Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, September 1999, p. 5219-5224, Vol. 181, No. 17
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Dual-Specificity Protein Phosphatase Yvh1p Acts
Upstream of the Protein Kinase Mck1p in Promoting Spore
Development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Alexander E.
Beeser and
Terrance G.
Cooper*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38163
Received 1 March 1999/Accepted 17 June 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells induce YVH1
expression and enter the developmental pathway, leading to sporulation when starved for nitrogen. We show that yvh1 disruption
causes a defect in spore maturation; overexpression of MCK1
or IME1 suppresses this yvh1 phenotype. While
mck1 mutations are epistatic to those in yvh1
relative to spore maturation, overexpression of MCK1 does not suppress the yvh1 slow-vegetative-growth phenotype. We
conclude that (i) Yvh1p functions earlier than Mck1p and Ime1p in the
signal transduction cascade that regulates sporulation and is triggered by nitrogen starvation and (ii) the role of Yvh1p in gametogenesis can
be genetically distinguished from its role in vegetative growth.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Starvation for nitrogen, in the
absence of a fermentable carbon source, causes diploid strains of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae to sporulate. Sporulation is a
complex developmental pathway involving many genes, whose products
mediate progression through two meiotic divisions, spore morphogenesis
and packaging (reviewed in reference 17). Initiation
of meiosis requires that both nutritional and cell-type-specific
signals be detected, integrated, and transmitted to modulate the
expression of the sporulation master regulator, IME1, and/or
the transcriptional activation activity of its product (12, 15,
17). The mechanism, which ensures that only diploid cells
sporulate, is well understood. Diploid cells produce
a1/
2, a transcriptional repressor that prevents
transcription of the RME1 gene (19). Since Rme1p
binds to a 21-bp sequence upstream of IME1 (designated
RRE) and prevents its expression, a1/
2 repression of RME1 expression removes its negative
regulation of IME1 expression (8). This view is
supported by the observation that MAT
/MAT
diploids
cannot sporulate unless Rme1p is absent or nonfunctional
(23).
Sagee et al. have analyzed the IME1 promoter and identified
four distinct upstream controlling sequences (UCS1 to -4)
(24). UCS1, -3, and -4 exhibit the characteristics of
negative elements, whereas UCS2 is a positive element required for
IME1 expression. Both carbon signaling and nitrogen
signaling are transmitted to IME1 but by different
mechanisms. Glucose signaling is transmitted to IME1 via the
Ras-cyclic AMP pathway in conjunction with Msn2p. Msn2p is a
transcriptional activator binding to IRE, an element that is
repeated in the IME1 promoter and shares homology to the stress response element (16, 25). Nitrogen signaling acts through the TATA-proximal UCS1, but the mechanism of this control is
unknown (24).
Another protein known to regulate IME1 expression in
response to nutritional signals is Mck1p, a dual-specificity protein kinase of the glycogen synthase kinase family (1, 21). Mck1p is a key regulator of entry into meiosis, as well as a participant in
centromere function in vegetatively growing cells (11, 26). mck1 null mutations reduce but do not abolish
IME1 expression and also possess an Ime1p-independent defect
in spore morphogenesis (21). The fact that Mck1p is a
dual-specificity protein kinase raises the possibility that
phosphorylation has a regulatory function similar to those of other
protein kinases. Further, Mck1p directly interacts with and negatively
regulates pyruvate kinase, a key glycolytic enzyme, likely by
phosphorylation of Pyk1p (3). Although Mck1p activity is
required for a variety of regulatory functions, the mechanism by which
it modulates IME1 expression in response to nutritional
signals, or how it promotes spore morphogenesis independently of Ime1p,
is unknown. The mechanisms, however, are likely to be posttranslational
because MCK1 expression is not regulated by the cell's
nutritional state (21). Genetic experiments argue against
Mck1p functioning in the same control pathways as either Rme1p, which
transmits cell-type signals, or Ime4p, another protein known to affect
IME1 expression and thought to transmit both nutrient and
cell type signals (21, 28).
Here we demonstrate that in addition to the previously characterized
phenotype of slow progression through meiosis, yvh1
disruption strains are defective in synthesizing dityrosine, a major
constituent of ascospore walls. This observation indicates that
dual-specificity Yvh1p phosphatase is required for spore maturation.
