio.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cocitto, C.
1979.
Antibiotics of the virginiamycin family, inhibitors which contain synergistic components.
Microbiol. Rev.
43:145-198[Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Garland, P. B.
1996.
Optical evanescent wave methods for the study of biomolecular interactions.
Q. Rev. Biophys.
29:91-117[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Gräfe, U.,
W. Schade,
I. Eritt,
W. F. Fleck, and L. Radics.
1982.
A new inducer of anthracycline biosynthesis from Streptomyces viridochromogenes.
J. Antibiot.
35:1722-1723[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Hillen, W., and C. Berens.
1994.
Mechanisms underlying expression of tn10 encoded tetracycline resistance.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
48:345-369[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Hinrichs, W.,
C. Kisker,
M. Düvel,
A. Müller,
K. Tovar,
W. Hillen, and W. Saenger.
1994.
Structure of the Tet repressor-tetracycline complex and regulation of antibiotic resistance.
Science
264:418-420[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Hopwood, D. A.,
M. J. Bibb,
K. F. Chater,
T. Kieser,
C. J. Bruton,
H. M. Kieser,
D. J. Lydiate,
C. P. Smith,
J. M. Ward, and H. Schrempf.
1985.
Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces: a laboratory manual.
The John Innes Foundation, Norwich, United Kingdom.
|
| 7.
|
Horinouchi, S., and T. Beppu.
1992.
Autoregulatory factors and communication in actinomycetes.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
46:377-398[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Janssen, G. R.,
J. M. Ward, and M. J. Bibb.
1989.
Unusual transcriptional and translational features of the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene (aph) from Streptomyces fradiae.
Genes Dev.
3:415-429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Kim, H. S.,
T. Nihira,
H. Tada,
M. Yanagimoto, and Y. Yamada.
1989.
Identification of binding protein of virginiae butanolide C, an autoregulator in virginiamycin production, from Streptomyces virginiae.
J. Antibiot.
42:769-778[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Kinoshita, H.,
H. Ipposhi,
S. Okamoto,
H. Nakano,
T. Nihira, and Y. Yamada.
1997.
Butyrolactone autoregulator receptor protein (BarA) as a transcriptional regulator in Streptomyces virginiae.
J. Bacteriol.
179:6986-6993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Kisker, C.,
W. Hinrichs,
K. Tovar,
W. Hillen, and W. Saenger.
1995.
The complex formed between Tet repressor and tetracycline-Mg2+ reveals mechanism of antibiotic resistance.
J. Mol. Biol.
247:260-280[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kitani, S.,
H. Kinoshita,
T. Nihira, and Y. Yamada.
1999.
In vitro analysis of the butyrolactone autoregulator receptor protein (FarA) of Streptomyces lavendulae FRI-5 reveals that FarA acts as a DNA-binding transcriptional regulator that controls its own synthesis.
J. Bacteriol.
181:5081-5084[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Kleiner, E. M.,
S. A. Pliner,
V. S. Soifer,
V. V. Onoprienko,
T. A. Blashova,
B. V. Rosynov, and A. S. Khokhlov.
1976.
The structure of A-factor, a bioregulator from Streptomyces griseus.
Bioorg. Khim.
2:1142-1147.
|
| 14.
|
Kondo, K.,
Y. Higuchi,
S. Sakuda,
T. Nihira, and Y. Yamada.
1989.
New virginiae butanolides from Streptomyces virginiae.
J. Antibiot.
42:1873-1876[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Mizuno, K.,
S. Sakuda,
T. Nihira, and Y. Yamada.
1996.
Enzymatic resolution of 2-acyl-3-hydroxymethyl-4-butanolide and preparation of optically active IM-2, the autoregulator from Streptomyces sp. FRI-5.
Tetrahedron
50:10849-10858.
|
| 16.
|
Mori, K.
1983.
Revision of the absolute configuration of A-factor.
Tetrahedron
39:3107-3109.
|
| 17.
|
Murray, M. G.
1986.
Use of sodium trichloroacetate and mung bean nuclease to increase sensitivity and precision during transcript mapping.
Anal. Biochem.
158:165-170[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Nakano, H.,
E. Takehara,
T. Nihira, and Y. Yamada.
1998.
Gene replacement analysis of the Streptomyces virginiae barA gene encoding the butyrolactone autoregulator receptor reveals that BarA acts as a repressor in virginiamycin biosynthesis.
J. Bacteriol.
180:3317-3322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Okamoto, S.,
K. Nakajima,
T. Nihira, and Y. Yamada.
1995.
Virginiae butanolide binding protein from Streptomyces virginiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:12319-12326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Onaka, H.,
N. Ando,
T. Nihira,
Y. Yamada,
T. Beppu, and S. Horinouchi.
1995.
Cloning and characterization of the A-factor receptor gene from Streptomyces griseus.
J. Bacteriol.
177:6083-6092[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Onaka, H., and S. Horinouchi.
1997.
DNA-binding activity of the A-factor receptor protein and its recognition DNA sequences.
Mol. Microbiol.
24:991-1000[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Sakuda, S., and Y. Yamada.
1991.
Stereochemistry of butyrolactone autoregulators from Streptomyces.
Tetrahedron Lett.
32:1817-1820.
|
| 23.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 24.
|
Sakuda, S., and Y. Yamada.