Overexpression of MCK1 or IME1 was found to
suppress the yvh1 mutant phenotype associated with
sporulation. Neither of these genes, however, suppressed the
slow-vegetative-growth phenotype of a yvh1 disruption, suggesting that the role of Yvh1p in vegetative growth is genetically distinct from its role in sporulation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Fluorescence assay.
The fluorescence assay, which monitors
spore maturation, was performed as described by Wagner et al.
(29), with the modification of using Glusulase (Sigma type
H-2) and increasing the volume of ammonium hydroxide to 0.6 ml prior to
photography. Strains GYC86, HPY120, and HPY123 were patched directly
onto sterile nylon colony/plaque screen (NEN Life Sciences) membranes.
The nylon membranes were transferred to a YEPD plate and allowed to
grow at 30°C for 12 to 18 hours. Here and in all instances described below, the membranes were oriented with the cells side up. Thereafter, the nylon membrane was transferred to a plate containing sporulation medium and incubated at 25°C for 144 h or the time indicated. Lifts were then removed from the plate and transferred to a plastic petri dish containing cell wall lysis buffer (350 µl of 0.1 M sodium
citrate [pH 5.8], 0.01 M EDTA, 15 µl of 2-mercaptoethanol, 70 µl
of Glusulase [Sigma type H-2]). After being digested at 37°C for 3 to 4 h, the nylon membranes were quickly blotted onto a piece of
Whatmann 3MM chromatography paper and transferred to a clean petri dish
containing 0.6 ml of concentrated ammonium hydroxide. The top of the
petri dish was replaced, and the nylon membrane incubated for 1 min
before being placed on a piece of black paper. The nylon lift was
illuminated with UV from above and photographed with a Kodak 47B
Wratten filter and Polaroid type 57 film (type 55 film would not work).
To test the ability of transformants to rescue the spore maturation
defect, transformants were patched onto nylon lifts, overlaid onto
selective medium, grown for 12 to 18 h under selective conditions, and then transferred to YEPD plates and processed as described above.
It is important to note that the relative levels of fluorescence differ
from lift to lift. We attribute this variability to the directness of
light used for excitation and the degree to which the cells were
completely digested by Glusulase. Therefore, quantitatively comparing
fluorescence observed on one membrane to that on another is strongly
discouraged. We also have not attempted to quantitate the effectiveness
of suppression for particular alleles and have scored all alleles only
as plus or minus with respect to the same strain transformed with the
parent control vector. For precisely this reason, control transformants
containing the parent vector plasmid are included in every lift.
A slightly different method was used for screening of the genomic
library. Diploid strain HPY120
(
yvh1::
HIS3) was transformed
with a
genomic bank contained on the vector Yep13, selecting for
leucine
prototrophy. A total of 7,500 independent Leu
+ colonies
were patched directly onto grids (1,500 independent
transformants per
large colony/plaque screen membrane) and placed
on the surface of a
large petri plate containing medium that selects
for growth only of
strains containing a genomic library plasmid;
these plates were the
master plates. When the cells had grown
sufficiently, a large
colony/plaque screen membrane was carefully
laid upon the emerging
colonies. It was then carefully peeled
off the plate and transferred to
a second plate containing selective
medium (one lacking leucine)
overnight before being transferred
again to a YEPD plate. After 12 to
18 h incubation, the membrane
was transferred to a sporulation
plate for 144 h. The fluorescence
assay was then used as described
for the smaller lifts except
that the volumes of cell wall lysis buffer
and concentrated ammonium
hydroxide were scaled up. Once putative
suppressors were identified
by fluorescence, corresponding live cells
were taken from the
master plate and retested to confirm the
suppression phenotype.
Putative suppressor plasmids, designated SYF
(suppressor of YVH1-associated
fluorescence [e.g., pSYF60]), were
recovered from the transformants
by using standard genetic
methods.
Plasmid construction.
To construct plasmid pAB7, containing
an epitope-tagged YVH1 gene, the 0.7-kb
XbaI/XhoI fragment of plasmid pHP175
(22) was subcloned into plasmid Litmus28 (New England
Biolabs) to generate plasmid pAB5 which was mutagenized with the MORPH
mutagenesis system, using a mutagenic oligonucleotide to generate an
in-frame NdeI site coincident with the initiation methionine
(boldface), CAT ATG. The entire
XbaI/XhoI fragment of the resulting plasmid
(pAB5-NdeI) was sequenced to confirm that no additional mutations had
been introduced. This plasmid was digested with NdeI, and a
DNA fragment encoding the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope was introduced.
The resulting plasmid was digested with NsiI and BglII, and the 400-bp fragment (containing the in-frame HA
tag) was isolated and cloned into
NsiI-BglII-digested plasmid vector pAB6 (2.2-kb
XbaI fragment from plasmid pHP145 cloned into
XbaI-digested plasmid pBluescript KS+) to
generate plasmid pAB7. Therefore, plasmid pAB7 consists of an
N-terminal HA-tagged allele of YVH1, transcribed from its
own promoter. When the insert of plasmid pAB7 is cloned into plasmid pRS316 (27) to yield plasmid pRSHAYVH1, the latter plasmid
complements the yvh1 disruption mutation (data not shown).
Plasmid pHAYVH1 contains the 2.2-kb XbaI fragment of plasmid
pAB7 cloned into vector plasmid Yep24 linearized with NheI.
A truncated version of
YVH1 (containing amino acids 1 to
214) was generated by using oligonucleotides containing unique
BamHI
sites and plasmid pAB7 as the template. After the PCR
product
was completely sequenced to ensure that no additional mutations
were present, the
BamHI fragment was cloned into plasmid
Yep24
digested with
BamHI.
Since
MCK1 was predicted to be contained on plasmid pSYF60,
it was digested with
StuI and the resulting 2.1-kb band was
isolated
and cloned into plasmid Litmus28 previously digested with
EcoRV,
generating plasmid pAB27. The insert contained on
pAB27 was sequenced
and found to contain an unexpected
BamHI
site so that a 2.1-kb
fragment containing the
MCK1 gene and
its promoter could be excised
and moved into other vectors, using
restriction endonuclease
BamHI.
This 2.1-kb
BamHI
fragment from plasmid pAB27 was subcloned and
ligated into vector
plasmid Yep24 to generate plasmid pMCK1. This
2.1-kb
BamHI
fragment was also ligated into centromere-based vector
plasmid pRS316
to yield plasmid
p316AB27.
To generate the catalytic null allele of
MCK1, plasmid pAB27
was digested with
ApaI and
SacII; the backbone
was isolated and
ligated to a 250-bp fragment generated by PCR. This
introduced
a change at codon 68 from AAA (Lys) to AGG (Arg). The
resulting
plasmid, pAB50, was sequenced through the
SacII
and
ApaI sites
to confirm the presence of only the desired
mutation. To construct
a plasmid that could be used to generate a
mck1 deletion, plasmid
pAB27 was digested with
SacII and
XmnI, resulting in the removal
of 25%
of the
MCK1 coding sequence, including all of the conserved
kinase domains VII, VIII, IX and portions of VI and X (
21).
A
TRP1 allele carried on a DNA fragment with
SacII and
XmnI termini
was generated by PCR. The
resulting PCR product was cloned into
plasmid pAB27 similarly digested
to generate plasmid
pAB34.
To construct plasmid pIME1, the 6.0-kb
BamHI-
XhoI
fragment of plasmid pIME1BX (gift from M. Clancy) was isolated and
ligated
into vector plasmid Yep24 previously digested with
BamHI and
SalI.
Sporulation frequency.
The extent of sporulation was
determined by using transformants that were processed identically to
those used in the fluorescence assay. The transformants were grown on
Ura
medium, transferred to YEPD medium for 12 to 18 h, and then transferred onto sporulation plates for 144 h. After
144 h on sporulation plates, the cells were scraped from the lift
membrane and 1.0 ml of 70% ethanol was added to them. The cells were
vortexed and stored at 4°C. The cells were then processed for
propidium iodide staining as described by Nash et al. (20).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Yvh1 protein phosphatase is specifically required for spore
maturation.