1991.
Stereochemistry of butyrolactone autoregulators from Streptomyces.
Tetrahedron Lett.
32:1817-1820.
|
| 25.
|
Sato, K.,
T. Nihira,
S. Sakuda,
M. Yanagimoto, and Y. Yamada.
1989.
Isolation and structure of a new butyrolactone autoregulator from Streptomyces sp. FRI-5.
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
68:170-173.
|
| 26.
|
Yamada, Y.,
T. Nihira, and S. Sakuda.
1992.
Biosynthesis and receptor protein of butyrolactone autoregulator of Streptomyces virginiae.
Actinomycetologica
6:1-8.
|
| 27.
|
Yamada, Y.,
K. Sugamura,
K. Kondo,
M. Yanagimoto, and H. Okada.
1987.
The structure of inducing factors for virginiamycin production in Streptomyces virginiae.
J. Antibiot.
40:496-504[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Yanagimoto, M., and T. Enatsu.
1983.
Regulation of a blue pigment production by -nonalactone in Streptomyces sp.
J. Ferment. Technol.
61:545-550.
|
| 29.
|
Yanagimoto, M., and G. Terui.
1971.
Physiological studies staphylomycin production. II. Formation of a substance effective in inducing staphylomycin production.
J. Ferment. Technol.
49:611-618.
|
| 30.
| Waki, M., T. Nihira, and Y. Yamada. Cloning and
characterization of the gene (farA) encoding the receptor
for an extracellular regulatory factor (IM-2) from
Streptomyces sp. strain FRI-5. J. Bacteriol.
179:5131-5137.
|
Journal of Bacteriology, August 1999, p. 5075-5080, Vol. 181, No. 16
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bunet, R., Mendes, M. V., Rouhier, N., Pang, X., Hotel, L., Leblond, P., Aigle, B.
(2008). Regulation of the Synthesis of the Angucyclinone Antibiotic Alpomycin in Streptomyces ambofaciens by the Autoregulator Receptor AlpZ and Its Specific Ligand. J. Bacteriol.
190: 3293-3305
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamamoto, S., He, Y., Arakawa, K., Kinashi, H.
(2008). {gamma}-Butyrolactone-Dependent Expression of the Streptomyces Antibiotic Regulatory Protein Gene srrY Plays a Central Role in the Regulatory Cascade Leading to Lankacidin and Lankamycin Production in Streptomyces rochei. J. Bacteriol.
190: 1308-1316
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kuscer, E., Coates, N., Challis, I., Gregory, M., Wilkinson, B., Sheridan, R., Petkovic, H.
(2007). Roles of rapH and rapG in Positive Regulation of Rapamycin Biosynthesis in Streptomyces hygroscopicus. J. Bacteriol.
189: 4756-4763
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Recio, E., Colinas, A., Rumbero, A., Aparicio, J. F., Martin, J. F.
(2004). PI Factor, a Novel Type Quorum-sensing Inducer Elicits Pimaricin Production in Streptomyces natalensis. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 41586-41593
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Choi, S.-U., Lee, C.-K., Hwang, Y.-I., Kinoshita, H., Nihira, T.
(2004). Cloning and Functional Analysis by Gene Disruption of a Gene Encoding a {gamma}-Butyrolactone Autoregulator Receptor from Kitasatospora setae. J. Bacteriol.
186: 3423-3430
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shikura, N., Yamamura, J., Nihira, T.
(2002). barS1, a Gene for Biosynthesis of a {gamma}-Butyrolactone Autoregulator, a Microbial Signaling Molecule Eliciting Antibiotic Production in Streptomyces Species. J. Bacteriol.
184: 5151-5157
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Santamarta, I., Rodriguez-Garcia, A., Perez-Redondo, R., Martin, J. F., Liras, P.
(2002). CcaR Is an Autoregulatory Protein That Binds to the ccaR and cefD-cmcI Promoters of the Cephamycin C-Clavulanic Acid Cluster in Streptomyces clavuligerus. J. Bacteriol.
184: 3106-3113
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Folcher, M., Gaillard, H., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, K. T., Lacroix, P., Bamas-Jacques, N., Rinkel, M., Thompson, C. J.
(2001). Pleiotropic Functions of a Streptomyces pristinaespiralis Autoregulator Receptor in Development, Antibiotic Biosynthesis, and Expression of a Superoxide Dismutase. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 44297-44306
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kitani, S., Yamada, Y., Nihira, T.
(2001). Gene Replacement Analysis of the Butyrolactone Autoregulator Receptor (FarA) Reveals that FarA Acts as a Novel Regulator in Secondary Metabolism of Streptomyces lavendulae FRI-5. J. Bacteriol.
183: 4357-4363
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kawachi, R., Wangchaisoonthorn, U., Nihira, T., Yamada, Y.
(2000). Identification by Gene Deletion Analysis of a Regulator, VmsR, That Controls Virginiamycin Biosynthesis in Streptomyces virginiae. J. Bacteriol.
182: 6259-6263
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamazaki, H., Ohnishi, Y., Horinouchi, S.
(2000). An A-Factor-Dependent Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factor (sigma AdsA) That Is Essential for Morphological Development in Streptomyces griseus. J. Bacteriol.
182: 4596-4605
[Abstract]
[Full Text]