We have previously demonstrated that Yvh1p
participates in controlling the onset and progression of S. cerevisiae through meiosis (22). yvh1 mutant
strains pass through meiosis I and II and initiate spore development,
but do so more slowly and less frequently than wild-type cells
(22). These observations prompted us to seek a genetically
tractable assay of the yvh1 phenotype. Therefore, we
investigated events that occur late in spore maturation. Dityrosine
production is such an event. Dityrosine is a major component of the
spore wall but is completely absent in vegetative cells or in cells
with certain defects in spore maturation (4, 6, 7, 9). The
presence of dityrosine can be detected by the molecule's inherent
pH-dependent fluorescence. Sporulated yvh1 disruption
mutants are unable to fluoresce, whereas ptp2 (encoding a
related protein phosphatase implicated in the Hog1p osmosensing
mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade) deletion strains possessed no
such defect and fluoresced just like wild-type cells (Fig.
1A). As expected of a marker for spore
maturation, this fluorescence is cell type restricted (Fig. 1A). The
time at which fluorescence appears (Fig.
2A) also correlates well with the onset
of spore development (22). This effect is not merely temporal, however, because yvh1 disruption strains lack the
ability to fluoresce even if left in sporulation medium for up to 12 days (data not shown).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Strain- and cell-type-restricted dityrosine
production. Wild-type (WT) diploid (2n; GYC86), wild-type haploid (n;
GYC121 and GYC122), yvh1 disruption diploid (2n; HPY120),
yvh1 disruption haploid (n; GYC123 and GYC124), and diploid
ptp2 deletion (2n; HPY123) strains were assayed after
144 h on sporulation medium as described in Materials and Methods.
(B) Genetic screen for suppressors of a yvh1 disruption. The
fluorescence assay was as described for the larger lifts in Materials
and Methods. The presence of fluorescent colonies (arrows) in a
background of nonfluorescing colonies was taken as indicative of
suppression.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Appearance of dityrosine fluorescence in diploid
wild-type (WT; GYC86), ptp2 deletion (HPY123), and
yvh1 disruption (HPY120) strains incubated for increasing
amounts of time on sporulation plates. (B) Epistatic relationships of
three genes which regulate sporulation in S. cerevisiae.
Wild-type (GYC86), yvh1 disruption (HPY120), and
mck1 deletion (YSB40) strains were transformed with parent
vector plasmid Yep24 alone (column A) or carrying HA-tagged
YVH1 (pHAYVH1; column B), MCK1 (pMCK1; column C),
or IME1 (pIME1; column D). All three genes were expressed
from their native promoters. Each assay appears in duplicate. There
were reproducible strain-specific differences in the vector plasmid
lane (column A); the mck1 deletion exhibited a more extreme
phenotype than the yvh1 deletion mutant. The total lack of
fluorescence with the mck1 deletion (column A) did not
derive from a lack of cells on the membrane. Suppression capacity was
always scored with respect to the test strain carrying the parent
vector plasmid (Yep24 [column A]).
|
|
Multiple copies of MCK1 can suppress the fluorescence defect
associated with yvh1 disruption.
Although a smaller
percentage of yvh1 mutant cells sporulate compared with wild
type and proceed through sporulation more slowly, these characteristics
are too subtle to support extensive genetic screening. However, the
lack of fluorescence associated with yvh1 disruption (Fig.
1A) permitted us to use this assay to identify high-copy-number
suppressors of its phenotype. This approach yielded suppressors that we
arbitrarily divided into strong, moderate, and weak based on the
fluorescence intensity of the patched cells (Fig. 1B). One of the
strongly suppressing plasmids (pSYF60) was characterized further.
Sequence data from plasmid pSYF60, which carried an approximately 7-kb
insert, indicated that it contained the
MCK1, YNL306W,
and
YNL305C genes and portions of YNL308C and YNL304W. The requirement
of
Mck1p (protein kinase) for maximal
IME1 expression, as well
as its Ime1p-independent role in spore maturation (
21), made
it a good candidate as the source of plasmid pSYF60's ability
to
suppress the
yvh1 fluorescence defect. To determine whether
suppression was due exclusively to
MCK1, the gene was
subcloned
into an episomal vector to yield plasmid pMCK1. When plasmid
pMCK1
was used to transform
yvh1 disruption mutant HPY120,
the transformants
fluoresced, indicating that
MCK1
suppressed the
yvh1 defect (Fig.
2B; compare columns A and C
for strain HPY120). To ensure that
Mck1p's ability to suppress the
yvh1 phenotype reflected a physiological
role in dityrosine
production, a homozygous diploid
mck1 deletion
strain
(YSB40) was constructed. This deletion mutant, which failed
to produce
detectable
MCK1 mRNA (data not shown), was unable to
fluoresce (Fig.
2B; compare columns A and C for strain YSB40);
i.e., it
possessed a phenotype similar that observed with
yvh1 disruption strains (Fig.
2B; compare column A for strain HPY120
and
YSB40). Further, it appears as though the defect in spore
maturation is
more pronounced in the
mck1 null strain than in
the
yvh1 disruption strain, an observation that occurs
reproducibly
(Fig.
2B; compare strain HPY120 [column A] with strain
YSB40 [column
A]).
Sporulation occurs more slowly and two- to threefold less frequently in
a
yvh1 disruption strain than in the wild type
(
22).
To ascertain whether overexpression of
MCK1
could suppress this
characteristic, we monitored sporulation
microscopically in a
diploid
yvh1 mutant (strain HPY120)
transformed with one of four
plasmids. Following sporulation of these
transformants for 144
h, the percentage of sporulated cells was
determined. About 7%
of transformants carrying the vector plasmid
(Yep24) sporulated
(Fig.
3). In contrast,
sporulation increased twofold when the
mutant was transformed with
plasmid Yep24 carrying either a wild-type
allele of
YVH1
(plasmid Yep24-YVH1) or
MCK1 (plasmid Yep24-MCK1).
Therefore, overexpression of
YVH1 or
MCK1
suppressed the
yvh1 disruption to the same degree as
observed when the mutation was
complemented with a wild-type
YVH1 allele.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effect of episomal expression of fluorescence
suppressors on sporulation. Strain HPY120 cells transformed with parent
vector Yep24 or plasmid Yep24-IME1, Yep24-MCK1, or Yep24-YVH1 were
processed as described in Materials and Methods. The extent of
sporulation, determined as cells which contained three or four spores,
was determined by visual inspection of at least 1,000 cells per
determination.
|
|
Our genetic assays identified
MCK1 as the gene carried on
plasmid pSYF60 that was responsible for suppressing the
yvh1
spore
maturation defect. To ensure that Mck1p-dependent suppression
of
yvh1 required Mck1p protein kinase activity (
14),
we constructed
a
MCK1 allele (
MCK1K68R), which
has been shown to abolish ATP
binding in related protein kinases
(
2). This allele and the
cognate wild type were cloned into
high-copy-number plasmid vector
Yep24, and the resulting plasmids
(pMCK1K68R and pMCK1, respectively)
were used to transform
yvh1 disruption (HPY120) and
mck1 deletion
(YSB40) strains. Dityrosine formation was tested in these six
transformants by using the fluorescence assay (Fig.
4). Only the
wild-type
MCK1
allele (plasmid Yep24/MCK1) suppressed the fluorescence
defects of
yvh1 and
mck1 mutant strains.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Mck1 protein kinase activity is required to suppress the
fluorescence defect of a yvh1 disruption (HPY120) or
mck1 YSB40 (YSB40) mutations. The strains were transformed
the vector (plasmid Yep24), wild-type MCK1 (plasmid
Yep24MCK1), or mck1 catalytic null allele (plasmid
Yep24MCK1K68R), and the fluorescence assay was performed as described
in Materials and Methods; each transformant was assayed in duplicate.
The degree to which fluorescence is lacking in a mck1 mutant
is similar to that seen in Fig. 2B; i.e., deletion of MCK1
has a stronger fluorescence defect than disruption of
YVH1.
|
|
Mck1p and Ime1p lie downstream of Yvh1p in the spore development
pathway.
Since both Mck1p and Yvh1p are required for fluorescence,
we established the epistatic relationship of these two genes. As shown
in Fig. 2B, and as suggested by the isolation of plasmid pSYF60,
high-level expression of MCK1 suppresses the fluorescence defect of yvh1-disrupted strains, whereas the parent vector
Yep24 does not (compare columns A and C for strain HPY120). The
IME1 gene was not isolated in our screening. However, we
were prompted, by virtue of its relationship to Mck1p (17),
to test whether its overexpression could suppress the fluorescence
defect of a yvh1 mutant. IME1 was able to
suppress the fluorescence defect (Fig. 2B; compare columns A and D for
strain HYP120) as well as the yvh1 sporulation phenotype
(Fig. 3; compare bars for plasmids Yep24 and Yep24-IME1). Although
overexpression of MCK1 could suppress the yvh1 disruption
phenotype, overexpression of YVH1 could not suppress the
fluorescence defect of a mck1 deletion mutant (Fig. 2B;
compare columns A and B for strain YSB40). On the other hand, Ime1p,
shown to act downstream of Mck1p in the promotion of meiosis, did
suppress the mck1 deletion phenotype (Fig. 2B; compare
columns A and D for strain YSB40). These experiments argue that Yvh1p is situated upstream of Mck1p and Ime1p in the spore maturation regulatory pathway. They also identify Yvh1 as the protein (of those
currently known) most proximal to the spore maturation signal.
The roles of Yvh1p in sporulation and vegetative growth are
genetically distinct.
In addition to its defect in sporulation, a
yvh1 disruption mutant grows slowly relative to wild type
(10). In view of this second defect, we determined whether
suppressors of the fluorescence defect also suppressed slow vegetative
growth. Episomal expression of MCK1, which suppressed the
fluorescence defect, was incapable of suppressing the growth defect
irrespective of whether it was expressed from a high-copy-number,
episomal, or centromere-based vector plasmid (Fig.
5); i.e., growth was no greater in
transformants carrying plasmid pMCK1 than in those carrying a
yvh1 deletion mutant or the vector alone (Fig. 5). A
truncated form of Yvh1p, containing the N-terminal 214 amino acids, was
similarly unable to complement the yvh1 growth phenotype
(Fig. 5). These results suggest that the role Yvh1p plays in promoting
vegetative growth can be genetically distinguished from its role in
spore morphogenesis.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The slow-growth phenotype of a yvh1
disruption mutant cannot be suppressed by overexpression of
MCK1. (A) Strain HPY120 was transformed with plasmids Yep24,
pHAYVH1, and pHAyvh1. All plasmids were Yep24 vector based.
Transformants were streaked onto yeast nitrogen
base-glucose-ammonia-Casamino Acids medium. Both plates were incubated
for the same length of time. a.a., amino acids. (B) Strain HPY120 was
transformed with plasmids pRS316 (centromere [CEN]-based vector
plasmid) (27), pYVH1 (22), and p316AB27
(Materials and Methods). The latter two plasmids contain wild-type
alleles of YVH1 and MCK1, respectively, cloned
into plasmid pRS316. Transformation and plating conditions are as for
panel A.
|
|
The experiments described above allowed us to establish the order of
function: nitrogen starvation signal-Yvh1p-Mck1p-Ime1p-spore
maturation. In other words, Yvh1p precedes Mck1p in the nitrogen
starvation signal transduction cascade. It is important to emphasize,
however, that our genetic assays cannot establish whether Yvh1p
and
Mck1p are contiguous steps in the cascade. As would be expected
of a
developmental pathway controlled by the phosphorylation state
of a key
regulator, a variant of
MCK1 which has been shown by
others
to be catalytically inactive (
14) is incapable of
suppressing
the spore development defects of
yvh1 disruption
or
mck1 deletion.
From our data it can be suggested that Yvh1p functions in spore
maturation by virtue of promoting
IME1 and
IME2
expression,
a characteristic shared in common with Mck1p. Consistent
with
this interpretation is the observation that overexpression of
IME1
suppresses the spore maturation defects (that we measured
as dityrosine
fluorescence) of both
yvh1 and
mck1 mutations.
This
is not quite congruent with the conclusion derived from the
experiments
of Neigeborn and Mitchell, who reported an IME1
expression-independent
spore maturation defect (measured by spore
morphology) for
mck1 mutants (
21). We can offer
two possible ways of resolving the
seeming incongruence and the manner
in which
IME1 was overexpressed.
The first and most obvious
difference was the strains used for
the experiments. Another
possibility is that the assays of events
upon which the two conclusions
were derived are quite different.
In short, the incongruence of our
results with those from Mitchell's
laboratory may well be more
apparent than
real.
Yvh1p is not the only regulatory protein to participate in the early
and late phases of the sporulation pathway as well as
in vegetative
growth. Mck1p and Cak1p possess similar characteristics.
Mck1p has a
role in vegetative growth that is associated with
centromere function;
it also modulates the activity of a key glycolytic
enzyme, pyruvate
kinase (
3). Mck1, also like Yvh1p, is required
for maximal
expression of
IME1 and later in spore maturation.
Cak1p
(cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase 1) has been shown
to
participate in vegetative growth by activating Cdc28p, the
cyclin-dependent protein kinase required for cell cycle progression,
and has also been identified as a suppressor of the spore maturation
defect caused by the
smk1-2 mutation (
29). There
are important
differences, however, in how
YVH1,
MCK1, and
CAK1 gene expression
is regulated.
Mck1p production is not induced by nutritional signals.
CAK1
is expressed in vegetative cells, but transfer of cells to
sporulation
medium causes a decrease in steady state levels of
CAK1 mRNA
followed by its reappearance in a way that is temporally
similar to two
known late sporulation genes,
SMK1 and
SPS1
(
29).
Yvh1p production, on the other hand, is rapidly
induced following
nitrogen starvation and thus would not have been a
priori a likely
candidate for a late sporulation specific gene such as
SMK1,
SPS1,
DIT1, or
DIT2
(
5,
13). Nevertheless, disruption of
YVH1 has
a
similar terminal phenotype as deletion of these late
sporulation-specific
genes.
A second important conclusion to derive from these experiments is that
the Yvh1p function in the nitrogen starvation-associated
signal
transduction pathway that is suppressed by Mck1p overproduction
appears
to be distinct from its role in vegetative growth. These
roles are
genetically distinguished by the observation that overproduction
of
MCK1, which suppresses the
yvh1 fluorescence defect but not
the slow-vegetative-growth phenotype of
yvh1 disruption
mutants.
The use of signal transduction pathway components for multiple
physiological purposes is an increasingly common finding and makes
good
sense in terms of a cell's economical use of its
resources.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank members of the UT Yeast Group who read the manuscript
and offered suggestions for improvement. Oligonucleotides were prepared
by the UT Molecular Resource Center.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM-35642.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN
38163. Phone: (901) 448-6175. Fax: (901) 448-8462. E-mail:
tcooper{at}utmem1.utmem.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bianchi, M. W.,
S. E. Plyte,
M. Kreis, and J. R. Woodgett.
1993.
A Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein-serine kinase related to mammalian glycogen synthase kinase-3 and the Drosophila melanogaster gene shaggy product.
Gene
134:51-56[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Booher, R., and D. Beach.
1986.
Site-specific mutagenesis of cdc2+, a cell cycle control gene of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:3523-3530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Brazill, D. T.,
J. Thorner, and G. S. Martin.
1997.
Mck1, a member of the glycogen synthase kinase 3 family of protein kinases, is a negative regulator of pyruvate kinase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
179:4415-4418[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Briza, P.,
M. Breitenbach,
A. Ellinger, and J. Segall.
1990.
Isolation of two developmentally regulated genes involved in spore wall maturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
4:1775-1789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Briza, P.,
M. Eckerstorfer, and M. Breitenbach.
1994.
The sporulation-specific enzymes encoded by the DIT1 and DIT2 genes catalyze a two-step reaction leading to a soluble LL-dityrosine-containing precursor of the yeast spore wall.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4524-4528[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Briza, P.,
A. Ellinger,
G. Winkler, and M. Breitenbach.
1988.
Chemical composition of the yeast ascospore wall. The second outer layer consists of chitosan.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:11569-11574[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Briza, P.,
G. Winkler,
H. Kalchhauser, and M. Breitenbach.
1986.
Dityrosine is a prominent component of the yeast ascospore wall. A proof of its structure.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:4288-4294[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Covitz, P. A., and A. P. Mitchell.
1993.
Repression by the yeast meiotic inhibitor RME1.
Genes Dev.
7:1598-1608[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Esposito, R. E.,
M. Dresser, and M. Breitenbach.
1991.
Identifying sporulation genes, visualizing synaptonemal complexes, and large-scale spore and spore wall purification.
Methods Enzymol.
194:110-131[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Guan, K.,
D. J. Hakes,
Y. Wang,
H. D. Park,
T. G. Cooper, and J. E. Dixon.
1992.
A yeast protein phosphatase related to the vaccinia virus VH1 phosphatase is induced by nitrogen starvation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:12175-12179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Jiang, W.,
M. Y. Lim,
H. J. Yoon,
J. Thorner,
G. S. Martin, and J. Carbon.
1995.
Overexpression of the yeast MCK1 protein kinase suppresses conditional mutations in centromere-binding protein genes CBF2 and CBF5.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
246:360-366[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Kassir, Y.,
D. Granot, and G. Simchen.
1988.
IME1, a positive regulator gene of meiosis in S. cerevisiae.
Cell
52:853-862[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Krisak, L.,
R. Strich,
R. S. Winters,
J. P. Hall,
M. J. Mallory,
D. Kreitzer,
R. S. Tuan, and E. Winter.
1994.
SMK1, a developmentally regulated MAP kinase, is required for spore wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
8:2151-2161[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Lim, M. Y.,
D. Dailey,
G. S. Martin, and J. Thorner.
1993.
Yeast MCK1 protein kinase autophosphorylates at tyrosine and serine but phosphorylates exogenous substrates at serine and threonine.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:21155-21164[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Mandel, S.,
K. Robzyk, and Y. Kassir.
1994.
IME1 gene encodes a transcription factor which is required to induce meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Dev. Genet.
15:139-147[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Martinez-Pastor, M. T.,
G. Marchler,
C. Schuller,
A. Marchler-Bauer,
H. Ruis, and F. Estruch.
1996.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE).
EMBO J.
15:2227-2235[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Mitchell, A. P.
1994.
Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:56-70[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Mitchell, A. P.,
S. E. Driscoll, and H. E. Smith.
1990.
Positive control of sporulation-specific genes by the IME1 and IME2 products in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:2104-2110[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Mitchell, A. P., and I. Herskowitz.
1986.
Activation of meiosis and sporulation by repression of the RME1 product in yeast.
Nature
319:738-742[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Nash, R.,
G. Tokiwa,
S. Anand,
K. Erickson, and B. Futcher.
1988.
The WHI1+ gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae tethers cell division to cell size and is a cyclin homolog.
EMBO J.
7:4335-4346[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Neigeborn, L., and A. P. Mitchell.
1991.
The yeast MCK1 gene encodes a protein kinase homolog that activates early meiotic gene expression.
Genes Dev.
5:533-548[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Park, H. D.,
A. E. Beeser,
M. J. Clancy, and T. G. Cooper.
1996.
The S. cerevisiae nitrogen starvation-induced Yvh1p and Ptp2p phosphatases play a role in control of sporulation.
Yeast
12:1135-1151[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Rine, J.,
G. F. Sprague, Jr., and I. Herskowitz.
1981.
rme1 mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: map position and bypass of mating type locus control of sporulation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
1:958-960[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Sagee, S.,
A. Sherman,
G. Shenhar,
K. Robzyk,
N. Ben-Doy,
G. Simchen, and Y. Kassir.
1998.
Multiple and distinct activation and repression sequences mediate the regulated transcription of IME1, a transcriptional activator of meiosis-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1985-1995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Schmitt, A. P., and K. McEntee.
1996.
Msn2p, a zinc finger DNA-binding protein, is the transcriptional activator of the multistress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:5777-5782[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Shero, J. H., and P. Hieter.
1991.
A suppressor of a centromere DNA mutation encodes a putative protein kinase (MCK1).
Genes Dev.
5:549-560[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter.
1989.
A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
122:19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Su, S. S., and A. P. Mitchell.
1993.
Molecular characterization of the yeast meiotic regulatory gene RIM1.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:3789-3797[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Wagner, M.,
M. Pierce, and E. Winter.
1997.
The CDK-activating kinase CAK1 can dosage suppress sporulation defects of smk1 MAP kinase mutants and is required for spore wall morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
EMBO J.
16:1305-1317[Medline].
|
Journal of Bacteriology, September 1999, p. 5219-5224, Vol. 181, No. 17
0021-9193/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kemmler, S., Occhipinti, L., Veisu, M., Panse, V. G.
(2009). Yvh1 is required for a late maturation step in the 60S biogenesis pathway. JCB
186: 863-880
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, Y., Chang, A.
(2009). A Mutant Plasma Membrane Protein Is Stabilized Upon Loss of Yvh1, a Novel Ribosome Assembly Factor. Genetics
181: 907-915
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Beeser, A. E., Cooper, T. G.
(2000). The Dual-Specificity Protein Phosphatase Yvh1p Regulates Sporulation, Growth, and Glycogen Accumulation Independently of Catalytic Activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via the Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Cascade. J. Bacteriol.
182: 3517-3528
[Abstract]
[Full Text]